Communist is the worst idea ever invented and yet it is believed in by millions

[daveman]

The basic idea is not about property calling it theft or not self made. The basic idea is " from each according to his ability and to each according to his need". This is the same basic idea behind slavery which is why it is no coincidence that every communist nation is a slave state.

They got it from the Bible.

That is not a defense of slavery, nor does it lend legitamacy to an evil idea.

But no they did not. There is no such scripture.

Slavery is not about free-market Capitalism.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about any "gospel Truth". Appeals to ignorance is all right-wingers are best at.

All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.[25]

— Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35

Christian communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Please point out where the Roman government mandated this sharing.

Again: Communism can work only in small communities and strictly voluntarily.

Read some history of the Roman Empire.

Only the Religious seem to be able to make it work. Not enough morals to go around among the secular laity?

Face it, kid. You fucked up. There is no Biblical justification for the tyranny you want.

If you had enough reading comprehension you would understand it take morals for that not right-wing fantasy.

Morals to steal from people?

You do know words have meanings, right? You don't get to make up new ones?

Only right-wingers allege that. The rest of us know that the social power to Tax is delegated to our representatives to Government.

"Social power".

No such thing.

But it's HILARIOUS you believe you get to make up definitions! How insanely intellectually bankrupt!

The ignorance of the right-wing is astounding.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

It is accomplished via the social-ism of Government.

Government is not socialism.

Socialism is a form of government which always fails.

That is fact in your face which has been proven time again but being a dishonest and immature right winger you still cling to a proven fallacy

It doesn't always fail at all. There have been a few examples of Socialism and they have failed because they struggled to deal with some of the fundamentals. I'm not a Socialist, but the doesn't mean it can't work.

People would say Capitalism has always failed too. Look at 2008.

If it hasn't worked in the past, it's not going to work in the future.

And it's never worked in the past.

That's such an illogical position to take.

Literally, if you fail at first, give up and never try again.

The problem with political systems is there are many ways to flog a horse.

You can set up Socialism in a million different ways. You can be intelligent about it and use human psychology to get the best out of workers, or you can just demand they do what they're told and use fear, or you can simply let the workers be lazy.

Each will have different results.

China is doing things much differently to the way the USSR did things, or how Cuba do things. So you'll have different results.

NO GUISE HONEST ITLL WORK THIS TIME PINKIE SWEAR

Yeah, I think I'll pass.

View attachment 504518

What? I didn't understand a single thing.

It's pretty simply. People who want to try failed ideologies always say "it'll work this time".

No, it won't.

And the image itself is simple, too. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to vote Democrat.

That's why Democrats keep insisting "it'll work this time!"

The problem is there are many ways to run a country with the same ideology.

So, yeah, if you'd do the USSR again in the same way, it'd fail.

But China isn't doing Socialism in the same way as the USSR. So, you can't say "because the USSR failed, China will too."

China is making money using slave labor and is harvesting organs from political prisoners.

Not a huge success there.

And look at the US. They had SLAVERY for 90 years, then segregation, then blacks currently have 25% poverty compared to 7% for whites.

SUCCESS????????

The US goes around the world bombing for oil.

Four OPEC countries hated the US in 2001. Iraq, invaded in 2003. Libya bombed and leader removed in 2011. Venezuela, US supported coup d'etat in 2002 followed by heavy sanctions. Iran, heavy sanctions.

Success?

Yeah, yeah, we get it. America sucks.

You're boring me.

 

[daveman]

The basic idea is not about property calling it theft or not self made. The basic idea is " from each according to his ability and to each according to his need". This is the same basic idea behind slavery which is why it is no coincidence that every communist nation is a slave state.

They got it from the Bible.

That is not a defense of slavery, nor does it lend legitamacy to an evil idea.

But no they did not. There is no such scripture.

Slavery is not about free-market Capitalism.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about any "gospel Truth". Appeals to ignorance is all right-wingers are best at.

All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.[25]

— Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35

Christian communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Please point out where the Roman government mandated this sharing.

Again: Communism can work only in small communities and strictly voluntarily.

Read some history of the Roman Empire.

Only the Religious seem to be able to make it work. Not enough morals to go around among the secular laity?

Face it, kid. You fucked up. There is no Biblical justification for the tyranny you want.

If you had enough reading comprehension you would understand it take morals for that not right-wing fantasy.

Morals to steal from people?

You do know words have meanings, right? You don't get to make up new ones?

Only right-wingers allege that. The rest of us know that the social power to Tax is delegated to our representatives to Government.

"Social power".

No such thing.

But it's HILARIOUS you believe you get to make up definitions! How insanely intellectually bankrupt!

The ignorance of the right-wing is astounding.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

It is accomplished via the social-ism of Government.

Government is not socialism.

Socialism is a form of government which always fails.

That is fact in your face which has been proven time again but being a dishonest and immature right winger you still cling to a proven fallacy

It doesn't always fail at all. There have been a few examples of Socialism and they have failed because they struggled to deal with some of the fundamentals. I'm not a Socialist, but the doesn't mean it can't work.

People would say Capitalism has always failed too. Look at 2008.

Capiyalism is still going strong socialism always fails.

Such a silly statement to make. How many Socialist countries have there ever been?

China. Hasn't failed
Cuba. Hasn't failed
Laos. Hasn't failed
Vietnam. Hasn't failed

Venezuela has failed insanely badly. Unless you think people eating their pets is a success.

Yes, Venezuela is failing badly.

Venezuela is a country run by people. Does this mean that ALL countries run by people will fail?

Plenty of capitalist countries have also failed. Somalia, Zimbabwe. Does this mean we should immediately stop capitalism?

Countries are run by people?! Oh, no!

I bet you though you had a point, too.

