CNN on Benghazi committee: Immediate headline "GOP committee finds no wrongdoing by Clinton"

[Synthaholic]

The FIRST investigation turned up FOUR DEAD AMERICANS & ONE BIG ASS LIE.

All a result of Hillary's ideals.

The 4 dead guys were already turned up and what you claim is a lie is only a claim. 17 investigations later and you still have shit but rumors and allegations.

Maybe you guys just suck that bad where you cant lay a glove on her

Glad to see you support corruption. It will weaken your position in future.

Again, your sheer declaration means nothing. You need more than pointing to your butt and going "owee"

The point should be clear. Obama refuses to follow the law. It is obvious from this report that he is covering it up. Plenty of evidence was found to support a prosecution of the guilty, but that won't happen. Obama is breaking his oath to enforce the law. That is corruption.

And you support it.

Anyone who supports corruption in any form, and knows it, is corrupt themselves.

So what we are seeing is a government that is intentionally screwing this country up. That's why they were allowed to win. The only type of person that will be allowed to be in charge of this country, in this type of corrupt environment, is someone who will intentionally screw up the economy. That's what Globalists want. They're making billions off of failing economies.

And you support it because of your inherent racism.

Obama refuses to follow the law?????

Then why doesn't the Republican Congress recommend he be prosecuted?

Or impeached! It's their wet dream. Why wouldn't they act upon it?

 

[Synthaholic]

If they had an ounce of truth they would have paraded it in front of the press and waved it in front of everyone's eyes. They didn't because they have nothing and never did. This was nothing more than a attempt to influence the election and if Democrats had not presented their report yesterday, you wouldn't have seen the Republican version for two or three more months.

At this point what does the death of an American Ambassador and three other Americans make?
Did I get that right?

How does that compare to the 5000+ dead U.S. military because of Bush's lies?

How many women have lost their lives due to Texas' unconstitutional extreme anti-abortion tactics? Should Texas officials be prosecuted for murder?

Maybe those 5,000 lives lost were about these lies.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

That was intel that Bush gave them. Remember when he refused to divulge all of the intel, even to the House & Senate Intelligence Committees, because he "was afraid of a leak"?

That's not what he was afraid of.

 

[Synthaholic]

"

So, when will conservative media and their rubes apologize to Hillary Clinton?

When she brings 4 Americans that she abandoned back to life.

She didn't abandon anyone. The new report confirms that the military wouldn't have been able to intervene in time.

Just as she has said all along.

In case you missed it, Hillary is a lying sack of dog squeeze and that would be one of her finest qualities. The military wasn't ordered to respond.

Because they were already dead.

 

[Synthaholic]

Headline: Benghazi report finds Hillary knowingly misled public. OH SNAP!

What did she do, tell the public that Saddam had mobile WMDs that could be launched in 40 minutes?

Did she out a CIA agent?

Did she approve torture, against international law and treaties?

What?

No just turned a country into a worse shit hole and untold people killed.
ISIS has a safe place,and oil for money.
Now before you invoke the BUSH syndrome,wr are talking Clinton.

Ghaddafi had rape rooms.

 

[Synthaholic]

At this point what does the death of an American Ambassador and three other Americans make?
Did I get that right?

How does that compare to the 5000+ dead U.S. military because of Bush's lies?

How many women have lost their lives due to Texas' unconstitutional extreme anti-abortion tactics? Should Texas officials be prosecuted for murder?

Maybe those 5,000 lives lost were about these lies.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

Obviously, the chicken had to lay the egg first, shorty! What was the SOURCE from which Kerry and Clinton got that information, hmmmmm?

"There is already a mountain of evidence that Saddam Hussein is gathering WMDs for the purpose of using them. And adding additional information is like adding a foot to Mount Everest."
--Ari Fleischer, Sept. 6, 2002 ~~http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Condoleezza_Rice_War_+_Peace.htm~~

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
--Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"There's no debate in the world as to whether they have these weapons. We all know that. A trained ape knows that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, Sept. 13, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
--President George W. Bush, Oct 6, 2002 CNN.com - Bush: Don't wait for mushroom cloud - Oct. 6, 2002

Bush, Cheney & Co. were on a very hard push in the early fall of 2002 to falsify a basis for an Iraq invasion to get the desired WPA AUMF out of Congress to do a little Nation building, shorty! That propaganda was fed directly to Senators like Kerry, Clinton, et al. If Congress, both House and Senate, believed the lies from the Bush administration, well that only proves the Bush/Cheney cabal were fucking good liars.

You are totally full of nonsense. Kerry and Clinton got their intel from the CIA, FBI and several other foreign intelligence agencies. The same place that Bush got his intel. I have several dozen more quotes from Democrats that say the same thing.

No, the DIA and CIA passed raw intel from "Curveball" who they never vetted and passed that information directly to senior policymakers in November 1999. That and the administration of George Bush giving any credibility to Ahmed Chalabi were the biggest intelligence mistakes in the run up to war.

Committee Chairman Pat Roberts told NBC's Tim Russert that "Curveball really provided 98 percent of the assessment as to whether or not the Iraqis had a biological weapon."[2] This was in despite the fact that "nobody inside the U.S. government had ever actually spoken to the informant—except [for a single] Pentagon analyst, who concluded the man was an alcoholic and utterly useless as a source."[3]

After learning the intelligence provided by Curveball was going to be used as the "backbone" of the case for war, the Pentagon analyst wrote a letter to the CIA expressing his concerns. The Deputy of the CIA Counter Proliferation Unit quickly responded by saying:

"Let's keep in mind the fact that this war's going to happen regardless of what Curve Ball said or didn't say. The Powers That Be probably aren't terribly interested in whether Curve Ball knows what he's talking about."[4][3]

Senate Report on Pre-war Intelligence on Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[bripat9643]

$7 million doing the job they are elected to do. A mere pittance compared to the $500 million Obama gave to bankrupt Solyndra.

The only difference is that the government was able to recoup all of the $536 million dollar loan to Solyndra - not so much in the case of Gowdy's clown court.

How did it "recoup" the money from this loan?

Do you ever tire of always being a day late and a dollar short?

I posted that yesterday, moron.

Perfect example.
Do you have a dollar by chance?

What was it late for, and what was the price it was short of?

You're a moron who spouts cliches that you don't understand.

 

[Synthaholic]

The dead-enders should also read this:

The Selling of the Iraq War: The First Casualty

 

[Synthaholic]

What's funny is how you take the evidence of two congressional investigations that prove you wrong, toss them into the waste can and then pretend that the Benghazi investigation is still going on. It's not, It's done its work it is over.

The Democrats' Benghazi report does not dispute what I posted, about how Al Qaeida - who Obama and Hillary sided with - was responsible for the attack and how Qaddafi's ex-forces had to rescue the Americans in Benghazi.

They do not dispute the fact that the vide , as Obama finally admitted, played no part in instigating the attack.

The Democrats' report's sole focus was on proclaiming Obama and Hillary did not do anything wrong. They failed to present any evidence, however, that they did anything RIGHT, either. That's hard to do when your 'allies' murder 4 Americans, to include the 1st US Ambassador to be murdered in over 30 years and when your Secretary of State fails so miserably to successfully accomplish her job of protecting the US Ambassador and other Americans.

The Obama administration along with Secretary Clinton and Ambassador Susan Rice were all absolved of wrongdoing by congress. You can't spin that and the Benghazi investigation by congress is over there will be no further investigation of any kind about Benghazi. It's done. They went home empty handed.

Susan Rice was the Clinton and Obama spokesperson and told the same LIES about an obscure internet video and a spontaneous demonstration causing the Benghazi attack on 5 Sunday talk shows.

Not obscure.

 

[Synthaholic]

LOL, if there was any of what you said was true there would have been indictments.

BS, and if you don't know it you should know it.

The only way anyone can be indicted is through the DOJ, OBAMA'S HANND-PICKED CORRUPT DOJ!

As pointed out earlier, this President has violated both Constitution and Laws, has ignored court orders, & been found in Contempt of court. His DOJ has protected AG Eric Holder from proven Perjury, for which he was sanctioned by a bi-partisan Congress. His DOJ is protecting and will continue to do so with Hillary.

This administration has refused to enforce laws and has run the most lawless administration in our nation's history.

The DOJ is independent from the Executive Branch.

Don't you know anything?

 

[Rambunctious]

Apparently a lot of people care about it and Donald s going to find himself between a rock and a hard place when he doesn't. The Clinton's have released every year since 1977 and aren't afraid of questions about their finances. Even Mitt Romney chastised Trump and said he should show his returns. The choice is Donald Trump's if it costs him votes or endorsements it's on him and he has no one to blame but himself

I went to his rally last week no one there cared about his tax returns...

 

[Juan de Fuca]

Apparently a lot of people care about it and Donald s going to find himself between a rock and a hard place when he doesn't. The Clinton's have released every year since 1977 and aren't afraid of questions about their finances. Even Mitt Romney chastised Trump and said he should show his returns. The choice is Donald Trump's if it costs him votes or endorsements it's on him and he has no one to blame but himself

I went to his rally last week no one there cared about his tax returns...

Yeah, I think the average Trump supporter is a rare animal that ignores all of the facts associated with him. I used to hear Republicans scream about Hillary Clinton supporters and now here they are doing the very same thing they complained about them.

 

[Rambunctious]

You don't give a crap about trump tax returns? That's your call but voters like to know if your cult leader earned his money the legal way or fraud. Maybe he is more crooked than Hillary. Definitely he is hiding something.
This will come up again and again during the election.

No I don't give a crap...do you give a crap about the corruption within the Clinton foundation?

 

[Rambunctious]

Yeah, I think the average Trump supporter is a rare animal that ignores all of the facts associated with him.

And there are a hell of a lot of us too...

 

[Synthaholic]

Apparently a lot of people care about it and Donald s going to find himself between a rock and a hard place when he doesn't. The Clinton's have released every year since 1977 and aren't afraid of questions about their finances. Even Mitt Romney chastised Trump and said he should show his returns. The choice is Donald Trump's if it costs him votes or endorsements it's on him and he has no one to blame but himself

I went to his rally last week no one there cared about his tax returns...

None of Mitten's supporters cared about his tax returns, either.

Sheep are easily led.

 

[TooTall]

At this point what does the death of an American Ambassador and three other Americans make?
Did I get that right?

How does that compare to the 5000+ dead U.S. military because of Bush's lies?

How many women have lost their lives due to Texas' unconstitutional extreme anti-abortion tactics? Should Texas officials be prosecuted for murder?

Maybe those 5,000 lives lost were about these lies.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

Obviously, the chicken had to lay the egg first, shorty! What was the SOURCE from which Kerry and Clinton got that information, hmmmmm?

"There is already a mountain of evidence that Saddam Hussein is gathering WMDs for the purpose of using them. And adding additional information is like adding a foot to Mount Everest."
--Ari Fleischer, Sept. 6, 2002 ~~http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Condoleezza_Rice_War_+_Peace.htm~~

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
--Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"There's no debate in the world as to whether they have these weapons. We all know that. A trained ape knows that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, Sept. 13, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
--President George W. Bush, Oct 6, 2002 CNN.com - Bush: Don't wait for mushroom cloud - Oct. 6, 2002

Bush, Cheney & Co. were on a very hard push in the early fall of 2002 to falsify a basis for an Iraq invasion to get the desired WPA AUMF out of Congress to do a little Nation building, shorty! That propaganda was fed directly to Senators like Kerry, Clinton, et al. If Congress, both House and Senate, believed the lies from the Bush administration, well that only proves the Bush/Cheney cabal were fucking good liars.

You are totally full of nonsense. Kerry and Clinton got their intel from the CIA, FBI and several other foreign intelligence agencies. The same place that Bush got his intel. I have several dozen more quotes from Democrats that say the same thing.

Your obfuscation doesn't change a damn thing, fool! Everybody got the same intel from the same source which was under the DIRECT AUTHORITY AND CONTROL of the Chief Executive, BUSH. Don't pretend otherwise, shorty!

The Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal dispensed that "intel" from the very same Executive Branch Agencies and Departments which was ALLOWED TO BE RELEASED by the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal. The Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal didn't go begging for it, they ORDERED its "collection, composition and editing" and selected what was to be released to sell the Iraq War to the Electorate! Who was responsible for their intel if not the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal? The secretaries in the reception areas of those Agencies and Departments or did the Buck stop at the desks of the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal who signed off and propagated it through every media outlet as well as every member of Congress?

Certainly, you can't be trying to absolve the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal from culpability for the statements made ONLY by Democrats which were entirely based on the pumped up, overstated and blatantly false characterizations configured by the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal. That dog don't hunt, shorty!

The Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal started pumping out the BS "intel" in late summer through early fall of 2002 to get Congress to provide the Iraq AUMF. That is why I posted those four quotes from the Bush regime to display that nearly EVERYONE in Congress was told the same fucking horseshit and saying the say thing because they were all DECEIVED, but NOT THE ADMINISTRATION FUNCTIONARIES I QUOTED who created the distortions and lies that were repeated by many outside of that neoconservative cabal. It was a very successful propaganda campaign, SHORTY!

Try these on for size, fool. You might note the dates of the statements and I have many more as well.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 | Source

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 | Source

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 | Source

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 | Source

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 | Source

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 | Source

This also seems to be germane:

"The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy calling for regime change in Iraq. It was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and states that it is the policy of the United States to support democratic movements within Iraq.. The Act was cited in October 2002 to argue for the authorization of military force against the Iraqi government."


As well as the UN clearly stating that Iraq was in material breach of the UN cease fire. I suppose a dumbass like you thinks Bush did that as well.

 

[TooTall]

"

So, when will conservative media and their rubes apologize to Hillary Clinton?

When she brings 4 Americans that she abandoned back to life.

She didn't abandon anyone. The new report confirms that the military wouldn't have been able to intervene in time.

Just as she has said all along.

In case you missed it, Hillary is a lying sack of dog squeeze and that would be one of her finest qualities. The military wasn't ordered to respond.

Because they were already dead.

Bullshit!

 

[TooTall]

The dead-enders should also read this:

The Selling of the Iraq War: The First Casualty

The New Republic source is biased.

"Domestically, The New Republic as of 2011, supports a largely modern liberal stance on fiscal and social issues, according to former editor Franklin Foer, who stated that it "invented the modern usage of the term 'liberal', and it's one of our historical legacies and obligations to be involved in the ongoing debate over what exactly liberalism means and stands for."

The magazine's outlook is associated with the Democratic Leadership Council and "New Democrats" such as former US President Bill Clinton and Connecticut Senator Joseph Lieberman, who received the magazine's endorsement in the 2004 Democratic primary; so did Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton in 2008."

 

[TooTall]

How does that compare to the 5000+ dead U.S. military because of Bush's lies?

How many women have lost their lives due to Texas' unconstitutional extreme anti-abortion tactics? Should Texas officials be prosecuted for murder?

Maybe those 5,000 lives lost were about these lies.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

Obviously, the chicken had to lay the egg first, shorty! What was the SOURCE from which Kerry and Clinton got that information, hmmmmm?

"There is already a mountain of evidence that Saddam Hussein is gathering WMDs for the purpose of using them. And adding additional information is like adding a foot to Mount Everest."
--Ari Fleischer, Sept. 6, 2002 ~~http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Condoleezza_Rice_War_+_Peace.htm~~

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
--Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"There's no debate in the world as to whether they have these weapons. We all know that. A trained ape knows that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, Sept. 13, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
--President George W. Bush, Oct 6, 2002 CNN.com - Bush: Don't wait for mushroom cloud - Oct. 6, 2002

Bush, Cheney & Co. were on a very hard push in the early fall of 2002 to falsify a basis for an Iraq invasion to get the desired WPA AUMF out of Congress to do a little Nation building, shorty! That propaganda was fed directly to Senators like Kerry, Clinton, et al. If Congress, both House and Senate, believed the lies from the Bush administration, well that only proves the Bush/Cheney cabal were fucking good liars.

You are totally full of nonsense. Kerry and Clinton got their intel from the CIA, FBI and several other foreign intelligence agencies. The same place that Bush got his intel. I have several dozen more quotes from Democrats that say the same thing.

No, the DIA and CIA passed raw intel from "Curveball" who they never vetted and passed that information directly to senior policymakers in November 1999. That and the administration of George Bush giving any credibility to Ahmed Chalabi were the biggest intelligence mistakes in the run up to war.

Committee Chairman Pat Roberts told NBC's Tim Russert that "Curveball really provided 98 percent of the assessment as to whether or not the Iraqis had a biological weapon."[2] This was in despite the fact that "nobody inside the U.S. government had ever actually spoken to the informant—except [for a single] Pentagon analyst, who concluded the man was an alcoholic and utterly useless as a source."[3]

After learning the intelligence provided by Curveball was going to be used as the "backbone" of the case for war, the Pentagon analyst wrote a letter to the CIA expressing his concerns. The Deputy of the CIA Counter Proliferation Unit quickly responded by saying:

"Let's keep in mind the fact that this war's going to happen regardless of what Curve Ball said or didn't say. The Powers That Be probably aren't terribly interested in whether Curve Ball knows what he's talking about."[4][3]

Senate Report on Pre-war Intelligence on Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They gassed their own people and some dipshits still don't think they had any gas left or didn't make any more.

 

[TooTall]

LOL, if there was any of what you said was true there would have been indictments.

BS, and if you don't know it you should know it.

The only way anyone can be indicted is through the DOJ, OBAMA'S HANND-PICKED CORRUPT DOJ!

As pointed out earlier, this President has violated both Constitution and Laws, has ignored court orders, & been found in Contempt of court. His DOJ has protected AG Eric Holder from proven Perjury, for which he was sanctioned by a bi-partisan Congress. His DOJ is protecting and will continue to do so with Hillary.

