WelfareQueen
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Yea that Halliburton was sure good at what they do. Remember when they were electrocuting soldiers in the showers in Iraq. They couldn't hook up the pump correctly and ended up killing a couple soldiers and injuring others. Or maybe when the soldiers didn't have the fresh water that Halliburton was supposed to provide.
Whew. They sure are good and deserving of that no bid contract. And the soldiers couldn't even sue them for anything they did. Now that's protection.
Yes.. because other companies do not have tragic mistakes by employees or whatever
Fact is with Haliburton (which you and your ilk just harp on because of the name Cheney), nobody else could do what was needed on the scale and timeframe.. there was not an option for another company to start up a whole new division, a whole new set of logistics, etc...
Much like my company.. you expect us to wait for another company to be able to deal with the installation of the technology to have a bid, or do it now without bid 6-12 months before our competition and gain even more advantage??
You sir, are an idiot
No Davy. You are the idiot. You just trivialized the death of American soldiers to justify a no bid contractors fuck up. Fuck you davy.
Why wasn't the Army providing for its own (like they have done forever). It was because Cheney wanted his old company to have those no bid contracts worth billions.
What a fuking tool you are.
![michael_moore_answer_1_xlarge.jpeg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.sodahead.com%2Fpolls%2F000926489%2Fmichael_moore_answer_1_xlarge.jpeg&hash=1e51bff9a95fd486276823b20bd6a677)