XponentialChaos
Platinum Member
- Jul 25, 2018
- 28,693
- 10,524
- 435
- Thread starter
- #181
I get that. One of the biggest turn offs is having someone thrust their religion on others.
Let me say a prayer for your soul.
Interesting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I get that. One of the biggest turn offs is having someone thrust their religion on others.
Let me say a prayer for your soul.
I get that. One of the biggest turn offs is having someone thrust their religion on others.
Let me say a prayer for your soul.
Interesting.
I don't know... It's a provable measurement. I would personally define that as a decline of the country because of a decline of morals.I just wanted to note that bullshit that you can't go to church, but you can go and try to burn shit down get arrested, and released, to do it the next day.How do you measure the decline of the country?
How do you measure the decline of morals?
***Just saying. I know I said this on the first or second page. But... Back then you said it didn't have anything to do with anything. I think it finally means something to the thread... Yes?
I think it's a stretch at best, lol.
I get that. One of the biggest turn offs is having someone thrust their religion on others.
Let me say a prayer for your soul.
There is nothing interesting about going to hell.
I don't know... It's a provable measurement.
I get that. One of the biggest turn offs is having someone thrust their religion on others.
Let me say a prayer for your soul.
There is nothing interesting about going to hell.
Whoosh. Right over your head.
That it happens. That is the measurement.I don't know... It's a provable measurement.
Then how do you measure it?
o.0Go ahead and objectively quantify the decline of the country today compared to 20 years ago.
Let me see the formula you're using.
That it happens. That is the measurement.I don't know... It's a provable measurement.
Then how do you measure it?
o.0Go ahead and objectively quantify the decline of the country today compared to 20 years ago.
Let me see the formula you're using.
Did riots happen over 100 days 20 years ago? Were people arrested, and then released... only be be arrested for the same thing the next day back then? What happened in Oregon seems like a new thing to me. Am I wrong thinking that?
Edit: This... Again... You ignored it the first time to ask it... But... Again... Did this happen 20 years ago?
I mean hell... Look at the guy who got arrested for pulling a gun on Antifa... When was it allowed to destroy a private persons property? In front of cops... They just... Allowed that to happen. It's ok that these people have harmed you or your property, it's not ok for you to show force back and defend yourself?
I mean it ABSOLUTELY should be the cops stepping in and arresting these people for breaking the law of destroying private property. But... They don't.
You are welcome to shed light on this as to how it's beneficial to the country and/or morally correct.
That it happens. That is the measurement.I don't know... It's a provable measurement.
Then how do you measure it?
o.0Go ahead and objectively quantify the decline of the country today compared to 20 years ago.
Let me see the formula you're using.
Did riots happen over 100 days 20 years ago? Were people arrested, and then released... only be be arrested for the same thing the next day back then? What happened in Oregon seems like a new thing to me. Am I wrong thinking that?
Edit: This... Again... You ignored it the first time to ask it... But... Again... Did this happen 20 years ago?
I mean hell... Look at the guy who got arrested for pulling a gun on Antifa... When was it allowed to destroy a private persons property? In front of cops... They just... Allowed that to happen. It's ok that these people have harmed you or your property, it's not ok for you to show force back and defend yourself?
I mean it ABSOLUTELY should be the cops stepping in and arresting these people for breaking the law of destroying private property. But... They don't.
You are welcome to shed light on this as to how it's beneficial to the country and/or morally correct.
So if I’m understanding you correctly, you measure the decline in America by the number of riots. You measure the decline in America because of a bunch of idiots damaging each other’s property and brandishing weapons at each other.
Is that accurate?
Are these the only things that matter in this “formula” that you’re using? Is this an agreed upon “formula” or is this just according to YOUR opinion? If it’s just something that YOU are using, doesn’t that make it subjective?
And by the way, nearly 30 years ago we had the Rodney King riots. So there’s also that.
That it happens. That is the measurement.I don't know... It's a provable measurement.
