- Moderator
- #101
Why? Because he shot an unarmed kid? Perhaps he felt his property was being threatened? Not really sure where your going with that.
Merely that we don't have enough information to make a determination of whether there is a defense or not. Sure as heck doesn't look good for him though. Definitely wasnt self defense. Why is this relevant? no one has a clue but you.
I know why it's relevant. And I know why the old fucker killed that kid. The kid was suspcious to the old fucker because the kid was one of those black people. They're just suspicious in general, you know what I mean. So when the old dude's guns went missing he probably wasn't surprised, considering that he had to live next to those black people. (probably not the terminology he would use)
And he'd just had enough of it, enough of their bullshit. So in his screwed up old racist mind he was totally justified in shooting that kid. That 13-year-old boy. Because that's how those old racist fucks think.
Ask me how I know how racists think. It's because I'm white and I've been around them and heard them talk.
Yeah, I understand how this is relevant, because it's the same kind of attitudes that justified Zimmerman killing Martin...in the minds of some.
Because you've lied to yourself doesn't mean your conclusion is true.
Zimmerman shot Trayvon in self defense. The facts and the law are pretty clear.
If Trayvon hadn't been beating Zimmerman, he wouldn't have been shot. This is true regardless of the race of anyone involved.
If this story is true, the teen didn't do anything to justify being shot. This is true regardless of the race of anyone involved.
RACE IS IRRELEVANT. Stop being racists and you won't have to worry about racial problem.