Zone1 Coalition of TJ Parents appeals racist admissions policy to Supreme Court

That would defeat the original purpose of the school, which was to provide the brightest kids in all of Fairfax County with the most advanced school.

Going school by school, as you suggest, would of course increase the number of blacks as the middle schools in the poor, black area around Rt 1 would send their top 1%, but it would decrease the better scoring Asians elsewhere in the county. And that of course is what the liberals on the TH Board decided to do.

Their intention was to decrease Asians, and they proudly announced their success. So the question remains: is “diversity” the overriding goal, or is “the best in Fairfax County” the goal?

The SCOTUS will decide.

And then the District can flip a big bird to SCOTUS and eliminate the "elite" school, which frankly, I'd be fine with.

Do you know how to fix Public Education in this country? Get rid of the private schools, the parochial Schools, the charter schools, the Magnet schools and make everyone go to the same schools.

Then people like you will start giving a f**k about the public school with the broken windows and outdated textbooks that are shared two to a student.
 
And then the District can flip a big bird to SCOTUS and eliminate the "elite" school, which frankly, I'd be fine with.

Do you know how to fix Public Education in this country? Get rid of the private schools, the parochial Schools, the charter schools, the Magnet schools and make everyone go to the same schools.

Then people like you will start giving a f**k about the public school with the broken windows and outdated textbooks that are shared two to a student.
Do you know why we have private schools in the first place? Because public education sucks and some parents wanted better for their kids.

Getting rid of private, parochial, charter and magnet schools will not fix the problem of atrocious education in public schools.
 
Don't fuck with Tiger Moms.

That said they all voted for what they got. NOtVA Asians are a solid liberal voting block there.
Typically, the best asian students are more

ambitious snd study harder than native born Americans

Americwn kids have to try harder rather than just discriminate against asians
 
And then the District can flip a big bird to SCOTUS and eliminate the "elite" school, which frankly, I'd be fine with.

Do you know how to fix Public Education in this country? Get rid of the private schools, the parochial Schools, the charter schools, the Magnet schools and make everyone go to the same schools.

Then people like you will start giving a f**k about the public school with the broken windows and outdated textbooks that are shared two to a student.
Stalin and Mao would be pleased

You are telling us its too hard for lazy students to keep up with the go-getters so lets kneecap the best students so they all finish the same
 
And then the District can flip a big bird to SCOTUS and eliminate the "elite" school, which frankly, I'd be fine with.

Do you know how to fix Public Education in this country? Get rid of the private schools, the parochial Schools, the charter schools, the Magnet schools and make everyone go to the same schools.

Then people like you will start giving a f**k about the public school with the broken windows and outdated textbooks that are shared two to a student.
Oh yeah.….”fix” the poor-performing public schools means throw more money at them. It’s been established that money doesn’t improve the outcome. Only the culture can do that.

And of course you would be opposed to superior private schools. That’s because they are better, for the better students, and you libtards want to dumb them down so everyone has the same outcome.
 
Stalin and Mao would be pleased

You are telling us its too hard for lazy students to keep up with the go-getters so lets kneecap the best students so they all finish the same
Yup. That’s what happens when libtards want “equity.” They were so intent to hold back the best students in liberal Fairfax County that they hid from the top achievers that they were named National Merit Scholars.

I’m glad I grew up in the days when the smart kids got to go to advanced classes, re the “tracking” system, and where high achievement was valued - not suppressed.
 
That would defeat the original purpose of the school, which was to provide the brightest kids in all of Fairfax County with the most advanced school.

Depends. Anyone who is accepted has some substantial croteria to meet.


Going school by school, as you suggest, would of course increase the number of blacks as the middle schools in the poor, black area around Rt 1 would send their top 1%, but it would decrease the better scoring Asians elsewhere in the county. And that of course is what the liberals on the TH Board decided to do.

Actually going school by school erases some of the advantages well funded schools have over poor schools and the differences are striking. This selection process is without regard to race. Presumably the hypothetical Asian student could always transfer schools and compete for he limited number of seats available there.

You haven’t shown that it is racist because race isn’t part of the selection process. Because of this, why do you think the SCOTUS would strike it down?



Their intention was to decrease Asians, and they proudly announced their success. So the question remains: is “diversity” the overriding goal, or is “the best in Fairfax County” the goal?

The SCOTUS will decide.
Where is that intention stated?
 
Oh yeah.….”fix” the poor-performing public schools means throw more money at them. It’s been established that money doesn’t improve the outcome. Only the culture can do that.

And of course you would be opposed to superior private schools. That’s because they are better, for the better students, and you libtards want to dumb them down so everyone has the same outcome.

Why would anyone be opposed to superior private schools? They are PRIVATE, and have broad latitude in their selection process.

There a multiple reasons why some schools perform poorly. Culture can be a part of it, but so is a lack of funding.
 
Why would anyone be opposed to superior private schools? They are PRIVATE, and have broad latitude in their selection process.

There a multiple reasons why some schools perform poorly. Culture can be a part of it, but so is a lack of funding.
Poster Joe - a leftist - just said he’d like to get rid of superior public schools. He clearly wants to suppress the brightest students.

Funding is not a part of why some schools perform poorly. The DC public school has TWICE the amount of money per student as nearby suburban schools and the DC schools still perform worse. Money won’t solve their problems.
 
Depends. Anyone who is accepted has some substantial croteria to meet.




Actually going school by school erases some of the advantages well funded schools have over poor schools and the differences are striking. This selection process is without regard to race. Presumably the hypothetical Asian student could always transfer schools and compete for he limited number of seats available there.

You haven’t shown that it is racist because race isn’t part of the selection process. Because of this, why do you think the SCOTUS would strike it down?