The point being that if you take a parameter and then you say "well, this has failed, so it'll never work, we could start with "run by people", as many countries run by people have failed, therefore your argument would be, they'll all fail. Inevitable.

Perhaps. Yet as an economic system, capitalism has lifted the greatest number of people out of poverty.

Problem is, poverty is just statistics.

Oh, and China has lifted so many people out of "poverty". Vietnam too, while the US was trying to put them in poverty in the 1970s.

Yeah. Freedom's for suckers, right? Nobody needs it. Just do what you're told, and you get to keep your organs.

Not sure why you brought up freedom.

China may or may not harvest prisoners organs. You literally have the Fulan Gong's word for it that this happens. They don't like the CCP and the CCP doesn't like them. Hardly unbiased.

But the US executes people. The US locks up political prisoners, the US does all kinds of nasty shit too.

It doesn't make China good and it doesn't make the US good.

But BOTH SYSTEMS do bad shit.

What's your point?

If I have to explain it, you're not capable of understanding it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The basic idea is not about property calling it theft or not self made. The basic idea is " from each according to his ability and to each according to his need". This is the same basic idea behind slavery which is why it is no coincidence that every communist nation is a slave state.

They got it from the Bible.

That is not a defense of slavery, nor does it lend legitamacy to an evil idea.

But no they did not. There is no such scripture.

Slavery is not about free-market Capitalism.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about any "gospel Truth". Appeals to ignorance is all right-wingers are best at.

All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.[25]

— Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35

Christian communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Please point out where the Roman government mandated this sharing.

Again: Communism can work only in small communities and strictly voluntarily.

Read some history of the Roman Empire.

Only the Religious seem to be able to make it work. Not enough morals to go around among the secular laity?

Face it, kid. You fucked up. There is no Biblical justification for the tyranny you want.

If you had enough reading comprehension you would understand it take morals for that not right-wing fantasy.

Morals to steal from people?

You do know words have meanings, right? You don't get to make up new ones?

Only right-wingers allege that. The rest of us know that the social power to Tax is delegated to our representatives to Government.

"Social power".

No such thing.

But it's HILARIOUS you believe you get to make up definitions! How insanely intellectually bankrupt!

The ignorance of the right-wing is astounding.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

It is accomplished via the social-ism of Government.

Government is not socialism.

Socialism is a form of government which always fails.

That is fact in your face which has been proven time again but being a dishonest and immature right winger you still cling to a proven fallacy

It doesn't always fail at all. There have been a few examples of Socialism and they have failed because they struggled to deal with some of the fundamentals. I'm not a Socialist, but the doesn't mean it can't work.

People would say Capitalism has always failed too. Look at 2008.

If it hasn't worked in the past, it's not going to work in the future.

And it's never worked in the past.

That's such an illogical position to take.

Literally, if you fail at first, give up and never try again.

The problem with political systems is there are many ways to flog a horse.

You can set up Socialism in a million different ways. You can be intelligent about it and use human psychology to get the best out of workers, or you can just demand they do what they're told and use fear, or you can simply let the workers be lazy.

Each will have different results.

China is doing things much differently to the way the USSR did things, or how Cuba do things. So you'll have different results.

NO GUISE HONEST ITLL WORK THIS TIME PINKIE SWEAR

Yeah, I think I'll pass.

View attachment 504518

What? I didn't understand a single thing.

It's pretty simply. People who want to try failed ideologies always say "it'll work this time".

No, it won't.

And the image itself is simple, too. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to vote Democrat.

That's why Democrats keep insisting "it'll work this time!"

The problem is there are many ways to run a country with the same ideology.

So, yeah, if you'd do the USSR again in the same way, it'd fail.

But China isn't doing Socialism in the same way as the USSR. So, you can't say "because the USSR failed, China will too."

China is making money using slave labor and is harvesting organs from political prisoners.

Not a huge success there.

And look at the US. They had SLAVERY for 90 years, then segregation, then blacks currently have 25% poverty compared to 7% for whites.

SUCCESS????????

The US goes around the world bombing for oil.

Four OPEC countries hated the US in 2001. Iraq, invaded in 2003. Libya bombed and leader removed in 2011. Venezuela, US supported coup d'etat in 2002 followed by heavy sanctions. Iran, heavy sanctions.

Success?

Yeah, yeah, we get it. America sucks.

You're boring me.

Seems we're not going to be able to have a sensible conversation.

You're just going to say something emotional at every turn.

Did I say "America sucks"? No, YOU DID.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The basic idea is not about property calling it theft or not self made. The basic idea is " from each according to his ability and to each according to his need". This is the same basic idea behind slavery which is why it is no coincidence that every communist nation is a slave state.

They got it from the Bible.

That is not a defense of slavery, nor does it lend legitamacy to an evil idea.

But no they did not. There is no such scripture.

Slavery is not about free-market Capitalism.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about any "gospel Truth". Appeals to ignorance is all right-wingers are best at.

All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.[25]

— Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35

Christian communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Please point out where the Roman government mandated this sharing.

Again: Communism can work only in small communities and strictly voluntarily.

Read some history of the Roman Empire.

Only the Religious seem to be able to make it work. Not enough morals to go around among the secular laity?

Face it, kid. You fucked up. There is no Biblical justification for the tyranny you want.

If you had enough reading comprehension you would understand it take morals for that not right-wing fantasy.

Morals to steal from people?

You do know words have meanings, right? You don't get to make up new ones?

Only right-wingers allege that. The rest of us know that the social power to Tax is delegated to our representatives to Government.

"Social power".

No such thing.

But it's HILARIOUS you believe you get to make up definitions! How insanely intellectually bankrupt!

The ignorance of the right-wing is astounding.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

It is accomplished via the social-ism of Government.

