"The theory that man is an ape is actively promoted in the Judeo Zionist academic world".
I think someone is suffering from IJHS (Irrational Jew Hatred Syndrome)
Has this malady been entered into the DSMMD yet ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"The theory that man is an ape is actively promoted in the Judeo Zionist academic world".
I think someone is suffering from IJHS (Irrational Jew Hatred Syndrome)
To Distinguish Creationism from ID, Try Evolution as the Outgroup - The Panda's Thumb
After the unit on Creationism and Intelligent Design in my Critical Thinking/Science and Pseudoscience class at New Mexico Tech (Psych 189), I asked the students to write an essay on the question
Is Intelligent Design just another version of Creationism? Why?
Along came student Elaine, who included this comment in her essay:
It seems that if you are only comparing Intelligent Design against Creationism, there are enough subtleties to identify one or the other. However, if it is a case of arguing Intelligent Design vs. Creationism vs. evolution, the contrast between evolution and the other two is so great that Intelligent Design and Creationism become indistinguishable in their respective arguments. The only giveaway would be a reference to Genesis, the use of God rather than Creator/Designer, or some explicit differentiation between the two. In contrast, no one could ever possibly confuse an evolution argument with any other.
I remarked that the student had used evolution as an outgroup to correctly root the evolution/creationism/ID tree, and gave her an A for the assignment.
Lol.
I guess the creationist club is gearing of for Easter a truly pagan holiday.To Distinguish Creationism from ID, Try Evolution as the Outgroup - The Panda's Thumb
After the unit on Creationism and Intelligent Design in my Critical Thinking/Science and Pseudoscience class at New Mexico Tech (Psych 189), I asked the students to write an essay on the question
Is Intelligent Design just another version of Creationism? Why?
Along came student Elaine, who included this comment in her essay:
It seems that if you are only comparing Intelligent Design against Creationism, there are enough subtleties to identify one or the other. However, if it is a case of arguing Intelligent Design vs. Creationism vs. evolution, the contrast between evolution and the other two is so great that Intelligent Design and Creationism become indistinguishable in their respective arguments. The only giveaway would be a reference to Genesis, the use of God rather than Creator/Designer, or some explicit differentiation between the two. In contrast, no one could ever possibly confuse an evolution argument with any other.
I remarked that the student had used evolution as an outgroup to correctly root the evolution/creationism/ID tree, and gave her an A for the assignment.
Lol.
Lol. As pointless as your usual babbling.
The Disco' tute Is a collection of Christian hacks, charlatans and snake oil salesmen.
I guess the creationist club is gearing of for Easter a truly pagan holiday.
didn't ur just say he's was not going to debate you or I ANY MORE?
Yep. But like bronchitis, he keeps coming back.I guess the creationist club is gearing of for Easter a truly pagan holiday.Lol.
Lol. As pointless as your usual babbling.
The Disco' tute Is a collection of Christian hacks, charlatans and snake oil salesmen.
didn't ur just say he's was not going to debate you or I ANY MORE?
are you this incredibly stupid all the time?I guess the creationist club is gearing of for Easter a truly pagan holiday.
didn't ur just say he's was not going to debate you or I ANY MORE?
Does it bear any resemblance to Seder or Hannakah or junk like that?
or herpes.Yep. But like bronchitis, he keeps coming back.I guess the creationist club is gearing of for Easter a truly pagan holiday.Lol. As pointless as your usual babbling.
The Disco' tute Is a collection of Christian hacks, charlatans and snake oil salesmen.
didn't ur just say he's was not going to debate you or I ANY MORE?
Judaism is not pagan, slapdick, they believe in the same god as Christians and Muslims.
using your lack of logic, logic would mean all Christian celebrations would be junk too.
Yep. But like bronchitis, he keeps coming back.or herpes.
mr ignorance Easter was usurped by the Christians along with what is now Christmas and lot s of others.Judaism is not pagan, slapdick, they believe in the same god as Christians and Muslims.
using your lack of logic, logic would mean all Christian celebrations would be junk too.
But you just said that Easter was Pagan, diklik.
Using your logic all Jewish sacrifice of chickens OR money would actually transfer their personal sins onto the chickens.
You aren't going to try to say that all their rip off schemes like the one Bernie Madoff pulled was the fault of a chicken?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NuNnsj3K_0]Protestors rally against Orthodox Jews' chicken sacrifice - YouTube[/ame]
I guess at least now we know why they never admit to doing anything wrong.
IT WAS ALL THE CHICKENS' FAULT!
the gist O shit for brains is that any one who celebrates Easter is celebrating a pagan holiday with some Christian frosting..
wrong it's obvious you have no idea what usurped means.the gist O shit for brains is that any one who celebrates Easter is celebrating a pagan holiday with some Christian frosting..
The gist "Oh sh!t for brains", is that the Jews are as Pagan as anyone else, more so than Christians, because the "Jews" retain the Laws and ordinances which practiced THOUSANDS of YEARS ago by ancient Hebrews.
