CIA Concludes Russia Interfered In Election To Help Trump Win

[eddiew37]

How many agencies swore that they had proof that Saddam had WMD's? And what percent of those were not "mistaken" but "liars? I mean, there was a lot of fake and fabrication being held up as "proof". Such false proof doesn't fall off of trees. Government agencies were specifically concocting it.

Don't know how many agencies thought there were WMD, but the CIA included sever qualifiers in their estimate that were dropped as they went up the intelligence chain of command. In other words, Bush ignored the parts that cast doubt on the possibility.
Here's the full version of the CIA's 2002 intelligence assessment on WMD in Iraq

You might note that we have a total of 17 intelligence agencies, and EVERY ONE of them say the Russians did it.

Trump said over and over again that he didn't have a relationship with Putin. That's kind of like saying anal sex isn't real sex.

But Russia already admitted they were communicating with the trump campaign for quite a while.

Alert Alert! Trump truly isn't our President! any one seen Rachel Maddow last night? CIA has proof Russia interfered in ELECTION. this is why President Obama has ordered a full investigation before the Electoral Votes. But, here's the BIG news they (the CIA) delivered this info to Congress and the Senate (Republicans and Democrates) Bipartisianship back in September but, guess who was against this being investigated Strongly and made a threat to Our President Obama, and not only corruptly got Trump elected, he also got his wish to get his Damn WIFE a Job for doing this. WAKE UP AMERICA We're talking that walking dead POS McConnell

What federal position did Obama's mother hold that garnered her a federal retirement income?

His wifes,,
The Former Presidents Act of 1958 provides lifetime benefits for presidents after they leave office. This law also provides some benefits for former first ladies (such as Secret Service protection), but not lifetime pensions for them (or their parents).

As the First Lady does not receive a salary or a pension, it is reasonable to assume that the unofficial position of "first grandma" is also unpaid and is similarly ineligible for a government pension.

The Boston Tribune is an offshoot of the fake Associated Media Coverage web site, which has previously published false stories claiming that Florida store owners killed 31 looters after Hurricane Matthew, that the practice of "open carry" was being banned in the United States," and that convicted murderer Jodi Arias had been released from prison.

 

[eddiew37]

Actually, there have been leaders of other nations such as Japan that have come forward expressing their satisfaction with Trump's election. This is a good thing.

Japan The country that's making a great $$$ deal with trumps daughter AFTER she visited japan with her thief father at a closed to reporters meeting??

Trump's daughter is one of his children who is running the Trump business. She has every right to enter into business dealings with the Japanese should she choose to do so. She is not employed by the federal government in any position at all.

She's running it already Didn't know that but you obviously don't know you're sitting at the same table with a den of thieves

Actually, I'm not sitting at a table right now. If what you claim is true, then you should easily be able to back up what you are saying by providing a link or article listing what this den of thieves have stolen and from whom they stole it. Have they been apprehended and brought into a court of law?

Chump and his lawyers have spent a dogs life in court Cheating whomever he can 75 open suits against him now and more sure to follow as he tries to use the presidency to get richer

 

[eddiew37]

Actually, there have been leaders of other nations such as Japan that have come forward expressing their satisfaction with Trump's election. This is a good thing.

Japan The country that's making a great $$$ deal with trumps daughter AFTER she visited japan with her thief father at a closed to reporters meeting??

Trump's daughter is one of his children who is running the Trump business. She has every right to enter into business dealings with the Japanese should she choose to do so. She is not employed by the federal government in any position at all.

She's running it already Didn't know that but you obviously don't know you're sitting at the same table with a den of thieves

Actually, I'm not sitting at a table right now. If what you claim is true, then you should easily be able to back up what you are saying by providing a link or article listing what this den of thieves have stolen and from whom they stole it. Have they been apprehended and brought into a court of law?

FOR EXAMPLE
Donald Trump and Kids Named in $250M Tax Scam
The lawsuit, unsealed Thursday, describes the scheme as simple, telling the judge ‘there need be no fear of complexity, for there is none.’

DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
07.14.16 5:41 PM ET
Four Donald Trump-licensed real-estate developments are at the center of a huge income tax evasion scheme, according to allegations in a lawsuit unsealed Thursday afternoon by a judge in Manhattan.

The presumptive Republican nominee is not personally accused. He is described as a “material witness” in the evasion of taxes on as much as $250 million in income. According to the court papers, that includes $100 million in profits and $65 million in real-estate transfer taxes from a Manhattan high rise project bearing his familiar name.