Government is not socialism.

Socialism is a form of government which always fails.

That is fact in your face which has been proven time again but being a dishonest and immature right winger you still cling to a proven fallacy

It doesn't always fail at all. There have been a few examples of Socialism and they have failed because they struggled to deal with some of the fundamentals. I'm not a Socialist, but the doesn't mean it can't work.

People would say Capitalism has always failed too. Look at 2008.

Capiyalism is still going strong socialism always fails.

Such a silly statement to make. How many Socialist countries have there ever been?

China. Hasn't failed
Cuba. Hasn't failed
Laos. Hasn't failed
Vietnam. Hasn't failed

Venezuela has failed insanely badly. Unless you think people eating their pets is a success.

Yes, Venezuela is failing badly.

Venezuela is a country run by people. Does this mean that ALL countries run by people will fail?

Plenty of capitalist countries have also failed. Somalia, Zimbabwe. Does this mean we should immediately stop capitalism?

Countries are run by people?! Oh, no!

I bet you though you had a point, too.

The point being that if you take a parameter and then you say "well, this has failed, so it'll never work, we could start with "run by people", as many countries run by people have failed, therefore your argument would be, they'll all fail. Inevitable.

Perhaps. Yet as an economic system, capitalism has lifted the greatest number of people out of poverty.

Problem is, poverty is just statistics.

Oh, and China has lifted so many people out of "poverty". Vietnam too, while the US was trying to put them in poverty in the 1970s.

Yeah. Freedom's for suckers, right? Nobody needs it. Just do what you're told, and you get to keep your organs.

Not sure why you brought up freedom.

China may or may not harvest prisoners organs. You literally have the Fulan Gong's word for it that this happens. They don't like the CCP and the CCP doesn't like them. Hardly unbiased.

But the US executes people. The US locks up political prisoners, the US does all kinds of nasty shit too.

It doesn't make China good and it doesn't make the US good.

But BOTH SYSTEMS do bad shit.

What's your point?

If I have to explain it, you're not capable of understanding it.

Conversation over. Bye

 

[daveman]

The basic idea is not about property calling it theft or not self made. The basic idea is " from each according to his ability and to each according to his need". This is the same basic idea behind slavery which is why it is no coincidence that every communist nation is a slave state.

They got it from the Bible.

That is not a defense of slavery, nor does it lend legitamacy to an evil idea.

But no they did not. There is no such scripture.

Slavery is not about free-market Capitalism.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about any "gospel Truth". Appeals to ignorance is all right-wingers are best at.

All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.[25]

— Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35

Christian communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Please point out where the Roman government mandated this sharing.

Again: Communism can work only in small communities and strictly voluntarily.

Read some history of the Roman Empire.

Only the Religious seem to be able to make it work. Not enough morals to go around among the secular laity?

Face it, kid. You fucked up. There is no Biblical justification for the tyranny you want.

If you had enough reading comprehension you would understand it take morals for that not right-wing fantasy.

Morals to steal from people?

You do know words have meanings, right? You don't get to make up new ones?

Only right-wingers allege that. The rest of us know that the social power to Tax is delegated to our representatives to Government.

"Social power".

No such thing.

But it's HILARIOUS you believe you get to make up definitions! How insanely intellectually bankrupt!

The ignorance of the right-wing is astounding.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

It is accomplished via the social-ism of Government.

Government is not socialism.

Socialism is a form of government which always fails.

That is fact in your face which has been proven time again but being a dishonest and immature right winger you still cling to a proven fallacy

It doesn't always fail at all. There have been a few examples of Socialism and they have failed because they struggled to deal with some of the fundamentals. I'm not a Socialist, but the doesn't mean it can't work.

People would say Capitalism has always failed too. Look at 2008.

If it hasn't worked in the past, it's not going to work in the future.

And it's never worked in the past.

That's such an illogical position to take.

Literally, if you fail at first, give up and never try again.

The problem with political systems is there are many ways to flog a horse.

You can set up Socialism in a million different ways. You can be intelligent about it and use human psychology to get the best out of workers, or you can just demand they do what they're told and use fear, or you can simply let the workers be lazy.

Each will have different results.

China is doing things much differently to the way the USSR did things, or how Cuba do things. So you'll have different results.

NO GUISE HONEST ITLL WORK THIS TIME PINKIE SWEAR

Yeah, I think I'll pass.

View attachment 504518

What? I didn't understand a single thing.

It's pretty simply. People who want to try failed ideologies always say "it'll work this time".

No, it won't.

And the image itself is simple, too. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to vote Democrat.

That's why Democrats keep insisting "it'll work this time!"

The problem is there are many ways to run a country with the same ideology.

So, yeah, if you'd do the USSR again in the same way, it'd fail.

But China isn't doing Socialism in the same way as the USSR. So, you can't say "because the USSR failed, China will too."

China is making money using slave labor and is harvesting organs from political prisoners.

Not a huge success there.

And look at the US. They had SLAVERY for 90 years, then segregation, then blacks currently have 25% poverty compared to 7% for whites.

SUCCESS????????

The US goes around the world bombing for oil.

Four OPEC countries hated the US in 2001. Iraq, invaded in 2003. Libya bombed and leader removed in 2011. Venezuela, US supported coup d'etat in 2002 followed by heavy sanctions. Iran, heavy sanctions.

Success?

Yeah, yeah, we get it. America sucks.

You're boring me.

Seems we're not going to be able to have a sensible conversation.

You're just going to say something emotional at every turn.

Did I say "America sucks"? No, YOU DID.

Well, yeah, actually, you did, in response to me pointing out the failures of socialism. Nothing but Whataboutism, as dictated by Communism.

