Common Sense & Mass Murder

For the slow:
Guns per capita:
US:120.5
Japan: .3

Incarceration rate:
US:655
Japan: 41

It's clear what the issue is.


For the moron like you...

http://www.atimes.com/article/japans-gun-control-laws-strict-yakuza-turn-toy-pistols/



Ryo Fujiwara, long-time writer on yakuza affairs and author of the book, The Three Yamaguchi-Gumi, says that the punishment for using a gun in a gang war or in a crime is now so heavy that most yakuza avoid their use at all – unless it is for an assassination.

“In a hit, whoever fires the gun, or is made to take responsibility for firing the gun, has to pretty much be willing to go to jail for the rest of their life. That’s a big decision. The repercussions are big, too. No one wants to claim responsibility for such acts – the gang office might actually get shut-down.”

The gang typically also has to support the family of the hit-man while he is in prison, which is also a financial burden for the organization.

Japan’s Firearms and Swords Control Laws make it a crime to illegally possess a gun, with a punishment of jail time of up to 10 years.

Illegal possession more than one gun, the penalty goes up to 15 years in prison. If you own a gun and matching ammunition, that’s another charge and a heavier penalty. The most severe penalty is for the act of discharging a gun in a train, on a bus, or most public spaces, which can result in a life sentence.

---

A low-ranking member of the Kobe-Yamaguchi-gumi put it this way: “All of the smart guys got rid of their guns a long-time ago. The penalties are way too high. You get life in prison if you just fire a gun. That’s not fun.”

Japan: Gun Control and People Control

Japan's low crime rate has almost nothing to do with gun control, and everything to do with people control. Americans, used to their own traditions of freedom, would not accept Japan's system of people controls and gun controls.



Robbery in Japan is about as rare as murder. Japan's annual robbery rate is 1.8 per 100,000 inhabitants; America's is 205.4. Do the gun banners have the argument won when they point to these statistics? No, they don't. A realistic examination of Japanese culture leads to the conclusion that gun control has little, if anything, to do with Japan's low crime rates. Japan's lack of crime is more the result of the very extensive powers of the Japanese police, and the distinctive relation of the Japanese citizenry to authority. Further, none of the reasons which have made gun control succeed in Japan (in terms of disarming citizens) exist in the U.S.

The Japanese criminal justice system bears more heavily on a suspect than any other system in an industrial democratic nation. One American found this out when he was arrested in Okinawa for possessing marijuana: he was interrogated for days without an attorney, and signed a confession written in Japanese that he could not read. He met his lawyer for the first time at his trial, which took 30 minutes.

Unlike in the United States, where the Miranda rule limits coercive police interrogation techniques, Japanese police and prosecutors may detain a suspect indefinitely until he confesses. (Technically, detentions are only allowed for three days, followed by ten day extensions approved by a judge, but defense attorneys rarely oppose the extension request, for fear of offending the prosecutor.) Bail is denied if it would interfere with interrogation.

Even after interrogation is completed, pretrial detention may continue on a variety of pretexts, such as preventing the defendant from destroying evidence. Criminal defense lawyers are the only people allowed to visit a detained suspect, and those meetings are strictly limited.

Partly as a result of these coercive practices, and partly as a result of the Japanese sense of shame, the confession rate is 95%.

For those few defendants who dare to go to trial, there is no jury. Since judges almost always defer to the prosecutors' judgment, the trial conviction rate for violent crime is 99.5%.
Of those convicted, 98% receive jail time.

In short, once a Japanese suspect is apprehended, the power of the prosecutor makes it very likely the suspect will go to jail. And the power of the policeman makes it quite likely that a criminal will be apprehended.

The police routinely ask "suspicious" characters to show what is in their purse or sack. In effect, the police can search almost anyone, almost anytime, because courts only rarely exclude evidence seized by the police -- even if the police acted illegally.

The most important element of police power, though, is not authority to search, but authority in the community. Like school teachers, Japanese policemen rate high in public esteem, especially in the countryside. Community leaders and role models, the police are trained in calligraphy and Haiku composition. In police per capita, Japan far outranks all other major democracies.

15,000 koban "police boxes" are located throughout the cities. Citizens go to the 24-hour-a-day boxes not only for street directions, but to complain about day-to-day problems, such as noisy neighbors, or to ask advice on how to raise children. Some of the policemen and their families live in the boxes. Police box officers clear 74.6% of all criminal cases cleared. Police box officers also spend time teaching neighborhood youth judo or calligraphy. The officers even hand- write their own newspapers, with information about crime and accidents, "stories about good deeds by children, and opinions of
residents."

