Common Sense & Mass Murder

The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.


It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.
Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.

theyre getting one either way

Ya wanna gun
in Brooklyn ....i make a phone call in and hour or less youd be sitting in front of a fine selection./.

Bring cash


pussy

Not cool, if such a transaction is to occur it ought to be a felony. Fine of $10k and mandatory five years in prison. That might slow down that type of commerce.
 
iu

Mary's such a coward he needs to carry a gun to the grocery store. It must really suck to be so scared all the time.
 
Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.
And yet, you demand more and more and more unnecessary and admittedly ineffective restrictions on the rights of the law abiding.
There's no sense to be found in that, at all.
You lying idiot, I have not demanded anything, I have simply offered ideas, something you fear.
:lol:
Your "ideas" consist of nothing but more and more and more unnecessary and admittedly ineffective restrictions on the rights of the law abiding.
There's no sense to be found in that, at all.
 
Not cool, if such a transaction is to occur it ought to be a felony. Fine of $10k and mandatory five years in prison. That might slow down that type of commerce.
It takes a special kind of stupid to think someone willing to commit murder - especially mass murder - will be deterred in the slightest by this
 
Why not reevaluate the 1st Amendment and the 5th Amendment for that matter? Hell, reevaluate the whole freaking Bill of Rights if you think you can get a couple of votes from ignorant Americans. It's a sad thing that three Americans were gunned down by a maniac but nobody seems to care about the hundreds of people murdered in Commings Baltimore.

Man, you guys get more stupid every post. How many people have been murdered because of the First Amendment; How many shot by the 5th Amendment.

The 2nd Amendment isn't the reason anyone has been killed either. It's the moral decay in society the past 50 years which caused this.....
 
Why not reevaluate the 1st Amendment and the 5th Amendment for that matter? Hell, reevaluate the whole freaking Bill of Rights if you think you can get a couple of votes from ignorant Americans. It's a sad thing that three Americans were gunned down by a maniac but nobody seems to care about the hundreds of people murdered in Commings Baltimore.

Man, you guys get more stupid every post. How many people have been murdered because of the First Amendment; How many shot by the 5th Amendment.

The 2nd Amendment isn't the reason anyone has been killed either. It's the moral decay in society the past 50 years which caused this.....

Get real. The 2nd A. has been focused on "shall not be infringed" by the NRA, gunsmiths and salesmen who seek profits not healthy outcomes for their consumers.

Shall not be infringed is a myth, one which no longer (if it ever did) carry weight:

https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4825&context=lcp

The Intro to this link:

In its important and controversial 2008 decision on the meaning of the Second Amendment, District of Columbia v. Heller,1 the Supreme Court ruled that average citizens have a constitutional right to possess handguns for personal selfprotection in the home.2 Yet in establishing this right, the Court also made clear that the right was by no means unlimited, and that it was subject to an array of legal restrictions, including: “prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”3 The Court also said that certain types of especially powerful weapons might be subject to regulation,4 along with allowing laws regarding the safe storage of firearms.5 Further, the Court referred repeatedly to gun laws that had existed earlier in American history as a justification for allowing similar contemporary laws,6 even though the court, by its own admission, did not undertake its own “exhaustive historical analysis” of past laws.7
 
The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.


It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.





No, it is time to admit that gun free zones and statist policies like those you espouse, and progressive policies in general, lead to violent assholes, getting guns, and murdering innocent people.
 
Get real. The 2nd A. has been focused on "shall not be infringed" by the NRA, gunsmiths and salesmen who seek profits not healthy outcomes for their consumers.
Shall not be infringed is a myth, one which no longer (if it ever did) carry weight:
Really.
Tell us why cities/states can no longer ban handguns, or require firearms to be secured or disassembled.
Tell us why Illinois now has shall-issue carry permits.
Tell us why you think limitations on the the right to keep and bear arms that are not constitutionally permissible when applied to other rights are constitutionally permissible when applies to said right?
The Intro to this link:
This means about 10% of what you want it to mean.
 
The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.


It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.





No, it is time to admit that gun free zones and statist policies like those you espouse, and progressive policies in general, lead to violent assholes, getting guns, and murdering innocent people.






I see the village idiot has showed up with his infantile laughing emoji. The facts are well known. These vermin are protected and nurtured by the progressive left, and then, when they go off, they are trotted out as an excuse to steal the Rights of the tens of millions of law abiding people.

Fuck you you statist piece of shit.
 
The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.


It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.
Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.

theyre getting one either way

Ya wanna gun
in Brooklyn ....i make a phone call in and hour or less youd be sitting in front of a fine selection./.

Bring cash


pussy

Not cool, if such a transaction is to occur it ought to be a felony. Fine of $10k and mandatory five years in prison. That might slow down that type of commerce.

Selling private property should be a felony?
 
The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.


It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.

How many laws do you need to tell society that killing is bad?

How many?

It seem you believe that removing the tool will allow humans to finally realize their error but the fact is you can take the second Amendment away and nutters will still kill...

My bet car bombings will increase massively...
 
The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.


It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.
Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.

theyre getting one either way

Ya wanna gun
in Brooklyn ....i make a phone call in and hour or less youd be sitting in front of a fine selection./.

Bring cash


pussy

Not cool, if such a transaction is to occur it ought to be a felony. Fine of $10k and mandatory five years in prison. That might slow down that type of commerce.

Selling private property should be a felony?

Actually it is if you are doing a straw purchase or selling too a known criminal.

So the Op'er knows this...
 
The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.


It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.

You really are a fruit loop.

Guns don't kill people. People kill people. The gun is the tool. The person using it is the weapon.

You need to get off your stupid ass and find a way to regulate and control murderous people. Once you've done that let us all know how you did it because then your problem will be solved.

Anyone can get a gun. They don't need to go to a gun store. They sure as hell don't have to fill out paperwork or wait for their gun. There is a huge black market out there for guns. If you have the money, you can get the gun.

You should regulate and control that as well since you think you are so smart.

Let us all know how it works out.

Idiot.
Not so fast, Claudette. Arguing that our law enforcement and government are incapable of handling the problem is not a reason not to look for solutions. Someone someday will be a competent enough leader to begin addressing this problem.

Shrugging your shoulders and saying "Duh, we can't handle controlling guns" isn't very flattering.

Bullshit. There are more than enough laws on the books concerning guns.

Find a way to regulate and control murderous people and the problem is solved.

The gun is the tool. The person using it is the weapon.
Remove the tool and the weapon could not shoot.

Yup. Good luck with that.
 
Ive seen a billion gun grabber threads started by bubble dwellers in here for over ten years. They never amount to dick just like that st00pid kid march last year. Congress goes right back to sleep because well..........they have to!:2up::eusa_dance::eusa_dance:

How many times do we see Wry Catcher come in here like Linus in the Pumpkin Patch, "Whats that?!!! Whats that?!! Time to grab the guns!"

:iyfyus.jpg:
:iyfyus.jpg:
:iyfyus.jpg:

Taking bows because, "Well I have empathy!"

LOL..........nobody cares s0n!:flirtysmile4:
 
The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.


It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.
We already have thousands of gun laws on the books that aren't enforced which ones of those are not "common sense"?
 
The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.


It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.
We already have thousands of gun laws on the books that aren't enforced which ones of those are not "common sense"?

Exactly. They don't really want common sense regulations. They want all the guns. As we have seen over and over again these common sense regulations don't work. We have yet to see a proposal put forward that would have prevented these killings.

The Republicans get on board with legislation because they too are political. They don't want to be seen as "heartless" when kids are killed. So more dumb bills are passed that actually don't do anything.
 

Forum List

Back
Top