According to Russian writer, chess grandmaster and political activist Garry Kasparov, "whataboutism" is a word that was coined to describe the frequent use of a rhetorical diversion by Soviet apologists and dictators, who would counter charges of their oppression, "massacres, gulags, and forced deportations" by invoking American slavery, racism, lynchings, etc.[4]

That's exactly what you were doing.

 

[daveman]

The basic idea is not about property calling it theft or not self made. The basic idea is " from each according to his ability and to each according to his need". This is the same basic idea behind slavery which is why it is no coincidence that every communist nation is a slave state.

They got it from the Bible.

That is not a defense of slavery, nor does it lend legitamacy to an evil idea.

But no they did not. There is no such scripture.

Slavery is not about free-market Capitalism.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about any "gospel Truth". Appeals to ignorance is all right-wingers are best at.

All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.[25]

— Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35

Christian communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Please point out where the Roman government mandated this sharing.

Again: Communism can work only in small communities and strictly voluntarily.

Read some history of the Roman Empire.

Only the Religious seem to be able to make it work. Not enough morals to go around among the secular laity?

Face it, kid. You fucked up. There is no Biblical justification for the tyranny you want.

If you had enough reading comprehension you would understand it take morals for that not right-wing fantasy.

Morals to steal from people?

You do know words have meanings, right? You don't get to make up new ones?

Only right-wingers allege that. The rest of us know that the social power to Tax is delegated to our representatives to Government.

"Social power".

No such thing.

But it's HILARIOUS you believe you get to make up definitions! How insanely intellectually bankrupt!

The ignorance of the right-wing is astounding.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

It is accomplished via the social-ism of Government.

Government is not socialism.

Socialism is a form of government which always fails.

That is fact in your face which has been proven time again but being a dishonest and immature right winger you still cling to a proven fallacy

It doesn't always fail at all. There have been a few examples of Socialism and they have failed because they struggled to deal with some of the fundamentals. I'm not a Socialist, but the doesn't mean it can't work.

People would say Capitalism has always failed too. Look at 2008.

Capiyalism is still going strong socialism always fails.

Such a silly statement to make. How many Socialist countries have there ever been?

China. Hasn't failed
Cuba. Hasn't failed
Laos. Hasn't failed
Vietnam. Hasn't failed

Venezuela has failed insanely badly. Unless you think people eating their pets is a success.

Yes, Venezuela is failing badly.

Venezuela is a country run by people. Does this mean that ALL countries run by people will fail?

Plenty of capitalist countries have also failed. Somalia, Zimbabwe. Does this mean we should immediately stop capitalism?

Countries are run by people?! Oh, no!

I bet you though you had a point, too.

The point being that if you take a parameter and then you say "well, this has failed, so it'll never work, we could start with "run by people", as many countries run by people have failed, therefore your argument would be, they'll all fail. Inevitable.

Perhaps. Yet as an economic system, capitalism has lifted the greatest number of people out of poverty.

Problem is, poverty is just statistics.

Oh, and China has lifted so many people out of "poverty". Vietnam too, while the US was trying to put them in poverty in the 1970s.

Yeah. Freedom's for suckers, right? Nobody needs it. Just do what you're told, and you get to keep your organs.

Not sure why you brought up freedom.

China may or may not harvest prisoners organs. You literally have the Fulan Gong's word for it that this happens. They don't like the CCP and the CCP doesn't like them. Hardly unbiased.

But the US executes people. The US locks up political prisoners, the US does all kinds of nasty shit too.

It doesn't make China good and it doesn't make the US good.

But BOTH SYSTEMS do bad shit.

What's your point?

If I have to explain it, you're not capable of understanding it.

Conversation over. Bye

 

[Blackrook]

The basic idea is not about property calling it theft or not self made. The basic idea is " from each according to his ability and to each according to his need". This is the same basic idea behind slavery which is why it is no coincidence that every communist nation is a slave state.

They got it from the Bible.

That is not a defense of slavery, nor does it lend legitamacy to an evil idea.

But no they did not. There is no such scripture.

Slavery is not about free-market Capitalism.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about any "gospel Truth". Appeals to ignorance is all right-wingers are best at.

All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.[25]

— Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35

Christian communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Please point out where the Roman government mandated this sharing.

Again: Communism can work only in small communities and strictly voluntarily.

Read some history of the Roman Empire.

Only the Religious seem to be able to make it work. Not enough morals to go around among the secular laity?

Face it, kid. You fucked up. There is no Biblical justification for the tyranny you want.

If you had enough reading comprehension you would understand it take morals for that not right-wing fantasy.

Morals to steal from people?

You do know words have meanings, right? You don't get to make up new ones?

Only right-wingers allege that. The rest of us know that the social power to Tax is delegated to our representatives to Government.

"Social power".

No such thing.

But it's HILARIOUS you believe you get to make up definitions! How insanely intellectually bankrupt!

The ignorance of the right-wing is astounding.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

It is accomplished via the social-ism of Government.

Government is not socialism.

Socialism is a form of government which always fails.

That is fact in your face which has been proven time again but being a dishonest and immature right winger you still cling to a proven fallacy

It doesn't always fail at all. There have been a few examples of Socialism and they have failed because they struggled to deal with some of the fundamentals. I'm not a Socialist, but the doesn't mean it can't work.

People would say Capitalism has always failed too. Look at 2008.

If it hasn't worked in the past, it's not going to work in the future.

And it's never worked in the past.

That's such an illogical position to take.

Literally, if you fail at first, give up and never try again.

The problem with political systems is there are many ways to flog a horse.

You can set up Socialism in a million different ways. You can be intelligent about it and use human psychology to get the best out of workers, or you can just demand they do what they're told and use fear, or you can simply let the workers be lazy.

Each will have different results.

China is doing things much differently to the way the USSR did things, or how Cuba do things. So you'll have different results.

