College: Girl who said rape left her "scarred" had sex 10 days later

And the point is?


Don't RW men have mothers, wives, sisters?

Surely the OP can't be saying this woman should not have had sex 10 after being raped?

More rapes not reported than there are untrue reports.

Yale Frat Pledges Chant “No Means Yes, Yes Means Anal”

Note the date of this article and that it was supposedly a "satire". Since when is making fun of rape acceptable?
You didn't mention the claim that she was "scarred". Scarred bitches don't have sex while "scarred". And did you read the part where she claimed to have been in extreme pain for 30 days after the alleged "rape"? Learn how to read and don't be lazy.
 
um, someone who is scarred for life wouldn't have sex 10 days later.
Who told you that? Are you claiming that someone that is raped would never have sex again?

If you look closer, he didn't suggest that.
He suggested he knew that someone that was scarred for life wouldnt have sex 10 days later. How would anyone know that when people have sex a lot because they are emotionally scarred? Can anyone say nympho?

It's different from saying the woman wouldn't have sex ever again.

On the matter of sex, being raped, and being emotionally scarred, is there anything scientific we can use to gain a better understanding?

This topic isn't one I know much about. If a woman was emotionally scarred from a rape she says happened, is it normal for her to then be having sex ten days later? I don't know.
Its a little different. I was being dramatic to make a point. There probably is not anything solid scientifically that can be used. All we can say for sure is that there are women that have been raped and had sex soon after. That doesnt take away from the fact that they were raped or emotionally scarred.
Does that include women who were in extreme for 30 days besides being emotionally scarred?
Another question: Liberal radfems go around complaining about little things that "trigger" rape thoughts. what bigger trigger than a dick in your pussy, when it comes to remind people of rape?
Even naked statues have been deemed "triggers" by liberal radfems. But hey it's fine if you bang her 10 days before being "scarred".
 
Who told you that? Are you claiming that someone that is raped would never have sex again?

If you look closer, he didn't suggest that.
He suggested he knew that someone that was scarred for life wouldnt have sex 10 days later. How would anyone know that when people have sex a lot because they are emotionally scarred? Can anyone say nympho?

It's different from saying the woman wouldn't have sex ever again.

On the matter of sex, being raped, and being emotionally scarred, is there anything scientific we can use to gain a better understanding?

This topic isn't one I know much about. If a woman was emotionally scarred from a rape she says happened, is it normal for her to then be having sex ten days later? I don't know.
Its a little different. I was being dramatic to make a point. There probably is not anything solid scientifically that can be used. All we can say for sure is that there are women that have been raped and had sex soon after. That doesnt take away from the fact that they were raped or emotionally scarred.
Does that include women who were in extreme for 30 days besides being emotionally scarred?
Another question: Liberal radfems go around complaining about little things that "trigger" rape thoughts. what bigger trigger than a dick in your pussy, when it comes to remind people of rape?
Even naked statues have been deemed "triggers" by liberal radfems. But hey it's fine if you bang her 10 days before being "scarred".
Yes it includes those women. Anyone that has a mind can understand different things trigger different thoughts for different people. Even a smell or sound can trigger a thought if its associated with an event. (Think Pavlov here.) The amazing thing is that no one can define for you what is a valid trigger except the person that is experiencing the thought.
 
Well to be fair, if I was raped I think I'd actually probably want to have sex with my husband as soon as safely possible (aka no std's) to feel "safe" in that act again.

Not saying that' what happened here at all, I'm just saying that's kind of what I'm thinking...
 
In a move that's driving liberal radfems nuts, a college is asking a girl who said she was in extreme pain for 30 days after being "raped" by a male student to explain how she had sex 10 days after allegedly losing her virginity and being "scarred". Liberals are flipping out because they argue that if a woman says she is a virgin then she is a virgin, period, and false testimony is not a thing.
See Wesleyan College's request for the girl's sexual history.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...0GbzduDBXijnUPVDQ&sig2=9JZrdkRiLGrMt1GOtxZQNg

Yo, they don`t make "Democrats" like you John Kennedy anymore! You were the last of the Mohicans!!! Now days they Lie, Cheat, Steal, and waste taxpayer money like it grows on trees!!! We no longer have a Democrat Party in America, we now have a Socialist Progressive Democrat Party in America! The sooner the Puppets who vote for them wake up? We will be a Great Country again!!!

"GTP"
democrats-charles-barkley-poor-people-154366367392.jpeg
 
Well to be fair, if I was raped I think I'd actually probably want to have sex with my husband as soon as safely possible (aka no std's) to feel "safe" in that act again.

Not saying that' what happened here at all, I'm just saying that's kind of what I'm thinking...
Something is obviously weird and untrustworthy with you according to the OP.
 
And the point is?


Don't RW men have mothers, wives, sisters?

Surely the OP can't be saying this woman should not have had sex 10 after being raped?

More rapes not reported than there are untrue reports.

Yale Frat Pledges Chant “No Means Yes, Yes Means Anal”

Note the date of this article and that it was supposedly a "satire". Since when is making fun of rape acceptable?
um, someone who is scarred for life wouldn't have sex 10 days later.
Who told you that? Are you claiming that someone that is raped would never have sex again?
My father was a Pedophile, care to ask that question again?


Pedos don't rape children.

One is not related to the other.






Are you really that stupid?
 
Well to be fair, if I was raped I think I'd actually probably want to have sex with my husband as soon as safely possible (aka no std's) to feel "safe" in that act again.

Not saying that' what happened here at all, I'm just saying that's kind of what I'm thinking...
Did she have sex with her husband or just another random fuck?
 
Well to be fair, if I was raped I think I'd actually probably want to have sex with my husband as soon as safely possible (aka no std's) to feel "safe" in that act again.

