Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You can say that about any trial, the prosecution was trying to pull a miracle off.There were things the judge did not allow. But what's done is done. Hopefully we don't start seeing Paul Kerseys everywhere.
So when you subdue someone who attacks you, thereby stopping that attack, and the police arrest you, you'll have no complaints, right ?
There is no ‘right’ to self-defense when one seeks out and pursues someone to murder him.But you have 100% right to self-defense when you shoot someone who is attacking you. (as Arbery was to McMichael).
Everyone is entitled to self-defense, but Arbery was not defending. He was ATTACKING. Have you not seen the video ?Yeah man. Shouting stop or we’ll blow your head off is pretty aggressive, isn’t it?
Isn’t Arbery entitled to self defense?
Hmmm you seemingly cant see the difference between subdue and murder. I wouldnt call it subduing as much as I'd call it attempted kidnapping.So when you subdue someone who attacks you, thereby stopping that attack, and the police arrest you, you'll have no complaints, right ?
There is no evidence that anybody sought out anybody to murder them. Please do not repeat media propaganda/hysteria/idiocy.There is no ‘right’ to self-defense when one seeks out and pursues someone to murder him.
Guess the jury wasnt as fucked in the head as you are. And they allowed you to purchase firearms? That's pretty nuts in and of itself.Everyone is entitled to self-defense, but Arbery was not defending. He was ATTACKING. Have you not seen the video ?
I easily know the difference. You seemingly cant tell the difference between self-defense and murder..Hmmm you seemingly cant see the difference between subdue and murder. I wouldnt call it subduing as much as I'd call it attempted kidnapping.
That's not the correct response when YOUR rights are trampled on by a bad trial verdict.
You do not need to wait to be attacked to defend yourself. The McMichaels threatened him therefore Arbery is free to defend against that threat.Everyone is entitled to self-defense, but Arbery was not defending. He was ATTACKING. Have you not seen the video ?
Youre the only one here saying Arbrey attacked the 3 hillbillies. You might want to stop and take the time to consider the fact you might be wrong.I easily know the difference. You seemingly cant tell the difference between self-defense and murder..
When you kill someone who attacks you, thereby stopping that attack, and the police arrest you, you'll have no complaints, right ?
Where do you see a shred of evidence that "the McMichaels were planning on killing Arbery" ?Did Bryan know the McMichaels were planning on killing Arbery?
FALSE! You most certainly DO need to wait to be attacked to defend yourself, if that "defense" means attacking the other person, who is just standing still, and not attacking you. If that other person is just standing still and not coming at you, you have no right to go at him.You do not need to wait to be attacked to defend yourself. The McMichaels threatened him therefore Arbery is free to defend against that threat.
You seemingly enjoy living in a society where you are scared enough where you feel you need to be armed all the time. Pretty pathetic way to go through life.