CNN megapixel of Trump inauguration.

[tyroneweaver]

Crowd is full all the way to washington monument???

Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump

 

[Fang]

Nice Gigapixel! Looks like a huge crowd to me. Certainly not as big as Obama, but Americans spoke in November. That's all that matters. Its pretty surreal to see all the ex-presidents, SCOTUS, Congress leaders, Hillary, etc all watching Trump give his speech.

 

[Zoom-boing]

This is so cool. Thanks for posting, t!

 

[Cowman]

A nice healthy 250,000 or so people.

 

[tyroneweaver]

A nice healthy 250,000 or so people.

care to comment of the fake pics you and your ilk have been posting
Your so dumb any how you wouldn't know if a cow had bangs or mastitis.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Nice Gigapixel! Looks like a huge crowd to me. Certainly not as big as Obama, but Americans spoke in November. That's all that matters. Its pretty surreal to see all the ex-presidents, SCOTUS, Congress leaders, Hillary, etc all watching Trump give his speech.

but the left has been posting fake pics of an empty mall. Now they'll come back with fake excuses for fake news.

 

[Zoom-boing]

A nice healthy 250,000 or so people.

Er, way more than that. NYT lied and printed a correction. They posted crowd info without numbers and without satellite imagery due to cloudy skies. Anything to diminish Trump. They are in for a rough ride cause he's gonna call them on their lying bullshit four years.

"The initial analysis was limited in scope because footage of a larger area was not yet available. The number of people on the National Mall is typically a fraction of the total crowd that gathers for a presidential inauguration. In 2009, for example, about 460,000 of the estimated 1.8 million people who attended President Obama’s inauguration were on the National Mall.

The cloudy skies above this year’s inauguration means that there will likely be no clear satellite imagery of Washington. Without satellite imagery it is difficult to make a complete and accurate estimate of crowd size."

Note the corrected picture at the bottom of the article.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/20/us/politics/trump-inauguration-crowd.html?_r=0

If you want, I can post Spicer's breakdown on the crowd. Let me know.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

i am pretty sure there were at least 1000 people there,,hey, thats a lot more than show up for Hillary

 

[Lakhota]

A nice healthy 250,000 or so people.

Funny how it's only shown from the stage area. It's the back that's really thin. Obama's wasn't thin in the back.

 

[Zoom-boing]

obama's, 2009

Trump's, 2017

obama's was bigger but the media putting out that Trump's wasn't huge diminishes the support that is there for him. They lie.


Gigapixel, do a 180 and look at the crowd going back to the WM. It.Was.UUGE.

Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump

 

[Pogo]

Nice Gigapixel! Looks like a huge crowd to me. Certainly not as big as Obama, but Americans spoke in November. That's all that matters. Its pretty surreal to see all the ex-presidents, SCOTUS, Congress leaders, Hillary, etc all watching Trump give his speech.

but the left has been posting fake pics of an empty mall. Now they'll come back with fake excuses for fake news.

"The left" posts pictures now?

sheesh. Technology.

 

[Lakhota]

The scene on the National Mall during Barack Obama’s first inauguration.

1.8 million...

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Zoom in on Hillary's face.

 

[my2¢]

I found Waldo.

 

[Pogo]

Er, way more than that. NYT lied and printed a correction. They posted crowd info without numbers and without satellite imagery due to cloudy skies. Anything to diminish Trump.

Durn Liberl Meedya! Bringing in cloud machines to make cloudy skies, no fair!

They shoulda hired Sean Hannity's crack pipe video team and hope Jon Stewart's not looking.

Note the corrected picture at the bottom of the article.

That's not a 'corrected' picture. The top one clearly states, "The footage on this page was captured 45 minutes before each oath of office". Nothing indicates that's not the case.

Also says, "The initial analysis was limited in scope because footage of a larger area was not yet available. The number of people on the National Mall is typically a fraction of the total crowd that gathers for a presidential inauguration. In 2009, for example, about 460,000 of the estimated 1.8 million people who attended President Obama’s inauguration were on the National Mall."

Your own link.


What exactly point are you trying to prove with this "ratings" fallacy?
Is attending an inaugurination the same thing as voting?

 

[tyroneweaver]

The scene on the National Mall during Barack Obama’s first inauguration.

1.8 million...

care to comment on the fake pics?
But I know you well enough you won't

 

[The Great Goose]

The type of people who support Trump aren't for frivolous outings.

 

[conserveguy877]

IT WAS YUGE

 

[Zoom-boing]

Er, way more than that. NYT lied and printed a correction. They posted crowd info without numbers and without satellite imagery due to cloudy skies. Anything to diminish Trump.

Durn Liberl Meedya! Bringing in cloud machines to make cloudy skies, no fair!

They shoulda hired Sean Hannity's crack pipe video team and hope Jon Stewart's not looking.

Note the corrected picture at the bottom of the article.

That's not a 'corrected' picture. The top one clearly states, "The footage on this page was captured 45 minutes before each oath of office". Nothing indicates that's not the case.

Also says, "The initial analysis was limited in scope because footage of a larger area was not yet available. The number of people on the National Mall is typically a fraction of the total crowd that gathers for a presidential inauguration. In 2009, for example, about 460,000 of the estimated 1.8 million people who attended President Obama’s inauguration were on the National Mall."

Your own link.


What exactly point are you trying to prove with this "ratings" fallacy?
Is attending an inaugurination the same thing as voting?

The point is that the media put out that Trump's crowd was less than obama's prior to having any numbers or clear satellite imagery. The bottom picture shows Trumps crowds were huge. By diminishing the crowd size the media squashes the amount of support Trump really has. You're right about one thing, the bottom pic isn't a correction it's accurate.

 

[mamooth]

The point is that Trump lied about the numbers, that he really is that delusional and petty.

That's what all his fans don't want to discuss. Somehow, Trump lying is all the fault of the liberals. That's how it's going to be from now on, with every daily Trump lie somehow being the fault of the liberals.