However, his status may change, according to the lawyers who filed the lawsuit, Richard Lerner and Frederick M. Oberlander, citing Trump’s testimony about Felix Sater, a convicted stock swindler at the center of the alleged scheme.

Trump received tens of millions of dollars in fees and partnership interests in one of the four projects, the Trump Soho New York, a luxury high rise in lower Manhattan. His son Donald Junior and his daughter Ivanka also were paid in fees and partnership interests, the lawyers said, and are also material witnesses in the case.

 

[eddiew37]

Trump Reprisals



Spencer Ackerman in New York


Sunday 11 December 2016 13.03 ESTFirst published on Sunday 11 December 2016

Legislators overseeing the CIA and other intelligence agencies have told the Guardian they will be vigilant about reprisals from Donald Trump over an internal assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to ensure Trump’s victory.

Fears of retaliation rose within US intelligence agencies over a tense weekend that saw Trump publicly dismiss not only the assessment but the basic competence of the intelligence apparatus.

“When the president-elect’s transition team is attempting to discredit the entire intelligence community [IC], it has never been more important for the IC and Congress to guard against possible political pressure or retaliation against intelligence analysts,” Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, told the Guardian.

Like his Democratic colleagues on the panel, Wyden is pressing Barack Obama for additional public disclosures revealing Russian electoral interference. Such pressure has placed the CIA and other intelligence agencies between the incoming president to whom they will soon answer and a chorus of legislators, mostly but not exclusively Democrats, who consider the Russia hack a national emergency.

It is not possible to gauge precisely how deep fears of retaliation run within the intelligence world. Two currently serving intelligence officers told the Guardian this weekend they had not heard their colleagues express such concerns.

One noted that civil-service laws prevented Trump from launching a purge, but also called attention to a report that Trump is combing through the energy department bureaucracy to identify people “who have attended climate change policy conferences”.

Former intelligence officers told the Guardian they considered retaliation by Trump to be all but a certainty after he is sworn into office next month. Trump still has several appointments to make at the highest levels of the intelligence apparatus, picks which are likely to be bellwethers for the new president’s attitudes toward the agencies.

 

[Meathead]

Trump Reprisals



Spencer Ackerman in New York


Sunday 11 December 2016 13.03 ESTFirst published on Sunday 11 December 2016

Legislators overseeing the CIA and other intelligence agencies have told the Guardian they will be vigilant about reprisals from Donald Trump over an internal assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to ensure Trump’s victory.

Fears of retaliation rose within US intelligence agencies over a tense weekend that saw Trump publicly dismiss not only the assessment but the basic competence of the intelligence apparatus.

“When the president-elect’s transition team is attempting to discredit the entire intelligence community [IC], it has never been more important for the IC and Congress to guard against possible political pressure or retaliation against intelligence analysts,” Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, told the Guardian.

Like his Democratic colleagues on the panel, Wyden is pressing Barack Obama for additional public disclosures revealing Russian electoral interference. Such pressure has placed the CIA and other intelligence agencies between the incoming president to whom they will soon answer and a chorus of legislators, mostly but not exclusively Democrats, who consider the Russia hack a national emergency.

It is not possible to gauge precisely how deep fears of retaliation run within the intelligence world. Two currently serving intelligence officers told the Guardian this weekend they had not heard their colleagues express such concerns.

One noted that civil-service laws prevented Trump from launching a purge, but also called attention to a report that Trump is combing through the energy department bureaucracy to identify people “who have attended climate change policy conferences”.

Former intelligence officers told the Guardian they considered retaliation by Trump to be all but a certainty after he is sworn into office next month. Trump still has several appointments to make at the highest levels of the intelligence apparatus, picks which are likely to be bellwethers for the new president’s attitudes toward the agencies.

Are you going to start crying Eddie?

 

[eddiew37]

Trump Reprisals



Spencer Ackerman in New York


Sunday 11 December 2016 13.03 ESTFirst published on Sunday 11 December 2016

Legislators overseeing the CIA and other intelligence agencies have told the Guardian they will be vigilant about reprisals from Donald Trump over an internal assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to ensure Trump’s victory.

Fears of retaliation rose within US intelligence agencies over a tense weekend that saw Trump publicly dismiss not only the assessment but the basic competence of the intelligence apparatus.

