Crowdstrike

[Thunk]

Truth be told, you got beat like a dog with that word.

Only in your teeny tiny little mind.

 

[Syriusly]

B) "Coupe Attempt' is not a crime. Nor by any stretch of the definition of 'coupe' is what is happening a coupe- except of course your Orange Messiah has told you to keep repeating 'its a coupe!"
.

After you wrote this you need to walk away from this discussion you dumbass

Poor little Trumpette- I can see you are feeling threatened by someone who understands the law.

There is no 'Coup law'.

Treason is defined in the Constitution- and Treason is a crime. But you keep repeating 'coup'

What is a coup?

A sudden, illegal, violent overturn of government.

That is what Trumpettes call a FBI investigation and an impeachment investigation.

 

[Faun]

i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server.

The liberals on this board know that!

But they are lying filth...they can't help but argue because they don't want to see their heroes get the death penalty!

The 'death penalty'.....for what exactly?

I know you Trumpettes are big on wishing to be able to kill other Americans but what does your fevered brain tell you that is going to lead to you being able to legally kill other Americans?.

I see leftist as enemies of America by the way they act.

So you wanna kill "leftists" too?

 

[BlindBoo]

A copy doesn't tell you squat!

You can't track the download speeds from a copy...Which could say the download speed was faster than any comm lines in existence...which would mean it would have to be a device that is physically attached to the server (thumb drive)...Which would mean it was not a "hack" but a "leak" (inside job).Which would mean it wasn't the russians...unless the democrats hired russians (which is plausible).

You can't tell any of that from a "copy".

i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server. i can also get zero reasonable explanations why a copy vs. the original is necessary.

if trump were to pull ANY OF THIS they would scream unholy hell at the party foul, and rightfully so - it would be. yet if "their side" does it, they protect to the death what they would want to "kill" others for doing.

go figure these people. may as well flush a broken turd as it would be more productive than talking with these people.

'Pull any of this'?

Tell us more about this mythical server you believe is hidden away in Ukraine......

Meanwhile in the real world....

The “server” Trump is obsessed with is actually 140 servers, most of them cloud-based, which the DNC was forced to decommission in June 2016 while trying to rid its network of the Russian GRU officers working to help Trump win the election, according to the figures in the DNC’s civil lawsuit against Russia and the Trump campaign. Another 180 desktop and laptop computers were also swapped out as the DNC raced to get the organization back on its feet and free of Putin’s surveillance.

But despite Trump’s repeated feverish claims to the contrary, no machines are actually missing.

It’s true that the FBI doesn’t have the DNC’s computer hardware. Agents didn’t sweep into DNC headquarters, load up all the equipment and leave Democrats standing stunned beside empty desks and dangling cables. There’s a reason for that, and it has nothing to do with a deep state conspiracy to frame Putin.

Trump and his allies are capitalizing on a basic misapprehension of how computer intrusion investigations work. Investigating a virtual crime isn’t a like investigating a murder. The Russians didn’t leave DNA evidence on the server racks and fingerprints on the keyboards. All the evidence of their comings and goings was on the computer hard drives, and in memory, and in the ephemeral network transmissions to and from the GRU’s command-and-control servers.

When cyber investigators respond to an incident, they capture that evidence in a process called “imaging.” They make an exact byte-for-byte copy of the hard drives. They do the same for the machine’s memory, capturing evidence that would otherwise be lost at the next reboot, and they monitor and store the traffic passing through the victim’s network. This has been standard procedure in computer intrusion investigations for decades. The images, not the computer’s hardware, provide the evidence.

Both the DNC and the security firm Crowdstrike, hired to respond to the breach, have said repeatedly over the years that they gave the FBI a copy of all the DNC images back in 2016. The DNC reiterated that Monday in a statement to the Daily Beast.

“The FBI was given images of servers, forensic copies, as well as a host of other forensic information we collected from our systems,” said Adrienne Watson, the DNC’s deputy communications director. “We were in close contact and worked cooperatively with the FBI and were always responsive to their requests. Any suggestion that they were denied access to what they wanted for their investigation is completely incorrect.”

It’s also consistent with the Department of Justice’s electronic evidence manual, which recommends capturing images when practical even when the FBI is executing a search warrant against a uncooperative suspect. When the computers belong to a cooperating victim, seizing the machines is pretty much out of the question, said James Harris, a former FBI cybercrime agent who worked on a 2009 breach at Google that’s been linked to the Chinese government.

“In most cases you don’t even ask, you just assume you’re going to make forensic copies,” said Harris, now vice president of engineering at PFP Cyber. “For example when the Google breach happened back in 2009, agents were sent out with express instructions that you image what they allow you to image, because they’re the victim, you don’t have a search warrant, and you don’t want to disrupt their business.”

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

Trump’s ‘Missing DNC Server’ Is Neither Missing Nor a Server

great - now give me 1 good reason why they couldn't examine the actual server itself. lobbing daily beast at me is, at best, that broken turd i was flushing.

Just one? There was no actual server itself.

where was the data held, in space? too fking funny. nope the file was in limbo and not on any physical device. hey, it's why nothing was hacked, there was nothing to hack. you just admitted it.

There were multiple servers on their network. Besides you claim that the FBI is corrupt anyway so turning all their virtual servers and computer over to the FBI would be useless. They'd never tell if they found out it was really the Ukraine anyway. Amirite?

 

[JustAGuy1]

Crowdstrike gave the FBI and others a copy of the server.... to verify it themselves.... And the FBI did just that..... And more....

A copy doesn't tell you squat!

You can't track the download speeds from a copy...Which could say the download speed was faster than any comm lines in existence...which would mean it would have to be a device that is physically attached to the server (thumb drive)...Which would mean it was not a "hack" but a "leak" (inside job).Which would mean it wasn't the russians...unless the democrats hired russians (which is plausible).

You can't tell any of that from a "copy".

i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server. i can also get zero reasonable explanations why a copy vs. the original is necessary.

if trump were to pull ANY OF THIS they would scream unholy hell at the party foul, and rightfully so - it would be. yet if "their side" does it, they protect to the death what they would want to "kill" others for doing.

go figure these people. may as well flush a broken turd as it would be more productive than talking with these people.

'Pull any of this'?

Tell us more about this mythical server you believe is hidden away in Ukraine......

Meanwhile in the real world....

The “server” Trump is obsessed with is actually 140 servers, most of them cloud-based, which the DNC was forced to decommission in June 2016 while trying to rid its network of the Russian GRU officers working to help Trump win the election, according to the figures in the DNC’s civil lawsuit against Russia and the Trump campaign. Another 180 desktop and laptop computers were also swapped out as the DNC raced to get the organization back on its feet and free of Putin’s surveillance.

But despite Trump’s repeated feverish claims to the contrary, no machines are actually missing.

It’s true that the FBI doesn’t have the DNC’s computer hardware. Agents didn’t sweep into DNC headquarters, load up all the equipment and leave Democrats standing stunned beside empty desks and dangling cables. There’s a reason for that, and it has nothing to do with a deep state conspiracy to frame Putin.

Trump and his allies are capitalizing on a basic misapprehension of how computer intrusion investigations work. Investigating a virtual crime isn’t a like investigating a murder. The Russians didn’t leave DNA evidence on the server racks and fingerprints on the keyboards. All the evidence of their comings and goings was on the computer hard drives, and in memory, and in the ephemeral network transmissions to and from the GRU’s command-and-control servers.

When cyber investigators respond to an incident, they capture that evidence in a process called “imaging.” They make an exact byte-for-byte copy of the hard drives. They do the same for the machine’s memory, capturing evidence that would otherwise be lost at the next reboot, and they monitor and store the traffic passing through the victim’s network. This has been standard procedure in computer intrusion investigations for decades. The images, not the computer’s hardware, provide the evidence.

Both the DNC and the security firm Crowdstrike, hired to respond to the breach, have said repeatedly over the years that they gave the FBI a copy of all the DNC images back in 2016. The DNC reiterated that Monday in a statement to the Daily Beast.

“The FBI was given images of servers, forensic copies, as well as a host of other forensic information we collected from our systems,” said Adrienne Watson, the DNC’s deputy communications director. “We were in close contact and worked cooperatively with the FBI and were always responsive to their requests. Any suggestion that they were denied access to what they wanted for their investigation is completely incorrect.”

It’s also consistent with the Department of Justice’s electronic evidence manual, which recommends capturing images when practical even when the FBI is executing a search warrant against a uncooperative suspect. When the computers belong to a cooperating victim, seizing the machines is pretty much out of the question, said James Harris, a former FBI cybercrime agent who worked on a 2009 breach at Google that’s been linked to the Chinese government.

“In most cases you don’t even ask, you just assume you’re going to make forensic copies,” said Harris, now vice president of engineering at PFP Cyber. “For example when the Google breach happened back in 2009, agents were sent out with express instructions that you image what they allow you to image, because they’re the victim, you don’t have a search warrant, and you don’t want to disrupt their business.”

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

Trump’s ‘Missing DNC Server’ Is Neither Missing Nor a Server

You realize there isn't a rightard in this establishment who can understand any of that, right?

Golly look how intelligent you think you are!!!!

 

[Faun]

Crowdstrike gave the FBI and others a copy of the server.... to verify it themselves.... And the FBI did just that..... And more....

A copy doesn't tell you squat!

You can't track the download speeds from a copy...Which could say the download speed was faster than any comm lines in existence...which would mean it would have to be a device that is physically attached to the server (thumb drive)...Which would mean it was not a "hack" but a "leak" (inside job).Which would mean it wasn't the russians...unless the democrats hired russians (which is plausible).

You can't tell any of that from a "copy".

i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server. i can also get zero reasonable explanations why a copy vs. the original is necessary.

if trump were to pull ANY OF THIS they would scream unholy hell at the party foul, and rightfully so - it would be. yet if "their side" does it, they protect to the death what they would want to "kill" others for doing.

go figure these people. may as well flush a broken turd as it would be more productive than talking with these people.

'Pull any of this'?

Tell us more about this mythical server you believe is hidden away in Ukraine......

Meanwhile in the real world....

The “server” Trump is obsessed with is actually 140 servers, most of them cloud-based, which the DNC was forced to decommission in June 2016 while trying to rid its network of the Russian GRU officers working to help Trump win the election, according to the figures in the DNC’s civil lawsuit against Russia and the Trump campaign. Another 180 desktop and laptop computers were also swapped out as the DNC raced to get the organization back on its feet and free of Putin’s surveillance.

But despite Trump’s repeated feverish claims to the contrary, no machines are actually missing.

It’s true that the FBI doesn’t have the DNC’s computer hardware. Agents didn’t sweep into DNC headquarters, load up all the equipment and leave Democrats standing stunned beside empty desks and dangling cables. There’s a reason for that, and it has nothing to do with a deep state conspiracy to frame Putin.

Trump and his allies are capitalizing on a basic misapprehension of how computer intrusion investigations work. Investigating a virtual crime isn’t a like investigating a murder. The Russians didn’t leave DNA evidence on the server racks and fingerprints on the keyboards. All the evidence of their comings and goings was on the computer hard drives, and in memory, and in the ephemeral network transmissions to and from the GRU’s command-and-control servers.

When cyber investigators respond to an incident, they capture that evidence in a process called “imaging.” They make an exact byte-for-byte copy of the hard drives. They do the same for the machine’s memory, capturing evidence that would otherwise be lost at the next reboot, and they monitor and store the traffic passing through the victim’s network. This has been standard procedure in computer intrusion investigations for decades. The images, not the computer’s hardware, provide the evidence.

Both the DNC and the security firm Crowdstrike, hired to respond to the breach, have said repeatedly over the years that they gave the FBI a copy of all the DNC images back in 2016. The DNC reiterated that Monday in a statement to the Daily Beast.

“The FBI was given images of servers, forensic copies, as well as a host of other forensic information we collected from our systems,” said Adrienne Watson, the DNC’s deputy communications director. “We were in close contact and worked cooperatively with the FBI and were always responsive to their requests. Any suggestion that they were denied access to what they wanted for their investigation is completely incorrect.”

It’s also consistent with the Department of Justice’s electronic evidence manual, which recommends capturing images when practical even when the FBI is executing a search warrant against a uncooperative suspect. When the computers belong to a cooperating victim, seizing the machines is pretty much out of the question, said James Harris, a former FBI cybercrime agent who worked on a 2009 breach at Google that’s been linked to the Chinese government.

“In most cases you don’t even ask, you just assume you’re going to make forensic copies,” said Harris, now vice president of engineering at PFP Cyber. “For example when the Google breach happened back in 2009, agents were sent out with express instructions that you image what they allow you to image, because they’re the victim, you don’t have a search warrant, and you don’t want to disrupt their business.”

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

Trump’s ‘Missing DNC Server’ Is Neither Missing Nor a Server

great - now give me 1 good reason why they couldn't examine the actual server itself. lobbing daily beast at me is, at best, that broken turd i was flushing.

Because they didn't need to. A byte-for-byte copy is an appropriate substitute.

 

[Care4all]

WOW! Did this thread take off!

Ya see what the word CROWDSTRIKE does to liberals???

CROWDSTRIKE CROWDSTRIKE CROWDSTRIKE!!!

DRAIN THE SWAMP!

So what's the conspiracy theory? Crowdstrike covered up the Ukraineans stealing the DNc and podesta private emails and RELEASING the stolen emails to wikileaks, to the public so that it would actually help Hillary????



Come on...You can't be serious????

 

[Faun]

Physics don't lie.

But Trump and his supporters sure do- your post is another great example.

You posted this lie way to soon
I am a Trump supporter and I DON'T LIE
SO THAT MAKES YOU A LYING SACK OF SHIT.

LOL

You don't lie, PussyBitch??

You lied in this thread. You claimed CrowdStrike altered the disk image they provided to the FBI but you can't prove that.

A lot of claims have been made and anything crowdstrike gave to the FBI is worthless and can never be used in a court of law.

Odd then that it was used in the indictments of the Russian nationals charged

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

indictments that went nowhere. When the trial date? If it had gone to court Judge would have kick any evidence crowd stikr gave to the FBI out as inadmissible

Dumbfuck.... indictments that go nowhere because the defendants can't be brought to trial -- NOT because the evidence is "worthless and can't be used in court."

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Dumb ass that idiot thinks a coupe is not a crime lol

Feel free to name the actual criminal code. Or just keep pulling this out of Trump's ass.

Either way it will be amusing.

18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government

 

[Faun]

The 'death penalty'.....for what exactly?

Do you have eyes?

It's called a coup attempt!

You're telling me you can't see the filth is trying to unseat a duly elected president? And have been since before his inauguration?

Wow, what a mindless parrot you are, huh? Trump says "coup," and you ask, how high?

 

[BlindBoo]

OMG Somebody's gonna yell "Crowdstrike" in a crowded message board!

Those bastards.

Quick liberals, head for the hills!

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You posted this lie way to soon
I am a Trump supporter and I DON'T LIE
SO THAT MAKES YOU A LYING SACK OF SHIT.

LOL

You don't lie, PussyBitch??

You lied in this thread. You claimed CrowdStrike altered the disk image they provided to the FBI but you can't prove that.

A lot of claims have been made and anything crowdstrike gave to the FBI is worthless and can never be used in a court of law.

Odd then that it was used in the indictments of the Russian nationals charged

There’s a final bit of evidence that the FBI got what it wanted from the DNC, and it was filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. last Friday: 29-pages of inside details showing exactly how and when the GRU’s hackers moved through the DNC’s network on their mission to help Trump.

indictments that went nowhere. When the trial date? If it had gone to court Judge would have kick any evidence crowd stikr gave to the FBI out as inadmissible

Dumbfuck.... indictments that go nowhere because the defendants can't be brought to trial -- NOT because the evidence is "worthless and can't be used in court."

STILL WAITING ON THAT COURT DATE

 

[JustAGuy1]

WOW! Did this thread take off!

Ya see what the word CROWDSTRIKE does to liberals???

CROWDSTRIKE CROWDSTRIKE CROWDSTRIKE!!!

DRAIN THE SWAMP!

So what's the conspiracy theory? Crowdstrike covered up the Ukraineans stealing the DNc and podesta private emails and RELEASING the stolen emails to wikileaks, to the public so that it would actually help Hillary????



Come on...You can't be serious????

Cite your source that proves the FBI got the server.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

i've given up trying to explain this. a copy can be anything and certainly no guarantee it's of the original unmodified server.

The liberals on this board know that!

But they are lying filth...they can't help but argue because they don't want to see their heroes get the death penalty!

The 'death penalty'.....for what exactly?

I know you Trumpettes are big on wishing to be able to kill other Americans but what does your fevered brain tell you that is going to lead to you being able to legally kill other Americans?.

I see leftist as enemies of America by the way they act.

So you wanna kill "leftists" too?

Enemies of America hell yes

 

[Thunk]

So what's the conspiracy theory? Crowdstrike covered up the Ukraineans stealing the DNc and podesta private emails and RELEASING the stolen emails to wikileaks,

More arguing nonsense.

It was the origin of the made up lie of "russian collusion"...A lie that they tried like hell to overthrow our president and remove him from office (remember the last 2 years? A guy named Mueller?).

When you invent a lie & try to use it to overthrow the president...it's a COUP.

 

[Faun]

Do you see how hard they try to derail this thread?

They are scared to DEATH over the word "CROWDSTRIKE".

That's why I titled this thread "CROWDSTRIKE"

There ain't no getting away from the word CROWDSTRIKE

And by "derail," you mean mock your ignorance over the very subject matter of your conspiracy thread?

 

[Faun]

CrowdStrike was able to provide the FBI a copy and they found that acceptable. Comey testified under oath that his agency deemed a copy was an "appropriate substitute."

They gave them a floppy with AUTOEXEC.BAT as the only file on it & comey found that acceptable?

You don't say?

A "floppy?" Exactly how old are you??

 

[Care4all]

WOW! Did this thread take off!

Ya see what the word CROWDSTRIKE does to liberals???

CROWDSTRIKE CROWDSTRIKE CROWDSTRIKE!!!

DRAIN THE SWAMP!

So what's the conspiracy theory? Crowdstrike covered up the Ukraineans stealing the DNc and podesta private emails and RELEASING the stolen emails to wikileaks, to the public so that it would actually help Hillary????



Come on...You can't be serious????

Cite your source that proves the FBI got the server.

they did not get the server, they got a copy of the server and Comey said it was good enough for the FBI to do their work...

 

[Thunk]

A "floppy?" Exactly how old are you??

old enough to see that you'll eat any shit the left spoon feeds you.

 

[Thunk]

they did not get the server, they got a copy of the server and Comey said it was good enough for the FBI to do their work...

They got shit & criminal comey said that was more than enough.