Democrat Version of "I Love America"

[PoliticalChic]

They love America.....sure they do.

But.....just to be sure, let's check:



"Democrats’ campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices"
Democrats' campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices


"Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats."
Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats.


"The Senate is undemocratic and it matters"
The Senate is undemocratic and it matters



"Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution”
Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution” | National Review




And....where it started....

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

Roosevelt made the right choice there. I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII or you are misrepresenting it because you are a cheerleader for one train of political thought. Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin.

Overly simplistic but it makes a point.

Heck, most of the countries in your high school history books ceased to exist or were ruled by madmen. The world had problems.

1. "Roosevelt made the right choice there."

As usual...you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be, but you wouldn't be successful.


2."I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII..."
First of all, you must never use those first two words again....clearly, you don't.

Now...your lesson in history:
No, Germany would not have conquered the USSR.

Hitler knew that....and so must have Roosevelt.

Here are the facts:
.. when Operation Barbarossa started on June 22, 1941, the available (German) supplies of fuel, tires, spare parts etc., were only good enough for about two months.....

Stalin, in fact, had been supplying resources to Hitler.

The Wehrmacht continued to advance, albeit very slowly, and by mid-November some units found themselves at only 30 kilometers from the capital. But the troops were now totally exhausted, and running out of supplies. Their commanders knew that it was simply impossible to take Moscow.
Hitler s Failed Blitzkrieg against the Soviet Union. The Battle of Moscow and Stalingrad Turning Point of World War II Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
72 Years Ago, December 1941: Turning Point of World War II
'The Victory of the Red Army in front of Moscow was a Major Break'…
by Jacques Pauwels



By attacking in June, Hitler had planned to avoid Russia's three greatest generals....December, January, and February.
He didn't.


So....once one recognizes that Stalin was going to be the winner.....
....why did FDR send him supplies that the Allies could have used?

The schools hide the truth to shield FDR from richly deserved contumely.


Same reason so many universities eschew teaching the French Revolution....students might recognize that it gave birth to every totalitarian revolution in modern times.



"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence




FDR had a bromance with Stalin, and embraced the cultural Marxism we labor under today.





3. "Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin."

Gads, you're a dunce .....the very opposite is the case.

And....mull this over: who knows more about the evil than those living under same.

1. When the Allies succumbed to Stalin's demands at Yalta, that all those refugees, from generals of armies to intellectuals, Cossacks, kulaks, teachers, peasants, and workers, be repatriated to Stalin!

2. The 850,000 strong army of Gen. Andrei Andreyevich Vlasov, having gone to the other side, Germany, "to save their country from Stalin" and having later surrendered to US forces, "formed the core of those forcebly repatritated between 1944 and 1947." "Operation Keelhaul; The Story of Forced Repatriation from 1944 to the Present. by Julius Epstein p.27, 53.
a. Gen. Deniken, former commanding general of the White Russian armies which were supported by the USA in 1917-1920, explained that none of these men served in the Nazi army out of love for Germany..."they hated the Germans" he wrote....rather, they knew what awaited them in the 'Soviet paradise.'
3. How badly did these individuals not want to go to Stalin's USSR? From the NYTimes, January 20, 1946: "Ten renegade Russian soldiers, in a frenzy of terror over their impending repatriation to the homeland, committed suicide today during a riot in the Dachau prison camp...."
a. And, in the Times, March 5, 1946: " - Many thousands of persons hostile to the present regime in the Soviet Union are being forcibly sent there....the Catholic Church constantly received appeals from 'displaced persons' terrified of being sent back to territory now controlled by Russia."
4. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.




Why have you never read a book????

Ask nicely, and I'll provide a curriculum that will let you appear less of an idiot.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They love America.....sure they do.

But.....just to be sure, let's check:



"Democrats’ campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices"
Democrats' campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices


"Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats."
Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats.


"The Senate is undemocratic and it matters"
The Senate is undemocratic and it matters



"Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution”
Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution” | National Review




And....where it started....