“When the president-elect’s transition team is attempting to discredit the entire intelligence community [IC], it has never been more important for the IC and Congress to guard against possible political pressure or retaliation against intelligence analysts,” Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, told the Guardian.

Like his Democratic colleagues on the panel, Wyden is pressing Barack Obama for additional public disclosures revealing Russian electoral interference. Such pressure has placed the CIA and other intelligence agencies between the incoming president to whom they will soon answer and a chorus of legislators, mostly but not exclusively Democrats, who consider the Russia hack a national emergency.

It is not possible to gauge precisely how deep fears of retaliation run within the intelligence world. Two currently serving intelligence officers told the Guardian this weekend they had not heard their colleagues express such concerns.

One noted that civil-service laws prevented Trump from launching a purge, but also called attention to a report that Trump is combing through the energy department bureaucracy to identify people “who have attended climate change policy conferences”.

Former intelligence officers told the Guardian they considered retaliation by Trump to be all but a certainty after he is sworn into office next month. Trump still has several appointments to make at the highest levels of the intelligence apparatus, picks which are likely to be bellwethers for the new president’s attitudes toward the agencies.

Are you going to start crying Eddie?

Yes meat I weep for America The America my children will grow up in An America full of meatheads sassy's and the rest of your ilk Thank God your kind won't last

 

[Divine Wind]

The CIA has been known to be associated with assassinations. Trump will tread lightly.

Really? When was that? If you say "before Watergate" (i.e. over 45 years ago), then we can agree they did some nasty things in the 1950s and 1960s. If you think the CIA killed JFK, then you're a nutjob with a tenuous grip on reality.

By your logic, we should dislike the British because those fuckers burned down the White House.

It has never stopped.

Awesome. Now prove it....or are you one of those conspiracy theory types?

 

[eddiew37]

The CIA has been known to be associated with assassinations. Trump will tread lightly.

Really? When was that? If you say "before Watergate" (i.e. over 45 years ago), then we can agree they did some nasty things in the 1950s and 1960s. If you think the CIA killed JFK, then you're a nutjob with a tenuous grip on reality.

By your logic, we should dislike the British because those fuckers burned down the White House.

It has never stopped.

Awesome. Now prove it....or are you one of those conspiracy theory types?

Please dear God let it be true and take a good look at the VP too

 

[Meathead]

Trump Reprisals



Spencer Ackerman in New York


Sunday 11 December 2016 13.03 ESTFirst published on Sunday 11 December 2016

Legislators overseeing the CIA and other intelligence agencies have told the Guardian they will be vigilant about reprisals from Donald Trump over an internal assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to ensure Trump’s victory.

Fears of retaliation rose within US intelligence agencies over a tense weekend that saw Trump publicly dismiss not only the assessment but the basic competence of the intelligence apparatus.

“When the president-elect’s transition team is attempting to discredit the entire intelligence community [IC], it has never been more important for the IC and Congress to guard against possible political pressure or retaliation against intelligence analysts,” Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, told the Guardian.

Like his Democratic colleagues on the panel, Wyden is pressing Barack Obama for additional public disclosures revealing Russian electoral interference. Such pressure has placed the CIA and other intelligence agencies between the incoming president to whom they will soon answer and a chorus of legislators, mostly but not exclusively Democrats, who consider the Russia hack a national emergency.

It is not possible to gauge precisely how deep fears of retaliation run within the intelligence world. Two currently serving intelligence officers told the Guardian this weekend they had not heard their colleagues express such concerns.

One noted that civil-service laws prevented Trump from launching a purge, but also called attention to a report that Trump is combing through the energy department bureaucracy to identify people “who have attended climate change policy conferences”.

Former intelligence officers told the Guardian they considered retaliation by Trump to be all but a certainty after he is sworn into office next month. Trump still has several appointments to make at the highest levels of the intelligence apparatus, picks which are likely to be bellwethers for the new president’s attitudes toward the agencies.

Are you going to start crying Eddie?

Yes meat I weep for America The America my children will grow up in An America full of meatheads sassy's and the rest of your ilk Thank God your kind won't last

No, I'm talking the hissyfit kinda whining and weeping while talking about how you're going to move to Venezuela or some other socialist paradise.

That's pretty much what you're doing anyway.

 

[Andylusion]

Actually, there have been leaders of other nations such as Japan that have come forward expressing their satisfaction with Trump's election. This is a good thing.

Japan The country that's making a great $$$ deal with trumps daughter AFTER she visited japan with her thief father at a closed to reporters meeting??

