🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Crowdstrike

Dumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lol

Feel free to name the actual criminal code. Or just keep pulling this out of Trump's ass.

Either way it will be amusing.
18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government
Dumbfucking PussyBitch, no one is seeking to overthrow the government.

Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?? :cuckoo:
What the FBI did is a coup spying on the political opposition and trying to remove that opposition when they become president is a COUP
deal with it pussy bitch.
Bologna. The FBI was investigating someone on suspicion of working for the Russians on Trump's team. And you have no evidence of any of these people doing anything wrong. Just more conspiracy propaganda disrespecting our government, all garbage propaganda for the dupes.... Russian assets that they are.
Emails!! What garbage....
 
Hey, whatchya suppose will happen to schiffs bug eyes when he's hanged?

Will they pop clean out of his head & roll away? :shok: :ack-1:
 
Trump is part of the government a duly elected president.
Being a member of the government does not make him the government. No one tried to overthrow the government, ya dumbass. You're merely being a mindless parrot again, squawking back what you hear.

Once again you prove to the forum what a dumb fucking PussyBitch you are. :lmao:
Being the Head executive of the branch of government and attempted removal of that executive is a coup.

So when Nixon was being investigated that was an attempted coup?
Nixion being investigated wasn't the beginning of the investigation
Nixon was being investigated after a crime had been committed he wasn't investigated because they were looking for a crime

'attempted removal of that executive is a coup'- your words.

The impeachment of Richard Nixon was an 'attempted removal' of a President- 'that executive'.

So by your definition- a coup.

But your definition is pretty fluid- pretty much just means anything you think threatens Trump is a coup
Swing and a miss
a crime was committed
the brake in of the watergate hotel
It was then when Nixon was caught up in the crime.
 
Hey, whatchya suppose will happen to schiffs bug eyes when he's hanged?

Will they pop clean out of his head & roll away? :shok: :ack-1:

You Trumpettes and your dreams of lynching Americans........

upload_2019-10-30_16-48-59.jpeg
 
Being a member of the government does not make him the government. No one tried to overthrow the government, ya dumbass. You're merely being a mindless parrot again, squawking back what you hear.

Once again you prove to the forum what a dumb fucking PussyBitch you are. :lmao:
Being the Head executive of the branch of government and attempted removal of that executive is a coup.

So when Nixon was being investigated that was an attempted coup?
Nixion being investigated wasn't the beginning of the investigation
Nixon was being investigated after a crime had been committed he wasn't investigated because they were looking for a crime

'attempted removal of that executive is a coup'- your words.

The impeachment of Richard Nixon was an 'attempted removal' of a President- 'that executive'.

So by your definition- a coup.

But your definition is pretty fluid- pretty much just means anything you think threatens Trump is a coup
Swing and a miss
a crime was committed
the brake in of the watergate hotel
It was then when Nixon was caught up in the crime.

LOL a crime was committed- but Nixon wasn't being impeached for the breakin.......
 
Dumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lol

Feel free to name the actual criminal code. Or just keep pulling this out of Trump's ass.

Either way it will be amusing.
18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government
Dumbfucking PussyBitch, no one is seeking to overthrow the government.

Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?? :cuckoo:
What the FBI did is a coup spying on the political opposition and trying to remove that opposition when they become president is a COUP
deal with it pussy bitch.
Bologna. The FBI was investigating someone on suspicion of working for the Russians on Trump's team. And you have no evidence of any of these people doing anything wrong. Just more conspiracy propaganda disrespecting our government, all garbage propaganda for the dupes.... Russian assets that they are.
Nope
The FBI used an agent to pass on information they created called entrapment.
 
Being the Head executive of the branch of government and attempted removal of that executive is a coup.

So when Nixon was being investigated that was an attempted coup?
Nixion being investigated wasn't the beginning of the investigation
Nixon was being investigated after a crime had been committed he wasn't investigated because they were looking for a crime

'attempted removal of that executive is a coup'- your words.

The impeachment of Richard Nixon was an 'attempted removal' of a President- 'that executive'.

So by your definition- a coup.

But your definition is pretty fluid- pretty much just means anything you think threatens Trump is a coup
Swing and a miss
a crime was committed
the brake in of the watergate hotel
It was then when Nixon was caught up in the crime.

LOL a crime was committed- but Nixon wasn't being impeached for the breakin.......
Nixon was being investigated because a crime was committed it was his guys who did the break-in or so it was reported
 
Nixion being investigated wasn't the beginning of the investigation
Nixon was being investigated after a crime had been committed he wasn't investigated because they were looking for a crime

'attempted removal of that executive is a coup'- your words.

The impeachment of Richard Nixon was an 'attempted removal' of a President- 'that executive'.

