C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Did it ever occur to the OP and other nitwits on the right that the reason why so many justices appointed by republican presidents vote in a manner that conflicts with errant conservative dogma is because that dogma is factually wrong as a matter of Constitutional law – where republican appointees review an issue in good faith, examining the relevant case law and precedent, the objective facts and documented evidence, and the legislative history and context of the measure subject to review, and base their opinion on settled and accepted jurisprudence most on the right disagree with for purely subjective, partisan reasons having nothing to do whatsoever with settled and accepted Constitutional jurisprudence.
In essence what most on the right are advocating is that republican appointees should ignore Constitutional case law and settled, accepted jurisprudence and instead rule based solely on subjective political opinion.
The ridiculous right, indeed.
In essence what most on the right are advocating is that republican appointees should ignore Constitutional case law and settled, accepted jurisprudence and instead rule based solely on subjective political opinion.
The ridiculous right, indeed.