When specimens from a known dateable event are examined by labs that are not told this, the age of the specimens that are in fact only a hundred or so years old are dated to be millions. This should call into question the validity of all such "scientific" determinations.The don't get it right when they examine the material either.
What is it that they don't get right?
What specimens? What labs?
I suspect you're just making this up as you go.