Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well said. They're driving the Middle Class out. California will be left with only the very rich and the very poor. Without that massive Middle Class tax revenue, the state will collapse. The Communists are dooming California.
As you know, and know well, the rich are leaving in droves. They are sick of paying for the homeless who are invited to their state by their local governments for their votes.
The great state of California has massive problems and seem to be doing everything possible to exacerbate the problem rather than even attempt solutions.
The rich aren't leaving California in droves, they're establishing tax shelters. Chumps tax.
Yeah, right!
Packing up and moving out: People are leaving California in droves, including some High Desert residents
By Rene Ray De La Cruz
Staff Writer
Posted Feb 3, 2018 at 7:00 AMUpdated Feb 5, 2018 at 2:40 PM
[...]
The Golden State continues to rank No. 1 as the state that has waved goodbye to more residents, about 143,000 last year, than welcomed those who have moved here, according to a U.S. Census Bureau report.
[...]
“California is just getting too expensive and the crime in the High Desert is getting worse by the day,” He said. “I think the last straw for us is when (Gov.) Jerry Brown came out with his new fuel taxes and car registration fees.”
[...]
“Prop. 47 made a huge impact in our area and people are feeling uncomfortable and unsafe because crime is going up,” Sanchez said. “It’s unsettling to hear that someone was murdered last night, but in reality, this is still a very safe area compared to many places in California.”
Passed by California voters in Nov 2014, Prop.47 reduces certain drug possession felonies to misdemeanors. It also requires misdemeanor sentencing for petty theft, receiving stolen property and forging/writing bad checks when the amount involved is $950 or less.
San Bernardino County Sheriff John McMahon said in 2017 that violent crime had risen over 20 percent in the High Desert since just a year earlier, the Daily Press reported.
[...]
Packing up and moving out: People are leaving California in droves, including some High Desert residents
California lost 0.004% in population? WOW!!!!
If you want less crime, provide more and better paying jobs.
Here ya go!
-Base Federal tax for corporations at 30% of revenue.
-Raise minimum wage to $23.50/hr. Based on where minimum wage should be using 1970-2018 rise in food, shelter, and transportation.
-Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.
-Companies with unlimited employees; employee expenses above the deduction are subsidized at 100% with funds usually give back to the States.
-Adjust Social Security and private/public retirement and pension payments using 1970-2018 price structure.
-Remove the FICA limit.
-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years which will eliminate inflation.
-Recall ALL off-shore investments tax free, and disallow any further off-shore investments.
-Make inversion illegal.
My plan would reduce business costs for employees and taxes to 30%. That's a 15%-30% drop.
My plan would put BILLIONS into the economy daily.
My plan would put the $100 trillion plus currently owned by corporate America back into the economy.
My plan would end all welfare.
My plan would significantly increase social security and pension payments.
My plan would hold prices for 10 years, thus eliminating inflation.
Why force people into something they want nothing to do with?You’re missing the point, No one’s against alternative energy. But everyone’s against being forced into alternative energy. People that want to force people into alternative energy are fucking cowards and should be treated as such...
Yah that's right, California is forcing new home buyers to pay $80.00 - $200.00mo. less in electric utility costs. Those "fucking cowards."
Make the argument that consumers don't want to save money.
Make the argument that consumers don't want to save money.
If they want to save money, and think solar panels are the way to do that, then they will.
No government mandate needed.
But you can't get the volume discount.
Well said. They're driving the Middle Class out. California will be left with only the very rich and the very poor. Without that massive Middle Class tax revenue, the state will collapse. The Communists are dooming California.
As you know, and know well, the rich are leaving in droves. They are sick of paying for the homeless who are invited to their state by their local governments for their votes.
The great state of California has massive problems and seem to be doing everything possible to exacerbate the problem rather than even attempt solutions.
The rich aren't leaving California in droves, they're establishing tax shelters. Chumps tax.
Yeah, right!
Packing up and moving out: People are leaving California in droves, including some High Desert residents
By Rene Ray De La Cruz
Staff Writer
Posted Feb 3, 2018 at 7:00 AMUpdated Feb 5, 2018 at 2:40 PM
[...]
The Golden State continues to rank No. 1 as the state that has waved goodbye to more residents, about 143,000 last year, than welcomed those who have moved here, according to a U.S. Census Bureau report.
[...]