Trump's daughter is one of his children who is running the Trump business. She has every right to enter into business dealings with the Japanese should she choose to do so. She is not employed by the federal government in any position at all.

She's running it already Didn't know that but you obviously don't know you're sitting at the same table with a den of thieves

Actually, I'm not sitting at a table right now. If what you claim is true, then you should easily be able to back up what you are saying by providing a link or article listing what this den of thieves have stolen and from whom they stole it. Have they been apprehended and brought into a court of law?

FOR EXAMPLE
Donald Trump and Kids Named in $250M Tax Scam
The lawsuit, unsealed Thursday, describes the scheme as simple, telling the judge ‘there need be no fear of complexity, for there is none.’

DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
07.14.16 5:41 PM ET
Four Donald Trump-licensed real-estate developments are at the center of a huge income tax evasion scheme, according to allegations in a lawsuit unsealed Thursday afternoon by a judge in Manhattan.

The presumptive Republican nominee is not personally accused. He is described as a “material witness” in the evasion of taxes on as much as $250 million in income. According to the court papers, that includes $100 million in profits and $65 million in real-estate transfer taxes from a Manhattan high rise project bearing his familiar name.

However, his status may change, according to the lawyers who filed the lawsuit, Richard Lerner and Frederick M. Oberlander, citing Trump’s testimony about Felix Sater, a convicted stock swindler at the center of the alleged scheme.

Trump received tens of millions of dollars in fees and partnership interests in one of the four projects, the Trump Soho New York, a luxury high rise in lower Manhattan. His son Donald Junior and his daughter Ivanka also were paid in fees and partnership interests, the lawyers said, and are also material witnesses in the case.

There should not be an income tax to begin with.

That said, I'm sure they'll just figure out how much they owe, and pay it.

The problem with articles like this, is people act like everyone knew they owed money, and simply avoided paying it.

But the tax code is thousands of pages long. Most people don't know what they owe. A few months ago I read about a University group which convinced a medium sized company to give all their tax documents to three different tax firms for 2013 or 2014 or around there.

Each tax firm was given all the exact same documents. Each tax firm came up with different numbers on how much tax the company owed. How can this be? Because the tax code is so massive, so complex, that no one anywhere, even professional tax filing firms, do not know every single rule of the tax code. Thus when you file your taxes, each firm gets different numbers.

I had this experience myself. I was self-employed for two years, and I did my own taxes, and came up with one number, then I did it online at TurboTax, and got a different number, then had a tax professional do it, and got a third number. All different.

So when they say so and so avoided taxes, I always take that with a grain of salt.

The truth will come out eventually, but until then I won't judge.

 

[Divine Wind]

Actually, there have been leaders of other nations such as Japan that have come forward expressing their satisfaction with Trump's election. This is a good thing.

Japan The country that's making a great $$$ deal with trumps daughter AFTER she visited japan with her thief father at a closed to reporters meeting??

Ooooooh. Nice spin. Now spin Obama....if you want to, that is.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

RetiredGySgt, post: 16020553

You lost grow a pair and live with it.

No true American should live with a foreign power having devious means of influencing an American Election.

I suppose you want Senator McCain to grow a pair. Oh I forgot you joined the Trumpunist Party who's politburo leader says McCain is no hero because he got shot down and captured.

Why don't you and Trump grow a pair and condemn Putin for interfering in the legitimacy of the 2016 election.

 

[Divine Wind]

The CIA has been known to be associated with assassinations. Trump will tread lightly.

Really? When was that? If you say "before Watergate" (i.e. over 45 years ago), then we can agree they did some nasty things in the 1950s and 1960s. If you think the CIA killed JFK, then you're a nutjob with a tenuous grip on reality.

By your logic, we should dislike the British because those fuckers burned down the White House.

It has never stopped.

Awesome. Now prove it....or are you one of those conspiracy theory types?

Please dear God let it be true and take a good look at the VP too

You think the CIA killed JFK? Wow. That's interesting....and it also explains a lot about your thought processes.

 

[eddiew37]

Trump Reprisals



Spencer Ackerman in New York


Sunday 11 December 2016 13.03 ESTFirst published on Sunday 11 December 2016

Legislators overseeing the CIA and other intelligence agencies have told the Guardian they will be vigilant about reprisals from Donald Trump over an internal assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to ensure Trump’s victory.