The police box system contrasts sharply with the practice in America. Here, most departments adopt a policy of "stranger policing." To prevent corruption, police are frequently rotated from one neighborhood to another. But as federal judge Charles Silberman writes, "the cure is worse than the disease, for officers develop no sense of identification with their beats, hence no emotional stake in improving the quality of life there."

Thus, the U.S. citizenry does not develop a supportive relationship with the police. One poll showed that 60% of police officers believe "it is difficult to persuade people to give patrolmen the information they need."

The Japanese police do not spend all their time in the koban boxes. As the Japanese government puts it: "Home visit is one of the most important duties of officers assigned to police boxes." Making annual visits to each home in their beat, officers keep track of who lives where, and which family member to contact in case of emergency. The police also check on all gun licensees, to make sure no gun has been stolen or misused, that the gun is securely stored, and that the licensees are emotionally stable.

Gun banners might rejoice at a society where the police keep such a sharp eye on citizens' guns. But the price is that the police keep an eye on everything.

Policemen are apt to tell people reading sexually-oriented magazines to read something more worthwhile. Japan's major official year-end police report includes statistics like "Background and Motives for Girls' Sexual Misconduct." In 1985, the police determined that 37.4% of the girls had been seduced, and the rest had had sex "voluntarily." For the volunteers, 19.6% acted "out of curiosity", while for 18.1%, the motive was "liked particular boy." The year-end police report also includes sections on labor demands, and on anti-nuclear or anti-military demonstrations.
For the slow:
Guns per capita:
US:120.5
Japan: .3

Incarceration rate:
US:655
Japan: 41

It's clear what the issue is.

Only to a simpleton like you who thinks guns make people commit crime
It empowers criminals just like it gives 2aguy courage.

And only idiots think they won't use another weapon to commit a crime
Well countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a small fraction of ours. Seems clear.
 
pie2019_jail_detail.png
You are showing how we have many, many people in jails?

76% are not convicted of any crime you fucking idiot

Fix the problem there and the number of people in jail drops
They are in jail you idiot. Are they committing crimes from jail?
 
For the moron like you...

http://www.atimes.com/article/japans-gun-control-laws-strict-yakuza-turn-toy-pistols/



Ryo Fujiwara, long-time writer on yakuza affairs and author of the book, The Three Yamaguchi-Gumi, says that the punishment for using a gun in a gang war or in a crime is now so heavy that most yakuza avoid their use at all – unless it is for an assassination.

“In a hit, whoever fires the gun, or is made to take responsibility for firing the gun, has to pretty much be willing to go to jail for the rest of their life. That’s a big decision. The repercussions are big, too. No one wants to claim responsibility for such acts – the gang office might actually get shut-down.”

The gang typically also has to support the family of the hit-man while he is in prison, which is also a financial burden for the organization.

Japan’s Firearms and Swords Control Laws make it a crime to illegally possess a gun, with a punishment of jail time of up to 10 years.

Illegal possession more than one gun, the penalty goes up to 15 years in prison. If you own a gun and matching ammunition, that’s another charge and a heavier penalty. The most severe penalty is for the act of discharging a gun in a train, on a bus, or most public spaces, which can result in a life sentence.

---

A low-ranking member of the Kobe-Yamaguchi-gumi put it this way: “All of the smart guys got rid of their guns a long-time ago. The penalties are way too high. You get life in prison if you just fire a gun. That’s not fun.”

Japan: Gun Control and People Control

Japan's low crime rate has almost nothing to do with gun control, and everything to do with people control. Americans, used to their own traditions of freedom, would not accept Japan's system of people controls and gun controls.



Robbery in Japan is about as rare as murder. Japan's annual robbery rate is 1.8 per 100,000 inhabitants; America's is 205.4. Do the gun banners have the argument won when they point to these statistics? No, they don't. A realistic examination of Japanese culture leads to the conclusion that gun control has little, if anything, to do with Japan's low crime rates. Japan's lack of crime is more the result of the very extensive powers of the Japanese police, and the distinctive relation of the Japanese citizenry to authority. Further, none of the reasons which have made gun control succeed in Japan (in terms of disarming citizens) exist in the U.S.

The Japanese criminal justice system bears more heavily on a suspect than any other system in an industrial democratic nation. One American found this out when he was arrested in Okinawa for possessing marijuana: he was interrogated for days without an attorney, and signed a confession written in Japanese that he could not read. He met his lawyer for the first time at his trial, which took 30 minutes.

