Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 17,527
- 5,034
True.The term "divided by class" is meaningless. All it means is that people earn different amounts of money.
Marx railed endlessly against class and taught his believers to do the same. You constantly hear marxists talk about class, class interests, class betrayal, class struggle blah blah blah.
This is one of the many facts proving that Marx was a true fool, or just a massive fraud or both. In his time class existed much more rigidly especially in europe. His predictions are predicated on the notion that this would never change or even get worse. Too bad for him exactly the opposite happened.
Capitalism has eliminated poverty worldwide more than any other economic idea or system ( collectivism whether sodcialism or communism only increases it where ever it is tried ). As a result socio economic class has been subdivided down so many times that there are simply too many socio economic classes to keep track of. Despite the claim of marxists there is also a great deal of upward and downward mobility between socio economic classes.
Today you would have to divide people by bottom lower class. slightly above bottom lower class, less than most lower class, lower class, upper lower class, barely lower class, barely middle class, very low middle class, lower middle class, high, lower middle class, middle class, slightly above middle class, comfortable middle class, upper middle class, marely upper class, lower upper class, upper class, high upper class, mega upper class.
And so on
These are some of the facts which cause marxists or even progressives who are just marxists light to fail constantly in spreading their idiotic ideas like the one Sanders proposes.
People know better.Even the economic lower classes know that these ideas are crap. Even during the height of the great depression the marxists only enjoyed a slight increase in followers and believers.