Crowdstrike

[francoHFW]

Odd then that it was used in the indictments of the Russian nationals charged

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

indictments that went nowhere. When the trial date? If it had gone to court Judge would have kick any evidence crowd stikr gave to the FBI out as inadmissible

According to who exactly?

Give us that citation.

When is the trial date? What do you mean give you a citation?
What the DNC did would be me going to a private security firm to investigate a crime and any evidence they choose to turn it over to the police. It would never fly in a court of law the judge would kick it out

Go ahead and give us that citation. Right now it is just your opinion as an anonymous uneducated poster.

I asked you first
WHEN'S THE COURT DATE for those indicted Russians?

I would say that has passed considering they are in Russia and not coming of course what a stupid question anyway -does that prove something? every Republican on the intelligence committees agreed the Russians hacked the DNC and podesta servers or whatever. There is no proof that Hillary's was ever hacked. It is total b******* the whole thing...investigation ended a few days ago the last investigations and it said she did nothing that general Powell and condoleezza did not do. total garbage staffers emailing each other lovers emailing each other who gives a s*** proves nothing. The only cheating Hillary did was the DNC and those super delegates. Who by the way would have voted for Sanders if he beat her. More phony scandals than you can stick a shake at...

 

[Faun]

Crowdstrike gave the FBI and others a copy of the server.... to verify it themselves.... And the FBI did just that..... And more....

A copy doesn't tell you squat!

You can't track the download speeds from a copy...Which could say the download speed was faster than any comm lines in existence...which would mean it would have to be a device that is physically attached to the server (thumb drive)...Which would mean it was not a "hack" but a "leak" (inside job).Which would mean it wasn't the russians...unless the democrats hired russians (which is plausible).

You can't tell any of that from a "copy".

i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server. i can also get zero reasonable explanations why a copy vs. the original is necessary.

if trump were to pull ANY OF THIS they would scream unholy hell at the party foul, and rightfully so - it would be. yet if "their side" does it, they protect to the death what they would want to "kill" others for doing.

go figure these people. may as well flush a broken turd as it would be more productive than talking with these people.

'Pull any of this'?

Tell us more about this mythical server you believe is hidden away in Ukraine......

Meanwhile in the real world....

The “server” Trump is obsessed with is actually 140 servers, most of them cloud-based, which the DNC was forced to decommission in June 2016 while trying to rid its network of the Russian GRU officers working to help Trump win the election, according to the figures in the DNC’s civil lawsuit against Russia and the Trump campaign. Another 180 desktop and laptop computers were also swapped out as the DNC raced to get the organization back on its feet and free of Putin’s surveillance.

But despite Trump’s repeated feverish claims to the contrary, no machines are actually missing.

It’s true that the FBI doesn’t have the DNC’s computer hardware. Agents didn’t sweep into DNC headquarters, load up all the equipment and leave Democrats standing stunned beside empty desks and dangling cables. There’s a reason for that, and it has nothing to do with a deep state conspiracy to frame Putin.

Trump and his allies are capitalizing on a basic misapprehension of how computer intrusion investigations work. Investigating a virtual crime isn’t a like investigating a murder. The Russians didn’t leave DNA evidence on the server racks and fingerprints on the keyboards. All the evidence of their comings and goings was on the computer hard drives, and in memory, and in the ephemeral network transmissions to and from the GRU’s command-and-control servers.

When cyber investigators respond to an incident, they capture that evidence in a process called “imaging.” They make an exact byte-for-byte copy of the hard drives. They do the same for the machine’s memory, capturing evidence that would otherwise be lost at the next reboot, and they monitor and store the traffic passing through the victim’s network. This has been standard procedure in computer intrusion investigations for decades. The images, not the computer’s hardware, provide the evidence.

Both the DNC and the security firm Crowdstrike, hired to respond to the breach, have said repeatedly over the years that they gave the FBI a copy of all the DNC images back in 2016. The DNC reiterated that Monday in a statement to the Daily Beast.