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

Roosevelt made the right choice there. I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII or you are misrepresenting it because you are a cheerleader for one train of political thought. Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin.

Overly simplistic but it makes a point.

Heck, most of the countries in your high school history books ceased to exist or were ruled by madmen. The world had problems.

More remediation for you.




1. There is hardly a degree of separation between Communism and Nazism.....and modern Liberalism.
All envision the very same end phase for society.
All citizens labor under the heel of the collective, of big government.


“[The] relationship [between communism and Nazism] may never be fully understood. But the Russian Red Terror, in its emphasis on the elimination of entire classes of peoples, in its description of opponents as "vermin" to be exterminated, does seem like a precursor of the German concentration camps.

Moreover, Nazism profited greatly not only from Lenin's and Stalin's Gulag system--Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz, solicited reports about the operations of Soviet camps--but also from Bolshevism itself, which served as both a whipping boy and, at times, a political idea that could be collaborated with. The two ideologies validated each other.

After World War II, the prestige of the Soviet Union was at its height. The country had fought on the side of the democracies, U.S. war propaganda had painted pipesmoking "Uncle Joe Stalin" as a friendly fellow.

In Europe, communists made a comeback in France, Italy and Germany with the flowering of the myth that communists were merely heroic anti-fascist freedom fighters. Thus the gruesome Soviet record was suppressed.

After the halo wore off the Soviet Union, China emerged as a new beacon for credulous Westerners. .Mr. Margolin writes that "one myth was common in the West: the idea that China was far from being a model democracy, but that at least Mao had managed to give a bowl of rice to every Chinese person." In fact, nothing was further than the truth. Mao, like Stalin deliberately engineered a famine that killed untold millions.”
WALL STREET JOURNAL MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 1999


'Vermin' = 'Deplorables'???



2. Hanson Baldwin, military critic of the New York Times, declares in his book, "Great Mistakes of the War:" 'There is no doubt whatsoever that it would have been to the interest of Britain, the United States, and the world to have allowed and indeed to have encouraged-the world's two great dictatorships to fight each other to a frazzle.'
Baldwin writes that the United States put itself "in the role-at times a disgraceful role-of fearful suppliant and propitiating ally, anxious at nearly any cost to keep Russia fighting. In retrospect, how stupid!"

 

[Edgetho]

PC, you can't fix stupid.

But I applaud your efforts

 

[Toronado3800]

They love America.....sure they do.

But.....just to be sure, let's check:



"Democrats’ campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices"
Democrats' campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices


"Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats."
Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats.


"The Senate is undemocratic and it matters"
The Senate is undemocratic and it matters



"Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution”
Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution” | National Review




And....where it started....

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

Roosevelt made the right choice there. I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII or you are misrepresenting it because you are a cheerleader for one train of political thought. Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin.

Overly simplistic but it makes a point.

Heck, most of the countries in your high school history books ceased to exist or were ruled by madmen. The world had problems.

1. "Roosevelt made the right choice there."

As usual...you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be, but you wouldn't be successful.


2."I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII..."
First of all, you must never use those first two words again....clearly, you don't.

Now...your lesson in history:
No, Germany would not have conquered the USSR.

Hitler knew that....and so must have Roosevelt.

Here are the facts:
.. when Operation Barbarossa started on June 22, 1941, the available (German) supplies of fuel, tires, spare parts etc., were only good enough for about two months.....

Stalin, in fact, had been supplying resources to Hitler.

The Wehrmacht continued to advance, albeit very slowly, and by mid-November some units found themselves at only 30 kilometers from the capital. But the troops were now totally exhausted, and running out of supplies. Their commanders knew that it was simply impossible to take Moscow.
Hitler s Failed Blitzkrieg against the Soviet Union. The Battle of Moscow and Stalingrad Turning Point of World War II Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
72 Years Ago, December 1941: Turning Point of World War II
'The Victory of the Red Army in front of Moscow was a Major Break'…
by Jacques Pauwels



By attacking in June, Hitler had planned to avoid Russia's three greatest generals....December, January, and February.
He didn't.