“California is just getting too expensive and the crime in the High Desert is getting worse by the day,” He said. “I think the last straw for us is when (Gov.) Jerry Brown came out with his new fuel taxes and car registration fees.”
[...]
“Prop. 47 made a huge impact in our area and people are feeling uncomfortable and unsafe because crime is going up,” Sanchez said. “It’s unsettling to hear that someone was murdered last night, but in reality, this is still a very safe area compared to many places in California.”
Passed by California voters in Nov 2014, Prop.47 reduces certain drug possession felonies to misdemeanors. It also requires misdemeanor sentencing for petty theft, receiving stolen property and forging/writing bad checks when the amount involved is $950 or less.
San Bernardino County Sheriff John McMahon said in 2017 that violent crime had risen over 20 percent in the High Desert since just a year earlier, the Daily Press reported.
[...]
Packing up and moving out: People are leaving California in droves, including some High Desert residents
California lost 0.004% in population? WOW!!!!
If you want less crime, provide more and better paying jobs.
Here ya go!
-Base Federal tax for corporations at 30% of revenue.
-Raise minimum wage to $23.50/hr. Based on where minimum wage should be using 1970-2018 rise in food, shelter, and transportation.
-Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.
-Companies with unlimited employees; employee expenses above the deduction are subsidized at 100% with funds usually give back to the States.
-Adjust Social Security and private/public retirement and pension payments using 1970-2018 price structure.
-Remove the FICA limit.
-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years which will eliminate inflation.
-Recall ALL off-shore investments tax free, and disallow any further off-shore investments.
-Make inversion illegal.
My plan would reduce business costs for employees and taxes to 30%. That's a 15%-30% drop.
My plan would put BILLIONS into the economy daily.
My plan would put the $100 trillion plus currently owned by corporate America back into the economy.
My plan would end all welfare.
My plan would significantly increase social security and pension payments.
My plan would hold prices for 10 years, thus eliminating inflation.
Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.
Handing corporations $5 trillion in rebates will stimulate the economy.
As you know, and know well, the rich are leaving in droves. They are sick of paying for the homeless who are invited to their state by their local governments for their votes.
The great state of California has massive problems and seem to be doing everything possible to exacerbate the problem rather than even attempt solutions.
The rich aren't leaving California in droves, they're establishing tax shelters. Chumps tax.
Yeah, right!
Packing up and moving out: People are leaving California in droves, including some High Desert residents
By Rene Ray De La Cruz
Staff Writer
Posted Feb 3, 2018 at 7:00 AMUpdated Feb 5, 2018 at 2:40 PM
[...]
The Golden State continues to rank No. 1 as the state that has waved goodbye to more residents, about 143,000 last year, than welcomed those who have moved here, according to a U.S. Census Bureau report.
[...]
“California is just getting too expensive and the crime in the High Desert is getting worse by the day,” He said. “I think the last straw for us is when (Gov.) Jerry Brown came out with his new fuel taxes and car registration fees.”
[...]
“Prop. 47 made a huge impact in our area and people are feeling uncomfortable and unsafe because crime is going up,” Sanchez said. “It’s unsettling to hear that someone was murdered last night, but in reality, this is still a very safe area compared to many places in California.”
Passed by California voters in Nov 2014, Prop.47 reduces certain drug possession felonies to misdemeanors. It also requires misdemeanor sentencing for petty theft, receiving stolen property and forging/writing bad checks when the amount involved is $950 or less.
San Bernardino County Sheriff John McMahon said in 2017 that violent crime had risen over 20 percent in the High Desert since just a year earlier, the Daily Press reported.
[...]
Packing up and moving out: People are leaving California in droves, including some High Desert residents
California lost 0.004% in population? WOW!!!!
If you want less crime, provide more and better paying jobs.
Here ya go!
-Base Federal tax for corporations at 30% of revenue.
-Raise minimum wage to $23.50/hr. Based on where minimum wage should be using 1970-2018 rise in food, shelter, and transportation.
-Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.
-Companies with unlimited employees; employee expenses above the deduction are subsidized at 100% with funds usually give back to the States.
-Adjust Social Security and private/public retirement and pension payments using 1970-2018 price structure.
-Remove the FICA limit.
-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years which will eliminate inflation.
-Recall ALL off-shore investments tax free, and disallow any further off-shore investments.
-Make inversion illegal.
My plan would reduce business costs for employees and taxes to 30%. That's a 15%-30% drop.
