Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
What the FBI did is a coup spying on the political opposition and trying to remove that opposition when they become president is a COUPDumbfucking PussyBitch, no one is seeking to overthrow the government.18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of GovernmentDumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lol
Feel free to name the actual criminal code. Or just keep pulling this out of Trump's ass.
Either way it will be amusing.
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you??
deal with it pussy bitch.
Trump Russia collusion didn't happen did it?Of course it's a huge cover-up LOL. Too bad you can't give any evidence she had a crime to cover up. Just garbage propaganda that real journalists and law enforcement have investigated and immediately found it was total crap, super duper. She did nothing general Powell and condoleezza didn't do. Except she had a private server that was never hacked big facking deal. No rule against it at the time. she is not a criminal she was Secretary of State you idiots..... LOLMueller issued 2,500 subpoenas. The Trump Administration turned over 1 Million Documents. Clinton deleted 33,000 emails
On a illegal Secret Server and destroyed 17 Electronic Devices. And it was proven that she lied, proven that she intentionally was trying to conceal her actions, and proven she was trying to circumvent FOIA.
Never once did a single Government Agency still Ran by Obama Holdovers issue even one Subpoena on Thr DNC server, not even with it being known Pakistani Hackers were Prying in to congressional files did they bother To look at It.
THAT is the one word that set the democrats hair on fire..."CROWDSTRIKE".
It was in the TRANSCRIPT!
When the democrat server was "hacked"...by the "russians"...the FBI never saw that server...debbie wasserman schultz wouldn't allow the FBI anywhere near the server.
So how did the FBI know that the "russians" "Hacked" the server?
CROWDSTRIKE told them so.
This is the very origin of the russia-collusion coup attempt & MANY democrats know this will get them the death penalty!
How would you act if you knew you were going to be executed for your crimes? A little bit CRAZY perhaps?
Would you start doing desperate & illogical things?
Would you try to take out the president before he takes you out and exposes your crimes?
Would your eyeballs start bugging out of your head?
Hey democrats...CROWDSTRIKE!!!
It's all over but the
And again, because the defendants can't be brought to trial, not because the evidence is "worthless."I know and knew it was never going to happen pussy bitchLOLOLDumbfuck.... indictments that go nowhere because the defendants can't be brought to trial -- NOT because the evidence is "worthless and can't be used in court."indictments that went nowhere. When the trial date? If it had gone to court Judge would have kick any evidence crowd stikr gave to the FBI out as inadmissibleOdd then that it was used in the indictments of the Russian nationals charged
There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.
STILL WAITING ON THAT COURT DATE
Hold your breath, PussyBitch. Thd lack of oxygen can only do you your brain good.
There was no attempt to overthrow the government, ya dumbfuck.What the FBI did is a coup spying on the political opposition and trying to remove that opposition when they become president is a COUPDumbfucking PussyBitch, no one is seeking to overthrow the government.18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of GovernmentDumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lol
Feel free to name the actual criminal code. Or just keep pulling this out of Trump's ass.
Either way it will be amusing.
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you??
deal with it pussy bitch.
It's a two-door car LOL. C o u p. And I was a French teacher. Coup d'etat!Dumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lolYou realize there isn't a rightard in this establishment who can understand any of that, right?i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server. i can also get zero reasonable explanations why a copy vs. the original is necessary.Crowdstrike gave the FBI and others a copy of the server.... to verify it themselves.... And the FBI did just that..... And more....
A copy doesn't tell you squat!
You can't track the download speeds from a copy...Which could say the download speed was faster than any comm lines in existence...which would mean it would have to be a device that is physically attached to the server (thumb drive)...Which would mean it was not a "hack" but a "leak" (inside job).Which would mean it wasn't the russians...unless the democrats hired russians (which is plausible).
You can't tell any of that from a "copy".
if trump were to pull ANY OF THIS they would scream unholy hell at the party foul, and rightfully so - it would be. yet if "their side" does it, they protect to the death what they would want to "kill" others for doing.
go figure these people. may as well flush a broken turd as it would be more productive than talking with these people.
'Pull any of this'?
Tell us more about this mythical server you believe is hidden away in Ukraine......
Meanwhile in the real world....
The “server” Trump is obsessed with is actually 140 servers, most of them cloud-based, which the DNC was forced to decommission in June 2016 while trying to rid its network of the Russian GRU officers working to help Trump win the election, according to the figures in the DNC’s civil lawsuit against Russia and the Trump campaign. Another 180 desktop and laptop computers were also swapped out as the DNC raced to get the organization back on its feet and free of Putin’s surveillance.
But despite Trump’s repeated feverish claims to the contrary, no machines are actually missing.