Unlike in the United States, where the Miranda rule limits coercive police interrogation techniques, Japanese police and prosecutors may detain a suspect indefinitely until he confesses. (Technically, detentions are only allowed for three days, followed by ten day extensions approved by a judge, but defense attorneys rarely oppose the extension request, for fear of offending the prosecutor.) Bail is denied if it would interfere with interrogation.

Even after interrogation is completed, pretrial detention may continue on a variety of pretexts, such as preventing the defendant from destroying evidence. Criminal defense lawyers are the only people allowed to visit a detained suspect, and those meetings are strictly limited.

Partly as a result of these coercive practices, and partly as a result of the Japanese sense of shame, the confession rate is 95%.

For those few defendants who dare to go to trial, there is no jury. Since judges almost always defer to the prosecutors' judgment, the trial conviction rate for violent crime is 99.5%.
Of those convicted, 98% receive jail time.

In short, once a Japanese suspect is apprehended, the power of the prosecutor makes it very likely the suspect will go to jail. And the power of the policeman makes it quite likely that a criminal will be apprehended.

The police routinely ask "suspicious" characters to show what is in their purse or sack. In effect, the police can search almost anyone, almost anytime, because courts only rarely exclude evidence seized by the police -- even if the police acted illegally.

The most important element of police power, though, is not authority to search, but authority in the community. Like school teachers, Japanese policemen rate high in public esteem, especially in the countryside. Community leaders and role models, the police are trained in calligraphy and Haiku composition. In police per capita, Japan far outranks all other major democracies.

15,000 koban "police boxes" are located throughout the cities. Citizens go to the 24-hour-a-day boxes not only for street directions, but to complain about day-to-day problems, such as noisy neighbors, or to ask advice on how to raise children. Some of the policemen and their families live in the boxes. Police box officers clear 74.6% of all criminal cases cleared. Police box officers also spend time teaching neighborhood youth judo or calligraphy. The officers even hand- write their own newspapers, with information about crime and accidents, "stories about good deeds by children, and opinions of
residents."

The police box system contrasts sharply with the practice in America. Here, most departments adopt a policy of "stranger policing." To prevent corruption, police are frequently rotated from one neighborhood to another. But as federal judge Charles Silberman writes, "the cure is worse than the disease, for officers develop no sense of identification with their beats, hence no emotional stake in improving the quality of life there."

Thus, the U.S. citizenry does not develop a supportive relationship with the police. One poll showed that 60% of police officers believe "it is difficult to persuade people to give patrolmen the information they need."

The Japanese police do not spend all their time in the koban boxes. As the Japanese government puts it: "Home visit is one of the most important duties of officers assigned to police boxes." Making annual visits to each home in their beat, officers keep track of who lives where, and which family member to contact in case of emergency. The police also check on all gun licensees, to make sure no gun has been stolen or misused, that the gun is securely stored, and that the licensees are emotionally stable.

Gun banners might rejoice at a society where the police keep such a sharp eye on citizens' guns. But the price is that the police keep an eye on everything.

Policemen are apt to tell people reading sexually-oriented magazines to read something more worthwhile. Japan's major official year-end police report includes statistics like "Background and Motives for Girls' Sexual Misconduct." In 1985, the police determined that 37.4% of the girls had been seduced, and the rest had had sex "voluntarily." For the volunteers, 19.6% acted "out of curiosity", while for 18.1%, the motive was "liked particular boy." The year-end police report also includes sections on labor demands, and on anti-nuclear or anti-military demonstrations.
For the slow:
Guns per capita:
US:120.5
Japan: .3

Incarceration rate:
US:655
Japan: 41

It's clear what the issue is.


Yes...
1) Japan is a police state
2) their culture does not reward crime
3) they have a 95% conviction rate, we have about a 30% or less conviction rate
4) They don't let repeat gun offenders out of prison the way our democrats do....use a gun for a crime you get life in prison.
Their incarceration rate is a tiny fraction of ours. Looks like we are the police state.
In other words, they like you refuse to punish crime.
We have the fullest jails in he world. How much more punishing can we do?


Letting gun criminals off with plea bargains that remove the gun portion of their sentence, then letting them out in less than 3 years...that isn't imprisoning anyone....you doofus.
 
For the slow:
Guns per capita:
US:120.5
Japan: .3

Incarceration rate:
US:655
Japan: 41

It's clear what the issue is.


