Clintons & Obamas Know Worldwide Influentials V. Remnant National Committee Members In The Exits!

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
The polls are bad. The shake-ups are bad. The Remnant National Committee cannot hold on to its own influential dignitaries. The language is foul. The denigrations are a litany to numerous to list. The hip-shoot policy, even on Immigration, was not well-thought through all those months. The former mayor of New York City forgot all about 9/11.

Compare: In just one report the Associated Press has noticed that the Clintons not only know and meet with worldwide notables, a part of the policy outcomes of the Obama-Biden Administration. Many of the influential warmly regard the former Presidential Administration of Bill Clinton, and donate lots of money.

Many donors to Clinton Foundation met with her at State

Trump donated $100,000.00 without any pretense at pay for play. No criminal or other quid pro quo policy outcomes can be found. The Trump Campaign agrees that the Clinton Foundation is one extremely impressive world Charity. The Democrats note that millions would be put in harm's way,. if it were to be suspended.

Just exactly who does anyone vote for?

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Giving major thought to value of Turquoise, really--for Trump Family Zingers(?) Foundation(?). . .or maybe its properties(?)! What does anyone suppose the Remnant National Committee does. . . .to. . .anyone(?)!)
 
The polls are bad. The shake-ups are bad. The Remnant National Committee cannot hold on to its own influential dignitaries. The language is foul. The denigrations are a litany to numerous to list. The hip-shoot policy, even on Immigration, was not well-thought through all those months. The former mayor of New York City forgot all about 9/11.

Compare: In just one report the Associated Press has noticed that the Clintons not only know and meet with worldwide notables, a part of the policy outcomes of the Obama-Biden Administration. Many of the influential warmly regard the former Presidential Administration of Bill Clinton, and donate lots of money.

Many donors to Clinton Foundation met with her at State

Trump donated $100,000.00 without any pretense at pay for play. No criminal or other quid pro quo policy outcomes can be found. The Trump Campaign agrees that the Clinton Foundation is one extremely impressive world Charity. The Democrats note that millions would be put in harm's way,. if it were to be suspended.

Just exactly who does anyone vote for?

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Giving major thought to value of Turquoise, really--for Trump Family Zingers(?) Foundation(?). . .or maybe its properties(?)! What does anyone suppose the Remnant National Committee does. . . .to. . .anyone(?)!)

Just exactly who does anyone vote for?

i_vote_none_of_the_above_yard_sign-rab91f2d01c2c4a7bbba758834af8b2a3_fomui_8byvr_512.jpg
 
Anarchy aside--where there is no central government, or much in the way of borders--there nevertheless would mostly be elections for boards of directors, most likely. Currently, "None Of The Above," would likely be "Leans Democrat.' A few weeks ago, it would likely be "Leans Remnant(?)." In New Mexico, it could also be former Governor Johnson. One of my old coaching friends is now even late all of the time, himself. He had been a founding director of the Libertarian Party. Anarchy requires a basic "Widespread Wealth Worldwide." Any Government understands the concept, "poor,l" regardless of party.

So for all the media appearances, and newscaster fictional analysis--and not just Fox for a change--The Clintons and the Foundation tend to have a better grasp of limited government, and of an anarchy: Than do the Libertarians, or The Remnant National Committee. The latter simply want a government of any type to plunder. The Clintons are widely acknowledged to give a lot of stuff away. The impact of that can actually be measured.

Along with the Bill Gates Foundation, worldwide Malaria is less of a problem, than it was only four years ago(?)! That originates of the Clinton Foundation.

Not so often is anyone willing to so-state, other than the Clinton Campaign manager, and other Clinton Democratic speakers.

No journalist appears so far to be able to make the astonishing and glaring comparison. The one party hosts and encourages international world diplomats and liberal donors and sponsors. The main opposition party mainly denigrates, bites, and pokes people's eyes out. That opposition party engages in street violence, right in the rooms where the audience is gathered. That opposition fights and hollers, and has nothing much to say!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Lack of fine Turquoise, does that to people not yet on board at Lands of Many Nations!"
 

Forum List

Back
Top