It’s true that the FBI doesn’t have the DNC’s computer hardware. Agents didn’t sweep into DNC headquarters, load up all the equipment and leave Democrats standing stunned beside empty desks and dangling cables. There’s a reason for that, and it has nothing to do with a deep state conspiracy to frame Putin.
Trump and his allies are capitalizing on a basic misapprehension of how computer intrusion investigations work. Investigating a virtual crime isn’t a like investigating a murder. The Russians didn’t leave DNA evidence on the server racks and fingerprints on the keyboards. All the evidence of their comings and goings was on the computer hard drives, and in memory, and in the ephemeral network transmissions to and from the GRU’s command-and-control servers.
When cyber investigators respond to an incident, they capture that evidence in a process called “imaging.” They make an exact byte-for-byte copy of the hard drives. They do the same for the machine’s memory, capturing evidence that would otherwise be lost at the next reboot, and they monitor and store the traffic passing through the victim’s network. This has been standard procedure in computer intrusion investigations for decades. The images, not the computer’s hardware, provide the evidence.
Both the DNC and the security firm Crowdstrike, hired to respond to the breach, have said repeatedly over the years that they gave the FBI a copy of all the DNC images back in 2016. The DNC reiterated that Monday in a statement to the Daily Beast.
“The FBI was given images of servers, forensic copies, as well as a host of other forensic information we collected from our systems,” said Adrienne Watson, the DNC’s deputy communications director. “We were in close contact and worked cooperatively with the FBI and were always responsive to their requests. Any suggestion that they were denied access to what they wanted for their investigation is completely incorrect.”
It’s also consistent with the Department of Justice’s electronic evidence manual, which recommends capturing images when practical even when the FBI is executing a search warrant against a uncooperative suspect. When the computers belong to a cooperating victim, seizing the machines is pretty much out of the question, said James Harris, a former FBI cybercrime agent who worked on a 2009 breach at Google that’s been linked to the Chinese government.
“In most cases you don’t even ask, you just assume you’re going to make forensic copies,” said Harris, now vice president of engineering at PFP Cyber. “For example when the Google breach happened back in 2009, agents were sent out with express instructions that you image what they allow you to image, because they’re the victim, you don’t have a search warrant, and you don’t want to disrupt their business.”
There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.
Trump’s ‘Missing DNC Server’ Is Neither Missing Nor a Server
But then you're a russian bot who wants to spread the lie that Crowdstrike had
Yup...I'm a russian bot from Minnesota.
NYET!
Trump is part of the government a duly elected president.What the FBI did is a coup spying on the political opposition and trying to remove that opposition when they become president is a COUPDumbfucking PussyBitch, no one is seeking to overthrow the government.18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of GovernmentDumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lol
Feel free to name the actual criminal code. Or just keep pulling this out of Trump's ass.
Either way it will be amusing.
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you??
deal with it pussy bitch.
Again- just showing your ignorance.
Trump is not the government.
If the FBI had wanted to prevent Trump from being elected President they could have done that with a single press conference.
But the FBI didn't do that.
dumb fuck I'm not french and you must of know what I was saying when I used the short form COUPIt's a two-door car LOL. C o u p. And I was a French teacher. Coup d'etat!Dumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lolYou realize there isn't a rightard in this establishment who can understand any of that, right?i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server. i can also get zero reasonable explanations why a copy vs. the original is necessary.A copy doesn't tell you squat!
You can't track the download speeds from a copy...Which could say the download speed was faster than any comm lines in existence...which would mean it would have to be a device that is physically attached to the server (thumb drive)...Which would mean it was not a "hack" but a "leak" (inside job).Which would mean it wasn't the russians...unless the democrats hired russians (which is plausible).
You can't tell any of that from a "copy".
if trump were to pull ANY OF THIS they would scream unholy hell at the party foul, and rightfully so - it would be. yet if "their side" does it, they protect to the death what they would want to "kill" others for doing.
go figure these people. may as well flush a broken turd as it would be more productive than talking with these people.
'Pull any of this'?
Tell us more about this mythical server you believe is hidden away in Ukraine......
Meanwhile in the real world....
The “server” Trump is obsessed with is actually 140 servers, most of them cloud-based, which the DNC was forced to decommission in June 2016 while trying to rid its network of the Russian GRU officers working to help Trump win the election, according to the figures in the DNC’s civil lawsuit against Russia and the Trump campaign. Another 180 desktop and laptop computers were also swapped out as the DNC raced to get the organization back on its feet and free of Putin’s surveillance.
But despite Trump’s repeated feverish claims to the contrary, no machines are actually missing.
