Pop23
Gold Member
YOU don't get it. Why did the accuser bother to name this person as a 'credible witness' then? In other words she has no witnesses.Political activists who want to be believed when they falsely accuse someone of 'almost rape' should not name someone as an eye witness who says it never happened.From the sound of things, they were the ones who showed up at a girl party. But you're essentially right. Teenage girls who don't want to be sexually assaulted shouldn't go out in public.
Another ^ one who doesn't get it a self-admitted "drooling blackout drunk" who wrote a book called Wasted: Tales of a GenX Drunk is NOT going to be a good witness.
You're posts often make me face-palm .. this one is no exception!![]()
It's just the blurry, fuzzy-memory-fueled accusation from a self-identified Trump-hating Progressive Liberal activist against a respected Judge who has now been defended by a parade of respected women who will vouch for his character.
Dr Ford called Mark Judge a "credible witness"? No, she said both he and Kav were "stumbling DRUNK".
Hey, we'll see how it goes on Monday - Kav is a known liar. Thus far Dr Ford is not.
She calls a stumbling drunk a credible witness?
You simply can't make this shit up.
And in your next breath you will call her credible.
Do you believe life's a box of chocolate?