NO GUISE HONEST ITLL WORK THIS TIME PINKIE SWEAR

Yeah, I think I'll pass.

View attachment 504518

What? I didn't understand a single thing.

It's pretty simply. People who want to try failed ideologies always say "it'll work this time".

No, it won't.

And the image itself is simple, too. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to vote Democrat.

That's why Democrats keep insisting "it'll work this time!"

The problem is there are many ways to run a country with the same ideology.

So, yeah, if you'd do the USSR again in the same way, it'd fail.

But China isn't doing Socialism in the same way as the USSR. So, you can't say "because the USSR failed, China will too."

Any government that finds it necessary to murder millions of people to stay in power is a failure.

 

[Dragonlady]

The fall of the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc countries did not spell the end of Communism. It clings on in Cuba, North Vietnam and in Venezuela.

However, the true threat comes from within the United States.

Communists are recruited in college or university through front groups that pretend to be concerned with other issues. The two most prominent Communist front group today is Black Lives Matter and Antifa.

However, very few Communists will admit to being Communists. One of the first thing a new Communist is taught is to lie and always deny being a Communist.

In the United States, Communists have infiltrated and now control a large percentage of our institutions. The Communists call this the "Long March Through the Institutions."

Communists take advantage of the fact that most Americans do not concern themselves that much with political issues, but devote themselves to career and family. Communists will always put Communism above all else, and will devote more time to their cause than anyone else will devote to any other cause.

The stolen election of 2020 was a Communist takeover. For the first time in American history, we do not have a democratically elected government. We are ruled by Communists who will do whatever it takes to ensure that a fair election is never again held in the United States.

Only idiot Republicans believe that the Democrats are communist. The rest of the world is a whole lot smarter than Republican Americans.

You are a danger to yourselves and others. The product of homeschooling

 

[GLASNOST]

If it hasn't worked in the past, it's not going to work in the future.

And it's never worked in the past.

That's such an illogical position to take.

Literally, if you fail at first, give up and never try again.

The problem with political systems is there are many ways to flog a horse.

You can set up Socialism in a million different ways. You can be intelligent about it and use human psychology to get the best out of workers, or you can just demand they do what they're told and use fear, or you can simply let the workers be lazy.

Each will have different results.

China is doing things much differently to the way the USSR did things, or how Cuba do things. So you'll have different results.

Unfortunately, you are speaking to an uneducated fool who doesn't understand a word you are saying. He's got a tattoo on the palm of one hand, "Capitalism, good" "Communism, bad" that he can glance at any time a political discussion arises. He has no idea of what philosophy goes into each of them or how many different ways they can be applied.

 

[GLASNOST]

Lions and tigers and communists oh my. The big bad Boogeymen communists. .000000000000000000000000000000000001 percent of the population. Hide under your bed. Laughing hysterically.

You prove yourself to be a Communist when you deny that Communism is a threat to our nation.

You prove yourself to be a moron when you assume that anyone with knowledge of political philosophy is a Communist.

 

[GLASNOST]

The basic idea is not about property calling it theft or not self made. The basic idea is " from each according to his ability and to each according to his need". This is the same basic idea behind slavery which is why it is no coincidence that every communist nation is a slave state.

They got it from the Bible.

That is not a defense of slavery, nor does it lend legitamacy to an evil idea.

But no they did not. There is no such scripture.

Slavery is not about free-market Capitalism.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about any "gospel Truth". Appeals to ignorance is all right-wingers are best at.

All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.[25]

— Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35

Christian communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Please point out where the Roman government mandated this sharing.

Again: Communism can work only in small communities and strictly voluntarily.

Read some history of the Roman Empire.

Only the Religious seem to be able to make it work. Not enough morals to go around among the secular laity?

Face it, kid. You fucked up. There is no Biblical justification for the tyranny you want.

If you had enough reading comprehension you would understand it take morals for that not right-wing fantasy.

Morals to steal from people?

You do know words have meanings, right? You don't get to make up new ones?

Only right-wingers allege that. The rest of us know that the social power to Tax is delegated to our representatives to Government.

"Social power".

No such thing.

But it's HILARIOUS you believe you get to make up definitions! How insanely intellectually bankrupt!

The ignorance of the right-wing is astounding.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

It is accomplished via the social-ism of Government.

Government is not socialism.

Socialism is a form of government which always fails.

That is fact in your face which has been proven time again but being a dishonest and immature right winger you still cling to a proven fallacy

It doesn't always fail at all. There have been a few examples of Socialism and they have failed because they struggled to deal with some of the fundamentals. I'm not a Socialist, but the doesn't mean it can't work.

People would say Capitalism has always failed too. Look at 2008.

Capiyalism is still going strong socialism always fails.

Such a silly statement to make. How many Socialist countries have there ever been?

China. Hasn't failed
Cuba. Hasn't failed
Laos. Hasn't failed
Vietnam. Hasn't failed

Venezuela has failed insanely badly. Unless you think people eating their pets is a success.

Yes, Venezuela is failing badly.

Venezuela is a country run by people. Does this mean that ALL countries run by people will fail?

Plenty of capitalist countries have also failed. Somalia, Zimbabwe. Does this mean we should immediately stop capitalism?

Countries are run by people?! Oh, no!

I bet you though you had a point, too.

The point being that if you take a parameter and then you say "well, this has failed, so it'll never work, we could start with "run by people", as many countries run by people have failed, therefore your argument would be, they'll all fail. Inevitable.

Right over his head.

 

[GLASNOST]

Bull shit. How many millions have been killed by Capitalist countries? And the US (that boasts of being the Capitalist leader of the world) has a terrible standard of living. Just look at the percentage of poverty in the US.