So....once one recognizes that Stalin was going to be the winner.....
....why did FDR send him supplies that the Allies could have used?

The schools hide the truth to shield FDR from richly deserved contumely.


Same reason so many universities eschew teaching the French Revolution....students might recognize that it gave birth to every totalitarian revolution in modern times.



"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence




FDR had a bromance with Stalin, and embraced the cultural Marxism we labor under today.





3. "Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin."

Gads, you're a dunce .....the very opposite is the case.

And....mull this over: who knows more about the evil than those living under same.

1. When the Allies succumbed to Stalin's demands at Yalta, that all those refugees, from generals of armies to intellectuals, Cossacks, kulaks, teachers, peasants, and workers, be repatriated to Stalin!

2. The 850,000 strong army of Gen. Andrei Andreyevich Vlasov, having gone to the other side, Germany, "to save their country from Stalin" and having later surrendered to US forces, "formed the core of those forcebly repatritated between 1944 and 1947." "Operation Keelhaul; The Story of Forced Repatriation from 1944 to the Present. by Julius Epstein p.27, 53.
a. Gen. Deniken, former commanding general of the White Russian armies which were supported by the USA in 1917-1920, explained that none of these men served in the Nazi army out of love for Germany..."they hated the Germans" he wrote....rather, they knew what awaited them in the 'Soviet paradise.'
3. How badly did these individuals not want to go to Stalin's USSR? From the NYTimes, January 20, 1946: "Ten renegade Russian soldiers, in a frenzy of terror over their impending repatriation to the homeland, committed suicide today during a riot in the Dachau prison camp...."
a. And, in the Times, March 5, 1946: " - Many thousands of persons hostile to the present regime in the Soviet Union are being forcibly sent there....the Catholic Church constantly received appeals from 'displaced persons' terrified of being sent back to territory now controlled by Russia."
4. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.




Why have you never read a book????

Ask nicely, and I'll provide a curriculum that will let you appear less of an idiot.

Hindsight is 20/20. I donot totally disagree with your opinion that the Red Army may have won the war by themselves. Letting iur enemies beat themselves into the ground was a strategy but man. What did Russia pull off at Kursk? A loss of 5 men for every German?

Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!

 

[PoliticalChic]

They love America.....sure they do.

But.....just to be sure, let's check:



"Democrats’ campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices"
Democrats' campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices


"Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats."
Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats.


"The Senate is undemocratic and it matters"
The Senate is undemocratic and it matters



"Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution”
Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution” | National Review




And....where it started....

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

Roosevelt made the right choice there. I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII or you are misrepresenting it because you are a cheerleader for one train of political thought. Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin.

Overly simplistic but it makes a point.

Heck, most of the countries in your high school history books ceased to exist or were ruled by madmen. The world had problems.

1. "Roosevelt made the right choice there."

As usual...you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be, but you wouldn't be successful.


2."I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII..."
First of all, you must never use those first two words again....clearly, you don't.

Now...your lesson in history:
No, Germany would not have conquered the USSR.

Hitler knew that....and so must have Roosevelt.

Here are the facts:
.. when Operation Barbarossa started on June 22, 1941, the available (German) supplies of fuel, tires, spare parts etc., were only good enough for about two months.....

Stalin, in fact, had been supplying resources to Hitler.

The Wehrmacht continued to advance, albeit very slowly, and by mid-November some units found themselves at only 30 kilometers from the capital. But the troops were now totally exhausted, and running out of supplies. Their commanders knew that it was simply impossible to take Moscow.
Hitler s Failed Blitzkrieg against the Soviet Union. The Battle of Moscow and Stalingrad Turning Point of World War II Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
72 Years Ago, December 1941: Turning Point of World War II
'The Victory of the Red Army in front of Moscow was a Major Break'…
by Jacques Pauwels



By attacking in June, Hitler had planned to avoid Russia's three greatest generals....December, January, and February.
He didn't.