“The FBI was given images of servers, forensic copies, as well as a host of other forensic information we collected from our systems,” said Adrienne Watson, the DNC’s deputy communications director. “We were in close contact and worked cooperatively with the FBI and were always responsive to their requests. Any suggestion that they were denied access to what they wanted for their investigation is completely incorrect.”

It’s also consistent with the Department of Justice’s electronic evidence manual, which recommends capturing images when practical even when the FBI is executing a search warrant against a uncooperative suspect. When the computers belong to a cooperating victim, seizing the machines is pretty much out of the question, said James Harris, a former FBI cybercrime agent who worked on a 2009 breach at Google that’s been linked to the Chinese government.

“In most cases you don’t even ask, you just assume you’re going to make forensic copies,” said Harris, now vice president of engineering at PFP Cyber. “For example when the Google breach happened back in 2009, agents were sent out with express instructions that you image what they allow you to image, because they’re the victim, you don’t have a search warrant, and you don’t want to disrupt their business.”

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

Trump’s ‘Missing DNC Server’ Is Neither Missing Nor a Server

You realize there isn't a rightard in this establishment who can understand any of that, right?

Golly look how intelligent you think you are!!!!

Well I'm certainly intelligent enough to understand that article. Though working in IT, I have a fair advantage. Whereas I don't see a rightard here grasping a word of it. Shit, there's even one nut here yapping about floppy disks.

 

[Thunk]

And now we're twoooooooo leftists hanging from a tree...That don't bother me...at allllllllllll

 

[Syriusly]

CrowdStrike was able to provide the FBI a copy and they found that acceptable. Comey testified under oath that his agency deemed a copy was an "appropriate substitute."

They gave them a floppy with AUTOEXEC.BAT as the only file on it & comey found that acceptable?

You don't say?

A "floppy?" Exactly how old are you??

I think when he was referring to a floppy it had nothing to do with his server......

 

[Syriusly]

And now we're twoooooooo leftists hanging from a tree...That don't bother me...at allllllllllll

You Trumpettes do love the lynching references.......guess you just are yearning for when America was Great.....

 

[JustAGuy1]

WOW! Did this thread take off!

Ya see what the word CROWDSTRIKE does to liberals???

CROWDSTRIKE CROWDSTRIKE CROWDSTRIKE!!!

DRAIN THE SWAMP!

So what's the conspiracy theory? Crowdstrike covered up the Ukraineans stealing the DNc and podesta private emails and RELEASING the stolen emails to wikileaks, to the public so that it would actually help Hillary????



Come on...You can't be serious????

Cite your source that proves the FBI got the server.

they did not get the server, they got a copy of the server and Comey said it was good enough for the FBI to do their work...

LOL, so why don't you want the "real" server?

 

[Faun]

Dumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lol

Feel free to name the actual criminal code. Or just keep pulling this out of Trump's ass.

Either way it will be amusing.

18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government

Dumbfucking PussyBitch, no one is seeking to overthrow the government.

Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you??

 

[JustAGuy1]

A copy doesn't tell you squat!

You can't track the download speeds from a copy...Which could say the download speed was faster than any comm lines in existence...which would mean it would have to be a device that is physically attached to the server (thumb drive)...Which would mean it was not a "hack" but a "leak" (inside job).Which would mean it wasn't the russians...unless the democrats hired russians (which is plausible).

You can't tell any of that from a "copy".

i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server. i can also get zero reasonable explanations why a copy vs. the original is necessary.

if trump were to pull ANY OF THIS they would scream unholy hell at the party foul, and rightfully so - it would be. yet if "their side" does it, they protect to the death what they would want to "kill" others for doing.

go figure these people. may as well flush a broken turd as it would be more productive than talking with these people.

'Pull any of this'?

Tell us more about this mythical server you believe is hidden away in Ukraine......

Meanwhile in the real world....