Yes...
1) Japan is a police state
2) their culture does not reward crime
3) they have a 95% conviction rate, we have about a 30% or less conviction rate
4) They don't let repeat gun offenders out of prison the way our democrats do....use a gun for a crime you get life in prison.
Their incarceration rate is a tiny fraction of ours. Looks like we are the police state.
In other words, they like you refuse to punish crime.
We have the fullest jails in he world. How much more punishing can we do?


Letting gun criminals off with plea bargains that remove the gun portion of their sentence, then letting them out in less than 3 years...that isn't imprisoning anyone....you doofus.
And yet we have the highest incarceration rate in the world! The rest of the world must be MUCH easier on crime than us.
 
For the slow:
Guns per capita:
US:120.5
Japan: .3

Incarceration rate:
US:655
Japan: 41

It's clear what the issue is.
 
For the moron like you...

http://www.atimes.com/article/japans-gun-control-laws-strict-yakuza-turn-toy-pistols/



Ryo Fujiwara, long-time writer on yakuza affairs and author of the book, The Three Yamaguchi-Gumi, says that the punishment for using a gun in a gang war or in a crime is now so heavy that most yakuza avoid their use at all – unless it is for an assassination.

“In a hit, whoever fires the gun, or is made to take responsibility for firing the gun, has to pretty much be willing to go to jail for the rest of their life. That’s a big decision. The repercussions are big, too. No one wants to claim responsibility for such acts – the gang office might actually get shut-down.”

The gang typically also has to support the family of the hit-man while he is in prison, which is also a financial burden for the organization.

Japan’s Firearms and Swords Control Laws make it a crime to illegally possess a gun, with a punishment of jail time of up to 10 years.

Illegal possession more than one gun, the penalty goes up to 15 years in prison. If you own a gun and matching ammunition, that’s another charge and a heavier penalty. The most severe penalty is for the act of discharging a gun in a train, on a bus, or most public spaces, which can result in a life sentence.

---

A low-ranking member of the Kobe-Yamaguchi-gumi put it this way: “All of the smart guys got rid of their guns a long-time ago. The penalties are way too high. You get life in prison if you just fire a gun. That’s not fun.”

Japan: Gun Control and People Control

Japan's low crime rate has almost nothing to do with gun control, and everything to do with people control. Americans, used to their own traditions of freedom, would not accept Japan's system of people controls and gun controls.



Robbery in Japan is about as rare as murder. Japan's annual robbery rate is 1.8 per 100,000 inhabitants; America's is 205.4. Do the gun banners have the argument won when they point to these statistics? No, they don't. A realistic examination of Japanese culture leads to the conclusion that gun control has little, if anything, to do with Japan's low crime rates. Japan's lack of crime is more the result of the very extensive powers of the Japanese police, and the distinctive relation of the Japanese citizenry to authority. Further, none of the reasons which have made gun control succeed in Japan (in terms of disarming citizens) exist in the U.S.

The Japanese criminal justice system bears more heavily on a suspect than any other system in an industrial democratic nation. One American found this out when he was arrested in Okinawa for possessing marijuana: he was interrogated for days without an attorney, and signed a confession written in Japanese that he could not read. He met his lawyer for the first time at his trial, which took 30 minutes.

Unlike in the United States, where the Miranda rule limits coercive police interrogation techniques, Japanese police and prosecutors may detain a suspect indefinitely until he confesses. (Technically, detentions are only allowed for three days, followed by ten day extensions approved by a judge, but defense attorneys rarely oppose the extension request, for fear of offending the prosecutor.) Bail is denied if it would interfere with interrogation.

Even after interrogation is completed, pretrial detention may continue on a variety of pretexts, such as preventing the defendant from destroying evidence. Criminal defense lawyers are the only people allowed to visit a detained suspect, and those meetings are strictly limited.

Partly as a result of these coercive practices, and partly as a result of the Japanese sense of shame, the confession rate is 95%.

For those few defendants who dare to go to trial, there is no jury. Since judges almost always defer to the prosecutors' judgment, the trial conviction rate for violent crime is 99.5%.
Of those convicted, 98% receive jail time.

In short, once a Japanese suspect is apprehended, the power of the prosecutor makes it very likely the suspect will go to jail. And the power of the policeman makes it quite likely that a criminal will be apprehended.

The police routinely ask "suspicious" characters to show what is in their purse or sack. In effect, the police can search almost anyone, almost anytime, because courts only rarely exclude evidence seized by the police -- even if the police acted illegally.