My plan would put BILLIONS into the economy daily.
My plan would put the $100 trillion plus currently owned by corporate America back into the economy.
My plan would end all welfare.
My plan would significantly increase social security and pension payments.
My plan would hold prices for 10 years, thus eliminating inflation.
Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.
Handing corporations $5 trillion in rebates will stimulate the economy.
Why would I open or invest in my own, or any other business if I was not able to deduct my costs of doing business from my gross income?
You are a fucking idiot. If solar panels ACTUALLY did what you claim, everyone would be installing them!You’re missing the point, No one’s against alternative energy. But everyone’s against being forced into alternative energy. People that want to force people into alternative energy are fucking cowards and should be treated as such...If a house has a 30-year-old solar system on the roof, it is almost certain to need a new ROOF soon.There are some improvements that add value to a home. Solar panels is not one of them. In fact it detracts from the value.
Absolutely. One of the things most buyers look for in a home is future expenses. How good are the windows? How old is the furnace or AC? How old is the roof and things like that.
So in the future, a couple looks at a house with 30 year old solar panels. The first thing that would cross my mind is how many of those I'm going to have to replace in the next ten years. Or if allowed by law, how much is it going to cost me to have those things removed and have a regular roof installed?
In the late 70's, my Father had solar water heating installed for the pool and the house. That part of the roof that was under the panels looked brand new. Kinda like your farmers tan.
Yah that's right, California is forcing new home buyers to pay $80.00 - $200.00mo. less in electric utility costs. Those "fucking cowards."
Which is, of course, worthless when the manufacturer goes under in 10 years!You forgot to factor rate increases for power. Also, if you attach it to a home mortgage the monthly payments are much less.
Yes, the monthly payments are much less and the total paid, with the interest, is much, much more. What is the effective life of a solar system? Thirty years as is your mortgage? NO!
Like all improvements someone can add to a house, some are cost-effective while others are for your own pleasure. A prime example, in our area (North Florida) you may spend $30,000. to install a swimming pool. When you sell, that pool will add $10,000 MAYBE $20,000 to what your house would have sold for without the pool.
It doesn't matter what effective life, the fact you are saving every month. Over the course of thirty years, even if you have to replace components you'll still be ahead. Remember, your power bill today will be 30% higher in ten years.
Most components for solar today have a 25 to 30 year manufactures warranty.
No, you don't. You are either a trust-fund baby born with a silver spoon up your ass, or a trolling child.You do know you are debating with a poster that owns a business that uses solar.....right? Quit making your short bus shorter.
I paid for my solar system up front and will get tax-cuts - something that you righties describe as government letting me keep more of my money, so I can spend it into economy.
So given that, can you say at which point anyone but me is paying for my solar panels?
I'll go get the popcorn, this should be good
That is a lie.
The government spend just as much money with or without filthy ass subsidies.
That means somebody else pays the money that would have been paid in tax. Either through revenue or debt.
Kind of like when that asshole Obama gave Solyndrda a half billion in subsidies he went in debt with the Federal government that year meaning our children will have to pay back the subsidy. The same damn thing with your stupid subsidy. All subsidies, either direct payment or though tax reduction, are a form of welfare.
The study of Economics is not a Moon Bat's strong suit, is it?
Your idiotic solar panels is nothing more than a tax on Moon Bat ignorance with a little welfare thrown in.
I love to see you stupid Moon Bats being taxed for being idiots.
.... when Bush or Trump pass tax-cuts, righties tell us that’s people and corporations getting to keep more of their money to better grow economy so that the revenue loss is made up.
But according to the same rightwingers when someone gets to keep more of their money because they bought a solar system....that needs to be paid for by someone else?
I don’t see you actually addressing that contradiction. Want to try again?
.... when Bush or Trump pass tax-cuts, righties tell us that’s people and corporations getting to keep more of their money
An across the board tax cut is not the same as a subsidy provided for a specific behavior.
Substantive difference being WHAT exactly?
I got to keep more of my money so I could spend it into economy - what is the tax-cut-magic killing difference?
Substantive difference being WHAT exactly?
I don't have to buy a stupid solar installation, I can buy useful things instead.