The “server” Trump is obsessed with is actually 140 servers, most of them cloud-based, which the DNC was forced to decommission in June 2016 while trying to rid its network of the Russian GRU officers working to help Trump win the election, according to the figures in the DNC’s civil lawsuit against Russia and the Trump campaign. Another 180 desktop and laptop computers were also swapped out as the DNC raced to get the organization back on its feet and free of Putin’s surveillance.

But despite Trump’s repeated feverish claims to the contrary, no machines are actually missing.

It’s true that the FBI doesn’t have the DNC’s computer hardware. Agents didn’t sweep into DNC headquarters, load up all the equipment and leave Democrats standing stunned beside empty desks and dangling cables. There’s a reason for that, and it has nothing to do with a deep state conspiracy to frame Putin.

Trump and his allies are capitalizing on a basic misapprehension of how computer intrusion investigations work. Investigating a virtual crime isn’t a like investigating a murder. The Russians didn’t leave DNA evidence on the server racks and fingerprints on the keyboards. All the evidence of their comings and goings was on the computer hard drives, and in memory, and in the ephemeral network transmissions to and from the GRU’s command-and-control servers.

When cyber investigators respond to an incident, they capture that evidence in a process called “imaging.” They make an exact byte-for-byte copy of the hard drives. They do the same for the machine’s memory, capturing evidence that would otherwise be lost at the next reboot, and they monitor and store the traffic passing through the victim’s network. This has been standard procedure in computer intrusion investigations for decades. The images, not the computer’s hardware, provide the evidence.

Both the DNC and the security firm Crowdstrike, hired to respond to the breach, have said repeatedly over the years that they gave the FBI a copy of all the DNC images back in 2016. The DNC reiterated that Monday in a statement to the Daily Beast.

“The FBI was given images of servers, forensic copies, as well as a host of other forensic information we collected from our systems,” said Adrienne Watson, the DNC’s deputy communications director. “We were in close contact and worked cooperatively with the FBI and were always responsive to their requests. Any suggestion that they were denied access to what they wanted for their investigation is completely incorrect.”

It’s also consistent with the Department of Justice’s electronic evidence manual, which recommends capturing images when practical even when the FBI is executing a search warrant against a uncooperative suspect. When the computers belong to a cooperating victim, seizing the machines is pretty much out of the question, said James Harris, a former FBI cybercrime agent who worked on a 2009 breach at Google that’s been linked to the Chinese government.

“In most cases you don’t even ask, you just assume you’re going to make forensic copies,” said Harris, now vice president of engineering at PFP Cyber. “For example when the Google breach happened back in 2009, agents were sent out with express instructions that you image what they allow you to image, because they’re the victim, you don’t have a search warrant, and you don’t want to disrupt their business.”

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

Trump’s ‘Missing DNC Server’ Is Neither Missing Nor a Server

You realize there isn't a rightard in this establishment who can understand any of that, right?

Golly look how intelligent you think you are!!!!

Well I'm certainly intelligent enough to understand that article. Though working in IT, I have a fair advantage. Whereas I don't see a rightard here grasping a word of it. Shit, there's even one nut here yapping about floppy disks.

So your "disk" is floppy, is that why you can't keep a woman?

 

[Faun]

LOL

You don't lie, PussyBitch??

You lied in this thread. You claimed CrowdStrike altered the disk image they provided to the FBI but you can't prove that.

A lot of claims have been made and anything crowdstrike gave to the FBI is worthless and can never be used in a court of law.

Odd then that it was used in the indictments of the Russian nationals charged

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

indictments that went nowhere. When the trial date? If it had gone to court Judge would have kick any evidence crowd stikr gave to the FBI out as inadmissible

Dumbfuck.... indictments that go nowhere because the defendants can't be brought to trial -- NOT because the evidence is "worthless and can't be used in court."

STILL WAITING ON THAT COURT DATE

LOLOL

Hold your breath, PussyBitch. The lack of oxygen can only do you your brain good.

