Oddball
Unobtanium Member
I believe that you just yammered something about strawmen?So your basic thesis is that the earnings of any person are not theirs, but actually belong to the state and therefore anything not collected by the state is a loss by the state?
How much money is earned by those that are not on your target list that they do not send to the government? Is this money counted as a loss from the government coffers also?
At what point does any person exceed the amount of money that you deem it acceptable for a person to earn? Is any money kept by an individual acceptable? Why not just take it all and give back what ever seems like the right amount according to the intelligencia?
Should any private property be allowed to be held by individuals?
This is such bullshit....Instead of addressing the issues you repackage it into a "people should keep their own money and you want to take it" strawman to make it easier for you to fight it.
Nothing is wrong to the conservative...The way things are are the way things should be. If the rich are raping our anuses numb....Hey, they deserve it...Poor people should make it on their own, but rich people deserve the additional help.
Adding non sequitur to the strawman doesn't make your argument any more coherent.I'll watch this thread to see if ANY CONSERVATIVE sees a problem with cutting early childhood learning programs so that we can cover tax cuts on someones estate. Early childhood learning for christ sakes....
Dam kids should learn to do for themselves! That's conservativism....The least amonst us are expected to do the most. The kids, the homeless, the poor, learning programs, healthy eating programs, medicare, medicade everything must go....But a 2-5% tax increase for the rich is sooooooo wrong. 2 f*ckin percent!!!!!