No, you will find nothing in the democratic platform for support of open boarders but you will find support for legal immigration within reasonable limits, that meets the needs of families, communities, and the economy as well as maintains the United States’ role as a beacon of hope for people seeking safety, freedom, and security.What your saying is stereotypes are not representative of either party. If that's the case then why can't we find common ground? IMHO, this is the key to bringing America together and actually creating the kind of environment that we all really want.The same is true for most democrats. The actually difference between people that vote democrat and republican is not as wide as you might think. Most of the differences is nothing but stereotyping.You don't care which is VERY telling.
A true conservative is a rich old usually white guy that would fuck-over anyone to make more money. Middle-class conservatives are just cheap.
Most everybody in the US is cheap today. Why do you think we don't buy our own products here?
If you think that all Republicans are rich old white dudes, that tells me your extremely limited knowledge of politics. It wouldn't even be a viable party today if that were the case. Republicans come from all walks of life including many in the middle-class who happened to vote for Trump. I'm very conservative, but I'm your average middle-class citizen.
Stereotyping is true only to a certain degree. But to say all Republicans are rich white people is ridiculous. Hillary outspent Trump almost three to one last election. She collected record amounts of contributions, and I seriously doubt she broke contribution records because of the homeless.
There are plenty of rich white Democrats as well. Most of Hollywood for one. Then there are individuals like Soros, the late Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and many others who have supported the Democrat party for decades.
The left is constantly telling us that Republicans live in the sticks riding around in pickup trucks with a gun rack in the back. They cling to that and their Bible.
I have many friends and acquaintances on both sides of the fence. Even when we discuss very decisive issues such as immigration, most democrats don't want open boards and most republicans don't want mass deportations.
Okay, but isn't it true they support a party that does want open borders and such strict gun control that just about nobody would be able to own one?
The left keeps going further left every election. For crying out loud, an admitted Socialist almost won the presidential nomination, and many believe he would have if not for rigging of the election.
The right is trying to move towards constitutionalism while the the lefts last three presidential nominees (and Sanders) had the full support of the US Communist Party.
So where is the middle ground between constitutionalism and communism? There isn't any.
On the right, we told the RNC we've had it with their bullshit. We elected an outsider like Trump. It's about time the left does the same instead of marching in lockstep. Only then will we ever see the slightest hint at middle ground. It's time we elect people that are going to do what's best for the country instead of what's best for the party. Please read my sig.
Same slippery slope when they required cars to have seat belts.No more free choice. They decide, you kneel.
Fortune: California to Require Solar Panels for All New Homes
No, you will find nothing in the democratic platform for support of open boarders but you will find support for legal immigration within reasonable limits, that meets the needs of families, communities, and the economy as well as maintains the United States’ role as a beacon of hope for people seeking safety, freedom, and security.What your saying is stereotypes are not representative of either party. If that's the case then why can't we find common ground? IMHO, this is the key to bringing America together and actually creating the kind of environment that we all really want.The same is true for most democrats. The actually difference between people that vote democrat and republican is not as wide as you might think. Most of the differences is nothing but stereotyping.Most everybody in the US is cheap today. Why do you think we don't buy our own products here?
If you think that all Republicans are rich old white dudes, that tells me your extremely limited knowledge of politics. It wouldn't even be a viable party today if that were the case. Republicans come from all walks of life including many in the middle-class who happened to vote for Trump. I'm very conservative, but I'm your average middle-class citizen.
Stereotyping is true only to a certain degree. But to say all Republicans are rich white people is ridiculous. Hillary outspent Trump almost three to one last election. She collected record amounts of contributions, and I seriously doubt she broke contribution records because of the homeless.
There are plenty of rich white Democrats as well. Most of Hollywood for one. Then there are individuals like Soros, the late Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and many others who have supported the Democrat party for decades.
The left is constantly telling us that Republicans live in the sticks riding around in pickup trucks with a gun rack in the back. They cling to that and their Bible.
I have many friends and acquaintances on both sides of the fence. Even when we discuss very decisive issues such as immigration, most democrats don't want open boards and most republicans don't want mass deportations.
Okay, but isn't it true they support a party that does want open borders and such strict gun control that just about nobody would be able to own one?
The left keeps going further left every election. For crying out loud, an admitted Socialist almost won the presidential nomination, and many believe he would have if not for rigging of the election.
The right is trying to move towards constitutionalism while the the lefts last three presidential nominees (and Sanders) had the full support of the US Communist Party.
So where is the middle ground between constitutionalism and communism? There isn't any.
