You're in retard mode, unwilling to actually read what I am writing, so have a great day.According to you, voters don't get to decide the nominees from the two Parties? They only have a right to choose between two people that private organizations have chosen?Parties are in control of a "Constitutional right?" What does that mean?
To be a relevant analogy, the parties would have to control whether you get to vote in the general election or not. The parties themselves aren't government, you don't get to control them
No, there are always more than two choices on the Presidential ballot. I've been voting since I was 18, and I've NEVER seen a ballot that didn't have at least four people listed.
That people are willing to view it as a two-party race is THEIR choice. No one's stopping them from voting for someone else, writing someone in, forming a group to put forward their own candidate, etc. The idea that people have a right to assume for themselves the benefits of other people's time and effort is . . . very leftist, like everything else you say.
The people made it two choices who could win, not the government
could you try that again in English?
You have to read the quotes I was responding to ...