Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then how come you can't QUOTE that coverage? How come you can't screenshot it? How come you can't link it?
Here in the real world you can do all those things. Because those things "exist".
I'm afraid "Feewings" from an echobubble don't count as "reality". You'll need evidence.
It's not easy finding youtube clips of CNN but you can check it out in this video starting from about the 38 second mark. The reporting was one sided... I can clearly remember and the short montage here, though short gives you a clear picture of what was being said about Sandman and his class mates. Again, if the coverage by the news media was fair and they did their job... why did the school have to be closed because of threats?
then watch what really happened and get back to us.
I don't get what your point is here. I checked the 38 second mark of both videos (neither of which appear to be NBC) and there's nothing there that applies.
Again, the story at the time was "there's this viral video going around" --- which was TRUE --- and they showed the video.
--------------- AND???
You can't allege "defamation" for passing on a video that already exists. What's the point?
Your two videos posted here also go on tangents about the Black Hebrew Israelites or whatever they're called. That too is irrelevant. Although it does put the lie to post 90 above.
So ................. what's your point?
What do you mean? the first video clearly shows clips from NBC, CNN and msnbc.... in the CNN one the kids are referred to as a mob, on MSNBC they were pulling the race card on the kids, ..and those were just very short clips.
sorry... i cant find every news report made by CNN, MSNBC, NBC... i dont have the time, and its not all kept handy to find on the internet... not everything is.
They describe what they see on the available video
There were more complete videos available at the time, if the Media would have looked for them. And the fact that these were minor children as well as non public figures, that gave them more responsibility to do exactly that. I don't know what 12 angry men in Kentucky will say, but if I were Bezos, I'd cut a check and offer a couple hundred million to see this go away. Better that than have jury give a $50 Billion judgment.
I knew it within seconds of watching,,,,so a grown man walking up to him pounding a drum inches from his face is not harassment???He was not being harassed at the timestanding there keeping his mouth shut while being called names and harassed is acting like an ass???The kid acted like an ass
you need to get out more,,,
Kid should have stepped aside, it would have saved him much grief
and step aside from what??? the indian came up to him for the purpose of harassing him,,,he would have just followed him,,,
None of that is in the video.
Again, a video is a video. You can't look at the same video and deny it shows what it shows. If your position is that the video is doctored -------------- make that case.
I never said it was edited,,,,,it was clear the aggressor was the old indian guy not the kids,,,I knew it within seconds of watching,,,,so a grown man walking up to him pounding a drum inches from his face is not harassment???He was not being harassed at the timestanding there keeping his mouth shut while being called names and harassed is acting like an ass???
you need to get out more,,,
Kid should have stepped aside, it would have saved him much grief
and step aside from what??? the indian came up to him for the purpose of harassing him,,,he would have just followed him,,,
None of that is in the video.
Again, a video is a video. You can't look at the same video and deny it shows what it shows. If your position is that the video is doctored -------------- make that case.
Then show us where the editing is.
Step aside out of respectso a grown man walking up to him pounding a drum inches from his face is not harassment???He was not being harassed at the timestanding there keeping his mouth shut while being called names and harassed is acting like an ass???The kid acted like an assI hope the kid wins. What the leftist media did to him was abhorrent and shouldn’t go unpunished.
you need to get out more,,,
Kid should have stepped aside, it would have saved him much grief
and step aside from what??? the indian came up to him for the purpose of harassing him,,,he would have just followed him,,,
Then how come you can't QUOTE that coverage? How come you can't screenshot it? How come you can't link it?
Here in the real world you can do all those things. Because those things "exist".
I'm afraid "Feewings" from an echobubble don't count as "reality". You'll need evidence.
It's not easy finding youtube clips of CNN but you can check it out in this video starting from about the 38 second mark. The reporting was one sided... I can clearly remember and the short montage here, though short gives you a clear picture of what was being said about Sandman and his class mates. Again, if the coverage by the news media was fair and they did their job... why did the school have to be closed because of threats?
then watch what really happened and get back to us.
I don't get what your point is here. I checked the 38 second mark of both videos (neither of which appear to be NBC) and there's nothing there that applies.
Again, the story at the time was "there's this viral video going around" --- which was TRUE --- and they showed the video.
--------------- AND???
You can't allege "defamation" for passing on a video that already exists. What's the point?
Your two videos posted here also go on tangents about the Black Hebrew Israelites or whatever they're called. That too is irrelevant. Although it does put the lie to post 90 above.
So ................. what's your point?
What do you mean? the first video clearly shows clips from NBC, CNN and msnbc.... in the CNN one the kids are referred to as a mob, on MSNBC they were pulling the race card on the kids, ..and those were just very short clips.
sorry... i cant find every news report made by CNN, MSNBC, NBC... i dont have the time, and its not all kept handy to find on the internet... not everything is.
They describe what they see on the available video
if thats the case then its clear they lied,,,because the video was clear on who the aggressor was,,,the old indian,,,
step aside from what???Step aside out of respectso a grown man walking up to him pounding a drum inches from his face is not harassment???He was not being harassed at the timestanding there keeping his mouth shut while being called names and harassed is acting like an ass???The kid acted like an assI hope the kid wins. What the leftist media did to him was abhorrent and shouldn’t go unpunished.
you need to get out more,,,
Kid should have stepped aside, it would have saved him much grief
and step aside from what??? the indian came up to him for the purpose of harassing him,,,he would have just followed him,,,
I would have instead of blocking his path with a stupid grin
It's not easy finding youtube clips of CNN but you can check it out in this video starting from about the 38 second mark. The reporting was one sided... I can clearly remember and the short montage here, though short gives you a clear picture of what was being said about Sandman and his class mates. Again, if the coverage by the news media was fair and they did their job... why did the school have to be closed because of threats?
then watch what really happened and get back to us.
I don't get what your point is here. I checked the 38 second mark of both videos (neither of which appear to be NBC) and there's nothing there that applies.
Again, the story at the time was "there's this viral video going around" --- which was TRUE --- and they showed the video.
--------------- AND???
You can't allege "defamation" for passing on a video that already exists. What's the point?
Your two videos posted here also go on tangents about the Black Hebrew Israelites or whatever they're called. That too is irrelevant. Although it does put the lie to post 90 above.
So ................. what's your point?
What do you mean? the first video clearly shows clips from NBC, CNN and msnbc.... in the CNN one the kids are referred to as a mob, on MSNBC they were pulling the race card on the kids, ..and those were just very short clips.
sorry... i cant find every news report made by CNN, MSNBC, NBC... i dont have the time, and its not all kept handy to find on the internet... not everything is.
They describe what they see on the available video
if thats the case then its clear they lied,,,because the video was clear on who the aggressor was,,,the old indian,,,
There is no "aggressor". No wonder you're confused.
There are two people, one is playing a drum, the other is staring with a blank smirk.
That's it.
Now suddenly the kid with the blank stare is to be "awarded" 275 million bucks? For a smirk?
I gotta practice my facial expressions. This is a gold mine.
I never said it was edited,,,,,it was clear the aggressor was the old indian guy not the kids,,,I knew it within seconds of watching,,,,so a grown man walking up to him pounding a drum inches from his face is not harassment???He was not being harassed at the time
Kid should have stepped aside, it would have saved him much grief
and step aside from what??? the indian came up to him for the purpose of harassing him,,,he would have just followed him,,,
None of that is in the video.
Again, a video is a video. You can't look at the same video and deny it shows what it shows. If your position is that the video is doctored -------------- make that case.
Then show us where the editing is.
Then how come you can't QUOTE that coverage? How come you can't screenshot it? How come you can't link it?
Here in the real world you can do all those things. Because those things "exist".
I'm afraid "Feewings" from an echobubble don't count as "reality". You'll need evidence.
It's not easy finding youtube clips of CNN but you can check it out in this video starting from about the 38 second mark. The reporting was one sided... I can clearly remember and the short montage here, though short gives you a clear picture of what was being said about Sandman and his class mates. Again, if the coverage by the news media was fair and they did their job... why did the school have to be closed because of threats?
then watch what really happened and get back to us.
I don't get what your point is here. I checked the 38 second mark of both videos (neither of which appear to be NBC) and there's nothing there that applies.
Again, the story at the time was "there's this viral video going around" --- which was TRUE --- and they showed the video.
--------------- AND???
You can't allege "defamation" for passing on a video that already exists. What's the point?
Your two videos posted here also go on tangents about the Black Hebrew Israelites or whatever they're called. That too is irrelevant. Although it does put the lie to post 90 above.
So ................. what's your point?
What do you mean? the first video clearly shows clips from NBC, CNN and msnbc.... in the CNN one the kids are referred to as a mob, on MSNBC they were pulling the race card on the kids, ..and those were just very short clips.
sorry... i cant find every news report made by CNN, MSNBC, NBC... i dont have the time, and its not all kept handy to find on the internet... not everything is.
Good luck with explaining anything that requires a little common sense to Pogo. The guy is one of our least intelligent members.
All I ask is a very simple question. There is only one possible answer to this question.
SHOW THE EVIDENCE.
That question has floated around, untouched, since mid-January.
It's now May.
Tell me more about this "intelligence" thingy.
thats not what the law suits are for dumbass,,,try to keep up pleaseThey describe what they see on the available videoI don't get what your point is here. I checked the 38 second mark of both videos (neither of which appear to be NBC) and there's nothing there that applies.
Again, the story at the time was "there's this viral video going around" --- which was TRUE --- and they showed the video.
--------------- AND???
You can't allege "defamation" for passing on a video that already exists. What's the point?
Your two videos posted here also go on tangents about the Black Hebrew Israelites or whatever they're called. That too is irrelevant. Although it does put the lie to post 90 above.
So ................. what's your point?
What do you mean? the first video clearly shows clips from NBC, CNN and msnbc.... in the CNN one the kids are referred to as a mob, on MSNBC they were pulling the race card on the kids, ..and those were just very short clips.
sorry... i cant find every news report made by CNN, MSNBC, NBC... i dont have the time, and its not all kept handy to find on the internet... not everything is.
if thats the case then its clear they lied,,,because the video was clear on who the aggressor was,,,the old indian,,,
There is no "aggressor". No wonder you're confused.
There are two people, one is playing a drum, the other is staring with a blank smirk.
That's it.
Now suddenly the kid with the blank stare is to be "awarded" 275 million bucks? For a smirk?
I gotta practice my facial expressions. This is a gold mine.
sorry mis communication on that one,,,I never said it was edited,,,,,it was clear the aggressor was the old indian guy not the kids,,,I knew it within seconds of watching,,,,so a grown man walking up to him pounding a drum inches from his face is not harassment???
and step aside from what??? the indian came up to him for the purpose of harassing him,,,he would have just followed him,,,
None of that is in the video.
Again, a video is a video. You can't look at the same video and deny it shows what it shows. If your position is that the video is doctored -------------- make that case.
Then show us where the editing is.
I asked you if you were claiming the video is doctored, and you said you knew it was within seconds.
Now you're running away from that.'
Aaaaaaaaaaaaallllllllll righty then.
why dont you just read the court documents in the link,,,thats not what the law suits are for dumbass,,,try to keep up pleaseThey describe what they see on the available videoWhat do you mean? the first video clearly shows clips from NBC, CNN and msnbc.... in the CNN one the kids are referred to as a mob, on MSNBC they were pulling the race card on the kids, ..and those were just very short clips.
sorry... i cant find every news report made by CNN, MSNBC, NBC... i dont have the time, and its not all kept handy to find on the internet... not everything is.
if thats the case then its clear they lied,,,because the video was clear on who the aggressor was,,,the old indian,,,
There is no "aggressor". No wonder you're confused.
There are two people, one is playing a drum, the other is staring with a blank smirk.
That's it.
Now suddenly the kid with the blank stare is to be "awarded" 275 million bucks? For a smirk?
I gotta practice my facial expressions. This is a gold mine.
Then why don't you (FINALLY) tell us all what they are about?
I've got fifteen and a half weeks with no answer but who's counting.
Then how come you can't QUOTE that coverage? How come you can't screenshot it? How come you can't link it?
Here in the real world you can do all those things. Because those things "exist".
I'm afraid "Feewings" from an echobubble don't count as "reality". You'll need evidence.
It's not easy finding youtube clips of CNN but you can check it out in this video starting from about the 38 second mark. The reporting was one sided... I can clearly remember and the short montage here, though short gives you a clear picture of what was being said about Sandman and his class mates. Again, if the coverage by the news media was fair and they did their job... why did the school have to be closed because of threats?
then watch what really happened and get back to us.
I don't get what your point is here. I checked the 38 second mark of both videos (neither of which appear to be NBC) and there's nothing there that applies.
Again, the story at the time was "there's this viral video going around" --- which was TRUE --- and they showed the video.
--------------- AND???
You can't allege "defamation" for passing on a video that already exists. What's the point?
Your two videos posted here also go on tangents about the Black Hebrew Israelites or whatever they're called. That too is irrelevant. Although it does put the lie to post 90 above.
So ................. what's your point?
What do you mean? the first video clearly shows clips from NBC, CNN and msnbc.... in the CNN one the kids are referred to as a mob, on MSNBC they were pulling the race card on the kids, ..and those were just very short clips.
sorry... i cant find every news report made by CNN, MSNBC, NBC... i dont have the time, and its not all kept handy to find on the internet... not everything is.
They describe what they see on the available video
There were more complete videos available at the time, if the Media would have looked for them. And the fact that these were minor children as well as non public figures, that gave them more responsibility to do exactly that. I don't know what 12 angry men in Kentucky will say, but if I were Bezos, I'd cut a check and offer a couple hundred million to see this go away. Better that than have jury give a $50 Billion judgment.
It's not easy finding youtube clips of CNN but you can check it out in this video starting from about the 38 second mark. The reporting was one sided... I can clearly remember and the short montage here, though short gives you a clear picture of what was being said about Sandman and his class mates. Again, if the coverage by the news media was fair and they did their job... why did the school have to be closed because of threats?
then watch what really happened and get back to us.
I don't get what your point is here. I checked the 38 second mark of both videos (neither of which appear to be NBC) and there's nothing there that applies.
Again, the story at the time was "there's this viral video going around" --- which was TRUE --- and they showed the video.
--------------- AND???
You can't allege "defamation" for passing on a video that already exists. What's the point?
Your two videos posted here also go on tangents about the Black Hebrew Israelites or whatever they're called. That too is irrelevant. Although it does put the lie to post 90 above.
So ................. what's your point?
What do you mean? the first video clearly shows clips from NBC, CNN and msnbc.... in the CNN one the kids are referred to as a mob, on MSNBC they were pulling the race card on the kids, ..and those were just very short clips.
sorry... i cant find every news report made by CNN, MSNBC, NBC... i dont have the time, and its not all kept handy to find on the internet... not everything is.
Good luck with explaining anything that requires a little common sense to Pogo. The guy is one of our least intelligent members.
All I ask is a very simple question. There is only one possible answer to this question.
SHOW THE EVIDENCE.
That question has floated around, untouched, since mid-January.
It's now May.
Tell me more about this "intelligence" thingy.
The media has a responsibility of getting the facts before reporting. As usual, CNN and MSNBC failed... miserably.
It’s why Fox News isn’t being sued and why their ratings are so high.
You can whine and cry all you want, pogo. Your ignorance of the world around you is partially why I think you’re an idiot. Its also why you will always be a loser.
It's not easy finding youtube clips of CNN but you can check it out in this video starting from about the 38 second mark. The reporting was one sided... I can clearly remember and the short montage here, though short gives you a clear picture of what was being said about Sandman and his class mates. Again, if the coverage by the news media was fair and they did their job... why did the school have to be closed because of threats?
then watch what really happened and get back to us.
I don't get what your point is here. I checked the 38 second mark of both videos (neither of which appear to be NBC) and there's nothing there that applies.
Again, the story at the time was "there's this viral video going around" --- which was TRUE --- and they showed the video.
--------------- AND???
You can't allege "defamation" for passing on a video that already exists. What's the point?
Your two videos posted here also go on tangents about the Black Hebrew Israelites or whatever they're called. That too is irrelevant. Although it does put the lie to post 90 above.
So ................. what's your point?
What do you mean? the first video clearly shows clips from NBC, CNN and msnbc.... in the CNN one the kids are referred to as a mob, on MSNBC they were pulling the race card on the kids, ..and those were just very short clips.
sorry... i cant find every news report made by CNN, MSNBC, NBC... i dont have the time, and its not all kept handy to find on the internet... not everything is.
They describe what they see on the available video
There were more complete videos available at the time, if the Media would have looked for them. And the fact that these were minor children as well as non public figures, that gave them more responsibility to do exactly that. I don't know what 12 angry men in Kentucky will say, but if I were Bezos, I'd cut a check and offer a couple hundred million to see this go away. Better that than have jury give a $50 Billion judgment.
Sandmann will have to prove in court that the media acted maliciously and with intent to harm him
Good luck
Oh, i didnt realize you were so uninformed on this topic, but im not surprised.No, the toothless indian just went on national TV in [sic] made up lies, which is why he may also get sued.True, thats why the toothless indian wont get a dime.Yeah, hes never going to have to work a day in his life now.
Well there's not that much of a market for standing in front of people staring at them like a dick.
Funny how the "toothless Indian" filed no suit for being stared at, while the dick-kid and McConnell's army went all media circus because somebody took his picture.
Says a lot about snowflakery, donut.
uh... really.
Link(s)?
What "lies" would these be?
We're gonna need another shipment of crickets.