This administration has refused to enforce laws and has run the most lawless administration in our nation's history.

The DOJ is independent from the Executive Branch.

Don't you know anything?

Sure it is. LMFAO. Who appoints the Attorney General?

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

How does that compare to the 5000+ dead U.S. military because of Bush's lies?

How many women have lost their lives due to Texas' unconstitutional extreme anti-abortion tactics? Should Texas officials be prosecuted for murder?

Maybe those 5,000 lives lost were about these lies.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 | Source

Obviously, the chicken had to lay the egg first, shorty! What was the SOURCE from which Kerry and Clinton got that information, hmmmmm?

"There is already a mountain of evidence that Saddam Hussein is gathering WMDs for the purpose of using them. And adding additional information is like adding a foot to Mount Everest."
--Ari Fleischer, Sept. 6, 2002 ~~http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Condoleezza_Rice_War_+_Peace.htm~~

"We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
--Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"There's no debate in the world as to whether they have these weapons. We all know that. A trained ape knows that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, Sept. 13, 2002 ~~Ibid~~

"Knowing these realities, America must not ignore the threat gathering against us. Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof -- the smoking gun -- that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud."
--President George W. Bush, Oct 6, 2002 CNN.com - Bush: Don't wait for mushroom cloud - Oct. 6, 2002

Bush, Cheney & Co. were on a very hard push in the early fall of 2002 to falsify a basis for an Iraq invasion to get the desired WPA AUMF out of Congress to do a little Nation building, shorty! That propaganda was fed directly to Senators like Kerry, Clinton, et al. If Congress, both House and Senate, believed the lies from the Bush administration, well that only proves the Bush/Cheney cabal were fucking good liars.

You are totally full of nonsense. Kerry and Clinton got their intel from the CIA, FBI and several other foreign intelligence agencies. The same place that Bush got his intel. I have several dozen more quotes from Democrats that say the same thing.

Your obfuscation doesn't change a damn thing, fool! Everybody got the same intel from the same source which was under the DIRECT AUTHORITY AND CONTROL of the Chief Executive, BUSH. Don't pretend otherwise, shorty!

The Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal dispensed that "intel" from the very same Executive Branch Agencies and Departments which was ALLOWED TO BE RELEASED by the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal. The Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal didn't go begging for it, they ORDERED its "collection, composition and editing" and selected what was to be released to sell the Iraq War to the Electorate! Who was responsible for their intel if not the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal? The secretaries in the reception areas of those Agencies and Departments or did the Buck stop at the desks of the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal who signed off and propagated it through every media outlet as well as every member of Congress?

Certainly, you can't be trying to absolve the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal from culpability for the statements made ONLY by Democrats which were entirely based on the pumped up, overstated and blatantly false characterizations configured by the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal. That dog don't hunt, shorty!

The Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal started pumping out the BS "intel" in late summer through early fall of 2002 to get Congress to provide the Iraq AUMF. That is why I posted those four quotes from the Bush regime to display that nearly EVERYONE in Congress was told the same fucking horseshit and saying the say thing because they were all DECEIVED, but NOT THE ADMINISTRATION FUNCTIONARIES I QUOTED who created the distortions and lies that were repeated by many outside of that neoconservative cabal. It was a very successful propaganda campaign, SHORTY!

Try these on for size, fool. You might note the dates of the statements and I have many more as well.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 | Source

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 | Source

"We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 | Source

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 | Source

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton.
- (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 | Source

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 | Source

This also seems to be germane:

"The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy calling for regime change in Iraq. It was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and states that it is the policy of the United States to support democratic movements within Iraq.. The Act was cited in October 2002 to argue for the authorization of military force against the Iraqi government."


As well as the UN clearly stating that Iraq was in material breach of the UN cease fire. I suppose a dumbass like you thinks Bush did that as well.

Were ANY of those remarks made after 9/11, shorty? Do any of those remarks you quoted say anything about mushroom clouds, or aluminum tubes, or centrifuges, or mobile chemical labs, or Al Qaeda, or Bin Laden, or yellow cake, or a dozen other lies contrived by the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal? The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 was NOT an Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) for regime change, shit for brains. Your attempt to conflate the two are absurd, uninformed and a desperate attempt to separate yourself from your initial stupidity to which I responded regarding the misinformation and propaganda campaign orchestrated by the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal laying the propagandized groundwork leading to the Iraq War.

Are you too much of a cowardly apologist for your corrupt faction to admit there was a deceitful covert propaganda campaign perpetrated by the Bush, Cheney & Co. cabal? Sunlight is sanitizing, shorty! Go to the light and cleanse yourself!