Clinton Broke Federal Rules With Email Server, Audit Finds

[francoHFW]

from the article:


The audit found that the non-compliance over personal email went beyond Clinton, and that former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a Republican, also failed to preserve government-related emails when he was secretary of state.

The State Department asked Powell to try to receive relevant emails from his internet provider, but "as of May 2016 the Department has not received a response" from Powell, the audit said.


Indeed, the report's conclusion cites "longstanding, systemic weaknesses" in electronic record-keeping "that go well beyond the tenure of any one secretary of state."

Yes of course, the wrong doing of one federal government miscreant excuses the wrong doing of every other federal government miscreant, as long as you have the power and connections to sweep it under the rug; That's of course the PERFECT design for a system of justice whereby there is one set of rules for the commons and a completely different set of rules for the rulers.

On second thought, going back to the days of separate justice for the nobility and the peasantry doesn't sound that attractive after all, since it was one of the primary reasons that THE AMERICAN COLONIES REVOLTED AGAINST THE KING OF ENGLAND.

... Meanwhile back on Earth, the IG report points out that Clinton violated rules that were derived from the FRA (aka a FEDERAL LAW) which means (for you partisan pom-pom waiving hedgehogs) that SHE BROKE THE LAW and the fact that anybody else also BROKE THE LAW is completely fucking irrelevant.

At the very least she needs to be denied the ability to hold a security clearance, which is exactly what would happen to anybody else in the State Department that did what she did and whose last name isn't Clinton.

Broke rules like predecessors, NOT LAWS.

 

[Geaux4it]

Greatest social reform since FDR, averted 2nd GOP Great Depression, 80 months straight of growth w/o GOP bubble/bust.scandal AGAIN, respect of world again,reform of college loans/pot laws/gay laws etc etc despite mindless GOP obstruction/fear mongering/propaganda/lies.

Respect of the world?

Really?

LMAO

-Geaux

 

[Geaux4it]

 

[francoHFW]

Only a liar would call Hillary innocent and worthy to be POTUS

-Geaux

Innocent until at least arrested ferchrissake...all this has already been admitted.

 

[francoHFW]

Greatest social reform since FDR, averted 2nd GOP Great Depression, 80 months straight of growth w/o GOP bubble/bust.scandal AGAIN, respect of world again,reform of college loans/pot laws/gay laws etc etc despite mindless GOP obstruction/fear mongering/propaganda/lies.

Respect of the world?

Really?

LMAO

-Geaux

How would you hater dupes know? lol. Booosh was a total catastrophe duh.

 

[Iceweasel]

Millions aren't under investigation for breaking the law - Hillary is. The State Department just declared Hillary Broke the Law. The Liberals response, after declaring for months that she never broke a rule / law? "Everybody does it, so it's ok."

You lie. It said she did not follow policy. They never broached the breaking the law issue. Cause she didn't.

I know it is hard to follow, but try...

The Rules were put into place to ensure people did not break the law. Hillary broke the rules, and - by breaking the rules - she broke the law. As I pointed out, they were very careful not to use the words 'she broke the law', requiring you to actually have to THINK. They even avoid saying she broke the law by having classified information in her possession but did point out that 'at the very least she was required to (by law) / should have turned over all of her State Dept-related e-mails, which they also point out she did NOT do.

Again, the State Department specifically did not use the words 'she broke the law' because they knew unless they did so libs like you were not capable of thinking for yourself and coming up with the fact yourself that she did so and would continue to defend her.

So Condi, Colin, and Hillary used private servers. When are Condi and Colin going to jail? DUMB A$S!

They aren't - they didn't break the law. Hillary did...and the State Department just said so.

They did not say she broke the law.

I realize that the subtleties of language are difficult for rightwingnut internet trolls

Oh she broke the law alright. Mishandling classified intel isn't legal, rightwingnuts didn't make it so. The "it was classified later" serves only to placate her followers and defraud the public.

 

[Freewill]

from the article:


The audit found that the non-compliance over personal email went beyond Clinton, and that former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a Republican, also failed to preserve government-related emails when he was secretary of state.

The State Department asked Powell to try to receive relevant emails from his internet provider, but "as of May 2016 the Department has not received a response" from Powell, the audit said.


Indeed, the report's conclusion cites "longstanding, systemic weaknesses" in electronic record-keeping "that go well beyond the tenure of any one secretary of state."

Yes of course, the wrong doing of one federal government miscreant excuses the wrong doing of every other federal government miscreant, as long as you have the power and connections to sweep it under the rug; That's of course the PERFECT design for a system of justice whereby there is one set of rules for the commons and a completely different set of rules for the rulers.

