Democrat thugs shut down Trump rally

[eagle1462010]

Why are you against them
Expressing Themsleves ? Mr free speech?

Why doesn't Trump just get out there and punch some protesters in the face. He's always talking about how much he'd enjoy doing that......now would be a perfect opportunity.

I would love to see that. However, he has "guys" to do that......damn, it's nice to be rich. Just ask Hillary.

He's had guys to do that for him his whole life. That's why he's such a craven, cowardly, chickenshit, draft dodging, dilettante, cock sucker.

Damn...tell us how you really feel...You serve in the military did you? I did. 22 years. Served in Viet Nam. Doesn't bother me that he never served, why the hell should it bother you? Bill Clinton didn't serve. Hillary Clinton never served. Bernie Sanders damned sure never served. Funny you didn't mention them, don't you think?

Of the above mentioned which one is constantly blustering about how tough he is?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Remember 2009 or thereabouts, when the Tea Partiers were busting up and closing down town hall meetings all over the country,

and every RWnut in America thought it was the greatest thing ever?

You don't remember that? You do now.

 

[Unkotare]

Just saw a live shot from the streets outside of an older pro-trump guy - 50s or so and pretty large - trying to talk calmly to an anti-trump protester (who was also apparently calm and engaged) being harassed by some little snot who appeared to have graduated from college three minutes prior and who very clearly had never once been punched in his entitled, naive little face (check the nose and the pose and you know) hopping around pecking his little beak in with vulgarities that were of course never expounded upon. Just the kind of little POS who assumes the world will never give him the beating he keeps begging for. I hope he never gets it, but I hope he manages to grow up some other way.

 

[bripat9643]

And now I know why I voted for Trump. Sure, he hasn't helped the atmosphere with his comments, but never has he stooped so low as to encourage his supporters to shut down other people's rallies.

Hey liberals, this is what a safe space on steroids looks like.

If this is the reason for supporting a candidate you're one of the easily manipulated.

Well, sir, guess you better count me in then - I mean, I guess I could vote for a 70 year old murderer or perhaps a 75 year old communist - but what the hell, why waste a vote, right?

No doubt your vote will be well spent on a sleazy salesman and self promoter.

Get this: Obama is blaming Trump for these thugs showing up at his event!

 

[9aces]

Good Lord, FoxNews asked two protesters what they are protesting and they couldn't answer the question. They have no idea why they are there. LOL

They were bused in, and didn't want to say it.

 

[bripat9643]

Remember 2009 or thereabouts, when the Tea Partiers were busting up and closing down town hall meetings all over the country,

and every RWnut in America thought it was the greatest thing ever?

You don't remember that? You do now.

All they did is yell at the scumbag who invited them there.

 

[Liminal]

Good Lord, FoxNews asked two protesters what they are protesting and they couldn't answer the question. They have no idea why they are there. LOL

That would indicate there was no security concern and that Rump is simply hiding to play "victim".

I thought Trump followers liked all the tough talk and appeals to mob violence. I guess they were just too fucking stupid to figure out that others might respond in kind.

 

[bripat9643]

Good Lord, FoxNews asked two protesters what they are protesting and they couldn't answer the question. They have no idea why they are there. LOL

That would indicate there was no security concern and that Rump is simply hiding to play "victim".

It wouldn't indicate anything of the sort, dumbass.

 

[Never3ndr]

The news is reporting that Trump cancelled a rally in Chicago because a hoard of Democrat thugs showed up to threaten him and his fans.

Whatever happened to freedom of speech? Who are the brownshirts here?

I'm a liberal and, while I think Trump is an extremist dangerously close in a lot of his views to other extreme radicals, I also support free speech.

I think that it is in bad taste to create a hostile environment not open for discussion, now with that said I honestly think that Trump's supporters should have been allowed to peaceably assemble AS WELL AS Trumps protesters been allowed to peaceably protest. I'm not sure who organized the event nor exactly how hostile the crowds seemed to be but either the event was planned by an idiot without enough resources available, or the people attending needed to chill their jets.

Bingo. And by backing out à la Megyn Kelly, Rump is tacitly admitting that he's not willing to chill those jets. After all, that sort of angst is exactly what he thrives on, so he's in effect admitting that he's made of blusterfluff. Only this and nothing more.

Interestingly when he disassociated from that fledgling third party 16 years ago he denounced David Duke as the "anger vote". And now look where he is.

I am not necessarily blaming Trump. I haven't really seen any coverage over the crowds before the event...if the atmosphere is pretty charged, an appearance by the guy that the people disagree over would likely increase tensions, not relieve them.