Then how do you measure it?
o.0Go ahead and objectively quantify the decline of the country today compared to 20 years ago.
Let me see the formula you're using.
Did riots happen over 100 days 20 years ago? Were people arrested, and then released... only be be arrested for the same thing the next day back then? What happened in Oregon seems like a new thing to me. Am I wrong thinking that?
Edit: This... Again... You ignored it the first time to ask it... But... Again... Did this happen 20 years ago?
I mean hell... Look at the guy who got arrested for pulling a gun on Antifa... When was it allowed to destroy a private persons property? In front of cops... They just... Allowed that to happen. It's ok that these people have harmed you or your property, it's not ok for you to show force back and defend yourself?
I mean it ABSOLUTELY should be the cops stepping in and arresting these people for breaking the law of destroying private property. But... They don't.
You are welcome to shed light on this as to how it's beneficial to the country and/or morally correct.
So if I’m understanding you correctly, you measure the decline in America by the number of riots. You measure the decline in America because of a bunch of idiots damaging each other’s property and brandishing weapons at each other.
Is that accurate?
Are these the only things that matter in this “formula” that you’re using? Is this an agreed upon “formula” or is this just according to YOUR opinion? If it’s just something that YOU are using, doesn’t that make it subjective?
And by the way, nearly 30 years ago we had the Rodney King riots. So there’s also that.
The way to measure the decline in America is by meaasuring the number of idiots claiming that religion is actually fading in the public sector after 30 years of the political elite suppressing/discouraging it.
Looks like that measurement is subjective then.
Absolutely.Looks like that measurement is subjective then.
churches have failed...its that simple...they want to do the same ol stale stuff. Like I recently became familiar with a dying church...membership was way down. However this same church had a very huge, very nice basketball gym. I thought they could use this building to make money...doing things like pro wrestling, basketball tournaments, flea market etc. with money earned they could do things with their members like taking tripsView attachment 474446
I guess it's easy to blame others instead of reflecting on your own shortcomings.
Absolutely.Looks like that measurement is subjective then.
Fantastic. We actually agreed on something.
Without fear, religion us useless.
Sorry Ducolax but I never took up religion out of fear. Fear had no part in my faith.
I believed in God because God revealed to me who he really was.
Sure. He burned your bush and killed all your bothers and sisters to torture your dad.
God forgives you your sins thinking that.
God’s followers are doing a great job of turning people away from him.
How is that? You mean they are turning people away from following him by following him?
Religion is a big turn off because many that claim to be Christians don't act like Christians. Christ was a minister, he was humble and he led by example. He felt empathy for the masses and was disgusted by the way clergy in his day lorded over his flock. Today, many Christians, seem selfish, look out for their own interests. That is just one facet, lots of other examples. Justmy thoughts.
I get that. One of the biggest turn offs is having someone thrust their religion on others.
That said, the ideal christian then is he who turns the other cheek-- -- -- they are wronged by the democrats and then just turn the other cheek so they can be wronged AGAIN.
Sounds a lot like the republicans: forever wronged, seldom doing enough about it.
No... My measurement is what is happening that isn't being addressed. People are actively breaking the law, but it's being actively ignored. But only if your ideology is a certain ... Way. The man with flags and what not put down RIGHT AWAY. What law did he break?So if I’m understanding you correctly, you measure the decline in America by the number of riots. You measure the decline in America because of a bunch of idiots damaging each other’s property and brandishing weapons at each other.
Is that accurate?
People clearly breaking the law with video evidence in front of police officers isn't really that subjective.Are these the only things that matter in this “formula” that you’re using? Is this an agreed upon “formula” or is this just according to YOUR opinion? If it’s just something that YOU are using, doesn’t that make it subjective?
You said 20 years, not me...And by the way, nearly 30 years ago we had the Rodney King riots. So there’s also that.
No... My measurement is what is happening that isn't being addressed. People are actively breaking the law, but it's being actively ignored. But only if your ideology is a certain ... Way. The man with flags and what not put down RIGHT AWAY. What law did he break?