It’s true that the FBI doesn’t have the DNC’s computer hardware. Agents didn’t sweep into DNC headquarters, load up all the equipment and leave Democrats standing stunned beside empty desks and dangling cables. There’s a reason for that, and it has nothing to do with a deep state conspiracy to frame Putin.
Trump and his allies are capitalizing on a basic misapprehension of how computer intrusion investigations work. Investigating a virtual crime isn’t a like investigating a murder. The Russians didn’t leave DNA evidence on the server racks and fingerprints on the keyboards. All the evidence of their comings and goings was on the computer hard drives, and in memory, and in the ephemeral network transmissions to and from the GRU’s command-and-control servers.
When cyber investigators respond to an incident, they capture that evidence in a process called “imaging.” They make an exact byte-for-byte copy of the hard drives. They do the same for the machine’s memory, capturing evidence that would otherwise be lost at the next reboot, and they monitor and store the traffic passing through the victim’s network. This has been standard procedure in computer intrusion investigations for decades. The images, not the computer’s hardware, provide the evidence.
Both the DNC and the security firm Crowdstrike, hired to respond to the breach, have said repeatedly over the years that they gave the FBI a copy of all the DNC images back in 2016. The DNC reiterated that Monday in a statement to the Daily Beast.
“The FBI was given images of servers, forensic copies, as well as a host of other forensic information we collected from our systems,” said Adrienne Watson, the DNC’s deputy communications director. “We were in close contact and worked cooperatively with the FBI and were always responsive to their requests. Any suggestion that they were denied access to what they wanted for their investigation is completely incorrect.”
It’s also consistent with the Department of Justice’s electronic evidence manual, which recommends capturing images when practical even when the FBI is executing a search warrant against a uncooperative suspect. When the computers belong to a cooperating victim, seizing the machines is pretty much out of the question, said James Harris, a former FBI cybercrime agent who worked on a 2009 breach at Google that’s been linked to the Chinese government.
“In most cases you don’t even ask, you just assume you’re going to make forensic copies,” said Harris, now vice president of engineering at PFP Cyber. “For example when the Google breach happened back in 2009, agents were sent out with express instructions that you image what they allow you to image, because they’re the victim, you don’t have a search warrant, and you don’t want to disrupt their business.”
There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.
Trump’s ‘Missing DNC Server’ Is Neither Missing Nor a Server
PUSSY BITCH until a trial and the judge hears the evidence that's when you'll find out it was worthless second-hand information almost always is no chain of custody.And again, because the defendants can't be brought to trial, not because the evidence is "worthless."I know and knew it was never going to happen pussy bitchLOLOLDumbfuck.... indictments that go nowhere because the defendants can't be brought to trial -- NOT because the evidence is "worthless and can't be used in court."indictments that went nowhere. When the trial date? If it had gone to court Judge would have kick any evidence crowd stikr gave to the FBI out as inadmissible
STILL WAITING ON THAT COURT DATE
Hold your breath, PussyBitch. Thd lack of oxygen can only do you your brain good.
And speaking of evidence.... where's your evidence to back up your claim that CrowdStrike altered the images they provided for the FBI?
Try spending a few minutes and read this.... it explains a whole bunch of what you are purposely playing ignorant on....A "floppy?" Exactly how old are you??
old enough to see that you'll eat any shit the left spoon feeds you.
Collusion isn't a criminal act. They also found that no one in the Trump campaign worked with Russia to change the outcome of the electionTrump Russia collusion didn't happen did it?Of course it's a huge cover-up LOL. Too bad you can't give any evidence she had a crime to cover up. Just garbage propaganda that real journalists and law enforcement have investigated and immediately found it was total crap, super duper. She did nothing general Powell and condoleezza didn't do. Except she had a private server that was never hacked big facking deal. No rule against it at the time. she is not a criminal she was Secretary of State you idiots..... LOLMueller issued 2,500 subpoenas. The Trump Administration turned over 1 Million Documents. Clinton deleted 33,000 emails
On a illegal Secret Server and destroyed 17 Electronic Devices. And it was proven that she lied, proven that she intentionally was trying to conceal her actions, and proven she was trying to circumvent FOIA.
Never once did a single Government Agency still Ran by Obama Holdovers issue even one Subpoena on Thr DNC server, not even with it being known Pakistani Hackers were Prying in to congressional files did they bother To look at It.
THAT is the one word that set the democrats hair on fire..."CROWDSTRIKE".
It was in the TRANSCRIPT!
When the democrat server was "hacked"...by the "russians"...the FBI never saw that server...debbie wasserman schultz wouldn't allow the FBI anywhere near the server.