 

[depotoo]

Crowdstrike gave the FBI and others a copy of the server.... to verify it themselves.... And the FBI did just that..... And more....

They followed the hackers, gathered how and who did it, who paid for it and how it was paid for, how the info also got to Wikileaks etc.... And had enough evidence to charge the perps who directed the theft at the Russian GRU.

Uhhh, no-

 

[Syriusly]

So what's the conspiracy theory? Crowdstrike covered up the Ukraineans stealing the DNc and podesta private emails and RELEASING the stolen emails to wikileaks,

More arguing nonsense.

It was the origin of the made up lie of "russian collusion"...A lie that they tried like hell to overthrow our president and remove him from office (remember the last 2 years? A guy named Mueller?).

When you invent a lie & try to use it to overthrow the president...it's a COUP.

Sigh.

Everytime a Trumpette uses the word coup, another Angel loses a finger.

(also coup d'état) a sudden, illegal, and often violent change of government example:
He seized power in a military coup in 2008.


But by your standard- Trump initiated a coup against Obama.......with the whole Birther lie.

 

[Faun]

i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server.

The liberals on this board know that!

But they are lying filth...they can't help but argue because they don't want to see their heroes get the death penalty!

The 'death penalty'.....for what exactly?

I know you Trumpettes are big on wishing to be able to kill other Americans but what does your fevered brain tell you that is going to lead to you being able to legally kill other Americans?.

I see leftist as enemies of America by the way they act.

So you wanna kill "leftists" too?

Enemies of America hell yes

And who would these "leftists" be, PussyBitch?

 

[Faun]

A "floppy?" Exactly how old are you??

old enough to see that you'll eat any shit the left spoon feeds you.

LOLOLOL

Spits the trumptard who started this thread because trump said, "crowdstrike."

The projection is strong in you.

 

[Care4all]

So what's the conspiracy theory? Crowdstrike covered up the Ukraineans stealing the DNc and podesta private emails and RELEASING the stolen emails to wikileaks,

More arguing nonsense.

It was the origin of the made up lie of "russian collusion"...A lie that they tried like hell to overthrow our president and remove him from office (remember the last 2 years? A guy named Mueller?).

When you invent a lie & try to use it to overthrow the president...it's a COUP.

And Crowdstrike involvement with the Ukraine and what Trump wanted from the UKE President was what????

 

[bigrebnc1775]

indictments that went nowhere. When the trial date? If it had gone to court Judge would have kick any evidence crowd stikr gave to the FBI out as inadmissible

According to who exactly?

Give us that citation.

When is the trial date? What do you mean give you a citation?
What the DNC did would be me going to a private security firm to investigate a crime and any evidence they choose to turn it over to the police. It would never fly in a court of law the judge would kick it out

Go ahead and give us that citation. Right now it is just your opinion as an anonymous uneducated poster.

I asked you first
WHEN'S THE COURT DATE for those indicted Russians?

I would say that has passed considering they are in Russia and not coming of course what a stupid question anyway -does that prove something? every Republican on the intelligence committees agreed the Russians hacked the DNC and podesta servers or whatever. There is no proof that Hillary's was ever hacked. It is total b******* the whole thing...investigation ended a few days ago the last investigations and it said she did nothing that general Powell and condoleezza did not do. total garbage staffers emailing each other lovers emailing each other who gives a s*** proves nothing. The only cheating Hillary did was the DNC and those super delegates. Who by the way would have voted for Sanders if he beat her. More phony scandals than you can stick a shake at...

Excuses excuses
So those indictments was to give hope to the democrat base?

 

[Faun]

i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server. i can also get zero reasonable explanations why a copy vs. the original is necessary.

if trump were to pull ANY OF THIS they would scream unholy hell at the party foul, and rightfully so - it would be. yet if "their side" does it, they protect to the death what they would want to "kill" others for doing.

go figure these people. may as well flush a broken turd as it would be more productive than talking with these people.

'Pull any of this'?

Tell us more about this mythical server you believe is hidden away in Ukraine......

