Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 123,612
- 79,069
- 2,635
Which means you lied when you described her server as "rather easy to hack." How many times are you going to admit it? You think there's anybody left here who hasn't seen you fess up to lying about her email server?But you don't know what's on it. Which is the key to showing you're a lying con tool -- despite not knowing what's on it, you're laying disparaging comments about its security which are quite obviously bullshit because you don't actually know what security was on it.It's a lie because you have absolutely zero knowledge of what security was on her server.Screeches the confessed liar who said her server could have been rather easily hacked -- before tacitly admitting he lied as he in fact, has no fucking clue what security was installed on her server.
![]()
How is it a "lie" to say that Hillary Clinton's two servers could have been easily hacked? They were set up by one of her staffers...not an expert on cyber security! That staffer is now taking the 5th. Think about that! Why would an IT guy take the 5th over how he set up a couple servers in somebody's house? Because he knows WHY they set it up that way and possibly even knows the emails that were deleted? This whole thing stinks to high heavens! It's the same corrupt STENCH that emanated from the IRS scandal!
But as usual for you, that doesn't stop you from lying.![]()
Well, Gee...Faun! We'd ALL know what kind of security was on her server if the tech who set it up wasn't taking the 5th and refusing to answer questions because it might incriminate him! He knows what they did was illegal. So does his lawyer!
![]()
Nobody outside of the Clinton inner circle knows what was on those servers...
Time for you to move on to your next con lie...