So by your definition- a coup.

But your definition is pretty fluid- pretty much just means anything you think threatens Trump is a coup
When there is no Justification for removal is a coup Peter Strzok thought he had an insurance policy

Oh so its completely subjective.......
Not when you have laws and rules to follow it's not subjective.
When you go outside those rules and laws it becomes a coup.

Okay so you agree that the impeachment hearings are not a coup.

But you think that the FBI investigation before the election was a coup......what rules and laws were broken?
When they go outside the rules and laws that is a coup.
 
Crowdstrike gave the FBI and others a copy of the server.... to verify it themselves.... And the FBI did just that..... And more....

They followed the hackers, gathered how and who did it, who paid for it and how it was paid for, how the info also got to Wikileaks etc.... And had enough evidence to charge the perps who directed the theft at the Russian GRU.
You're really insane, I see.
 
Mueller issued 2,500 subpoenas. The Trump Administration turned over 1 Million Documents. Clinton deleted 33,000 emails
On a illegal Secret Server and destroyed 17 Electronic Devices. And it was proven that she lied, proven that she intentionally was trying to conceal her actions, and proven she was trying to circumvent FOIA.

Never once did a single Government Agency still Ran by Obama Holdovers issue even one Subpoena on Thr DNC server, not even with it being known Pakistani Hackers were Prying in to congressional files did they bother To look at It.

THAT is the one word that set the democrats hair on fire..."CROWDSTRIKE".

It was in the TRANSCRIPT!

When the democrat server was "hacked"...by the "russians"...the FBI never saw that server...debbie wasserman schultz wouldn't allow the FBI anywhere near the server.

So how did the FBI know that the "russians" "Hacked" the server?

CROWDSTRIKE told them so.

This is the very origin of the russia-collusion coup attempt & MANY democrats know this will get them the death penalty!

How would you act if you knew you were going to be executed for your crimes? A little bit CRAZY perhaps?

Would you start doing desperate & illogical things?

Would you try to take out the president before he takes you out and exposes your crimes?

Would your eyeballs start bugging out of your head?

Hey democrats...CROWDSTRIKE!!! :50:

It's all over but the :206:
Of course it's a huge cover-up LOL. Too bad you can't give any evidence she had a crime to cover up. Just garbage propaganda that real journalists and law enforcement have investigated and immediately found it was total crap, super duper. She did nothing general Powell and condoleezza didn't do. Except she had a private server that was never hacked big facking deal. No rule against it at the time. she is not a criminal she was Secretary of State you idiots..... LOL
Trump Russia collusion didn't happen did it?

Mueller found no evidence of a criminal collusion.

Doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Plenty of circumstantial evidence. And I believe there is some real evidence in there of that I wish somebody would talk about LOL.
i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server. i can also get zero reasonable explanations why a copy vs. the original is necessary.

if trump were to pull ANY OF THIS they would scream unholy hell at the party foul, and rightfully so - it would be. yet if "their side" does it, they protect to the death what they would want to "kill" others for doing.

go figure these people. may as well flush a broken turd as it would be more productive than talking with these people.

'Pull any of this'?

Tell us more about this mythical server you believe is hidden away in Ukraine......
180716-poulsen-trump-hero_smaafa


Meanwhile in the real world....

The “server” Trump is obsessed with is actually 140 servers, most of them cloud-based, which the DNC was forced to decommission in June 2016 while trying to rid its network of the Russian GRU officers working to help Trump win the election, according to the figures in the DNC’s civil lawsuit against Russia and the Trump campaign. Another 180 desktop and laptop computers were also swapped out as the DNC raced to get the organization back on its feet and free of Putin’s surveillance.

But despite Trump’s repeated feverish claims to the contrary, no machines are actually missing.

It’s true that the FBI doesn’t have the DNC’s computer hardware. Agents didn’t sweep into DNC headquarters, load up all the equipment and leave Democrats standing stunned beside empty desks and dangling cables. There’s a reason for that, and it has nothing to do with a deep state conspiracy to frame Putin.

Trump and his allies are capitalizing on a basic misapprehension of how computer intrusion investigations work. Investigating a virtual crime isn’t a like investigating a murder. The Russians didn’t leave DNA evidence on the server racks and fingerprints on the keyboards. All the evidence of their comings and goings was on the computer hard drives, and in memory, and in the ephemeral network transmissions to and from the GRU’s command-and-control servers.

When cyber investigators respond to an incident, they capture that evidence in a process called “imaging.” They make an exact byte-for-byte copy of the hard drives. They do the same for the machine’s memory, capturing evidence that would otherwise be lost at the next reboot, and they monitor and store the traffic passing through the victim’s network. This has been standard procedure in computer intrusion investigations for decades. The images, not the computer’s hardware, provide the evidence.