Fears of retaliation rose within US intelligence agencies over a tense weekend that saw Trump publicly dismiss not only the assessment but the basic competence of the intelligence apparatus.

“When the president-elect’s transition team is attempting to discredit the entire intelligence community [IC], it has never been more important for the IC and Congress to guard against possible political pressure or retaliation against intelligence analysts,” Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, told the Guardian.

Like his Democratic colleagues on the panel, Wyden is pressing Barack Obama for additional public disclosures revealing Russian electoral interference. Such pressure has placed the CIA and other intelligence agencies between the incoming president to whom they will soon answer and a chorus of legislators, mostly but not exclusively Democrats, who consider the Russia hack a national emergency.

It is not possible to gauge precisely how deep fears of retaliation run within the intelligence world. Two currently serving intelligence officers told the Guardian this weekend they had not heard their colleagues express such concerns.

One noted that civil-service laws prevented Trump from launching a purge, but also called attention to a report that Trump is combing through the energy department bureaucracy to identify people “who have attended climate change policy conferences”.

Former intelligence officers told the Guardian they considered retaliation by Trump to be all but a certainty after he is sworn into office next month. Trump still has several appointments to make at the highest levels of the intelligence apparatus, picks which are likely to be bellwethers for the new president’s attitudes toward the agencies.

Are you going to start crying Eddie?

Yes meat I weep for America The America my children will grow up in An America full of meatheads sassy's and the rest of your ilk Thank God your kind won't last

No, I'm talking the hissyfit kinda whining and weeping while talking about how you're going to move to Venezuela or some other socialist paradise.

That's pretty much what you're doing anyway.

Meat let me explain again ,,I have a few bucks and have no need to sweat out anything AND I'll have many more bucks if this market keeps up BUT I'd rather have a sane president in office that's not a complete AH who would be good for the entire country even your rednecks

 

[Meathead]

Trump Reprisals



Spencer Ackerman in New York


Sunday 11 December 2016 13.03 ESTFirst published on Sunday 11 December 2016

Legislators overseeing the CIA and other intelligence agencies have told the Guardian they will be vigilant about reprisals from Donald Trump over an internal assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to ensure Trump’s victory.

Fears of retaliation rose within US intelligence agencies over a tense weekend that saw Trump publicly dismiss not only the assessment but the basic competence of the intelligence apparatus.

“When the president-elect’s transition team is attempting to discredit the entire intelligence community [IC], it has never been more important for the IC and Congress to guard against possible political pressure or retaliation against intelligence analysts,” Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, told the Guardian.

Like his Democratic colleagues on the panel, Wyden is pressing Barack Obama for additional public disclosures revealing Russian electoral interference. Such pressure has placed the CIA and other intelligence agencies between the incoming president to whom they will soon answer and a chorus of legislators, mostly but not exclusively Democrats, who consider the Russia hack a national emergency.

It is not possible to gauge precisely how deep fears of retaliation run within the intelligence world. Two currently serving intelligence officers told the Guardian this weekend they had not heard their colleagues express such concerns.

One noted that civil-service laws prevented Trump from launching a purge, but also called attention to a report that Trump is combing through the energy department bureaucracy to identify people “who have attended climate change policy conferences”.

Former intelligence officers told the Guardian they considered retaliation by Trump to be all but a certainty after he is sworn into office next month. Trump still has several appointments to make at the highest levels of the intelligence apparatus, picks which are likely to be bellwethers for the new president’s attitudes toward the agencies.

Are you going to start crying Eddie?

Yes meat I weep for America The America my children will grow up in An America full of meatheads sassy's and the rest of your ilk Thank God your kind won't last

No, I'm talking the hissyfit kinda whining and weeping while talking about how you're going to move to Venezuela or some other socialist paradise.

That's pretty much what you're doing anyway.

Meat let me explain again ,,I have a few bucks and have no need to sweat out anything AND I'll have many more bucks if this market keeps up BUT I'd rather have a sane president in office that's not a complete AH who would be good for the entire country even your rednecks

So what's with all the hissyfitting and crying? You'll most likely continue to get your free stuff initially, but at some point you may have to find a job.

 

[Andylusion]

The CIA has been known to be associated with assassinations. Trump will tread lightly.

Really? When was that? If you say "before Watergate" (i.e. over 45 years ago), then we can agree they did some nasty things in the 1950s and 1960s. If you think the CIA killed JFK, then you're a nutjob with a tenuous grip on reality.