Meanwhile in the real world....

The “server” Trump is obsessed with is actually 140 servers, most of them cloud-based, which the DNC was forced to decommission in June 2016 while trying to rid its network of the Russian GRU officers working to help Trump win the election, according to the figures in the DNC’s civil lawsuit against Russia and the Trump campaign. Another 180 desktop and laptop computers were also swapped out as the DNC raced to get the organization back on its feet and free of Putin’s surveillance.

But despite Trump’s repeated feverish claims to the contrary, no machines are actually missing.

It’s true that the FBI doesn’t have the DNC’s computer hardware. Agents didn’t sweep into DNC headquarters, load up all the equipment and leave Democrats standing stunned beside empty desks and dangling cables. There’s a reason for that, and it has nothing to do with a deep state conspiracy to frame Putin.

Trump and his allies are capitalizing on a basic misapprehension of how computer intrusion investigations work. Investigating a virtual crime isn’t a like investigating a murder. The Russians didn’t leave DNA evidence on the server racks and fingerprints on the keyboards. All the evidence of their comings and goings was on the computer hard drives, and in memory, and in the ephemeral network transmissions to and from the GRU’s command-and-control servers.

When cyber investigators respond to an incident, they capture that evidence in a process called “imaging.” They make an exact byte-for-byte copy of the hard drives. They do the same for the machine’s memory, capturing evidence that would otherwise be lost at the next reboot, and they monitor and store the traffic passing through the victim’s network. This has been standard procedure in computer intrusion investigations for decades. The images, not the computer’s hardware, provide the evidence.

Both the DNC and the security firm Crowdstrike, hired to respond to the breach, have said repeatedly over the years that they gave the FBI a copy of all the DNC images back in 2016. The DNC reiterated that Monday in a statement to the Daily Beast.

“The FBI was given images of servers, forensic copies, as well as a host of other forensic information we collected from our systems,” said Adrienne Watson, the DNC’s deputy communications director. “We were in close contact and worked cooperatively with the FBI and were always responsive to their requests. Any suggestion that they were denied access to what they wanted for their investigation is completely incorrect.”

It’s also consistent with the Department of Justice’s electronic evidence manual, which recommends capturing images when practical even when the FBI is executing a search warrant against a uncooperative suspect. When the computers belong to a cooperating victim, seizing the machines is pretty much out of the question, said James Harris, a former FBI cybercrime agent who worked on a 2009 breach at Google that’s been linked to the Chinese government.

“In most cases you don’t even ask, you just assume you’re going to make forensic copies,” said Harris, now vice president of engineering at PFP Cyber. “For example when the Google breach happened back in 2009, agents were sent out with express instructions that you image what they allow you to image, because they’re the victim, you don’t have a search warrant, and you don’t want to disrupt their business.”

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

Trump’s ‘Missing DNC Server’ Is Neither Missing Nor a Server

You realize there isn't a rightard in this establishment who can understand any of that, right?

Golly look how intelligent you think you are!!!!

Well I'm certainly intelligent enough to understand that article. Though working in IT, I have a fair advantage. Whereas I don't see a rightard here grasping a word of it. Shit, there's even one nut here yapping about floppy disks.

So your "disk" is floppy, is that why you can't keep a woman?

LOL

And by "can't keep a woman," you mean going on 26 years of marriage to the one and only wife, and mother of my children, I ever had.

I'm tellin' ya, there is no dumber creature slithering on the face of this Earth than a conservative. <smh>

 

[bigrebnc1775]

A lot of claims have been made and anything crowdstrike gave to the FBI is worthless and can never be used in a court of law.

Odd then that it was used in the indictments of the Russian nationals charged

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

indictments that went nowhere. When the trial date? If it had gone to court Judge would have kick any evidence crowd stikr gave to the FBI out as inadmissible

Dumbfuck.... indictments that go nowhere because the defendants can't be brought to trial -- NOT because the evidence is "worthless and can't be used in court."