Easter is a holiday which commemorates the Death, Burial, and Resurrection of CHRIST, who, the Jews totally reject, and therefore have absolutely NOTHING to do with.
Why are these traditions so ingrained in Easter Sunday? And what do they have to do with the resurrection of Jesus?
Well, to be frank, nothing.
Bunnies, eggs, Easter gifts and fluffy, yellow chicks in gardening hats all stem from pagan roots. These tropes were incorporated into the celebration of Easter separately from the Christian tradition of honoring the day Jesus Christ rose from the dead.
Observing the Lord's Supper
(Matthew 26:26-30; Mark 14:22-26; Luke 22:14-23)
23 For I received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, that the Lord Jesus in the night in which he was betrayed took bread; 24 and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, This is my body, which is for you: this do in remembrance of me. 25 In like manner also the cup, after supper, saying, This cup is the new covenant in my blood: this do, as often as ye drink it , in remembrance of me. 26 For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink the cup, ye proclaim the Lord's death till he come.
Rosemary's Baby is a 1968 American psychological horror film written and directed by *Roman Polanski, based on the bestselling 1967 novel Rosemary's Baby by Ira Levin.
To Distinguish Creationism from ID, Try Evolution as the Outgroup - The Panda's Thumb
After the unit on Creationism and Intelligent Design in my Critical Thinking/Science and Pseudoscience class at New Mexico Tech (Psych 189), I asked the students to write an essay on the question
Is Intelligent Design just another version of Creationism? Why?
Along came student Elaine, who included this comment in her essay:
It seems that if you are only comparing Intelligent Design against Creationism, there are enough subtleties to identify one or the other. However, if it is a case of arguing Intelligent Design vs. Creationism vs. evolution, the contrast between evolution and the other two is so great that Intelligent Design and Creationism become indistinguishable in their respective arguments. The only giveaway would be a reference to Genesis, the use of God rather than Creator/Designer, or some explicit differentiation between the two. In contrast, no one could ever possibly confuse an evolution argument with any other.
I remarked that the student had used evolution as an outgroup to correctly root the evolution/creationism/ID tree, and gave her an A for the assignment.
Lol.
Lol. As pointless as your usual babbling.
The Disco' tute Is a collection of Christian hacks, charlatans and snake oil salesmen.
Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain: for the LORD will not hold [him] guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
15 It is true that some preach Christ out of envy and rivalry, but others out of goodwill. 16 The latter do so out of love, knowing that I am put here for the defense of the gospel. 17 The former preach Christ out of selfish ambition, not sincerely, supposing that they can stir up trouble for me while I am in chains. 18 But what does it matter? The important thing is that in every way, whether from false motives or true, Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice.
Cohen (Hebrew: כֹּהֵן, kōhēn, "priest") is a Jewish surname[1] of biblical origins (see: Kohen). It is a very common Jewish surname, comparable to 'Smith' in an English-language context.
Bearing the surname indicates that one's patrilineal ancestors were priests in the Temple of Jerusalem. A single such priest was known as a Kohen, and the hereditary caste descending from these priests is collectively known as the Kohanim
Epigentics...
"This is far more involved than a random mutation occurring that just happens to improve slightly how the organism works. In fact epigenetics would involve literally hundreds (and that is conservative) of changes required before any benefit would be realized.
The tagging machines not only need to be built, or adapted from other machines, but they need to know where in all the genome to place the tags. Likewise for the machines that remove and move the tags. In other words, it is not good enough merely to evolve the machines. They somehow much know where to place the tags given a spectrum of environmental signals.
And then the machines that interpret the tags would have to do so correctly. They would have to know what the tag means. So again, not only must these machines have evolved or adapted, but they must know what they are doing.
That is astronomically unlikely to occur according to our knowledge of science."
Darwin's God: Plant's Epigenome as Varied as Their Environments
Wait! Here comes Hawly without a rebuttal and another lame Ad Hominem attack.
No, wait. Here comes the knucklehead with another cut and paste outlined in gargantuan fonts and bright colors. All from the same fundie whackjob.
Epigentics...
"This is far more involved than a random mutation occurring that just happens to improve slightly how the organism works. In fact epigenetics would involve literally hundreds (and that is conservative) of changes required before any benefit would be realized.
The tagging machines not only need to be built, or adapted from other machines, but they need to know where in all the genome to place the tags. Likewise for the machines that remove and move the tags. In other words, it is not good enough merely to evolve the machines. They somehow much know where to place the tags given a spectrum of environmental signals.
And then the machines that interpret the tags would have to do so correctly. They would have to know what the tag means. So again, not only must these machines have evolved or adapted, but they must know what they are doing.
That is astronomically unlikely to occur according to our knowledge of science."
Darwin's God: Plant's Epigenome as Varied as Their Environments
Wait! Here comes Hawly without a rebuttal and another lame Ad Hominem attack.
No, wait. Here comes the knucklehead with another cut and paste outlined in gargantuan fonts and bright colors. All from the same fundie whackjob.
Your response is exactly as I said it would be. Man you are easily manipulated.