I'll just repeat this again, either the even organizer was an idiot (not having enough security on hand, nor able to properly rope off / account for designated areas for the protesters outside of the venue of the rally), or the crowds (not saying one side or another, again, we have no information...at least any that I've seen, I'd be more than happy if somebody had a link to how the crowds appeared) needed to tone it down.

That (the logistics) may well be, as you say we don't know those details. What I'm saying is the guy in whose hands lies, because he's got their unwavering personality-cult devotion, the power to defuse the whole situation ------ chooses not to go that route. It indicates he sees more benefit in keeping the flames hot than in quenching them.

He could have used the moment as a springboard to a far more exalted atmosphere than what's hanging in the air after yesterday ---- but he chose not to do that and instead maintain the divisive one.

Which is after all predictable, since that --- the atmosphere of friction --- is what serves the self-interest of Numero Uno, while OTOH playing peacemaker offers nothing to that same ego-feed.

I don't honestly think that his showing up could have helped given the scenario that the crowds were hostile...I honestly think it would have escalated the situation. Now, again, I don't really know the climate of the crowds, nor the logistics of the situation, but I think it is safe to say that he did the right thing in postponing it.

Will he use the fact that he postponed the rally to likely fuel an "us vs. them" mentality? Likely...it has basically been his campaign MO. Also, given how successful it has been...could you blame him?

Now, I don't agree with his tactics, but I don't think it is reasonable to say that he could have or even should have tried to defuse the situation. He is a polarizing figure and, even if you allow a hypothetical where he does defuse his side of the crowd, you have to admit that there are increasingly extreme oppositions charging up against him and his campaign. I think that postponing it was likely the right choice at the end of the day but am disappointed in whomever is at fault (the event organizer, the crowds, or, likely, a combination of both) in not remaining a bit more competent or civil.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Anything a liberal doesn't agree with is "extremely dangerous". Jesus - just openly say that Climate Change is bogus - you will see pussies wetting their little panties they are so upset.

If you actually read my quote I never say "extremely dangerous"...just because the guy added quotes doesn't mean that he accurately quoted the material.

Maybe you should read the quote before getting angry over what wasn't said.

Seriously, you guys seem to have the literacy level of a 4th grader.

Who the hell is angry? I stated a FACT. Anything a liberal doesn't agree with is "extremely dangerous". Tell me where I'm wrong. Please.

Well, I'm a liberal, I don't agree with Trump, and I don't consider Trump as extremely dangerous. I'm literally a living counter-example.

So, yeah, you are pretty wrong.

Apparently, your reading comprehension is not as good as you think sonny.

You said, "Anything a liberal doesn't agree with is "extremely dangerous". Tell me where I'm wrong."

I said, "Well, I'm a liberal, I don't agree with Trump, and I don't consider Trump as extremely dangerous."

If my reading comprehension is off, then please help me. How, exactly, are you right when me, a liberal, disagrees with Trump, and explicitly tells you that I don't find him extremely dangerous.

Perhaps I'm missing something here, but here you have somebody directly counter your statement and you refuse to acknowledge their opinion, still yelling (with fingers in ears I imagine) that the person you don't agree with is wrong...

Also, I felt like I've seen somewhere that you said you were a vet...as an ACTUAL vet let me just say that, if you are a vet...get your shit together and stop acting like a 5 year old...you are seriously misrepresenting our brotherhood...if you are just a faker (and believe me, there are tons out there), please stop using that word to describe yourself...its becoming more and more stigmatized in recent years and I'd hate for some fake nutjob to keep running around further degrading the image of a lot of good men and women.

Sonny, I don't have to answer to any jerk off like you. 11B and 97B. Viet Nam 1965-66. Ashau Valley and Quang Tri. Retired in 1987. Thank you. I'll trade war stories with your sorry ass any day of the week. You're not fooling anyone. I've got more DD214's than you have hair on your balls.

 

[NYcarbineer]

2009, Chicago Tea Partiers disrupt a Democratic rep's town hall meeting:



Thugs???????

 

[Liminal]

Begs the questions: Are there any intelligent Trump followers anywhere? Do they have any potential for learning? Can they be taught?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Good Lord, FoxNews asked two protesters what they are protesting and they couldn't answer the question. They have no idea why they are there. LOL

That would indicate there was no security concern and that Rump is simply hiding to play "victim".

I thought Trump followers liked all the tough talk and appeals to mob violence. I guess they were just too fucking stupid to figure out that others might respond in kind.

You condemn Trump for his violent rhetoric, but condone behavior like this. It shows how poorly you believe in free speech, when only one side can exercise it but not the other.

 

[ClosedCaption]

And now I know why I voted for Trump. Sure, he hasn't helped the atmosphere with his comments, but never has he stooped so low as to encourage his supporters to shut down other people's rallies.

Hey liberals, this is what a safe space on steroids looks like.

If this is the reason for supporting a candidate you're one of the easily manipulated.

Well, sir, guess you better count me in then - I mean, I guess I could vote for a 70 year old murderer or perhaps a 75 year old communist - but what the hell, why waste a vote, right?

No doubt your vote will be well spent on a sleazy salesman and self promoter.

Get this: Obama is blaming Trump for these thugs showing up at his event!

Yeah, that's crazy...it's not like they are they protesting Trump...

Wait...

 

[sarahgop]

Good Lord, FoxNews asked two protesters what they are protesting and they couldn't answer the question. They have no idea why they are there. LOL

That would indicate there was no security concern and that Rump is simply hiding to play "victim".

I thought Trump followers liked all the tough talk and appeals to mob violence. I guess they were just too fucking stupid to figure out that others might respond in kind.

I know you arent that stupid. Please tell me the events trump supporters have used nazi tactics to disrupt. You cant because there arent any

 

[Liminal]

Good Lord, FoxNews asked two protesters what they are protesting and they couldn't answer the question. They have no idea why they are there. LOL

That would indicate there was no security concern and that Rump is simply hiding to play "victim".

I thought Trump followers liked all the tough talk and appeals to mob violence. I guess they were just too fucking stupid to figure out that others might respond in kind.

You condemn Trump for his violent rhetoric, but condone behavior like this. It shows how poorly you believe in free speech, when only one side can exercise it but not the other.

Feel free to point to part where I condoned violence. Why do you dummies have to lie about everything all the time?

 

[bripat9643]

2009, Chicago Tea Partiers disrupt a Democratic rep's town hall meeting:



Thugs???????

You mean they used their freedom of speech to petition their representative? And you oppose that?

 

[eagle1462010]

Begs the questions: Are there any intelligent Trump followers anywhere? Do they have any potential for learning? Can they be taught?

Begs the question on why anyone would want to have a discussion with your ignorant TROLL ass....................Bye Bye ..............You are insignificant................................

 

[Fang]

Good Lord, FoxNews asked two protesters what they are protesting and they couldn't answer the question. They have no idea why they are there. LOL

That would indicate there was no security concern and that Rump is simply hiding to play "victim".

No, it would indicate Liberals are the dumbest people on the planet. Now go vote for Bernie so your lazy ass can sit home all day and collect free shit while Republicans pay the bills.

 

[Never3ndr]

If you actually read my quote I never say "extremely dangerous"...just because the guy added quotes doesn't mean that he accurately quoted the material.

Maybe you should read the quote before getting angry over what wasn't said.

Seriously, you guys seem to have the literacy level of a 4th grader.

Who the hell is angry? I stated a FACT. Anything a liberal doesn't agree with is "extremely dangerous". Tell me where I'm wrong. Please.

Well, I'm a liberal, I don't agree with Trump, and I don't consider Trump as extremely dangerous. I'm literally a living counter-example.

So, yeah, you are pretty wrong.

Apparently, your reading comprehension is not as good as you think sonny.

You said, "Anything a liberal doesn't agree with is "extremely dangerous". Tell me where I'm wrong."

I said, "Well, I'm a liberal, I don't agree with Trump, and I don't consider Trump as extremely dangerous."

If my reading comprehension is off, then please help me. How, exactly, are you right when me, a liberal, disagrees with Trump, and explicitly tells you that I don't find him extremely dangerous.

Perhaps I'm missing something here, but here you have somebody directly counter your statement and you refuse to acknowledge their opinion, still yelling (with fingers in ears I imagine) that the person you don't agree with is wrong...

Also, I felt like I've seen somewhere that you said you were a vet...as an ACTUAL vet let me just say that, if you are a vet...get your shit together and stop acting like a 5 year old...you are seriously misrepresenting our brotherhood...if you are just a faker (and believe me, there are tons out there), please stop using that word to describe yourself...its becoming more and more stigmatized in recent years and I'd hate for some fake nutjob to keep running around further degrading the image of a lot of good men and women.

Sonny, I don't have to answer to any jerk off like you. 11B and 97B. Viet Nam 1965-66. Ashau Valley and Quang Tri. Retired in 1987. Thank you. I'll trade war stories with your sorry ass any day of the week. You're not fooling anyone. I've got more DD214's than you have hair on your balls.

You say that, you realize you only get one set of DD214's when you get out right...I'm glad you googled some stuff on the internet to keep up your fake persona...please stop degrading the image of actual vets. You can stir your crazy without having to try and take the honor away from people who actually have strapped gear on their backs and been shot at.