Not saying that' what happened here at all, I'm just saying that's kind of what I'm thinking...
Did she have sex with her husband or just another random fuck?
What difference does that make or are you another idiot that tries to tell people when they should feel secure and who to feel secure with?
 
After reading the interrogatories, it's clear that this little slut was lying through her teeth. She says she was a virgin prior to this "rape". Yet was unable to have sex after the rape. An attorney should ask her under oath why having sex suddenly became so important?

Her having sex ten days after the alleged rape just destroyed her claim of being a virgin since a medical examination would not be able to determine which experience ruptured her hymen.

She's another rape liar and should have her little ass raped repeatedly on the stand and under oath.
 
Well to be fair, if I was raped I think I'd actually probably want to have sex with my husband as soon as safely possible (aka no std's) to feel "safe" in that act again.

Not saying that' what happened here at all, I'm just saying that's kind of what I'm thinking...
Did she have sex with her husband or just another random fuck?
What difference does that make or are you another idiot that tries to tell people when they should feel secure and who to feel secure with?
Any woman can feel secure with a random fuck. Look at how many women still think the guy is going to call them.
 
Well to be fair, if I was raped I think I'd actually probably want to have sex with my husband as soon as safely possible (aka no std's) to feel "safe" in that act again.

Not saying that' what happened here at all, I'm just saying that's kind of what I'm thinking...
Did she have sex with her husband or just another random fuck?
What difference does that make or are you another idiot that tries to tell people when they should feel secure and who to feel secure with?
Any woman can feel secure with a random fuck. Look at how many women still think the guy is going to call them.
Thanks for making my point.
 
hmmm no intimacy wouldn't be the goal of it, it'd be about the act of sex itself rather than the specific partner... So I guess I'm saying that anyone I could trust would work, which could indeed have been, at least when I was younger, a purely sexual friend, rather than having to be a boyfriend or anything like that. Hell, it could probably even be just a friend I trusted but wasn't attracted to that way... It's not about the relationship, or the intimacy of said relationship, so much as sex feeling "good and safe" rather than "bad and dangerous."

Now in this case, I mean she's saying she was a virgin and from a psychological view point, I /can/ see her wanting to "give" it to someone rather than having it "taken," even if it is merely symbolic act after the fact...
 
In a move that's driving liberal radfems nuts, a college is asking a girl who said she was in extreme pain for 30 days after being "raped" by a male student to explain how she had sex 10 days after allegedly losing her virginity and being "scarred". Liberals are flipping out because they argue that if a woman says she is a virgin then she is a virgin, period, and false testimony is not a thing.
See Wesleyan College's request for the girl's sexual history.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...0GbzduDBXijnUPVDQ&sig2=9JZrdkRiLGrMt1GOtxZQNg

People lie. This isn't something new. Are you going to say all rapes are false because of one liar?
 
In a move that's driving liberal radfems nuts, a college is asking a girl who said she was in extreme pain for 30 days after being "raped" by a male student to explain how she had sex 10 days after allegedly losing her virginity and being "scarred". Liberals are flipping out because they argue that if a woman says she is a virgin then she is a virgin, period, and false testimony is not a thing.
See Wesleyan College's request for the girl's sexual history.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...0GbzduDBXijnUPVDQ&sig2=9JZrdkRiLGrMt1GOtxZQNg
Massive hasty generalization fallacy – idiotic inferences devoid of evidence or merit.
 
And the point is?


Don't RW men have mothers, wives, sisters?

Surely the OP can't be saying this woman should not have had sex 10 after being raped?

More rapes not reported than there are untrue reports.

Yale Frat Pledges Chant “No Means Yes, Yes Means Anal”

Note the date of this article and that it was supposedly a "satire". Since when is making fun of rape acceptable?
um, someone who is scarred for life wouldn't have sex 10 days later.
Who told you that? Are you claiming that someone that is raped would never have sex again?
My father was a Pedophile, care to ask that question again?


Pedos don't rape children.

One is not related to the other.
True-story-of-killings-written-by-detective-2.jpg
 
In a move that's driving liberal radfems nuts, a college is asking a girl who said she was in extreme pain for 30 days after being "raped" by a male student to explain how she had sex 10 days after allegedly losing her virginity and being "scarred". Liberals are flipping out because they argue that if a woman says she is a virgin then she is a virgin, period, and false testimony is not a thing.
See Wesleyan College's request for the girl's sexual history.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...0GbzduDBXijnUPVDQ&sig2=9JZrdkRiLGrMt1GOtxZQNg

People lie. This isn't something new. Are you going to say all rapes are false because of one liar?
The question is : did I ever say that?
 
In a move that's driving liberal radfems nuts, a college is asking a girl who said she was in extreme pain for 30 days after being "raped" by a male student to explain how she had sex 10 days after allegedly losing her virginity and being "scarred". Liberals are flipping out because they argue that if a woman says she is a virgin then she is a virgin, period, and false testimony is not a thing.
See Wesleyan College's request for the girl's sexual history.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...0GbzduDBXijnUPVDQ&sig2=9JZrdkRiLGrMt1GOtxZQNg
Wtf does her sexual activity have to do with her being raped?
 
And the point is?


Don't RW men have mothers, wives, sisters?

Surely the OP can't be saying this woman should not have had sex 10 after being raped?

More rapes not reported than there are untrue reports.

Yale Frat Pledges Chant “No Means Yes, Yes Means Anal”

Note the date of this article and that it was supposedly a "satire". Since when is making fun of rape acceptable?
um, someone who is scarred for life wouldn't have sex 10 days later.
Pretty sick that you do not understand the difference between sex and the violent crime of rape. Is she supposed to hide out in shame for being the victim of a violent crime? For how long?
 

Forum List

Back
Top