The most important element of police power, though, is not authority to search, but authority in the community. Like school teachers, Japanese policemen rate high in public esteem, especially in the countryside. Community leaders and role models, the police are trained in calligraphy and Haiku composition. In police per capita, Japan far outranks all other major democracies.

15,000 koban "police boxes" are located throughout the cities. Citizens go to the 24-hour-a-day boxes not only for street directions, but to complain about day-to-day problems, such as noisy neighbors, or to ask advice on how to raise children. Some of the policemen and their families live in the boxes. Police box officers clear 74.6% of all criminal cases cleared. Police box officers also spend time teaching neighborhood youth judo or calligraphy. The officers even hand- write their own newspapers, with information about crime and accidents, "stories about good deeds by children, and opinions of
residents."

The police box system contrasts sharply with the practice in America. Here, most departments adopt a policy of "stranger policing." To prevent corruption, police are frequently rotated from one neighborhood to another. But as federal judge Charles Silberman writes, "the cure is worse than the disease, for officers develop no sense of identification with their beats, hence no emotional stake in improving the quality of life there."

Thus, the U.S. citizenry does not develop a supportive relationship with the police. One poll showed that 60% of police officers believe "it is difficult to persuade people to give patrolmen the information they need."

The Japanese police do not spend all their time in the koban boxes. As the Japanese government puts it: "Home visit is one of the most important duties of officers assigned to police boxes." Making annual visits to each home in their beat, officers keep track of who lives where, and which family member to contact in case of emergency. The police also check on all gun licensees, to make sure no gun has been stolen or misused, that the gun is securely stored, and that the licensees are emotionally stable.

Gun banners might rejoice at a society where the police keep such a sharp eye on citizens' guns. But the price is that the police keep an eye on everything.

Policemen are apt to tell people reading sexually-oriented magazines to read something more worthwhile. Japan's major official year-end police report includes statistics like "Background and Motives for Girls' Sexual Misconduct." In 1985, the police determined that 37.4% of the girls had been seduced, and the rest had had sex "voluntarily." For the volunteers, 19.6% acted "out of curiosity", while for 18.1%, the motive was "liked particular boy." The year-end police report also includes sections on labor demands, and on anti-nuclear or anti-military demonstrations.
For the slow:
Guns per capita:
US:120.5
Japan: .3

Incarceration rate:
US:655
Japan: 41

It's clear what the issue is.

Only to a simpleton like you who thinks guns make people commit crime
It empowers criminals just like it gives 2aguy courage.

And only idiots think they won't use another weapon to commit a crime
Well countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a small fraction of ours. Seems clear.


Only if you are an idiot.....

Those countries had low gun crime and murder rates before they banned guns...and that didn't change after they banned and confiscated guns....

That means banning guns had no effect on crimes that were rare in the first place, you asshat.
 
You are showing how we have many, many people in jails?

76% are not convicted of any crime you fucking idiot

Fix the problem there and the number of people in jail drops
They are in jail you idiot. Are they committing crimes from jail?

How fucking obtuse are you?

REally let me know so I can dumb it down for you.

Our prison population is high mostly because of procedural and policy reason not because our crime rates are increasing

Fix the policy and procedure failings and the prison population will decrease significantly

Use alternative sentencing for low level and nonviolent crimes and and see the prison population drop yet again

I know it's lot to understand for a person that think only a single variable causes all the ills of the world
 
For the moron like you...

http://www.atimes.com/article/japans-gun-control-laws-strict-yakuza-turn-toy-pistols/



Ryo Fujiwara, long-time writer on yakuza affairs and author of the book, The Three Yamaguchi-Gumi, says that the punishment for using a gun in a gang war or in a crime is now so heavy that most yakuza avoid their use at all – unless it is for an assassination.

“In a hit, whoever fires the gun, or is made to take responsibility for firing the gun, has to pretty much be willing to go to jail for the rest of their life. That’s a big decision. The repercussions are big, too. No one wants to claim responsibility for such acts – the gang office might actually get shut-down.”

The gang typically also has to support the family of the hit-man while he is in prison, which is also a financial burden for the organization.

Japan’s Firearms and Swords Control Laws make it a crime to illegally possess a gun, with a punishment of jail time of up to 10 years.

Illegal possession more than one gun, the penalty goes up to 15 years in prison. If you own a gun and matching ammunition, that’s another charge and a heavier penalty. The most severe penalty is for the act of discharging a gun in a train, on a bus, or most public spaces, which can result in a life sentence.