On second thought, going back to the days of separate justice for the nobility and the peasantry doesn't sound that attractive after all, since it was one of the primary reasons that THE AMERICAN COLONIES REVOLTED AGAINST THE KING OF ENGLAND.

... Meanwhile back on Earth, the IG report points out that Clinton violated rules that were derived from the FRA (aka a FEDERAL LAW) which means (for you partisan pom-pom waiving hedgehogs) that SHE BROKE THE LAW and the fact that anybody else also BROKE THE LAW is completely fucking irrelevant.

At the very least she needs to be denied the ability to hold a security clearance, which is exactly what would happen to anybody else in the State Department that did what she did and whose last name isn't Clinton.

Even if every other SOS did EXACTLY what Mrs. Tuzla Clinton did, which they did not, they are now not running for POTUS.

 

[rightwinger]

How far our conservatives have fallen

They have now gone from Hillary is guilty of a massive security breach that will undoubtedly send her to prison to Hillary is a serial non-record keeper

 

[Freewill]

from the article:


The audit found that the non-compliance over personal email went beyond Clinton, and that former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a Republican, also failed to preserve government-related emails when he was secretary of state.

The State Department asked Powell to try to receive relevant emails from his internet provider, but "as of May 2016 the Department has not received a response" from Powell, the audit said.


Indeed, the report's conclusion cites "longstanding, systemic weaknesses" in electronic record-keeping "that go well beyond the tenure of any one secretary of state."

Yes of course, the wrong doing of one federal government miscreant excuses the wrong doing of every other federal government miscreant, as long as you have the power and connections to sweep it under the rug; That's of course the PERFECT design for a system of justice whereby there is one set of rules for the commons and a completely different set of rules for the rulers.

On second thought, going back to the days of separate justice for the nobility and the peasantry doesn't sound that attractive after all, since it was one of the primary reasons that THE AMERICAN COLONIES REVOLTED AGAINST THE KING OF ENGLAND.

... Meanwhile back on Earth, the IG report points out that Clinton violated rules that were derived from the FRA (aka a FEDERAL LAW) which means (for you partisan pom-pom waiving hedgehogs) that SHE BROKE THE LAW and the fact that anybody else also BROKE THE LAW is completely fucking irrelevant.

At the very least she needs to be denied the ability to hold a security clearance, which is exactly what would happen to anybody else in the State Department that did what she did and whose last name isn't Clinton.

Broke rules like predecessors, NOT LAWS.

As with the excuses for her lying husband the liberal apologists have concocted a flimsy excuse for Mrs. Tuzla. The report from the Obama State Department could hardly be more damning for Mrs. Tuzla. She is so dirty they couldn't even try and hide it, but that doesn't stop you.

Yes, she broke rules which were put in place to protect state secrets. In so doing she allowed access to state secrets. Which in anyone's world isn't legal. Except maybe in the world of flaming liberals.

 

[Freewill]

Espionage is a pretty serious crime bro.

Because they had no laws that covered this specific activity, it falls under the Espionage act. It becomes espionage because they knew they were hacked, and did not alert proper authorities. They should have reported the hack to the FBI. They instead just shut off the server and merely rebooted and hoped nothing serious was intercepted by hackers. If she wasn't doing something wrong she would have reported the incident.

You are also wrong.


Jesus Christ, you people need to educate yourselves or just shut up.

The alleged hacking has ZERO bearing on the charges of espionage. ZERO

Let's use an analogy. I'll try to stick with one syllable words so the liberals can keep up.

Let's say you are going from one office to another and have a briefcase full of classified material. Let's say you stop and have lunch. Let's say that for whatever reason you leave said briefcase at the restaraunt.

You are guilty of espionage. Whether someone opened that briefcase or not, you are guilty of espionage.

As a person who is authorized to have classified material you are charged with taking proactive steps to ensure that the material REMAINS secure.

Hell... Even low level corporate office workers have to complete training courses on protocols to protect information.

This is not rocket science. Yet democrats like to pretend they have never heard of such things.

Morons

Don't be too hard on them, apparently they don't know how to get a photo id or find a polling station.

I'm surprised they can feed themselves or wipe their ass without a social worker to stop by three times a day to help.

Well, it isn't like they don't want someone. It is YOU, as represented by the right wing, that stops them from having the much-needed help in personal hygiene. You are callous expecting people to take care of their own butt wiping. It is their right to personal butt wiping and whomever is doing just better call them they and use the proper colored toilet paper.

