Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It IS Sotomayor
Liberal SCOTUS Justice Took $3M From Book Publisher, Didn’t Recuse From Its Cases - The Billings Report
SCOTUS justice Sotomayor refused to recuse herself in a case where one of the litigants paid her $3.6 million dollars.billingsreport.com
Soros is an enemy of the US so your comparison is absurdSo if this was Soros and Sotomayor you would have called for a public lynching.
in demklan world it’s illegal for the mere fact Thomas is off their plantation.If there is something illegal here pursue it if not get over it.
ouch…and the demafasict say nothing.It IS Sotomayor
Liberal SCOTUS Justice Took $3M From Book Publisher, Didn’t Recuse From Its Cases - The Billings Report
SCOTUS justice Sotomayor refused to recuse herself in a case where one of the litigants paid her $3.6 million dollars.
The Hi-Tech Lynching 2.0in demklan world it’s illegal for the mere fact Thomas is off their plantation.
pknopp any answers to the questions below?
The lefty hack writer claims the case was against "Trammel Crow Residential company" when in fact it was from a subsidiary that nobody would connect unless the attorneys for the plaintiff made the court aware of.
Here is the actual case:
04-528 WOMACK & HAMPTON ARCHITECTS, L.L.C V. METRIC HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL.
Now explain to the class how the hell Thomas was supposed to know this company was one of the dozens of subs of one of the dozens of Trammel Crow companies?
So since your hack lied you really have nothing. Did the entire court vote to not hear the case? Would Thomas' recusing himself have changed that decision? Was the lower court decision in favor or against Metric Holdings?
Got any answers to those questions, Simp?
He knew. Justices have a full staff that researches all of this stuff.
this is about 1356.00 when it comes to ThomasThe Hi-Tech Lynching 2.0
even if he knew that some subsidiary was involved in that case…who cares?He knew. Justices have a full staff that researches all of this stuff.
Your attempt to mind read isn't evidence.
Wanna answer these questions you keep dodging?
Now explain to the class how the hell Thomas was supposed to know this company was one of the dozens of subs of one of the dozens of Trammel Crow companies?
No you didn't. You claimed you could read his mind, Simp.
I answered that.
haha you made up something. Seriously what makes you think law clerks research what subsidiaries plantiffs or defendants are of??? what do you think a law clerk does???!
I answered that.
No you didn't. You claimed you could read his mind, Simp.
Try again.
I note you keep dodging the other questions.
Face it, you brought some lefty hack who lied and got your ass handed to you.
haha you made up something. Seriously what makes you think law clerks research what subsidiaries plantiffs or defendants are of??? what do you think a law clerk does???!
you provided us your opinion not an answer…you haven’t even bothered to support your opinionBite me. I answered the question and not how you falsely portrayed my answer.
hhhab no it’s not the job of a law clerk to look up what the parties are subsidiaries ofThat is their job.
Since we have established you have no answer to the first question, let's move on:Bite me. I answered the question and not how you falsely portrayed my answer.
hhhab no it’s not the job of a law clerk to look up what the parties are subsidiaries of
Show us where it says that in their job description.That is their job.
Show us where it says that in their job description.