---

A low-ranking member of the Kobe-Yamaguchi-gumi put it this way: “All of the smart guys got rid of their guns a long-time ago. The penalties are way too high. You get life in prison if you just fire a gun. That’s not fun.”

Japan: Gun Control and People Control

Japan's low crime rate has almost nothing to do with gun control, and everything to do with people control. Americans, used to their own traditions of freedom, would not accept Japan's system of people controls and gun controls.



Robbery in Japan is about as rare as murder. Japan's annual robbery rate is 1.8 per 100,000 inhabitants; America's is 205.4. Do the gun banners have the argument won when they point to these statistics? No, they don't. A realistic examination of Japanese culture leads to the conclusion that gun control has little, if anything, to do with Japan's low crime rates. Japan's lack of crime is more the result of the very extensive powers of the Japanese police, and the distinctive relation of the Japanese citizenry to authority. Further, none of the reasons which have made gun control succeed in Japan (in terms of disarming citizens) exist in the U.S.

The Japanese criminal justice system bears more heavily on a suspect than any other system in an industrial democratic nation. One American found this out when he was arrested in Okinawa for possessing marijuana: he was interrogated for days without an attorney, and signed a confession written in Japanese that he could not read. He met his lawyer for the first time at his trial, which took 30 minutes.

Unlike in the United States, where the Miranda rule limits coercive police interrogation techniques, Japanese police and prosecutors may detain a suspect indefinitely until he confesses. (Technically, detentions are only allowed for three days, followed by ten day extensions approved by a judge, but defense attorneys rarely oppose the extension request, for fear of offending the prosecutor.) Bail is denied if it would interfere with interrogation.

Even after interrogation is completed, pretrial detention may continue on a variety of pretexts, such as preventing the defendant from destroying evidence. Criminal defense lawyers are the only people allowed to visit a detained suspect, and those meetings are strictly limited.

Partly as a result of these coercive practices, and partly as a result of the Japanese sense of shame, the confession rate is 95%.

For those few defendants who dare to go to trial, there is no jury. Since judges almost always defer to the prosecutors' judgment, the trial conviction rate for violent crime is 99.5%.
Of those convicted, 98% receive jail time.

In short, once a Japanese suspect is apprehended, the power of the prosecutor makes it very likely the suspect will go to jail. And the power of the policeman makes it quite likely that a criminal will be apprehended.

The police routinely ask "suspicious" characters to show what is in their purse or sack. In effect, the police can search almost anyone, almost anytime, because courts only rarely exclude evidence seized by the police -- even if the police acted illegally.

The most important element of police power, though, is not authority to search, but authority in the community. Like school teachers, Japanese policemen rate high in public esteem, especially in the countryside. Community leaders and role models, the police are trained in calligraphy and Haiku composition. In police per capita, Japan far outranks all other major democracies.

15,000 koban "police boxes" are located throughout the cities. Citizens go to the 24-hour-a-day boxes not only for street directions, but to complain about day-to-day problems, such as noisy neighbors, or to ask advice on how to raise children. Some of the policemen and their families live in the boxes. Police box officers clear 74.6% of all criminal cases cleared. Police box officers also spend time teaching neighborhood youth judo or calligraphy. The officers even hand- write their own newspapers, with information about crime and accidents, "stories about good deeds by children, and opinions of
residents."

The police box system contrasts sharply with the practice in America. Here, most departments adopt a policy of "stranger policing." To prevent corruption, police are frequently rotated from one neighborhood to another. But as federal judge Charles Silberman writes, "the cure is worse than the disease, for officers develop no sense of identification with their beats, hence no emotional stake in improving the quality of life there."

Thus, the U.S. citizenry does not develop a supportive relationship with the police. One poll showed that 60% of police officers believe "it is difficult to persuade people to give patrolmen the information they need."

The Japanese police do not spend all their time in the koban boxes. As the Japanese government puts it: "Home visit is one of the most important duties of officers assigned to police boxes." Making annual visits to each home in their beat, officers keep track of who lives where, and which family member to contact in case of emergency. The police also check on all gun licensees, to make sure no gun has been stolen or misused, that the gun is securely stored, and that the licensees are emotionally stable.

Gun banners might rejoice at a society where the police keep such a sharp eye on citizens' guns. But the price is that the police keep an eye on everything.