By your logic, we should dislike the British because those fuckers burned down the White House.

It has never stopped.

Awesome. Now prove it....or are you one of those conspiracy theory types?

This is another example of how actions have long term consequences.

When the Russians were saying we were interfering with Ukraine politics, I was blowing them off, and then it came out that Obama directly attempted to influence elections in Israel.

As soon as you can prove it once, people immediately see conspiracy everyone.

This is the problem with CIA plots in the 1960s. Yeah, the CIA hasn't been doing anything like that for ages, but if it's proven once, then everything on the planet is a CIA plot.

The truck pulling Castro's coffin breaking down, was really a CIA plot that was just too late to kill him.

Reminds me of Hugo Chavez, who blamed all his health problem on a CIA plot, when in reality, his socialist dictatorship policies ruined the capitalist care system with 'free' health care so badly, they had to import 'doctors' from Cuba, when immediately defected and fled to Columbia or the US. Yeah CIA plot was to have you destroy your country, and die from an illness your ruined health care couldn't heal anymore. Brilliant CIA strategy there.

 

[rightwinger]

Somehow...Trump disagrees with the CIA based on no information other than he doesn't like what they have reported

 

[eddiew37]

Trump Reprisals



Spencer Ackerman in New York


Sunday 11 December 2016 13.03 ESTFirst published on Sunday 11 December 2016

Legislators overseeing the CIA and other intelligence agencies have told the Guardian they will be vigilant about reprisals from Donald Trump over an internal assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to ensure Trump’s victory.

Fears of retaliation rose within US intelligence agencies over a tense weekend that saw Trump publicly dismiss not only the assessment but the basic competence of the intelligence apparatus.

“When the president-elect’s transition team is attempting to discredit the entire intelligence community [IC], it has never been more important for the IC and Congress to guard against possible political pressure or retaliation against intelligence analysts,” Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat on the Senate intelligence committee, told the Guardian.

Like his Democratic colleagues on the panel, Wyden is pressing Barack Obama for additional public disclosures revealing Russian electoral interference. Such pressure has placed the CIA and other intelligence agencies between the incoming president to whom they will soon answer and a chorus of legislators, mostly but not exclusively Democrats, who consider the Russia hack a national emergency.

It is not possible to gauge precisely how deep fears of retaliation run within the intelligence world. Two currently serving intelligence officers told the Guardian this weekend they had not heard their colleagues express such concerns.

One noted that civil-service laws prevented Trump from launching a purge, but also called attention to a report that Trump is combing through the energy department bureaucracy to identify people “who have attended climate change policy conferences”.

Former intelligence officers told the Guardian they considered retaliation by Trump to be all but a certainty after he is sworn into office next month. Trump still has several appointments to make at the highest levels of the intelligence apparatus, picks which are likely to be bellwethers for the new president’s attitudes toward the agencies.

Are you going to start crying Eddie?

Yes meat I weep for America The America my children will grow up in An America full of meatheads sassy's and the rest of your ilk Thank God your kind won't last

No, I'm talking the hissyfit kinda whining and weeping while talking about how you're going to move to Venezuela or some other socialist paradise.

That's pretty much what you're doing anyway.

Meat let me explain again ,,I have a few bucks and have no need to sweat out anything AND I'll have many more bucks if this market keeps up BUT I'd rather have a sane president in office that's not a complete AH who would be good for the entire country even your rednecks

So what's with all the hissyfitting and crying? You'll most likely continue to get your free stuff initially, but at some point you may have to find a job.

I'm retired for 10 years and get no free stuff or ever have unless you count SS and medi care being free stuff. I drink the best scotch go to the best restaurants and spend my winters in my condo in Florida My kids if they felt like it would never need to work another day when I'm gone although I brought them up better than that Now please stop your bs about crying and free stuff

 

[Divine Wind]

Meat let me explain again ,,I have a few bucks and have no need to sweat out anything AND I'll have many more bucks if this market keeps up BUT I'd rather have a sane president in office that's not a complete AH who would be good for the entire country even your rednecks

Nice platitude. Name me some people who want an insane President bad for the country. I can wait.

Interesting that you are a bigot, but not surprising. Many political extremists are bigoted assholes. Haters hate. That's what they do.

 

[Divine Wind]

Somehow...Trump disagrees with the CIA based on no information other than he doesn't like what they have reported

$25 says we see a reversal on Russian cyber-warfare by the Fourth of July 2017. Are you in?