CNBC cuts off live coverage of Trump speaking about the election results, because, says Shepherd Smith, “what he’s saying is absolutely untrue”

[Mac-7]

He came across to me as a sanctimonious goody two-shoes.

Actually smith acts like a bitch

 

[colfax_m]

But not the same stature

Irrelevant. Stature does not grand him rights.

 

[Mac-7]

Irrelevant. Stature does not grand him rights.

Ok

so why is biden being worshiped in the lib news media instead of you?

 

[colfax_m]

Irrelevant. Stature does not grand him rights.

Ok

so why is biden being worshiped in the lib news media instead of you?

He’s a winner

Sorry, Trump does not had additional rights that are violated by not having his speech broadcast by others. This isn’t a dictatorship.

 

[bripat9643]

Irrelevant. Stature does not grand him rights.

Ok

so why is biden being worshiped in the lib news media instead of you?

He’s a winner

Sorry, Trump does not had additional rights that are violated by not having his speech broadcast by others. This isn’t a dictatorship.

That doesn't alter the fact that he's being censored. Any pretense that the fake news is not partisan is was exposed as a lie.

 

[colfax_m]

That doesn't alter the fact that he's being censored

Am I being censored when CNBC refuses to cover my speech?

 

[bripat9643]

That doesn't alter the fact that he's being censored

Am I being censored when CNBC refuses to cover my speech?

If you were a political candidate and they covered your oponents speech, then yes you are.

 

[colfax_m]

If you were a political candidate and they covered your oponents speech, then yes you are.

So now you’re talking about some kind of fairness doctrine?

 

[hadit]

So who decides the speaker is lying?

And therein lies the rub. The usual idiots are falling all over themselves with glee that the talking heads are cutting off the president simply because they agree with the talking heads. They would not be so gleeful to see Frail Joe get thusly cut off, not at all. Suddenly they would discover all sorts of reasons why that would be bad.

 

[Mac-7]

Sorry, Trump does not had additional rights that are violated by not having his speech broadcast by others. This isn’t a dictatorship.

The public has a right to hear what the president has to say

the dictatorship is of your making on the left

 

[MaryAnne11]

I so wish that the media would cut away from anyone blatantly lying.

I like CNN fact checkers.

 

[pknopp]

I so wish that the media would cut away from anyone blatantly lying.

I like CNN fact checkers.

If they are consistent in addressing all that will be great. I doubt they will.

 

[colfax_m]

The public has a right to hear what the president has to say

Does the public have a right to ignore the president as well?

 

[Mac-7]

Does the public have a right to ignore the president as well?

Absolutely

But they/we deserve to have the choice

 

[pknopp]

Does the public have a right to ignore the president as well?

Absolutely

But they deserve to have the choice

The solution is easy. Stop lying.

 

[colfax_m]

Absolutely

So doesn’t that right also apply to a news network?

 

[Mac-7]

The solution is easy. Stop lying.

The lying lib news media does not have the moral right to decide what the public can or cannot hear

 

[Mac-7]

So doesn’t that right also apply to a news network?

If you are splitting legal hairs yes

but if you want 71 million Americans to stop calling the lying lib media the lying lib media they will have to clean up their act

 

[colfax_m]

If you are splitting legal hairs yes

If the news media has the freedom to ignore Trump, there can be no legitimate accusation of censorship of him.

Thanks!

 

[bripat9643]

The public has a right to hear what the president has to say

Does the public have a right to ignore the president as well?

Ignoring is one thing. Censorship is another. No matter how hard you try, you can't alter the fact the fake news media censored Trump