On the right, we told the RNC we've had it with their bullshit. We elected an outsider like Trump. It's about time the left does the same instead of marching in lockstep. Only then will we ever see the slightest hint at middle ground. It's time we elect people that are going to do what's best for the country instead of what's best for the party. Please read my sig.
On gun control, the party supports responsible gun ownership as part of the fabric of many communities. However, they support the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, expanding and strengthen background checks and closing dangerous loopholes in our current laws.
Unfortunate, the most radical elements of both parties are perceived to represent the party norms. This is dangerous to the nation and counterproductive. We have apparently reached a point where control of government by one party means wiping out all accomplishments of the previous administration. While shared control of government insures no movement in any direction where each party successful blocks all attempts at change, good or bad.
No, you will find nothing in the democratic platform for support of open boarders but you will find support for legal immigration within reasonable limits, that meets the needs of families, communities, and the economy as well as maintains the United States’ role as a beacon of hope for people seeking safety, freedom, and security.
That is a lie.
The government spend just as much money with or without filthy ass subsidies.
That means somebody else pays the money that would have been paid in tax. Either through revenue or debt.
Kind of like when that asshole Obama gave Solyndrda a half billion in subsidies he went in debt with the Federal government that year meaning our children will have to pay back the subsidy. The same damn thing with your stupid subsidy. All subsidies, either direct payment or though tax reduction, are a form of welfare.
The study of Economics is not a Moon Bat's strong suit, is it?
Your idiotic solar panels is nothing more than a tax on Moon Bat ignorance with a little welfare thrown in.
I love to see you stupid Moon Bats being taxed for being idiots.
.... when Bush or Trump pass tax-cuts, righties tell us that’s people and corporations getting to keep more of their money to better grow economy so that the revenue loss is made up.
But according to the same rightwingers when someone gets to keep more of their money because they bought a solar system....that needs to be paid for by someone else?
I don’t see you actually addressing that contradiction. Want to try again?
.... when Bush or Trump pass tax-cuts, righties tell us that’s people and corporations getting to keep more of their money
An across the board tax cut is not the same as a subsidy provided for a specific behavior.
Substantive difference being WHAT exactly?
I got to keep more of my money so I could spend it into economy - what is the tax-cut-magic killing difference?
Substantive difference being WHAT exactly?
I don't have to buy a stupid solar installation, I can buy useful things instead.
How the fuck is producing 100% of electricity I use from solar energy, not usefull? Stupid much?
And how come this is the very first time you got all concerned about WHAT tax-cut is spent on? Smells like straw grasping.
That is a lie.
The government spend just as much money with or without filthy ass subsidies.
That means somebody else pays the money that would have been paid in tax. Either through revenue or debt.
Kind of like when that asshole Obama gave Solyndrda a half billion in subsidies he went in debt with the Federal government that year meaning our children will have to pay back the subsidy. The same damn thing with your stupid subsidy. All subsidies, either direct payment or though tax reduction, are a form of welfare.
The study of Economics is not a Moon Bat's strong suit, is it?
Your idiotic solar panels is nothing more than a tax on Moon Bat ignorance with a little welfare thrown in.
I love to see you stupid Moon Bats being taxed for being idiots.
.... when Bush or Trump pass tax-cuts, righties tell us that’s people and corporations getting to keep more of their money to better grow economy so that the revenue loss is made up.
But according to the same rightwingers when someone gets to keep more of their money because they bought a solar system....that needs to be paid for by someone else?
I don’t see you actually addressing that contradiction. Want to try again?
.... when Bush or Trump pass tax-cuts, righties tell us that’s people and corporations getting to keep more of their money
An across the board tax cut is not the same as a subsidy provided for a specific behavior.
Substantive difference being WHAT exactly?
I got to keep more of my money so I could spend it into economy - what is the tax-cut-magic killing difference?
Substantive difference being WHAT exactly?
I don't have to buy a stupid solar installation, I can buy useful things instead.
How the fuck is producing 100% of electricity I use from solar energy, not usefull? Stupid much?
And how come this is the very first time you got all concerned about WHAT tax-cut is spent on? Smells like straw grasping.
There's nothing wrong with the way we arrive at taxable income (revenues less the cost of doing business). Taxing systems that tend to ignore the cost of doing business penalize those companies that operate on slim profit margins rewarding those with high margins.Well said. They're driving the Middle Class out. California will be left with only the very rich and the very poor. Without that massive Middle Class tax revenue, the state will collapse. The Communists are dooming California.