So....once one recognizes that Stalin was going to be the winner.....
....why did FDR send him supplies that the Allies could have used?

The schools hide the truth to shield FDR from richly deserved contumely.


Same reason so many universities eschew teaching the French Revolution....students might recognize that it gave birth to every totalitarian revolution in modern times.



"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence




FDR had a bromance with Stalin, and embraced the cultural Marxism we labor under today.





3. "Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin."

Gads, you're a dunce .....the very opposite is the case.

And....mull this over: who knows more about the evil than those living under same.

1. When the Allies succumbed to Stalin's demands at Yalta, that all those refugees, from generals of armies to intellectuals, Cossacks, kulaks, teachers, peasants, and workers, be repatriated to Stalin!

2. The 850,000 strong army of Gen. Andrei Andreyevich Vlasov, having gone to the other side, Germany, "to save their country from Stalin" and having later surrendered to US forces, "formed the core of those forcebly repatritated between 1944 and 1947." "Operation Keelhaul; The Story of Forced Repatriation from 1944 to the Present. by Julius Epstein p.27, 53.
a. Gen. Deniken, former commanding general of the White Russian armies which were supported by the USA in 1917-1920, explained that none of these men served in the Nazi army out of love for Germany..."they hated the Germans" he wrote....rather, they knew what awaited them in the 'Soviet paradise.'
3. How badly did these individuals not want to go to Stalin's USSR? From the NYTimes, January 20, 1946: "Ten renegade Russian soldiers, in a frenzy of terror over their impending repatriation to the homeland, committed suicide today during a riot in the Dachau prison camp...."
a. And, in the Times, March 5, 1946: " - Many thousands of persons hostile to the present regime in the Soviet Union are being forcibly sent there....the Catholic Church constantly received appeals from 'displaced persons' terrified of being sent back to territory now controlled by Russia."
4. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.




Why have you never read a book????

Ask nicely, and I'll provide a curriculum that will let you appear less of an idiot.

Hindsight is 20/20. I donot totally disagree with your opinion that the Red Army may have won the war by themselves. Letting iur enemies beat themselves into the ground was a strategy but man. What did Russia pull off at Kursk? A loss of 5 men for every German?

Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!

It's not my opinion, you dunce.

I provided links and sources.



"Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!"

What a moron.
FDR's agenda was to give half of Europe to his bro.

He did give half of Europe to the Communists!!!!!!!!

1. FDR let Stalin determine the attack on Europe at the western most part...Normandy. The army, and Eisenhower, knew that straight up through Italy, already conquered, was best.
But FDR and Stalin wanted Eastern Europe left to the Red Army's occupation.


2. Evidence can be seen in a document which Hopkins took with him to the Quebec conference in August, 1943, entitled "Russia's Position," quoted as follows in Robert Sherwood's book, "Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History,":
"Russia's post-war position in Europe will be a dominant one. With Germany crushed, there is no power in Europe to oppose her tremendous military forces."



You really should take my offer to suggest a series of books, so you don't remain an imbecile.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They love America.....sure they do.

But.....just to be sure, let's check:



"Democrats’ campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices"
Democrats' campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices


"Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats."
Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats.


"The Senate is undemocratic and it matters"
The Senate is undemocratic and it matters



"Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution”
Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution” | National Review




And....where it started....

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

Roosevelt made the right choice there. I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII or you are misrepresenting it because you are a cheerleader for one train of political thought. Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin.

Overly simplistic but it makes a point.

Heck, most of the countries in your high school history books ceased to exist or were ruled by madmen. The world had problems.

1. "Roosevelt made the right choice there."

As usual...you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be, but you wouldn't be successful.


2."I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII..."
First of all, you must never use those first two words again....clearly, you don't.

Now...your lesson in history:
No, Germany would not have conquered the USSR.

