Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another lying website, another conspiracy theory, quackery site:
Daily Sceptic - Bias and Credibility
CONSPIRACY-PSEUDOSCIENCE Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.mediabiasfactcheck.com
Maybe a "bit"...but a "leading climate scientist" he AIN'T
Maybe a "bit"...but a "leading climate scientist" he AIN'T
Kininmonth's article has never been peer reviewed and the GWPF is a AGW denier think tank. Bripat's comment about rats is absolutely laughable.The rats are starting to abandon ship:
CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate ScientistForget ‘settled’ science or ‘consensus’ – that is a political construct designed to quash debate in the interests of promoting a command-and-control Net Zero agenda. One of the great drivers of continual changes in the climate is heat exchange within both the atmosphere and the Earth’s surface. Current understanding of the entire picture is limited, and it seems the opportunity has been taken to fill this gap by blaming carbon dioxide almost entirely for the recent gentle warming. A new paper on the so-called ‘greenhouse’ effect highlights the vital role played by oceans and water vapour flows. CO2 is said to have “minimal effect” on the Earth’s temperature and climate.The paper has been published by the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) and is written by meteorologist William Kininmonth, a former consultant to the World Meteorological Organisation’s Commission for Climatology and former head of the Australian Government’s National Climate Centre. Kininmonth argues that the oceans are the “vital inertial and thermal flywheels” of the climate system. If one wants to control climate, it will be necessary to control the oceans, he argues. “Efforts to decarbonise in the hope of affecting global temperatures will be in vain,” he adds.In Kininmonth’s view, the recent warming is “probably simply the result of fluctuations in the ever-changing ocean circulation”. CO2 “must be recognised” as a very minor contributor to the observed warming, and one that is unlikely to prolong the warming trend beyond the peak generated by the natural oceanic oscillations, he notes. He explains that the main driver of global temperature is the movement of energy in water, both in the oceans and the atmosphere after evaporation.As CO₂ concentration increases from 0 to 600 parts per million (green bars), the total strength of the greenhouse effect, measured as the energy the greenhouse gases radiate to the Earth’s surface, barely changes (orange line). Source: Kininmonth 2022
Or perhaps because he's only got a masters in meteorology and isn't qualified to conduct research and has nothing but a long career as a policy wonk. He has always disputed AGW - he wasn't turned around by evidence as some might suggest.Oh c'mon, Slosh--- --- you know very well that the only reason he isn't a "leading" climate scientist is because he is thinking for himself, instead of going along with the mainstream climate fascists who get to decide who is "leading."
Thinking for oneself is a good thiung.Oh c'mon, Slosh--- --- you know very well that the only reason he isn't a "leading" climate scientist is because he is thinking for himself, instead of going along with the mainstream climate fascists who get to decide who is "leading."
Or perhaps because he's only got a masters in meteorology and isn't qualified to conduct research
Claiming shit without scientific evidence...or expertise. Yea...no
Wow, you are stupid. There is an enormous amount of science behind recommendations to get vaccinated and wear masks and even more supporting the effectiveness of both.Kinda like saying babies and everyone needs a covid shot whether they have immunity or not or else they don't deserve to live.
Much like making people wear masks everywhere and get a vaccine despite there being no proof that either prevents spreading the virus.
He's no Nobel Prize winner Michael Mann, that's for sure.
Just out of curiosity, have you yet learned to count beyond 10?
No there isn't.Wow, you are stupid. There is an enormous amount of science behind recommendations to get vaccinated and wear masks and even more supporting the effectiveness of both.
Of course....Both are greatly exaggerated scams, meant to centralize political power, not science based.So you reject the real science on global warming and COVID-19 and buy into the bullshit. Got it.
Just out of curiosity, do you have a fucking scintilla a curiosity?Just out of curiosity, have you yet learned to count beyond 10?
I have enough to drive me to read extensively. You?Just out of curiosity, do you have a fucking scintilla a curiosity?
Scientists don't start arguments with insults, so we can disqualify you as having any worthwhile opinion on the matter.Wow, you are stupid.
No there isn't. The exact opposite. Any immunologist will tell you the best vaccine is to actually GET the infection, people under 65 were at minimal risk of dying from covid anyway, much less kids, and nearly all masks worn were wholly incapable of stopping something as small as a virus, toots. Even the whole 6 foot thing was completely arbitrary. The one thing certain now is that the covid vaccine as offered was nothing but a huge money-making scam without the research or development to make it safe, and thousands paid the price.There is an enormous amount of science behind recommendations to get vaccinated and wear masks
And the numerous peer reviewed studies on these topics... what of them?No there isn't.
Of course....Both are greatly exaggerated scams, meant to centralize political power, not science based.
I'm not a scientist, asshole (and neither are you). I'm just another fool with a computer. And this isn't the forum for an argument about COVID measures, as much as I'd love to get into it with you.Scientists don't start arguments with insults, so we can disqualify you as having any worthwhile opinion on the matter.
No there isn't. The exact opposite. Any immunologist will tell you the best vaccine is to actually GET the infection, people under 65 were at minimal risk of dying from covid anyway, much less kids, and nearly all masks worn were wholly incapable of stopping something as small as a virus, toots. Even the whole 6 foot thing was completely arbitrary. The one thing certain now is that the covid vaccine as offered was nothing but a huge money=making scam without the research or development to make it safe, and thousands paid the price.
If you did so, you'd certainly know that you've fallen for a fucking pseudo-scientific hoax, whose predictions have never ever been correct.I have enough to drive me to read extensively. You?
That's easily the most truthful thing you've ever posted.I'm just another fool with a computer.
Peer review is a politicized circle jerk, and you know it.And the numerous peer reviewed studies on these topics... what of them?
