Common Sense & Mass Murder

The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.
Oh look - an anti-gun loon, standing on the bodies and bathing in the blood of innocents, as a means to push his mindless agenda.
Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.
And yet, your "solution" is to lay MORE necessary and ineffective, utterly devoid of any sense whatsoever, restrictions on the law abiding.
It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment,
Amend the constitution.
Until you do, the 2A is there, it means something you don't like, and you don't get to ignore it.
Oh look - an anti-gun loon, standing on the bodies and bathing in the blood of innocents, as a means to push his mindless agenda.
NO! We are begging for this to stop, for this to be the last slaughter of innocents. Of course, it won't be the last; bad things will happen. But they don't have to happen this often! You 2A people are ignoring how much worse it is getting. I have a right to NOT be shot by some lunatic, too. And with the totally unnecessary number of guns in circulation in this country, it is far too easy for your common garden variety lunatic to get a gun every time. It is time that ended.

It's not getting worse..... Violent gun crime is down 75% over the last 26 years, gun murder is down 49%...that means it isn't getting worse.....


The 1.1 million Americans who use their legal guns to save lives would say they were very necessary.....

Sooo.....for you, it would be better that a woman is raped, beaten and murdered than she have a gun to stop the attack....that is your choice...right?

You would prefer that a 60 year old man, is beaten and robbed than he use a gun to save himself...that is the better outcome for you....his beating...right?

That is your choice.

YAWN. Your rant, riffled with straw men, is ridiculous.
 
The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.


It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.
YAWN. Your rant, riffled with straw men, is ridiculous.
 
[
How many times must I remind you, that you are one very sick puppy. Get some therapy before you hurt someone or yourself. I mean that with all seriousness based on your hateful comments and lack of social decorum in past posts.

Calling someone a "very sick puppy" while hiding behind a keyboard is one more piece of evidence that you are a coward.

Based on his(?) prior comments it was a very nice way to call him out as mentally deranged. He is consumed by hate, you are simply consumed by ignorance.
 
The shooter according to news reports cut through a back fence to avoid security checkpoints legally purchased the gun in Nevada where background checks are required on all gun purchases unless you have a valid CCW permit. So forgive me but I’m not sure what common sense gun law would have prevented this.


In fact, every "common sense" law mindlessly demanded by the anti-gun loons failed to prevent this shooting.
Why?
Because laws cannot prevent people from breaking another law.


DUH! I have noted in all my posts that common sense laws are not a panacea, for there will always be monsters and people like you who support them.

You and trump and the NRA and 2aguy and others who bristle by those who call for common sense gun legislation are culpable, i.e. morally guilty of every death by every monster in every event of mass murder.
 
The shooter according to news reports cut through a back fence to avoid security checkpoints legally purchased the gun in Nevada where background checks are required on all gun purchases unless you have a valid CCW permit. So forgive me but I’m not sure what common sense gun law would have prevented this.
In fact, every "common sense" law mindlessly demanded by the anti-gun loons failed to prevent this shooting.
Why?
Because laws cannot prevent people from breaking another law.
DUH! I have noted in all my posts that common sense laws are not a panacea, for there will always be monsters and people like you who support them.
Sadly, yes - there will always be liberals and Democrats, mindlessly supporting gun-free zones and more than willing to make it as hard as possible of the law abiding to exercise their right to keep and bear arms.
 
He is consumed by hate, you are simply consumed by ignorance.
:lol:
Have you READ the OP?
:lol:

Of course, I wrote it:

To wit:

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.

Do you need someone to explain this quote of mine to help you understand it?
 
He is consumed by hate, you are simply consumed by ignorance.
:lol:
Have you READ the OP?
:lol:
Of course, I wrote it:
To wit:
Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.
Do you need someone to explain this quote of mine to help you understand it?
Thank you for, again, demonstrating your consumption by ignorance.
 
The shooter according to news reports cut through a back fence to avoid security checkpoints legally purchased the gun in Nevada where background checks are required on all gun purchases unless you have a valid CCW permit. So forgive me but I’m not sure what common sense gun law would have prevented this.
In fact, every "common sense" law mindlessly demanded by the anti-gun loons failed to prevent this shooting.
Why?
Because laws cannot prevent people from breaking another law.
DUH! I have noted in all my posts that common sense laws are not a panacea, for there will always be monsters and people like you who support them.
Sadly, yes - there will always be liberals and Democrats, mindlessly supporting gun-free zones and more than willing to make it as hard as possible of the law abiding to exercise their right to keep and bear arms.

How many times have you needed to have a gun in your possession?

I never needed to have a gun in my possession in my 72 years on earth, and that includes 32 years as a member of the Law Enforcement Community.
 
How many times have you needed to have a gun in your possession?
Oh... changing the subject, eh?
OK...
Fact:
There's no sense whatsoever in placing unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on the rights of the law abiding.
I never needed to have a gun in my possession in my 72 years on earth
Huh. We must be safe, then.
If we're safe, why do we need more unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on the rights of the law abiding?
 
How many times have you needed to have a gun in your possession?
Oh... changing the subject, eh?
OK...
Fact:
There's no sense whatsoever in placing unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on the rights of the law abiding.
I never needed to have a gun in my possession in my 72 years on earth
Huh. We must be safe, then.
If we're safe, why do we need more unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on the rights of the law abiding?