Hitler knew that....and so must have Roosevelt.

Here are the facts:
.. when Operation Barbarossa started on June 22, 1941, the available (German) supplies of fuel, tires, spare parts etc., were only good enough for about two months.....

Stalin, in fact, had been supplying resources to Hitler.

The Wehrmacht continued to advance, albeit very slowly, and by mid-November some units found themselves at only 30 kilometers from the capital. But the troops were now totally exhausted, and running out of supplies. Their commanders knew that it was simply impossible to take Moscow.
Hitler s Failed Blitzkrieg against the Soviet Union. The Battle of Moscow and Stalingrad Turning Point of World War II Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
72 Years Ago, December 1941: Turning Point of World War II
'The Victory of the Red Army in front of Moscow was a Major Break'…
by Jacques Pauwels



By attacking in June, Hitler had planned to avoid Russia's three greatest generals....December, January, and February.
He didn't.


So....once one recognizes that Stalin was going to be the winner.....
....why did FDR send him supplies that the Allies could have used?

The schools hide the truth to shield FDR from richly deserved contumely.


Same reason so many universities eschew teaching the French Revolution....students might recognize that it gave birth to every totalitarian revolution in modern times.



"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence




FDR had a bromance with Stalin, and embraced the cultural Marxism we labor under today.





3. "Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin."

Gads, you're a dunce .....the very opposite is the case.

And....mull this over: who knows more about the evil than those living under same.

1. When the Allies succumbed to Stalin's demands at Yalta, that all those refugees, from generals of armies to intellectuals, Cossacks, kulaks, teachers, peasants, and workers, be repatriated to Stalin!

2. The 850,000 strong army of Gen. Andrei Andreyevich Vlasov, having gone to the other side, Germany, "to save their country from Stalin" and having later surrendered to US forces, "formed the core of those forcebly repatritated between 1944 and 1947." "Operation Keelhaul; The Story of Forced Repatriation from 1944 to the Present. by Julius Epstein p.27, 53.
a. Gen. Deniken, former commanding general of the White Russian armies which were supported by the USA in 1917-1920, explained that none of these men served in the Nazi army out of love for Germany..."they hated the Germans" he wrote....rather, they knew what awaited them in the 'Soviet paradise.'
3. How badly did these individuals not want to go to Stalin's USSR? From the NYTimes, January 20, 1946: "Ten renegade Russian soldiers, in a frenzy of terror over their impending repatriation to the homeland, committed suicide today during a riot in the Dachau prison camp...."
a. And, in the Times, March 5, 1946: " - Many thousands of persons hostile to the present regime in the Soviet Union are being forcibly sent there....the Catholic Church constantly received appeals from 'displaced persons' terrified of being sent back to territory now controlled by Russia."
4. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.




Why have you never read a book????

Ask nicely, and I'll provide a curriculum that will let you appear less of an idiot.

Hindsight is 20/20. I donot totally disagree with your opinion that the Red Army may have won the war by themselves. Letting iur enemies beat themselves into the ground was a strategy but man. What did Russia pull off at Kursk? A loss of 5 men for every German?

Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!

BTW....no 'hindsight' involved.

FDR knew everything I've posted.....but had an ulterior motive.....and not one to benefit America or Americans.


'A more sinister ' proximate cause of our numbness when it come to Soviet crime' is the lies that Franklin Roosevelt told the public in support of Stalin.
Loy Henderson, State Department Russian expert of the time said: "Russia does not fight for the same ideals as the United States."

Roosevelt swore to the American public the exact opposite: he declared that Stalin fought for the same ideals!

September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR."The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow," by Dennis J. Dunn, p. 137

 

[Edgetho]

They love America.....sure they do.

But.....just to be sure, let's check:



"Democrats’ campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices"
Democrats' campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices


"Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats."
Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats.


"The Senate is undemocratic and it matters"
The Senate is undemocratic and it matters



"Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution”
Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution” | National Review




And....where it started....