Poor people in America have big-screen televisions, cars, and cell phones.

How about poor people in Asia or Africa?

There you have it, ladies and gentlemen! The best way to judge a nation of superior quality of life is by the number of big-screen televisions, cars, and cell phones they have! We can ignore the proliferation of rioting, serial killers, mass shootings, and wars that the population experiences on a daily basis. Go America!

 

[frigidweirdo]

The basic idea is not about property calling it theft or not self made. The basic idea is " from each according to his ability and to each according to his need". This is the same basic idea behind slavery which is why it is no coincidence that every communist nation is a slave state.

They got it from the Bible.

That is not a defense of slavery, nor does it lend legitamacy to an evil idea.

But no they did not. There is no such scripture.

Slavery is not about free-market Capitalism.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about any "gospel Truth". Appeals to ignorance is all right-wingers are best at.

All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.[25]

— Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35

Christian communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Please point out where the Roman government mandated this sharing.

Again: Communism can work only in small communities and strictly voluntarily.

Read some history of the Roman Empire.

Only the Religious seem to be able to make it work. Not enough morals to go around among the secular laity?

Face it, kid. You fucked up. There is no Biblical justification for the tyranny you want.

If you had enough reading comprehension you would understand it take morals for that not right-wing fantasy.

Morals to steal from people?

You do know words have meanings, right? You don't get to make up new ones?

Only right-wingers allege that. The rest of us know that the social power to Tax is delegated to our representatives to Government.

"Social power".

No such thing.

But it's HILARIOUS you believe you get to make up definitions! How insanely intellectually bankrupt!

The ignorance of the right-wing is astounding.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

It is accomplished via the social-ism of Government.

Government is not socialism.

Socialism is a form of government which always fails.

That is fact in your face which has been proven time again but being a dishonest and immature right winger you still cling to a proven fallacy

It doesn't always fail at all. There have been a few examples of Socialism and they have failed because they struggled to deal with some of the fundamentals. I'm not a Socialist, but the doesn't mean it can't work.

People would say Capitalism has always failed too. Look at 2008.

If it hasn't worked in the past, it's not going to work in the future.

And it's never worked in the past.

That's such an illogical position to take.

Literally, if you fail at first, give up and never try again.

The problem with political systems is there are many ways to flog a horse.

You can set up Socialism in a million different ways. You can be intelligent about it and use human psychology to get the best out of workers, or you can just demand they do what they're told and use fear, or you can simply let the workers be lazy.

Each will have different results.

China is doing things much differently to the way the USSR did things, or how Cuba do things. So you'll have different results.

NO GUISE HONEST ITLL WORK THIS TIME PINKIE SWEAR

Yeah, I think I'll pass.

View attachment 504518

What? I didn't understand a single thing.

It's pretty simply. People who want to try failed ideologies always say "it'll work this time".

No, it won't.

And the image itself is simple, too. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to vote Democrat.

That's why Democrats keep insisting "it'll work this time!"

The problem is there are many ways to run a country with the same ideology.

So, yeah, if you'd do the USSR again in the same way, it'd fail.

But China isn't doing Socialism in the same way as the USSR. So, you can't say "because the USSR failed, China will too."

Any government that finds it necessary to murder millions of people to stay in power is a failure.

Look what the US did. Killing people in Latin America, killing or suppressing Native Americans and blacks..... Does this mean the US is a failure.

The reality is China is copying the US.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Hey leftists, defend this. Replace China for Russia and places, and you're going to have to apply your tiny heads to see most of this was implemented by your Demonicrats and more.

This is who you are: https://cultureshield.com/PDF/45_Goals.pdf

Right, dumbass.

Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America. At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen.

An opinion from a BOOK from a kook.
Written in 1958.
Willard Cleon Skousen (/ˈskaʊzən/; January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.
A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society, Skousen's works involved a wide range of subjects including the Six-Day War, Mormon eschatology, New World Order conspiracies, and parenting. His most popular works are The 5,000 Year Leap and The Naked Communist.

Skousen opposed all federal regulatory agencies and argued against the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency.
He also wanted to repeal the minimum wage, eliminate unions, nullify anti-discrimination laws, sell off public lands and national parks, end the direct election of senators, eliminate the income tax and the estate tax, remove the walls separating church and state, and end the Federal Reserve System.

Skousen "once called Jamestown's original settlers communists, wrote end-of-days prophecy and suggested Russians stole Sputnik from the United States."

Statement given in the house of representatives 1963.

TINY head, Skousen could be Q.

You did nothing to dispute the 45 declarations. Let's try this another way, the declarations are a recipe to breakdown the country for the best interests of her enemy. Which of the 45 declarations has the left not acted on and/or instituted? They did more than meet the lion's share and much more, especially in light of COVID.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Hey leftists, defend this. Replace China for Russia and places, and you're going to have to apply your tiny heads to see most of this was implemented by your Demonicrats and more.

This is who you are: https://cultureshield.com/PDF/45_Goals.pdf

Right, dumbass.

Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America. At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen.

An opinion from a BOOK from a kook.
Written in 1958.
Willard Cleon Skousen (/ˈskaʊzən/; January 20, 1913 – January 9, 2006) was an American conservative author and faith-based political theorist.
A notable anti-communist and supporter of the John Birch Society, Skousen's works involved a wide range of subjects including the Six-Day War, Mormon eschatology, New World Order conspiracies, and parenting. His most popular works are The 5,000 Year Leap and The Naked Communist.

Skousen opposed all federal regulatory agencies and argued against the creation of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency.
He also wanted to repeal the minimum wage, eliminate unions, nullify anti-discrimination laws, sell off public lands and national parks, end the direct election of senators, eliminate the income tax and the estate tax, remove the walls separating church and state, and end the Federal Reserve System.