As you know, and know well, the rich are leaving in droves. They are sick of paying for the homeless who are invited to their state by their local governments for their votes.
The great state of California has massive problems and seem to be doing everything possible to exacerbate the problem rather than even attempt solutions.
The rich aren't leaving California in droves, they're establishing tax shelters. Chumps tax.
Yeah, right!
Packing up and moving out: People are leaving California in droves, including some High Desert residents
By Rene Ray De La Cruz
Staff Writer
Posted Feb 3, 2018 at 7:00 AMUpdated Feb 5, 2018 at 2:40 PM
[...]
The Golden State continues to rank No. 1 as the state that has waved goodbye to more residents, about 143,000 last year, than welcomed those who have moved here, according to a U.S. Census Bureau report.
[...]
“California is just getting too expensive and the crime in the High Desert is getting worse by the day,” He said. “I think the last straw for us is when (Gov.) Jerry Brown came out with his new fuel taxes and car registration fees.”
[...]
“Prop. 47 made a huge impact in our area and people are feeling uncomfortable and unsafe because crime is going up,” Sanchez said. “It’s unsettling to hear that someone was murdered last night, but in reality, this is still a very safe area compared to many places in California.”
Passed by California voters in Nov 2014, Prop.47 reduces certain drug possession felonies to misdemeanors. It also requires misdemeanor sentencing for petty theft, receiving stolen property and forging/writing bad checks when the amount involved is $950 or less.
San Bernardino County Sheriff John McMahon said in 2017 that violent crime had risen over 20 percent in the High Desert since just a year earlier, the Daily Press reported.
[...]
Packing up and moving out: People are leaving California in droves, including some High Desert residents
California lost 0.004% in population? WOW!!!!
If you want less crime, provide more and better paying jobs.
Here ya go!
-Base Federal tax for corporations at 30% of revenue.
-Raise minimum wage to $23.50/hr. Based on where minimum wage should be using 1970-2018 rise in food, shelter, and transportation.
-Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.
-Companies with unlimited employees; employee expenses above the deduction are subsidized at 100% with funds usually give back to the States.
-Adjust Social Security and private/public retirement and pension payments using 1970-2018 price structure.
-Remove the FICA limit.
-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years which will eliminate inflation.
-Recall ALL off-shore investments tax free, and disallow any further off-shore investments.
-Make inversion illegal.
My plan would reduce business costs for employees and taxes to 30%. That's a 15%-30% drop.
My plan would put BILLIONS into the economy daily.
My plan would put the $100 trillion plus currently owned by corporate America back into the economy.
My plan would end all welfare.
My plan would significantly increase social security and pension payments.
My plan would hold prices for 10 years, thus eliminating inflation.
Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.
Handing corporations $5 trillion in rebates will stimulate the economy.
There's nothing wrong with the way we arrive at taxable income (revenues less the cost of doing business). Taxing systems that tend to ignore the cost of doing business penalize those companies that operate on slim profit margins rewarding those with high margins.As you know, and know well, the rich are leaving in droves. They are sick of paying for the homeless who are invited to their state by their local governments for their votes.
The great state of California has massive problems and seem to be doing everything possible to exacerbate the problem rather than even attempt solutions.
The rich aren't leaving California in droves, they're establishing tax shelters. Chumps tax.
Yeah, right!
Packing up and moving out: People are leaving California in droves, including some High Desert residents
By Rene Ray De La Cruz
Staff Writer
Posted Feb 3, 2018 at 7:00 AMUpdated Feb 5, 2018 at 2:40 PM
[...]
The Golden State continues to rank No. 1 as the state that has waved goodbye to more residents, about 143,000 last year, than welcomed those who have moved here, according to a U.S. Census Bureau report.
[...]
“California is just getting too expensive and the crime in the High Desert is getting worse by the day,” He said. “I think the last straw for us is when (Gov.) Jerry Brown came out with his new fuel taxes and car registration fees.”
[...]
“Prop. 47 made a huge impact in our area and people are feeling uncomfortable and unsafe because crime is going up,” Sanchez said. “It’s unsettling to hear that someone was murdered last night, but in reality, this is still a very safe area compared to many places in California.”
Passed by California voters in Nov 2014, Prop.47 reduces certain drug possession felonies to misdemeanors. It also requires misdemeanor sentencing for petty theft, receiving stolen property and forging/writing bad checks when the amount involved is $950 or less.