STILL WAITING ON THAT COURT DATE

LOLOL

Hold your breath, PussyBitch. Thd lack of oxygen can only do you your brain good.

I know and knew it was never going to happen pussy bitch

 

[francoHFW]

Mueller issued 2,500 subpoenas. The Trump Administration turned over 1 Million Documents. Clinton deleted 33,000 emails
On a illegal Secret Server and destroyed 17 Electronic Devices. And it was proven that she lied, proven that she intentionally was trying to conceal her actions, and proven she was trying to circumvent FOIA.

Never once did a single Government Agency still Ran by Obama Holdovers issue even one Subpoena on Thr DNC server, not even with it being known Pakistani Hackers were Prying in to congressional files did they bother To look at It.

THAT is the one word that set the democrats hair on fire..."CROWDSTRIKE".

It was in the TRANSCRIPT!

When the democrat server was "hacked"...by the "russians"...the FBI never saw that server...debbie wasserman schultz wouldn't allow the FBI anywhere near the server.

So how did the FBI know that the "russians" "Hacked" the server?

CROWDSTRIKE told them so.

This is the very origin of the russia-collusion coup attempt & MANY democrats know this will get them the death penalty!

How would you act if you knew you were going to be executed for your crimes? A little bit CRAZY perhaps?

Would you start doing desperate & illogical things?

Would you try to take out the president before he takes you out and exposes your crimes?

Would your eyeballs start bugging out of your head?

Hey democrats...CROWDSTRIKE!!!

It's all over but the

Of course it's a huge cover-up LOL. Too bad you can't give any evidence she had a crime to cover up. Just garbage propaganda that real journalists and law enforcement have investigated and immediately found it was total crap, super duper. She did nothing general Powell and condoleezza didn't do. Except she had a private server that was never hacked big facking deal. No rule against it at the time. she is not a criminal she was Secretary of State you idiots..... LOL

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Dumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lol

Feel free to name the actual criminal code. Or just keep pulling this out of Trump's ass.

Either way it will be amusing.

18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government

Dumbfucking PussyBitch, no one is seeking to overthrow the government.

Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you??

What the FBI did is a coup spying on the political opposition and trying to remove that opposition when they become president is a COUP
deal with it pussy bitch.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Mueller issued 2,500 subpoenas. The Trump Administration turned over 1 Million Documents. Clinton deleted 33,000 emails
On a illegal Secret Server and destroyed 17 Electronic Devices. And it was proven that she lied, proven that she intentionally was trying to conceal her actions, and proven she was trying to circumvent FOIA.

Never once did a single Government Agency still Ran by Obama Holdovers issue even one Subpoena on Thr DNC server, not even with it being known Pakistani Hackers were Prying in to congressional files did they bother To look at It.

THAT is the one word that set the democrats hair on fire..."CROWDSTRIKE".

It was in the TRANSCRIPT!

When the democrat server was "hacked"...by the "russians"...the FBI never saw that server...debbie wasserman schultz wouldn't allow the FBI anywhere near the server.

So how did the FBI know that the "russians" "Hacked" the server?

CROWDSTRIKE told them so.

This is the very origin of the russia-collusion coup attempt & MANY democrats know this will get them the death penalty!

How would you act if you knew you were going to be executed for your crimes? A little bit CRAZY perhaps?

Would you start doing desperate & illogical things?

Would you try to take out the president before he takes you out and exposes your crimes?

Would your eyeballs start bugging out of your head?

Hey democrats...CROWDSTRIKE!!!

It's all over but the

Of course it's a huge cover-up LOL. Too bad you can't give any evidence she had a crime to cover up. Just garbage propaganda that real journalists and law enforcement have investigated and immediately found it was total crap, super duper. She did nothing general Powell and condoleezza didn't do. Except she had a private server that was never hacked big facking deal. No rule against it at the time. she is not a criminal she was Secretary of State you idiots..... LOL

Trump Russia collusion didn't happen did it?