Policemen are apt to tell people reading sexually-oriented magazines to read something more worthwhile. Japan's major official year-end police report includes statistics like "Background and Motives for Girls' Sexual Misconduct." In 1985, the police determined that 37.4% of the girls had been seduced, and the rest had had sex "voluntarily." For the volunteers, 19.6% acted "out of curiosity", while for 18.1%, the motive was "liked particular boy." The year-end police report also includes sections on labor demands, and on anti-nuclear or anti-military demonstrations.
For the slow:
Guns per capita:
US:120.5
Japan: .3

Incarceration rate:
US:655
Japan: 41

It's clear what the issue is.

Only to a simpleton like you who thinks guns make people commit crime
It empowers criminals just like it gives 2aguy courage.

And only idiots think they won't use another weapon to commit a crime
Well countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a small fraction of ours. Seems clear.

Only to the blind

you really think that just one thing is responsible for crime and murder?
 
For the slow:
Guns per capita:
US:120.5
Japan: .3

Incarceration rate:
US:655
Japan: 41

It's clear what the issue is.

Only to a simpleton like you who thinks guns make people commit crime
It empowers criminals just like it gives 2aguy courage.

And only idiots think they won't use another weapon to commit a crime
Well countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a small fraction of ours. Seems clear.


Only if you are an idiot.....

Those countries had low gun crime and murder rates before they banned guns...and that didn't change after they banned and confiscated guns....

That means banning guns had no effect on crimes that were rare in the first place, you asshat.
Yes they had a low number of guns per capita always. When they started heaving problems they made sure it stayed that way. And now they have much lower homicide rates than us.
 
Only to a simpleton like you who thinks guns make people commit crime
It empowers criminals just like it gives 2aguy courage.

And only idiots think they won't use another weapon to commit a crime
Well countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a small fraction of ours. Seems clear.


Only if you are an idiot.....

Those countries had low gun crime and murder rates before they banned guns...and that didn't change after they banned and confiscated guns....

That means banning guns had no effect on crimes that were rare in the first place, you asshat.
Yes they had a low number of guns per capita always. When they started heaving problems they made sure it stayed that way. And now they have much lower homicide rates than us.

guns do not cause murder
 
Only to a simpleton like you who thinks guns make people commit crime
It empowers criminals just like it gives 2aguy courage.

And only idiots think they won't use another weapon to commit a crime
Well countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a small fraction of ours. Seems clear.


Only if you are an idiot.....

Those countries had low gun crime and murder rates before they banned guns...and that didn't change after they banned and confiscated guns....

That means banning guns had no effect on crimes that were rare in the first place, you asshat.
Yes they had a low number of guns per capita always. When they started heaving problems they made sure it stayed that way. And now they have much lower homicide rates than us.


They didn't have a problem......they had easy access to guns and their criminals did not use them to murder people.....

The banned guns, and they still have low gun murder...nothing changed.....it isn't guns you dipstick...it is culture....and their culture is changing.
 
It empowers criminals just like it gives 2aguy courage.

And only idiots think they won't use another weapon to commit a crime
Well countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a small fraction of ours. Seems clear.


Only if you are an idiot.....

Those countries had low gun crime and murder rates before they banned guns...and that didn't change after they banned and confiscated guns....

That means banning guns had no effect on crimes that were rare in the first place, you asshat.
Yes they had a low number of guns per capita always. When they started heaving problems they made sure it stayed that way. And now they have much lower homicide rates than us.


They didn't have a problem......they had easy access to guns and their criminals did not use them to murder people.....

The banned guns, and they still have low gun murder...nothing changed.....it isn't guns you dipstick...it is culture....and their culture is changing.
They have always had few guns per capita. Your lies get old. It is culture, gun culture. We have it, they don't.
 
And only idiots think they won't use another weapon to commit a crime
Well countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a small fraction of ours. Seems clear.


Only if you are an idiot.....

Those countries had low gun crime and murder rates before they banned guns...and that didn't change after they banned and confiscated guns....

That means banning guns had no effect on crimes that were rare in the first place, you asshat.
Yes they had a low number of guns per capita always. When they started heaving problems they made sure it stayed that way. And now they have much lower homicide rates than us.


They didn't have a problem......they had easy access to guns and their criminals did not use them to murder people.....

The banned guns, and they still have low gun murder...nothing changed.....it isn't guns you dipstick...it is culture....and their culture is changing.
They have always had few guns per capita. Your lies get old. It is culture, gun culture. We have it, they don't.

SO move we won;t miss you
 
Well countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a small fraction of ours. Seems clear.


Only if you are an idiot.....

Those countries had low gun crime and murder rates before they banned guns...and that didn't change after they banned and confiscated guns....

