Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're an idiot. Your argument is called "the appeal to authority." It's a logical fallacy. Credentials don't constitute proof of anything, dipstick.
Credentials do not prove anything, but the opinions of people who have been well educated and have worked their entire lives in a field are much more likely to be accurate than the opinions of those who know next to nothing about the subject - like yourself for example.
Saigon doesn't understand Americans. "Conservatism" to him is not the same as it is to us. His view of the U.S. is shaped by liberals and atheists. To him, mediocrity is excellence, and he will never understand what true conservatism is, or what it's like to excel. I pity the fool.
Who cares. Saigon is not an American. Therefore he has no right to opine on American matters. He should worry about his home nation.
You're an idiot. Your argument is called "the appeal to authority." It's a logical fallacy. Credentials don't constitute proof of anything, dipstick.
Credentials do not prove anything, but the opinions of people who have been well educated and have worked their entire lives in a field are much more likely to be accurate than the opinions of those who know next to nothing about the subject - like yourself for example.
Except when they aren't. You're trying to claim the appeal to authority is not a fallacy.
Claims are either true or false. The credentials of the people who advance the claims don't prove a thing.
That wasn't the point, stupid. My comment was not about global warming, it was about Saigon's lack of understanding of conservatism.Saigon doesn't understand Americans. "Conservatism" to him is not the same as it is to us. His view of the U.S. is shaped by liberals and atheists. To him, mediocrity is excellence, and he will never understand what true conservatism is, or what it's like to excel. I pity the fool.
Who cares. Saigon is not an American. Therefore he has no right to opine on American matters. He should worry about his home nation.
Now that comment earns a dumb fuck commendation. The ongoing climate change is a worldwide problem, not just an American problem. And what we do, affects everyone, just as what China or India, or Europe, for that matter, affects all of us on this small planet.
Credentials do not prove anything, but the opinions of people who have been well educated and have worked their entire lives in a field are much more likely to be accurate than the opinions of those who know next to nothing about the subject - like yourself for example.
Except when they aren't. You're trying to claim the appeal to authority is not a fallacy.
Claims are either true or false. The credentials of the people who advance the claims don't prove a thing.
Ah so. You believe that a mechanic's opinion concerning a cancer is just as valid as a doctor's that is trained in Oncology? Yes, I do realize you truly are that stupid.
You can engineer the results of a survey if you are selective in who you survey. If I wanted a study to conclude that 75% of citizens think Obama is the anti-christ, I would ask 3 Christians and 1 atheist the question.Most scientists believe that man effects climate change. The naysayers say no. These are usually the same individuals who believe that not only is Sarah Palin not as dumb as a box of hammers, but that she's a highly intelligent, articulate woman. I think I'll defer to the scientists.
Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real
Saigon doesn't understand Americans. "Conservatism" to him is not the same as it is to us. His view of the U.S. is shaped by liberals and atheists. To him, mediocrity is excellence, and he will never understand what true conservatism is, or what it's like to excel. I pity the fool.
Who cares. Saigon is not an American. Therefore he has no right to opine on American matters. He should worry about his home nation.
Now that comment earns a dumb fuck commendation. The ongoing climate change is a worldwide problem, not just an American problem. And what we do, affects everyone, just as what China or India, or Europe, for that matter, affects all of us on this small planet.
Most scientists believe that man effects climate change. The naysayers say no. These are usually the same individuals who believe that not only is Sarah Palin not as dumb as a box of hammers, but that she's a highly intelligent, articulate woman. I think I'll defer to the scientists.
Report: 97 percent of scientists say man-made climate change is real
Saigon doesn't understand Americans. "Conservatism" to him is not the same as it is to us. His view of the U.S. is shaped by liberals and atheists. To him, mediocrity is excellence, and he will never understand what true conservatism is, or what it's like to excel. I pity the fool.
Who cares. Saigon is not an American. Therefore he has no right to opine on American matters. He should worry about his home nation.
Now that comment earns a dumb fuck commendation. The ongoing climate change is a worldwide problem, not just an American problem. And what we do, affects everyone, just as what China or India, or Europe, for that matter, affects all of us on this small planet.
If Saigon or any of you other tree hugging enviro wackos had an ounce of integrity ,you'd be screaming from the roof tops of Beijing because it is the Chinese industrial complex which blatantly disregards the environment.
No, with you libs , this is a political agenda.
You didn't SAY otherwise, you just didn't include them in your condemnation. You posted the worst polluters OF THE WESTERN COUNTRIES. That's called deception. I called you on it and you disappeared, as I recall.Yes, absolutely China is the worst polluter on the planet - who said otherwise?
So why didn't you include them as the world's worst polluters? You want everyone to think the U.S. is the bad guy, as usual. How do you expect to have any credibility when you do shit like that?S.J. -
I don't see the point in comparing the US with Zimbabwe, Fiji or Guam - hence I generally use other western countries as a basis for comparison.
This doesn't exempt other countries from responsibility - it just means that I think they belong in a different category. China and India pollute terribly, obviously.
And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously.S.J.
Firstly, because the situation with developing countries like India and China is very different to older economies like the EU and US.
Secondly, because everyone knows China pollutes, but to the best of my knowledge there aren't any Chinese posters here to discuss the issue.
You defend them by omission. You left them out of the equation completely. The worst polluters on the planet didn't even get a mention from you until somebody shoved it down your throat.S.J. -
I do realise that at times it is very difficult for posters raised on blogs and tabloids to deal with arguments based on facts and genuine information, but I can't say that bothers me unduly.
If you want to believe posters here are somehow defending China from criticism, go right ahead.
What fucking difference does it make? You post bullshit, you point the finger at the only countries that are making an effort to limit pollution, and ignore the ones who aren't. It's a pretty sorry excuse to say you leave them out because there aren't any Chinese posters here.S.J.
How many Chinese posters do we have on this board?
