Pogo
Diamond Member
- Dec 7, 2012
- 123,708
- 22,748
The reality is that the adulterous affairs of public figures will always be newsworthy. You can cry your little eyes out while you pursue your "agenda" that it should not be. And you can try and make your ad hominem attacks against me and you still won't be changing the reality.
You don't have the foggiest idea what "ad hominem" means, do you?
And no, holding the position that there is no there there is not an "agenda". It's the absence of one.
Actually, I do. And you just made another ad hominem attack, IDIOT.
.... QED ^^
![]()
The irony is that you don't know what an ad hominem attack is while you accuse me of not knowing. You made a personal putdown while not listing your logic. That's the very definition of ad hominem, you fucking moron.
![]()
.... The QED2
There she blows.
![]()
Nothing like an idiot who is fully wrong and still feels the need to mock. But, that's been your theme for virtually all of the thread.
Critical thinking requires something called rigors. When they're not followed, fallacies occur. It's actually a very precise method of communication and frankly morons like yourself would be well advised to not pretend that you are an authority on the matter.
aaaand there it is, three in a row. Let's hear it for my straight man with his amazing display of self oblivion.
Dig deep.
Last edited: