[uSeerl]http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/weekinreview/12wade.html?_r=0[/url]
See how they are spinning the evidence.
First of all, it talks about the evolution of the god gene, and you refute evolution, don't you? And nowhere in the article does it talk about the gene. So I dunno man, got anything else?
Design in nature is all the evidence you need unless you believe chaos will promote order and precision in nature.
What in nature is the product of supermagical "design"?
You continue to make these absurd claims to magic being an extant part of the natural world yet you always put on your Christian creationist dancing shoes when required to demonstrate this supermagicalism.