Both the DNC and the security firm Crowdstrike, hired to respond to the breach, have said repeatedly over the years that they gave the FBI a copy of all the DNC images back in 2016. The DNC reiterated that Monday in a statement to the Daily Beast.

“The FBI was given images of servers, forensic copies, as well as a host of other forensic information we collected from our systems,” said Adrienne Watson, the DNC’s deputy communications director. “We were in close contact and worked cooperatively with the FBI and were always responsive to their requests. Any suggestion that they were denied access to what they wanted for their investigation is completely incorrect.”

It’s also consistent with the Department of Justice’s electronic evidence manual, which recommends capturing images when practical even when the FBI is executing a search warrant against a uncooperative suspect. When the computers belong to a cooperating victim, seizing the machines is pretty much out of the question, said James Harris, a former FBI cybercrime agent who worked on a 2009 breach at Google that’s been linked to the Chinese government.

“In most cases you don’t even ask, you just assume you’re going to make forensic copies,” said Harris, now vice president of engineering at PFP Cyber. “For example when the Google breach happened back in 2009, agents were sent out with express instructions that you image what they allow you to image, because they’re the victim, you don’t have a search warrant, and you don’t want to disrupt their business.”

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

Trump’s ‘Missing DNC Server’ Is Neither Missing Nor a Server
You realize there isn't a rightard in this establishment who can understand any of that, right?
Dumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lol
It's a two-door car LOL. C o u p. And I was a French teacher. Coup d'etat!
dumb fuck I'm not french and you must of know what I was saying when I used the short form COUP
Except you spelled it coupe duh.
 
Crowdstrike gave the FBI and others a copy of the server.... to verify it themselves.... And the FBI did just that..... And more....

They followed the hackers, gathered how and who did it, who paid for it and how it was paid for, how the info also got to Wikileaks etc.... And had enough evidence to charge the perps who directed the theft at the Russian GRU.
You're really insane, I see.
so is the entire world outside your bubble of garbage propaganda, super duper dupe. Wellington
 
So when Nixon was being investigated that was an attempted coup?
Nixion being investigated wasn't the beginning of the investigation
Nixon was being investigated after a crime had been committed he wasn't investigated because they were looking for a crime

'attempted removal of that executive is a coup'- your words.

The impeachment of Richard Nixon was an 'attempted removal' of a President- 'that executive'.

So by your definition- a coup.

But your definition is pretty fluid- pretty much just means anything you think threatens Trump is a coup
Swing and a miss
a crime was committed
the brake in of the watergate hotel
It was then when Nixon was caught up in the crime.

LOL a crime was committed- but Nixon wasn't being impeached for the breakin.......
Nixon was being investigated because a crime was committed it was his guys who did the break-in or so it was reported

Nixon wasn't being impeached because of the breakin. Nixon was investigated because of the breakin- but he wasn't being impeached for it.
 
Mueller issued 2,500 subpoenas. The Trump Administration turned over 1 Million Documents. Clinton deleted 33,000 emails
On a illegal Secret Server and destroyed 17 Electronic Devices. And it was proven that she lied, proven that she intentionally was trying to conceal her actions, and proven she was trying to circumvent FOIA.

Never once did a single Government Agency still Ran by Obama Holdovers issue even one Subpoena on Thr DNC server, not even with it being known Pakistani Hackers were Prying in to congressional files did they bother To look at It.

THAT is the one word that set the democrats hair on fire..."CROWDSTRIKE".

It was in the TRANSCRIPT!

When the democrat server was "hacked"...by the "russians"...the FBI never saw that server...debbie wasserman schultz wouldn't allow the FBI anywhere near the server.

So how did the FBI know that the "russians" "Hacked" the server?

CROWDSTRIKE told them so.

This is the very origin of the russia-collusion coup attempt & MANY democrats know this will get them the death penalty!

How would you act if you knew you were going to be executed for your crimes? A little bit CRAZY perhaps?

Would you start doing desperate & illogical things?

Would you try to take out the president before he takes you out and exposes your crimes?

Would your eyeballs start bugging out of your head?

Hey democrats...CROWDSTRIKE!!! :50:

It's all over but the :206:
Of course it's a huge cover-up LOL. Too bad you can't give any evidence she had a crime to cover up. Just garbage propaganda that real journalists and law enforcement have investigated and immediately found it was total crap, super duper. She did nothing general Powell and condoleezza didn't do. Except she had a private server that was never hacked big facking deal. No rule against it at the time. she is not a criminal she was Secretary of State you idiots..... LOL
Trump Russia collusion didn't happen did it?

Mueller found no evidence of a criminal collusion.

Doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Plenty of circumstantial evidence. And I believe there is some real evidence in there of that I wish somebody would talk about LOL.
'Pull any of this'?

Tell us more about this mythical server you believe is hidden away in Ukraine......
180716-poulsen-trump-hero_smaafa


Meanwhile in the real world....

The “server” Trump is obsessed with is actually 140 servers, most of them cloud-based, which the DNC was forced to decommission in June 2016 while trying to rid its network of the Russian GRU officers working to help Trump win the election, according to the figures in the DNC’s civil lawsuit against Russia and the Trump campaign. Another 180 desktop and laptop computers were also swapped out as the DNC raced to get the organization back on its feet and free of Putin’s surveillance.

But despite Trump’s repeated feverish claims to the contrary, no machines are actually missing.

It’s true that the FBI doesn’t have the DNC’s computer hardware. Agents didn’t sweep into DNC headquarters, load up all the equipment and leave Democrats standing stunned beside empty desks and dangling cables. There’s a reason for that, and it has nothing to do with a deep state conspiracy to frame Putin.

Trump and his allies are capitalizing on a basic misapprehension of how computer intrusion investigations work. Investigating a virtual crime isn’t a like investigating a murder. The Russians didn’t leave DNA evidence on the server racks and fingerprints on the keyboards. All the evidence of their comings and goings was on the computer hard drives, and in memory, and in the ephemeral network transmissions to and from the GRU’s command-and-control servers.

When cyber investigators respond to an incident, they capture that evidence in a process called “imaging.” They make an exact byte-for-byte copy of the hard drives. They do the same for the machine’s memory, capturing evidence that would otherwise be lost at the next reboot, and they monitor and store the traffic passing through the victim’s network. This has been standard procedure in computer intrusion investigations for decades. The images, not the computer’s hardware, provide the evidence.

Both the DNC and the security firm Crowdstrike, hired to respond to the breach, have said repeatedly over the years that they gave the FBI a copy of all the DNC images back in 2016. The DNC reiterated that Monday in a statement to the Daily Beast.

“The FBI was given images of servers, forensic copies, as well as a host of other forensic information we collected from our systems,” said Adrienne Watson, the DNC’s deputy communications director. “We were in close contact and worked cooperatively with the FBI and were always responsive to their requests. Any suggestion that they were denied access to what they wanted for their investigation is completely incorrect.”

It’s also consistent with the Department of Justice’s electronic evidence manual, which recommends capturing images when practical even when the FBI is executing a search warrant against a uncooperative suspect. When the computers belong to a cooperating victim, seizing the machines is pretty much out of the question, said James Harris, a former FBI cybercrime agent who worked on a 2009 breach at Google that’s been linked to the Chinese government.

“In most cases you don’t even ask, you just assume you’re going to make forensic copies,” said Harris, now vice president of engineering at PFP Cyber. “For example when the Google breach happened back in 2009, agents were sent out with express instructions that you image what they allow you to image, because they’re the victim, you don’t have a search warrant, and you don’t want to disrupt their business.”

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

Trump’s ‘Missing DNC Server’ Is Neither Missing Nor a Server
You realize there isn't a rightard in this establishment who can understand any of that, right?
Dumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lol
It's a two-door car LOL. C o u p. And I was a French teacher. Coup d'etat!
dumb fuck I'm not french and you must of know what I was saying when I used the short form COUP
Except you spelled it coupe duh.
NO evidence doofus
 
Nixion being investigated wasn't the beginning of the investigation
Nixon was being investigated after a crime had been committed he wasn't investigated because they were looking for a crime

'attempted removal of that executive is a coup'- your words.

The impeachment of Richard Nixon was an 'attempted removal' of a President- 'that executive'.

So by your definition- a coup.

But your definition is pretty fluid- pretty much just means anything you think threatens Trump is a coup
Swing and a miss
a crime was committed
the brake in of the watergate hotel
It was then when Nixon was caught up in the crime.

LOL a crime was committed- but Nixon wasn't being impeached for the breakin.......
Nixon was being investigated because a crime was committed it was his guys who did the break-in or so it was reported

Nixon wasn't being impeached because of the breakin. Nixon was investigated because of the breakin- but he wasn't being impeached for it.
Nixon was being investigated for what part he played in the break-in. He was actually being impeached for the tapings of conversations
 
Hey, whatchya suppose will happen to schiffs bug eyes when he's hanged?

Will they pop clean out of his head & roll away? :shok: :ack-1:

You Trumpettes and your dreams of lynching Americans........

View attachment 287132
Democrats have a long history of lynching people.

So now you think Thunk is a Democrat?
No I said democrats have a long history of lynching people
Hanging enemies of America will be done according to the law.
 

Forum List

Back
Top