Where is that intention stated?
It was stated many times that the school had too many Asians and not enough blacks - and the reason was that most of the kids acing the admissions exam was Asian and very few Black. So in order to reduce the number of Asians and increase the number of blacks, they abolished the exam entirely.

Local news here applauded the success - “celebrating” how they were able to reduce the Asian population and increase the black population by their new admissions policy. It is racist to devise policies with the goal of certain racial outcomes.
 
Do you know why we have private schools in the first place? Because public education sucks and some parents wanted better for their kids.

Getting rid of private, parochial, charter and magnet schools will not fix the problem of atrocious education in public schools.
Sure it would. The minute Richie Rich's parents find out that his school has broken windows and out of date textbooks, you ar damned right are going to fix that if their kid has to go there.

Why do you think white people blew a gasket over busing in the 1970's.
 
Poster Joe - a leftist - just said he’d like to get rid of superior public schools. He clearly wants to suppress the brightest students.

Funding is not a part of why some schools perform poorly. The DC public school has TWICE the amount of money per student as nearby suburban schools and the DC schools still perform worse. Money won’t solve their problems.

Uh, no, they don't. I've already proven that they don't, so I'm not going to rehash that here.


Stalin and Mao would be pleased

You are telling us its too hard for lazy students to keep up with the go-getters so lets kneecap the best students so they all finish the same

If they are smarter, they'll do well no matter where they go.

The foolishness is spending money on "elite" schools while the vast majority of kids aren't having their needs addressed.

It's like preparing filet minot for only 10% while everyone else goes hungry.
 
Poster Joe - a leftist - just said he’d like to get rid of superior public schools. He clearly wants to suppress the brightest students.

I don’t believe that is what was said or implied.


Funding is not a part of why some schools perform poorly. The DC public school has TWICE the amount of money per student as nearby suburban schools and the DC schools still perform worse. Money won’t solve their problems.
Funding is one of multiple factors.

For example, here is an interesting ranking state ratings in education.


…and per pupil spending


While there are two states that are heavily funded and have abysmal rankings, there are many more with poor performance and low funding.

There are many factors.
 
It was stated many times that the school had too many Asians and not enough blacks - and the reason was that most of the kids acing the admissions exam was Asian and very few Black. So in order to reduce the number of Asians and increase the number of blacks, they abolished the exam entirely.

Local news here applauded the success - “celebrating” how they were able to reduce the Asian population and increase the black population by their new admissions policy. It is racist to devise policies with the goal of certain racial outcomes.
Link?
 

The school board's 2020 changes removed standardized testing requirements in applications as well as the requirement to provide two teacher recommendations. Instead, each middle school in the area around Fairfax, Virginia, was allotted an equal number of slots. Candidates from those schools were not considered by race, but the school did grant increased weight to applicants from lower-income families and those who were still learning English.




This seems like a good policy and it is income rather than racial based in weighting, which means the bright new Asian immigrant still learning English would have a chance as would the bright impoverished tenement living Jewish student. There are still very high standards. Win win.
 

The school board's 2020 changes removed standardized testing requirements in applications as well as the requirement to provide two teacher recommendations. Instead, each middle school in the area around Fairfax, Virginia, was allotted an equal number of slots. Candidates from those schools were not considered by race, but the school did grant increased weight to applicants from lower-income families and those who were still learning English.




This seems like a good policy and it is income rather than racial based in weighting, which means the bright new Asian immigrant still learning English would have a chance as would the bright impoverished tenement living Jewish student. There are still very high standards. Win win.
They changed the policy from seeking out the very best, with no other considerations, in order to give more weight to non-English speaking immigrant families and low-income families.

As a result, many of the best and brightest were denied admission they WOULD have gotten under the old policy - Asians in particular. The liberals here celebrated that “we” were able to reduce the number of Asians by more than 40%.

As far as families still learning English or low-income, these kids STILL could have gotten in if they were the best and brightest - with no special handicap. How do you think both my uncle and father (two years apart) got into Brooklyn Tech?
 
They changed the policy from seeking out the very best, with no other considerations, in order to give more weight to non-English speaking immigrant families and low-income families.
Which is not racist and perfectly legal.



As a result, many of the best and brightest were denied admission they WOULD have gotten under the old policy - Asians in particular. The liberals here celebrated that “we” were able to reduce the number of Asians by more than 40%.

TJH’s admission rates are around 20%. That means 80% of the best and brightest don’t get in any given year.

Where is this supposed celebration?


As far as families still learning English or low-income, these kids STILL could have gotten in if they were the best and brightest - with no special handicap. How do you think both my uncle and father (two years apart) got into Brooklyn Tech?
Not necessarily. There is a strong correlation between family income, quality of schools and achievement. Being in the process of learning English is also a handicap.

 
Here in liberal NoVa, the liberal school board of TJ High School (the #1 ranked competitive public high school in America) decided there were too many smart Asians acing the admission exam and not enough blacks. So….in order to reduce the number of Asians and increase the number of blacks, they abolished the exam.

Given the SCOTUS’ ruling in which Harvard was prohibited from using race as a factor in whom to admit or reject, a coalition of parents has appealed Tj’s anti-Asian admissions change to the SCOTUS.

Since TJ set out to deliberately reject smart, accomplished students who are Asian, the number in attendance has dropped by 42%. Liberals consider this a success, but the SCOTUS is likely to rule racial discrimination a violation of the Constitution.

Biden needs to replace Jumanji Jackson on SCOTUS with an Asian
 
Sure it would. The minute Richie Rich's parents find out that his school has broken windows and out of date textbooks, you ar damned right are going to fix that if their kid has to go there.

You think so? Boy are you delusional.
Why do you think white people blew a gasket over busing in the 1970's.

What does this have to do with busing in the 70s?
 

Forum List

Back
Top