It's not easy finding youtube clips of CNN but you can check it out in this video starting from about the 38 second mark. The reporting was one sided... I can clearly remember and the short montage here, though short gives you a clear picture of what was being said about Sandman and his class mates. Again, if the coverage by the news media was fair and they did their job... why did the school have to be closed because of threats?
then watch what really happened and get back to us.
I don't get what your point is here. I checked the 38 second mark of both videos (neither of which appear to be NBC) and there's nothing there that applies.
Again, the story at the time was "there's this viral video going around" --- which was TRUE --- and they showed the video.
--------------- AND???
You can't allege "defamation" for passing on a video that already exists. What's the point?
Your two videos posted here also go on tangents about the Black Hebrew Israelites or whatever they're called. That too is irrelevant. Although it does put the lie to post 90 above.
So ................. what's your point?
What do you mean? the first video clearly shows clips from NBC, CNN and msnbc.... in the CNN one the kids are referred to as a mob, on MSNBC they were pulling the race card on the kids, ..and those were just very short clips.
sorry... i cant find every news report made by CNN, MSNBC, NBC... i dont have the time, and its not all kept handy to find on the internet... not everything is.
They describe what they see on the available video
There were more complete videos available at the time, if the Media would have looked for them. And the fact that these were minor children as well as non public figures, that gave them more responsibility to do exactly that. I don't know what 12 angry men in Kentucky will say, but if I were Bezos, I'd cut a check and offer a couple hundred million to see this go away. Better that than have jury give a $50 Billion judgment.
Sandmann will have to prove in court that the media acted maliciously and with intent to harm him
Good luck
Sandmann will have to prove in court that the media acted maliciously and with intent to harm himThey describe what they see on the available videoI don't get what your point is here. I checked the 38 second mark of both videos (neither of which appear to be NBC) and there's nothing there that applies.
Again, the story at the time was "there's this viral video going around" --- which was TRUE --- and they showed the video.
--------------- AND???
You can't allege "defamation" for passing on a video that already exists. What's the point?
Your two videos posted here also go on tangents about the Black Hebrew Israelites or whatever they're called. That too is irrelevant. Although it does put the lie to post 90 above.
So ................. what's your point?
What do you mean? the first video clearly shows clips from NBC, CNN and msnbc.... in the CNN one the kids are referred to as a mob, on MSNBC they were pulling the race card on the kids, ..and those were just very short clips.
sorry... i cant find every news report made by CNN, MSNBC, NBC... i dont have the time, and its not all kept handy to find on the internet... not everything is.
There were more complete videos available at the time, if the Media would have looked for them. And the fact that these were minor children as well as non public figures, that gave them more responsibility to do exactly that. I don't know what 12 angry men in Kentucky will say, but if I were Bezos, I'd cut a check and offer a couple hundred million to see this go away. Better that than have jury give a $50 Billion judgment.
Good luck
They'll also have to show where they did that. With evidence.
why dont you just read the court documents in the link,,,thats not what the law suits are for dumbass,,,try to keep up pleaseThey describe what they see on the available video
if thats the case then its clear they lied,,,because the video was clear on who the aggressor was,,,the old indian,,,
There is no "aggressor". No wonder you're confused.
There are two people, one is playing a drum, the other is staring with a blank smirk.
That's it.
Now suddenly the kid with the blank stare is to be "awarded" 275 million bucks? For a smirk?
I gotta practice my facial expressions. This is a gold mine.
Then why don't you (FINALLY) tell us all what they are about?
I've got fifteen and a half weeks with no answer but who's counting.
as I said ,,,you need to get out of your moms basement and see the world around youwhy dont you just read the court documents in the link,,,thats not what the law suits are for dumbass,,,try to keep up pleaseif thats the case then its clear they lied,,,because the video was clear on who the aggressor was,,,the old indian,,,
There is no "aggressor". No wonder you're confused.
There are two people, one is playing a drum, the other is staring with a blank smirk.
That's it.
Now suddenly the kid with the blank stare is to be "awarded" 275 million bucks? For a smirk?
I gotta practice my facial expressions. This is a gold mine.
Then why don't you (FINALLY) tell us all what they are about?
I've got fifteen and a half weeks with no answer but who's counting.
As I said I already read them a couple of months back when this grandstanding first oozed up. Apparently they're not getting enough attention so they're waving their arms again.
They cite no evidence. I invited anyone on this board to quote it then too. Got nothing then either.
Sooner or later y'all delusionists are going to have to own up to the fact that the emperor has no clothes. This PR firm is playing y'all like a three-dollar banjo.