Skousen "once called Jamestown's original settlers communists, wrote end-of-days prophecy and suggested Russians stole Sputnik from the United States."

Statement given in the house of representatives 1963.

TINY head, Skousen could be Q.

You did nothing to dispute the 45 declarations. Let's try this another way, the declarations are a recipe to breakdown the country for the best interests of her enemy. Which of the 45 declarations has the left not acted on and/or instituted? They did more than meet the lion's share and much more, especially in light of COVID.

Just like Q NUT "Declarations".

TOTAL BS from a loon.

 

[GLASNOST]

The reality is China is copying the US.

At lower cost rates, hence less expensive to purchase. That's why the US government hates the Chinese while the American population loves them and can't do without them.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Why do Progressives never have a bad word to say about Communism or mankind's most prolific mass murders, all Communists?

Because communism has never killed anyone.
Stalin was not a communist, but a capitalist bank robber, who infiltrated the Communists, Socialists, and Anarchists, killed them all, took over, and implemented state capitalism instead.

Look at the characteristics. Communism is collaborative, cooperative, communal, and the way humans normally treat each other in small social groups like families, clubs, tribes, etc.
Those who think communism implies a large centralized state, simply do not know anything about communism.
And what Stalin implemented was not at all collaborative, cooperative, communal, or voluntary.
It was forced, state, capitalism, with purely a profit motive for the ruling elite.

Communism has killed un toldf tens of millions.

Stalin was a communist. He was not a capitalist,

Communism is totalitarian and never cooperative or communial or cllobaorative,

It is you who grapss nothing about communism and is ignorant of it.

Stalin wasn't really a Communist. Do you think Stalin gave a damn about Communism at all? What did Stalin do that was either Communist or pushing for Communism?

He was a communist through and through. he etablished the comintern specifically for the purpose of spreading communism world wide just as Marx required communism to work. He forced the entire nation to work and live in accordance with his interpretation of Marx which is precisely what the dictatorship of the proletariate is meant to do.

Well, the Comintern was established in 1919 before Stalin was a major force. Stalin was on the delegate's list, but it's not known if he actually went.

Stalin was one of those guys who'd use the system he was in in order to gain the power he wanted. Nothing seems to suggest he was a Communist.

Even the early Communists in Russia thought he might be an agent provocateur.The proven worldwide railure of socialism

Everything proves he was a communist inclluding his own admission.

Yeah, only if you see things in simple.

You mean seeing things clearly without denial

The problem is you think you're seeing things clearly, but mostly this is because you don't actually bother looking at much.

I look at it all you selectively ignore what is inconvenient.

Such as?

The fact that Stalin was a communist

Ah, so, what we seem to be dealing with is this sort of "fact" that most people "know", but haven't actually thought about.

Why, exactly, was Stalin a Communist? Just because he was leader of the USSR?

Because he stated he was and enforced communism on people as envisioned by marx. He followed the play book as directed.

So, if North Korea says it's democracy, IT'S DEMOCRATIC?????

What you have to remember about people and politics is they'll say anything and pretend to be anything to get power.

Try the anti-gay politician caught having gay sex.

Anti-LGBT politician 'caught having sex with a man in his office' facing 30 accusations of sexual misconduct

Ohio state legislator resigns after witness reports extramarital affair to House Chief of Staff

www.independent.co.uk

"Wes Goodman: Anti-LGBT Republican politician 'caught having sex with man in his office' facing 30 sexual misconduct accusations"

Try Xi Jinping who was sent to the countryside under Mao and ran away. He literally ran away from Communism. But he wanted power, and in a one party state, if you want power, you go to the party.

The cave the Chinese president called home

The Chinese president spent his formative years living in a cave in a backwater village. Now, it is being transformed into a theme park-style tourist attraction, as the Chinese leader’s past is used to legitimise Communist Party rule

s.telegraph.co.uk

"Xi Jinping has said that he experienced his political awakening when he was “sent down” to Liangjiahe in Shaanxi province,"

"But the misery of life in the impoverished village of a few dozen houses was too much for the 15-year-old Xi. Longing for his home comforts, he escaped."

People will pretend to be anything. China still has Mao on its banknotes. You have to wonder why, when it was DengXiaoPing who set up the modern China, not Mao. Mao tried to destroy China.

But he didn't enforce Communism as Marx envisioned at all.

Marxism was a classless society.

The USSR clearly had some people more equal than others.

He did enforce communism as envisioned. Marxism calls for a classless society at the end which of course is never reached in reality. However Marxism calls for and demands a new arrangement of class in society before the end is reached. That is why it calls for a dictatorship of the proletariate. Marx clearly stated despotism would be necessary while striving to reach that end. Stalin merely provided the dictatorship while striving for thaty end exactly as Marx demanded.

Once again commubnism is not the end result it is the revolution and ideology to reach that result.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Capitalism does not kill. Some capitalists do but they are simply criminals.

How many people died during our civil war when we had freer market based capitalism then than we do now?

That was not why the war was fought or what it was fought over. Communists kill directly FOR communism and because of it.

It was for the capitalism of private property by ignoring natural rights for a certain segment of our population.

How many people die of poverty and lack of adequate medical care under our form of Capitalism?

No it was not for capitalism at all. Capitalism succeeded where it was praciticed in states without slavery which produced well over 90 % of the nations GDP at that time.

Fewer die of poverty and inadequate medical care under capitalism than those who die of the same causes in any socialist nation.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Even Stalin had great faults and great virtues. He played the greatest role among mortal humans in defeating Nazism.

Really, can you name some of these fictional virtues you hold in such high esteem?

1) Joseph Stalin played the greatest role of any mortal in defeating Nazis and saving the World from Nazism.

2) Joseph Stalin helped create Israel.