So how did the FBI know that the "russians" "Hacked" the server?
CROWDSTRIKE told them so.
This is the very origin of the russia-collusion coup attempt & MANY democrats know this will get them the death penalty!
How would you act if you knew you were going to be executed for your crimes? A little bit CRAZY perhaps?
Would you start doing desperate & illogical things?
Would you try to take out the president before he takes you out and exposes your crimes?
Would your eyeballs start bugging out of your head?
Hey democrats...CROWDSTRIKE!!!
It's all over but the
Mueller found no evidence of a criminal collusion.
Doesn't mean it didn't happen.
Being a member of the government does not make him the government. No one tried to overthrow the government, ya dumbass. You're merely being a mindless parrot again, squawking back what you hear.Trump is part of the government a duly elected president.What the FBI did is a coup spying on the political opposition and trying to remove that opposition when they become president is a COUPDumbfucking PussyBitch, no one is seeking to overthrow the government.18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of GovernmentFeel free to name the actual criminal code. Or just keep pulling this out of Trump's ass.
Either way it will be amusing.
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you??
deal with it pussy bitch.
Again- just showing your ignorance.
Trump is not the government.
If the FBI had wanted to prevent Trump from being elected President they could have done that with a single press conference.
But the FBI didn't do that.
Collusion isn't a criminal act. They also found that no one in the Trump campaign worked with Russia to change the outcome of the electionTrump Russia collusion didn't happen did it?Of course it's a huge cover-up LOL. Too bad you can't give any evidence she had a crime to cover up. Just garbage propaganda that real journalists and law enforcement have investigated and immediately found it was total crap, super duper. She did nothing general Powell and condoleezza didn't do. Except she had a private server that was never hacked big facking deal. No rule against it at the time. she is not a criminal she was Secretary of State you idiots..... LOLMueller issued 2,500 subpoenas. The Trump Administration turned over 1 Million Documents. Clinton deleted 33,000 emails
On a illegal Secret Server and destroyed 17 Electronic Devices. And it was proven that she lied, proven that she intentionally was trying to conceal her actions, and proven she was trying to circumvent FOIA.
Never once did a single Government Agency still Ran by Obama Holdovers issue even one Subpoena on Thr DNC server, not even with it being known Pakistani Hackers were Prying in to congressional files did they bother To look at It.
THAT is the one word that set the democrats hair on fire..."CROWDSTRIKE".
It was in the TRANSCRIPT!
When the democrat server was "hacked"...by the "russians"...the FBI never saw that server...debbie wasserman schultz wouldn't allow the FBI anywhere near the server.
So how did the FBI know that the "russians" "Hacked" the server?
CROWDSTRIKE told them so.
This is the very origin of the russia-collusion coup attempt & MANY democrats know this will get them the death penalty!
How would you act if you knew you were going to be executed for your crimes? A little bit CRAZY perhaps?
Would you start doing desperate & illogical things?
Would you try to take out the president before he takes you out and exposes your crimes?
Would your eyeballs start bugging out of your head?
Hey democrats...CROWDSTRIKE!!!
It's all over but the
Mueller found no evidence of a criminal collusion.
Doesn't mean it didn't happen.
But we did find that the democrats clinton campigan worked with the Ukranian government
PUSSY BITCH until a trial and the judge hears the evidence that's when you'll find out it was worthless second-hand information almost always is no chain of custody.And again, because the defendants can't be brought to trial, not because the evidence is "worthless."I know and knew it was never going to happen pussy bitchLOLOLDumbfuck.... indictments that go nowhere because the defendants can't be brought to trial -- NOT because the evidence is "worthless and can't be used in court."
STILL WAITING ON THAT COURT DATE
Hold your breath, PussyBitch. Thd lack of oxygen can only do you your brain good.
And speaking of evidence.... where's your evidence to back up your claim that CrowdStrike altered the images they provided for the FBI?
Being the Head executive of the branch of government and attempted removal of that executive is a coup.Being a member of the government does not make him the government. No one tried to overthrow the government, ya dumbass. You're merely being a mindless parrot again, squawking back what you hear.Trump is part of the government a duly elected president.What the FBI did is a coup spying on the political opposition and trying to remove that opposition when they become president is a COUPDumbfucking PussyBitch, no one is seeking to overthrow the government.
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you??
deal with it pussy bitch.
Again- just showing your ignorance.
Trump is not the government.
If the FBI had wanted to prevent Trump from being elected President they could have done that with a single press conference.
But the FBI didn't do that.
Once again you prove to the forum what a dumb fucking PussyBitch you are.