That means banning guns had no effect on crimes that were rare in the first place, you asshat.
Yes they had a low number of guns per capita always. When they started heaving problems they made sure it stayed that way. And now they have much lower homicide rates than us.


They didn't have a problem......they had easy access to guns and their criminals did not use them to murder people.....

The banned guns, and they still have low gun murder...nothing changed.....it isn't guns you dipstick...it is culture....and their culture is changing.
They have always had few guns per capita. Your lies get old. It is culture, gun culture. We have it, they don't.

SO move we won;t miss you
I'm glad you realize you have lost the debate.
 
And only idiots think they won't use another weapon to commit a crime
Well countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a small fraction of ours. Seems clear.


Only if you are an idiot.....

Those countries had low gun crime and murder rates before they banned guns...and that didn't change after they banned and confiscated guns....

That means banning guns had no effect on crimes that were rare in the first place, you asshat.
Yes they had a low number of guns per capita always. When they started heaving problems they made sure it stayed that way. And now they have much lower homicide rates than us.


They didn't have a problem......they had easy access to guns and their criminals did not use them to murder people.....

The banned guns, and they still have low gun murder...nothing changed.....it isn't guns you dipstick...it is culture....and their culture is changing.
They have always had few guns per capita. Your lies get old. It is culture, gun culture. We have it, they don't.


Bzzzzzz....wrong answer.

The anti-gun theory and argument.....

More Guns = More Gun crime regardless of any other factors.

Actual Result:

In the U.S....as more Americans own and carry guns over the last 26 years, gun murder down 49%, gun crime down 75%, violent crime down 72%

The result: Exact opposite of theory of anti-gunners....


In Science when you have a theory, when that theory is tested....and the exact opposite result happens...that means your theory is wrong. That is science....not left wing wishful thinking.


Whatever the crime rate does......as more Americans owned more guns the crime rate did not go up....so again...

The exact opposite of your theory happened....in science that means your theory is wrong.
 
Well countries with strong gun control have homicide rates a small fraction of ours. Seems clear.


Only if you are an idiot.....

Those countries had low gun crime and murder rates before they banned guns...and that didn't change after they banned and confiscated guns....

That means banning guns had no effect on crimes that were rare in the first place, you asshat.
Yes they had a low number of guns per capita always. When they started heaving problems they made sure it stayed that way. And now they have much lower homicide rates than us.


They didn't have a problem......they had easy access to guns and their criminals did not use them to murder people.....

The banned guns, and they still have low gun murder...nothing changed.....it isn't guns you dipstick...it is culture....and their culture is changing.
They have always had few guns per capita. Your lies get old. It is culture, gun culture. We have it, they don't.


Bzzzzzz....wrong answer.

The anti-gun theory and argument.....

More Guns = More Gun crime regardless of any other factors.

Actual Result:

In the U.S....as more Americans own and carry guns over the last 26 years, gun murder down 49%, gun crime down 75%, violent crime down 72%

The result: Exact opposite of theory of anti-gunners....


In Science when you have a theory, when that theory is tested....and the exact opposite result happens...that means your theory is wrong. That is science....not left wing wishful thinking.


Whatever the crime rate does......as more Americans owned more guns the crime rate did not go up....so again...

The exact opposite of your theory happened....in science that means your theory is wrong.
Oh yeah, right after we got some gun control crime dropped. Right after getting background checks the homicide rate dropped like a rock. FACT!
 
We have just had another mass shooting. Meanwhile countries with strong gun control are again not having a mass shooting.
 
Only if you are an idiot.....

Those countries had low gun crime and murder rates before they banned guns...and that didn't change after they banned and confiscated guns....

That means banning guns had no effect on crimes that were rare in the first place, you asshat.
Yes they had a low number of guns per capita always. When they started heaving problems they made sure it stayed that way. And now they have much lower homicide rates than us.


They didn't have a problem......they had easy access to guns and their criminals did not use them to murder people.....

The banned guns, and they still have low gun murder...nothing changed.....it isn't guns you dipstick...it is culture....and their culture is changing.
They have always had few guns per capita. Your lies get old. It is culture, gun culture. We have it, they don't.

SO move we won;t miss you
I'm glad you realize you have lost the debate.

You're not debating you are trolling

you have not presented any links or any other cogent arguments other than you think that murder is a one variable equation.

You ignore socioeconomic, historical, political and legal aspects that all contribute to the level of crime and violence present in any society because you are incapable of understanding such complex relationships
 

Forum List

Back
Top