Statistikhengst
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #681
The charge isn't that democrats voted for Cochran. It's that democrats who voted in the earlier primary voted for Cochran. They voted twice. The votes of everyone who had voted previously should be disqualified.
Well, sure they should, but for that there are poll workers specifically cased with that kind of work. And those poll workers were, I assume, Republicans, since it was exclusively a Republican runoff election.
seems reasonable
Not only that, but in every state that I know of, poll workers work in teams of two or more, so for this stuff to have happened in any major way would require the knowing collusion of a number of poll workers, which would be a crime for which they can be prosecuted.
Is it possible that a poll worker team screwed up a name or two and let a vote get through that should have been disqualified? Well, sure, that is possible, but highly unlikely that enough of those votes, if any, would change the results of this runoff election.
Not only did Cochran do better in black counties in contrast to the primary in early June, he also did decidedly better in a great number of majority white counties, counties that tend to be 70-30 or 80-20 R-D in presidential elections.
So, it wasn't just black democrats who had not yet voted in a primary who helped Cochran along, he obviously picked up a great number of white, conservative votes as well. Exactly how many and the motivations of each voter, no one will ever know, nor should everyone know. Secret ballot, right of privacy, inalienable rights and all that cool jazz....
Last edited: