Curiosity Question for the Gun Nuts

Dateline Texas:

A jerk from Texas drove his truck into a hotel lobby to express his disappointment over a bill.

A second jerk from Texas ordered 2 of his students/players to cheap shot a referee during a game.

Obviously both Texicans have anger issues. Set aside the law for a moment since we all know background checks are a joke and you can get around them by buying a weapon from anyone willing to sell it to you.

Do the gun nuts who frequent this forum think these 2 men should still be allowed to own weapons/be in the same house where weapons are?

What about Adam Lanza's Father?

no one that has ever had a temper fit should own a firearm?


Hilarious


A temper tantrum that results in that amount of destruction should prevent gun ownership. Yelling at someone and attempted murder with a vehicle is not the same thing.

Maybe he should be prevented from having a pickup truck.
 
Dateline Texas:

A jerk from Texas drove his truck into a hotel lobby to express his disappointment over a bill.

A second jerk from Texas ordered 2 of his students/players to cheap shot a referee during a game.

Obviously both Texicans have anger issues. Set aside the law for a moment since we all know background checks are a joke and you can get around them by buying a weapon from anyone willing to sell it to you.

Do the gun nuts who frequent this forum think these 2 men should still be allowed to own weapons/be in the same house where weapons are?

What about Adam Lanza's Father?

Good question. It'd be nice if a gun nut would actually take the time to answer it rather than deflect with "wut the fuk yu ask fer? ey dunt git it!!"

Their silence is answer enough. The profanity is music to my ears.

If I answer the leading question, I would be admitting I am a 'gun nut' instead of an American citizen who owns a gun in accordance with the 2nd Amendment and a legal state issued concealed carry permit. Ask the question in a civil manner and you might get a civil answer rather than kiss off's.

And for the 3,000,000 times I was called a "gun grabber", who do I talk to about that? Hmmm?
 
So, is there any demonstration of someone having anger issues that would make you think twice?
 
Don't get your question?


Did they have guns?

Don't know. Doesn't matter. They do have profound anger/coping issues that were demonstrated (outside of Lanza Sr.).

Should they be allowed to have them/live in the same place where people that have them?

Of course.

Is there a law that precludes them from owning guns based on the crime committed?

-Geaux
 
Don't get your question?


Did they have guns?

Don't know. Doesn't matter. They do have profound anger/coping issues that were demonstrated (outside of Lanza Sr.).

Should they be allowed to have them/live in the same place where people that have them?

Of course.

Is there a law that precludes them from owning guns based on the crime committed?

-Geaux

The question was this: Do you (a gun nut) think someone with such anger issues--demonstrated objective issues to where they had someone injured and drove their truck through the lobby of a hotel--should have a firearm. It has nothing to do with laws or whatever...they're hardly worth having since they can be violated so easily...it's just asking for your opinion.
 
Don't get your question?


Did they have guns?

Don't know. Doesn't matter. They do have profound anger/coping issues that were demonstrated (outside of Lanza Sr.).

Should they be allowed to have them/live in the same place where people that have them?

Of course.

Is there a law that precludes them from owning guns based on the crime committed?

-Geaux

The question was this: Do you (a gun nut) think someone with such anger issues--demonstrated objective issues to where they had someone injured and drove their truck through the lobby of a hotel--should have a firearm. It has nothing to do with laws or whatever...they're hardly worth having since they can be violated so easily...it's just asking for your opinion.

As I said, fairly confident they have firearms and chose not to use them. So the answer again is NO.... If its a felony, guns are over for you. We have laws in place to address your curiosity

-Geaux
 
What you fail to realize is gun owners loose their cool just like anyone else. However, the vast majority do not resort to using a gun to settle disputes.

Your question is in search of a red herring

-Geaux
 
Don't get your question?


Did they have guns?

Don't know. Doesn't matter. They do have profound anger/coping issues that were demonstrated (outside of Lanza Sr.).

Should they be allowed to have them/live in the same place where people that have them?

Of course.

Is there a law that precludes them from owning guns based on the crime committed?

-Geaux

The question was this: Do you (a gun nut) think someone with such anger issues--demonstrated objective issues to where they had someone injured and drove their truck through the lobby of a hotel--should have a firearm. It has nothing to do with laws or whatever...they're hardly worth having since they can be violated so easily...it's just asking for your opinion.

As I said, fairly confident they have firearms and chose not to use them. So the answer again is NO.... If its a felony, guns are over for you. We have laws in place to address your curiosity

-Geaux

Is there any demonstration of anger that would make you think twice. Like there was this girl in Corpus Christie, Texas that locked her family in a house and set fire to the house in 4 places. If she's not convicted of this crime, you think she should be able to buy weapons--right?
 
Don't get your question?


Did they have guns?

Don't know. Doesn't matter. They do have profound anger/coping issues that were demonstrated (outside of Lanza Sr.).

Should they be allowed to have them/live in the same place where people that have them?

Of course.

Is there a law that precludes them from owning guns based on the crime committed?

-Geaux

The question was this: Do you (a gun nut) think someone with such anger issues--demonstrated objective issues to where they had someone injured and drove their truck through the lobby of a hotel--should have a firearm. It has nothing to do with laws or whatever...they're hardly worth having since they can be violated so easily...it's just asking for your opinion.

As I said, fairly confident they have firearms and chose not to use them. So the answer again is NO.... If its a felony, guns are over for you. We have laws in place to address your curiosity

-Geaux

Is there any demonstration of anger that would make you think twice. Like there was this girl in Corpus Christie, Texas that locked her family in a house and set fire to the house in 4 places. If she's not convicted of this crime, you think she should be able to buy weapons--right?

Again, red herring,......

But.... if somehow she was not convicted (can't see how that would happen with your scenario) then the answer is YES- She should be able to buy a weapon.

-Geaux
 
Dateline Texas:

A jerk from Texas drove his truck into a hotel lobby to express his disappointment over a bill.

A second jerk from Texas ordered 2 of his students/players to cheap shot a referee during a game.

Obviously both Texicans have anger issues. Set aside the law for a moment since we all know background checks are a joke and you can get around them by buying a weapon from anyone willing to sell it to you.

Do the gun nuts who frequent this forum think these 2 men should still be allowed to own weapons/be in the same house where weapons are?

What about Adam Lanza's Father?

Good question. It'd be nice if a gun nut would actually take the time to answer it rather than deflect with "wut the fuk yu ask fer? ey dunt git it!!"

Belueve me, if you were about to get raped by a bear, you'd want to be armed -- or would you?
 
Dateline Texas:

A jerk from Texas drove his truck into a hotel lobby to express his disappointment over a bill.

A second jerk from Texas ordered 2 of his students/players to cheap shot a referee during a game.

Obviously both Texicans have anger issues. Set aside the law for a moment since we all know background checks are a joke and you can get around them by buying a weapon from anyone willing to sell it to you.

Do the gun nuts who frequent this forum think these 2 men should still be allowed to own weapons/be in the same house where weapons are?

What about Adam Lanza's Father?

no one that has ever had a temper fit should own a firearm?


Hilarious
A temper fit? You call driving your truck through the lobby of a hotel a temper fit? Holy Christ!
 
Dateline Texas:

A jerk from Texas drove his truck into a hotel lobby to express his disappointment over a bill.

A second jerk from Texas ordered 2 of his students/players to cheap shot a referee during a game.

Obviously both Texicans have anger issues. Set aside the law for a moment since we all know background checks are a joke and you can get around them by buying a weapon from anyone willing to sell it to you.

Do the gun nuts who frequent this forum think these 2 men should still be allowed to own weapons/be in the same house where weapons are?

What about Adam Lanza's Father?
A DV conviction will make you lose your gun rights here and I know zip about Lanza's dad. His parents were not responsible. As far as DQing people with emotional problems, that means most liberals. Should liberals own guns since truth is what they want to see and display no personal responsibility?
 
Dateline Texas:

A jerk from Texas drove his truck into a hotel lobby to express his disappointment over a bill.

A second jerk from Texas ordered 2 of his students/players to cheap shot a referee during a game.

Obviously both Texicans have anger issues. Set aside the law for a moment since we all know background checks are a joke and you can get around them by buying a weapon from anyone willing to sell it to you.

Do the gun nuts who frequent this forum think these 2 men should still be allowed to own weapons/be in the same house where weapons are?

What about Adam Lanza's Father?


have you ever heard of due process
 

Forum List

Back
Top