Trump is part of the government a duly elected president.What the FBI did is a coup spying on the political opposition and trying to remove that opposition when they become president is a COUPDumbfucking PussyBitch, no one is seeking to overthrow the government.18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of GovernmentFeel free to name the actual criminal code. Or just keep pulling this out of Trump's ass.
Either way it will be amusing.
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you??
deal with it pussy bitch.
Again- just showing your ignorance.
Trump is not the government.
If the FBI had wanted to prevent Trump from being elected President they could have done that with a single press conference.
But the FBI didn't do that.
And the FBI tried just ask Peter S. and his side piece of ass page he said they had an insurance policy
BUT THE VOTERS DIDN'T BUY IT.
Is that what you took away from what I said? Nice dodge from ignoring the insurance policyPUSSY BITCH until a trial and the judge hears the evidence that's when you'll find out it was worthless second-hand information almost always is no chain of custody.And again, because the defendants can't be brought to trial, not because the evidence is "worthless."I know and knew it was never going to happen pussy bitchLOLOLSTILL WAITING ON THAT COURT DATE
Hold your breath, PussyBitch. Thd lack of oxygen can only do you your brain good.
And speaking of evidence.... where's your evidence to back up your claim that CrowdStrike altered the images they provided for the FBI?
You have some anger issues with women obviously.
Being the Head executive of the branch of government and attempted removal of that executive is a coup.Being a member of the government does not make him the government. No one tried to overthrow the government, ya dumbass. You're merely being a mindless parrot again, squawking back what you hear.Trump is part of the government a duly elected president.What the FBI did is a coup spying on the political opposition and trying to remove that opposition when they become president is a COUPDumbfucking PussyBitch, no one is seeking to overthrow the government.
Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you??
deal with it pussy bitch.
Again- just showing your ignorance.
Trump is not the government.
If the FBI had wanted to prevent Trump from being elected President they could have done that with a single press conference.
But the FBI didn't do that.
Once again you prove to the forum what a dumb fucking PussyBitch you are.
Mueller found no evidence of collusion periodCollusion isn't a criminal act. They also found that no one in the Trump campaign worked with Russia to change the outcome of the electionTrump Russia collusion didn't happen did it?Of course it's a huge cover-up LOL. Too bad you can't give any evidence she had a crime to cover up. Just garbage propaganda that real journalists and law enforcement have investigated and immediately found it was total crap, super duper. She did nothing general Powell and condoleezza didn't do. Except she had a private server that was never hacked big facking deal. No rule against it at the time. she is not a criminal she was Secretary of State you idiots..... LOLMueller issued 2,500 subpoenas. The Trump Administration turned over 1 Million Documents. Clinton deleted 33,000 emails
On a illegal Secret Server and destroyed 17 Electronic Devices. And it was proven that she lied, proven that she intentionally was trying to conceal her actions, and proven she was trying to circumvent FOIA.
Never once did a single Government Agency still Ran by Obama Holdovers issue even one Subpoena on Thr DNC server, not even with it being known Pakistani Hackers were Prying in to congressional files did they bother To look at It.
Mueller found no evidence of a criminal collusion.
Doesn't mean it didn't happen.
But we did find that the democrats clinton campigan worked with the Ukranian government
Like I said- Mueller found no evidence of criminal collusion. We also found out that the Trump campaign welcomed support from Russia to change the outcome of the election- they just didn't get it.
And of course there is no evidence that the Clinton campaign worked with the Ukrainian government, except of course in the head of your Dear Leader.
Of course not, brainwashed functional idiot. It is to give the findings of the investigation for crying out loud. And no it's not a conspiracy against your orange clown.Excuses excusesI would say that has passed considering they are in Russia and not coming of course what a stupid question anyway -does that prove something? every Republican on the intelligence committees agreed the Russians hacked the DNC and podesta servers or whatever. There is no proof that Hillary's was ever hacked. It is total b******* the whole thing...investigation ended a few days ago the last investigations and it said she did nothing that general Powell and condoleezza did not do. total garbage staffers emailing each other lovers emailing each other who gives a s*** proves nothing. The only cheating Hillary did was the DNC and those super delegates. Who by the way would have voted for Sanders if he beat her. More phony scandals than you can stick a shake at...I asked you firstWhen is the trial date? What do you mean give you a citation?According to who exactly?
Give us that citation.
What the DNC did would be me going to a private security firm to investigate a crime and any evidence they choose to turn it over to the police. It would never fly in a court of law the judge would kick it out
Go ahead and give us that citation. Right now it is just your opinion as an anonymous uneducated poster.
WHEN'S THE COURT DATE for those indicted Russians?
So those indictments was to give hope to the democrat base?