Yes he did. Which is irrelevant as he commited even greater genocide thasn the nazis did. Saving the world from naziism in order to subject the world to communism is not doing the world a favor.

Communism is far bloodier and worse thasn naziism. What he did was akin to a serial killer stopping a mass murderer.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The basic idea is not about property calling it theft or not self made. The basic idea is " from each according to his ability and to each according to his need". This is the same basic idea behind slavery which is why it is no coincidence that every communist nation is a slave state.

They got it from the Bible.

That is not a defense of slavery, nor does it lend legitamacy to an evil idea.

But no they did not. There is no such scripture.

Slavery is not about free-market Capitalism.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about any "gospel Truth". Appeals to ignorance is all right-wingers are best at.

All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.[25]

— Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35

Christian communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Please point out where the Roman government mandated this sharing.

Again: Communism can work only in small communities and strictly voluntarily.

Read some history of the Roman Empire.

Only the Religious seem to be able to make it work. Not enough morals to go around among the secular laity?

Face it, kid. You fucked up. There is no Biblical justification for the tyranny you want.

If you had enough reading comprehension you would understand it take morals for that not right-wing fantasy.

Morals to steal from people?

You do know words have meanings, right? You don't get to make up new ones?

Only right-wingers allege that. The rest of us know that the social power to Tax is delegated to our representatives to Government.

"Social power".

No such thing.

But it's HILARIOUS you believe you get to make up definitions! How insanely intellectually bankrupt!

The ignorance of the right-wing is astounding.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

It is accomplished via the social-ism of Government.

Government is not socialism.

Socialism is a form of government which always fails.

That is fact in your face which has been proven time again but being a dishonest and immature right winger you still cling to a proven fallacy

It doesn't always fail at all. There have been a few examples of Socialism and they have failed because they struggled to deal with some of the fundamentals. I'm not a Socialist, but the doesn't mean it can't work.

People would say Capitalism has always failed too. Look at 2008.

Capiyalism is still going strong socialism always fails.

Such a silly statement to make. How many Socialist countries have there ever been?

China. Hasn't failed
Cuba. Hasn't failed
Laos. Hasn't failed
Vietnam. Hasn't failed

and how many millions have been killed in those countries under commie rule ? and countries that practice capitalism have a much better standard of living .

What's your point? Capitalism doesn't kill?

Look at Vietnam. They had the Capitalist French turn up and try and kill them, then the US turned up and tried to kill them.

Yes, different countries have pounded on their people.

China is pounding on the Xinjiang and Tibetan peoples.
The US pounded on the blacks and Native Americans.

Difference is.... NOTHING>

Capitalism does not kill. Some capitalists do but they are simply criminals.

The basic idea is not about property calling it theft or not self made. The basic idea is " from each according to his ability and to each according to his need". This is the same basic idea behind slavery which is why it is no coincidence that every communist nation is a slave state.

They got it from the Bible.

That is not a defense of slavery, nor does it lend legitamacy to an evil idea.

But no they did not. There is no such scripture.

Slavery is not about free-market Capitalism.

Nobody takes right-wingers seriously about any "gospel Truth". Appeals to ignorance is all right-wingers are best at.

All who believed were together and had all things in common; 45 they would sell their possessions and goods and distribute the proceeds to all, as any had need. ... Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. ... There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.[25]

— Acts 2:44–45, Acts 4:32–35

Christian communism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Please point out where the Roman government mandated this sharing.

Again: Communism can work only in small communities and strictly voluntarily.

Read some history of the Roman Empire.

Only the Religious seem to be able to make it work. Not enough morals to go around among the secular laity?

Face it, kid. You fucked up. There is no Biblical justification for the tyranny you want.

If you had enough reading comprehension you would understand it take morals for that not right-wing fantasy.

Morals to steal from people?

You do know words have meanings, right? You don't get to make up new ones?

Only right-wingers allege that. The rest of us know that the social power to Tax is delegated to our representatives to Government.

"Social power".

No such thing.

But it's HILARIOUS you believe you get to make up definitions! How insanely intellectually bankrupt!

The ignorance of the right-wing is astounding.

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

It is accomplished via the social-ism of Government.

Government is not socialism.

Socialism is a form of government which always fails.

That is fact in your face which has been proven time again but being a dishonest and immature right winger you still cling to a proven fallacy

It doesn't always fail at all. There have been a few examples of Socialism and they have failed because they struggled to deal with some of the fundamentals. I'm not a Socialist, but the doesn't mean it can't work.

People would say Capitalism has always failed too. Look at 2008.

Capiyalism is still going strong socialism always fails.

Such a silly statement to make. How many Socialist countries have there ever been?

China. Hasn't failed
Cuba. Hasn't failed
Laos. Hasn't failed
Vietnam. Hasn't failed

They all have

What's the point of making such a comment?

It is accurate and correcting your comment

Ah, so "some capitalists" kill. But all Socialists do.

Huh?

So when the people elect someone like George W. Bush, and then he goes to Iraq and invades and kills or gets killed upwards of one million, he's just a criminal.

But when Socialist Vietnam invades Khmer Rouge controlled Cambodia and kicks out the US BACKED Khmer Rouge (think the Killing Fields), that's what? Just Socialism killing?


Your comment is pointless. I cannot reply to a comment that doesn't tell me anything. You might as well tell me that your dog aNo you lack comprehension.

No matter the system some criminals kill, Capitalists do not kill in the name of capitalism or to enforce or spread capitalism. Communists always kill to enforce or spread communism'

My comment is accurate.

te some chips. It's pointless. No matter how true you think it might be.

So, the US didn't go to Vietnam to spread Capitalism?

No. We were supporting an ally who we had a treaty with and which was being subjected to a war of aggression.