San Bernardino County Sheriff John McMahon said in 2017 that violent crime had risen over 20 percent in the High Desert since just a year earlier, the Daily Press reported.
[...]
Packing up and moving out: People are leaving California in droves, including some High Desert residents
California lost 0.004% in population? WOW!!!!
If you want less crime, provide more and better paying jobs.
Here ya go!
-Base Federal tax for corporations at 30% of revenue.
-Raise minimum wage to $23.50/hr. Based on where minimum wage should be using 1970-2018 rise in food, shelter, and transportation.
-Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.
-Companies with unlimited employees; employee expenses above the deduction are subsidized at 100% with funds usually give back to the States.
-Adjust Social Security and private/public retirement and pension payments using 1970-2018 price structure.
-Remove the FICA limit.
-Back down ALL costs, prices, fees, to January 1, 2009 levels and hold them for 10 years which will eliminate inflation.
-Recall ALL off-shore investments tax free, and disallow any further off-shore investments.
-Make inversion illegal.
My plan would reduce business costs for employees and taxes to 30%. That's a 15%-30% drop.
My plan would put BILLIONS into the economy daily.
My plan would put the $100 trillion plus currently owned by corporate America back into the economy.
My plan would end all welfare.
My plan would significantly increase social security and pension payments.
My plan would hold prices for 10 years, thus eliminating inflation.
Eliminate all business subsidies (deductions/write-offs/write-downs) except for employee expenses which are deducted dollar-for-dollar on all city, state, and Federal taxes and fees with the Feds refunding city, State, and fees.
Handing corporations $5 trillion in rebates will stimulate the economy.
Under such as a system, low margin businesses such as grocery stores and low end retailers would be highly taxed while high margin businesses such software companies and jewelers would have low taxes. Companies that were losing money would be paying high taxes and companies with large profits would be paying low taxes.
.... when Bush or Trump pass tax-cuts, righties tell us that’s people and corporations getting to keep more of their money to better grow economy so that the revenue loss is made up.
But according to the same rightwingers when someone gets to keep more of their money because they bought a solar system....that needs to be paid for by someone else?
I don’t see you actually addressing that contradiction. Want to try again?
.... when Bush or Trump pass tax-cuts, righties tell us that’s people and corporations getting to keep more of their money
An across the board tax cut is not the same as a subsidy provided for a specific behavior.
Substantive difference being WHAT exactly?
I got to keep more of my money so I could spend it into economy - what is the tax-cut-magic killing difference?
Substantive difference being WHAT exactly?
I don't have to buy a stupid solar installation, I can buy useful things instead.
How the fuck is producing 100% of electricity I use from solar energy, not usefull? Stupid much?
And how come this is the very first time you got all concerned about WHAT tax-cut is spent on? Smells like straw grasping.
Two reasons idiot:
1. It is not cheaper than fossil fuel. Not when you look at all the cost, direct and indirect. If you think it is then you are confused Moon Bat.
2. You are getting welfare payments in the form of subsidies that somebody else has to pay for.
You Moon Bats are not too bight, are you?
.... when Bush or Trump pass tax-cuts, righties tell us that’s people and corporations getting to keep more of their money to better grow economy so that the revenue loss is made up.
But according to the same rightwingers when someone gets to keep more of their money because they bought a solar system....that needs to be paid for by someone else?
I don’t see you actually addressing that contradiction. Want to try again?
.... when Bush or Trump pass tax-cuts, righties tell us that’s people and corporations getting to keep more of their money
An across the board tax cut is not the same as a subsidy provided for a specific behavior.
Substantive difference being WHAT exactly?
I got to keep more of my money so I could spend it into economy - what is the tax-cut-magic killing difference?
Substantive difference being WHAT exactly?
I don't have to buy a stupid solar installation, I can buy useful things instead.
How the fuck is producing 100% of electricity I use from solar energy, not usefull? Stupid much?
And how come this is the very first time you got all concerned about WHAT tax-cut is spent on? Smells like straw grasping.
How the fuck is producing 100% of electricity I use from solar energy, not usefull?
How much was your bill before? How much is your bill today?
Stupid much?
Don't be so hard on yourself. Just because you don't understand economics doesn't make you stupid.
And how come this is the very first time you got all concerned about WHAT tax-cut is spent on?
I'm not concerned what you spend your tax cut on.......a subsidy is another matter.