 

[easyt65]

How far our conservatives have fallen

They have now gone from Hillary is guilty of a massive security breach that will undoubtedly send her to prison to Hillary is a serial non-record keeper

The only one who has said this is YOU.

 

[Freewill]

How far our conservatives have fallen

They have now gone from Hillary is guilty of a massive security breach that will undoubtedly send her to prison to Hillary is a serial non-record keeper

The only one who has said this is YOU.

It is what they do.

 

[rightwinger]

How far our conservatives have fallen

They have now gone from Hillary is guilty of a massive security breach that will undoubtedly send her to prison to Hillary is a serial non-record keeper

The only one who has said this is YOU.

Really?

Then why the conservative outrage over not properly maintaining public records?
I always thought conservatives opposed the freedom of information act up until Hillary

 

[Freewill]

How far our conservatives have fallen

They have now gone from Hillary is guilty of a massive security breach that will undoubtedly send her to prison to Hillary is a serial non-record keeper

The only one who has said this is YOU.

Really?

Then why the conservative outrage over not properly maintaining public records?
I always thought conservatives opposed the freedom of information act up until Hillary

Just keep making it up as you go Jake, it is what you do.

 

[froggy]

She'll look good in strips.

yeah....no.

so much delusional wishful thinking among the rightwingnut brigade.

Let me guess Jillian she's your hero.

 

[rightwinger]

How far our conservatives have fallen

They have now gone from Hillary is guilty of a massive security breach that will undoubtedly send her to prison to Hillary is a serial non-record keeper

The only one who has said this is YOU.

Really?

Then why the conservative outrage over not properly maintaining public records?
I always thought conservatives opposed the freedom of information act up until Hillary

Just keep making it up as you go Jake, it is what you do.

What is there to make up?

Did you read the report?

 

[Redfish]

then indict both Clinton and powell. Do it.

Your desperation is duly noted.

Colin Powell accidentally sent several classified emails through his private email ACCOUNT.

Crooked Hillary Clinton sent ALL her email, classified, top secret, ABOVE top secret through a private email server that was hidden from the government.

We know you'd love for them to be identical, but you're making a flawed attempt to compare apples with artichokes.

Do you know the definition of the word, "systemic"?

I understand all of that. I was responding to the other fool who implied
"if Powell did it then its OK for Clinton to do it".

Anyone who breaks the law should be held accountable, regardless of party.

 

[Redfish]

from the article:


The audit found that the non-compliance over personal email went beyond Clinton, and that former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a Republican, also failed to preserve government-related emails when he was secretary of state.

The State Department asked Powell to try to receive relevant emails from his internet provider, but "as of May 2016 the Department has not received a response" from Powell, the audit said.


Indeed, the report's conclusion cites "longstanding, systemic weaknesses" in electronic record-keeping "that go well beyond the tenure of any one secretary of state."

then indict both Clinton and powell. Do it.

indict them for what? Breaking a rule?

Remember YOU said she committed Espionage, You said she aided and abetted the enemy, YOU claimed she broke National Security rules and put govt workers at risk, you and right wingers claimed a bunch of crapola your right wing media CREATED to make their own news....

And she simply did not comply with one simple rule that other SOS's didn't comply with either....

Deal with it!

She broke the law regarding the protection of classified data. Not a rule, a law.

But if Powell and Rice did it, they should also be held accountable.

What are you going to say when Putin releases 3000 of Hillary's e-mails, some of which were classified top secret or SAP?

The woman is a criminal and a habitual liar------------Deal with it.

 

[Redfish]

from the article:


The audit found that the non-compliance over personal email went beyond Clinton, and that former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a Republican, also failed to preserve government-related emails when he was secretary of state.

The State Department asked Powell to try to receive relevant emails from his internet provider, but "as of May 2016 the Department has not received a response" from Powell, the audit said.


Indeed, the report's conclusion cites "longstanding, systemic weaknesses" in electronic record-keeping "that go well beyond the tenure of any one secretary of state."

then indict both Clinton and powell. Do it.

And who else? Keep going

Anyone who broke the law PERIOD

Since this was a problem with all of them, how silly will it look when everyone finds out everyone else was ok but Hilary should play by different rules because....?

If they all did it, indict them all. No one is above the law.

But you are hurling bullshit again, No one else transmitted classified data on an unsecure server. Hillary's violations are much more serious.

 

[easyt65]

This is a sad pattern - libs blaming others for their actions and, at the very least, falsely claiming someone else did the exact same thing then trying to justify the act by saying it's ok if someone else did it, too.