- Thread starter
- #21
Sour Grapes from a loser is all the soap is
.Exchange stablished by the government" and "exchange established by the state" aren't literally synonymous terms, but they so embody one another that the latter is meant to function as a perfect substitute for the former. That's why Scalia's new favorite sentence of the Affordable Care Act doesn’t really mean people in states with federal exchanges should be denied subsidies. In every other context, including his own dissent, Scalia understands that a sentence's meaning often arises from more than just the order and way its words are arranged on a page.
Scalia s Dissent Disproves His Own Reading of the Affordable Care Act The New Republic
Roberts saved his court from being nutty like all the RWnutjobs that run amok in this country.
1. Does the ObamaCare bill specify that subsidies can only be given to those who purchase coverage via exchanges 'established by the state'?
2. Does it include that exact language..."established by the state'?
3. Did ObamaCare architect Gruber testify that it was that it was the carefully considered aim of the bills creators to pressure states to set up state exchanges by including the language specifying that subsidies can only be given to those who purchase coverage via exchanges 'established by the state'?
4. Did the Supreme Court ignore the obvious meaning of 'established by the state'?
5. When do you plan to change your avi to 'FooledByObama'?