Me, change the subject? I suppose that was too abstract for you to comprehend - I must remember to dumb things down when responding to you.

We need to be safe because people like you enable monsters to buy firearms legally. Did I write I never carried a firearm? No, I said no situation have I ever encountered when I needed a firearm.

Is that simple enough for you to understand, simon?
 
Me, change the subject?
Obviously.
We need to be safe
The unnecessary, ineffective and senseless restriction you want to mindlessly place on the law abiding will not make you safe.
Just ask the people in Gilroy.
Did I write I never carried a firearm? No
Why did you carry a firearm if you did not need one?
Oh. Inadequacies. Never mind.
 
Me, change the subject?
Obviously.
We need to be safe
The unnecessary, ineffective and senseless restriction you want to mindlessly place on the law abiding will not make you safe.
Just ask the people in Gilroy.
Did I write I never carried a firearm? No
Why did you carry a firearm if you did not need one?
Oh. Inadequacies. Never mind.
Policy.
:lol:
OK
:lol:
And you never had to use it.
That must mean you were safe.
And if -you're- safe, we're all safe .
If we're safe, why do we need more unnecessary and ineffective restrictions on the rights of the law abiding?
 
[
How many times must I remind you, that you are one very sick puppy. Get some therapy before you hurt someone or yourself. I mean that with all seriousness based on your hateful comments and lack of social decorum in past posts.
Calling someone a "very sick puppy" while hiding behind a keyboard is one more piece of evidence that you are a coward.

I considered his comment in Post #1, in the thread he authored: "Tell me again this is not an invasion".

I suppose you agree with this potential monster.

He wrote: Half of us wouldn't mind if Border Patrol started shooting these animals. The other half dont matter.
 
The shooter according to news reports cut through a back fence to avoid security checkpoints legally purchased the gun in Nevada where background checks are required on all gun purchases unless you have a valid CCW permit. So forgive me but I’m not sure what common sense gun law would have prevented this.


In fact, every "common sense" law mindlessly demanded by the anti-gun loons failed to prevent this shooting.
Why?
Because laws cannot prevent people from breaking another law.


DUH! I have noted in all my posts that common sense laws are not a panacea, for there will always be monsters and people like you who support them.

You and trump and the NRA and 2aguy and others who bristle by those who call for common sense gun legislation are culpable, i.e. morally guilty of every death by every monster in every event of mass murder.
Common sense gun regulation really means everyone should be armed at all times.
 
[
How many times must I remind you, that you are one very sick puppy. Get some therapy before you hurt someone or yourself. I mean that with all seriousness based on your hateful comments and lack of social decorum in past posts.
Calling someone a "very sick puppy" while hiding behind a keyboard is one more piece of evidence that you are a coward.
I considered his comment in Post #1, in the thread he authored: "Tell me again this is not an invasion".
Fact remains:
Calling someone a "very sick puppy" while hiding behind a keyboard is one more piece of evidence that you are a coward.
 
The 6 year old, 13 year old and a young man murdered by a gun lost their right to life, liberty and happiness.

Common sense gun regulations may not prevent a monster from getting a gun, but no regulations assure a monster will get a gun and kill innocent people.


It's past time to reevaluate the Second Amendment, and to face the reality that the majority of members of Congress put their job security first, in spite of the costs in blood and treasure that their inaction allows. There is enough ambiguity in the wording of the 2nd to allow Congress, and/or State Legislatures or City Councils to pass regulations which protect the people they represent.

Then let the NRA go broke defending their outdated policies.

You really are a fruit loop.

Guns don't kill people. People kill people. The gun is the tool. The person using it is the weapon.

You need to get off your stupid ass and find a way to regulate and control murderous people. Once you've done that let us all know how you did it because then your problem will be solved.

Anyone can get a gun. They don't need to go to a gun store. They sure as hell don't have to fill out paperwork or wait for their gun. There is a huge black market out there for guns. If you have the money, you can get the gun.

You should regulate and control that as well since you think you are so smart.

Let us all know how it works out.

Idiot.
Not so fast, Claudette. Arguing that our law enforcement and government are incapable of handling the problem is not a reason not to look for solutions. Someone someday will be a competent enough leader to begin addressing this problem.

Shrugging your shoulders and saying "Duh, we can't handle controlling guns" isn't very flattering.

Bullshit. There are more than enough laws on the books concerning guns.

Find a way to regulate and control murderous people and the problem is solved.

The gun is the tool. The person using it is the weapon.
Remove the tool and the weapon could not shoot.
 
The shooter according to news reports cut through a back fence to avoid security checkpoints legally purchased the gun in Nevada where background checks are required on all gun purchases unless you have a valid CCW permit. So forgive me but I’m not sure what common sense gun law would have prevented this.


In fact, every "common sense" law mindlessly demanded by the anti-gun loons failed to prevent this shooting.
Why?
Because laws cannot prevent people from breaking another law.


DUH! I have noted in all my posts that common sense laws are not a panacea, for there will always be monsters and people like you who support them.

You and trump and the NRA and 2aguy and others who bristle by those who call for common sense gun legislation are culpable, i.e. morally guilty of every death by every monster in every event of mass murder.

Please give us a common sense gun law that would have prevented this from happening.
 

Forum List

Back
Top