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

Roosevelt made the right choice there. I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII or you are misrepresenting it because you are a cheerleader for one train of political thought. Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin.

Overly simplistic but it makes a point.

Heck, most of the countries in your high school history books ceased to exist or were ruled by madmen. The world had problems.

1. "Roosevelt made the right choice there."

As usual...you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be, but you wouldn't be successful.


2."I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII..."
First of all, you must never use those first two words again....clearly, you don't.

Now...your lesson in history:
No, Germany would not have conquered the USSR.

Hitler knew that....and so must have Roosevelt.

Here are the facts:
.. when Operation Barbarossa started on June 22, 1941, the available (German) supplies of fuel, tires, spare parts etc., were only good enough for about two months.....

Stalin, in fact, had been supplying resources to Hitler.

The Wehrmacht continued to advance, albeit very slowly, and by mid-November some units found themselves at only 30 kilometers from the capital. But the troops were now totally exhausted, and running out of supplies. Their commanders knew that it was simply impossible to take Moscow.
Hitler s Failed Blitzkrieg against the Soviet Union. The Battle of Moscow and Stalingrad Turning Point of World War II Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
72 Years Ago, December 1941: Turning Point of World War II
'The Victory of the Red Army in front of Moscow was a Major Break'…
by Jacques Pauwels



By attacking in June, Hitler had planned to avoid Russia's three greatest generals....December, January, and February.
He didn't.


So....once one recognizes that Stalin was going to be the winner.....
....why did FDR send him supplies that the Allies could have used?

The schools hide the truth to shield FDR from richly deserved contumely.


Same reason so many universities eschew teaching the French Revolution....students might recognize that it gave birth to every totalitarian revolution in modern times.



"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence




FDR had a bromance with Stalin, and embraced the cultural Marxism we labor under today.





3. "Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin."

Gads, you're a dunce .....the very opposite is the case.

And....mull this over: who knows more about the evil than those living under same.

1. When the Allies succumbed to Stalin's demands at Yalta, that all those refugees, from generals of armies to intellectuals, Cossacks, kulaks, teachers, peasants, and workers, be repatriated to Stalin!

2. The 850,000 strong army of Gen. Andrei Andreyevich Vlasov, having gone to the other side, Germany, "to save their country from Stalin" and having later surrendered to US forces, "formed the core of those forcebly repatritated between 1944 and 1947." "Operation Keelhaul; The Story of Forced Repatriation from 1944 to the Present. by Julius Epstein p.27, 53.
a. Gen. Deniken, former commanding general of the White Russian armies which were supported by the USA in 1917-1920, explained that none of these men served in the Nazi army out of love for Germany..."they hated the Germans" he wrote....rather, they knew what awaited them in the 'Soviet paradise.'
3. How badly did these individuals not want to go to Stalin's USSR? From the NYTimes, January 20, 1946: "Ten renegade Russian soldiers, in a frenzy of terror over their impending repatriation to the homeland, committed suicide today during a riot in the Dachau prison camp...."
a. And, in the Times, March 5, 1946: " - Many thousands of persons hostile to the present regime in the Soviet Union are being forcibly sent there....the Catholic Church constantly received appeals from 'displaced persons' terrified of being sent back to territory now controlled by Russia."
4. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.




Why have you never read a book????

Ask nicely, and I'll provide a curriculum that will let you appear less of an idiot.

Hindsight is 20/20. I donot totally disagree with your opinion that the Red Army may have won the war by themselves. Letting iur enemies beat themselves into the ground was a strategy but man. What did Russia pull off at Kursk? A loss of 5 men for every German?

Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!

It's not my opinion, you dunce.

I provided links and sources.



"Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!"

What a moron.
FDR's agenda was to give half of Europe to his bro.

He did give half of Europe to the Communists!!!!!!!!

1. FDR let Stalin determine the attack on Europe at the western most part...Normandy. The army, and Eisenhower, knew that straight up through Italy, already conquered, was best.
But FDR and Stalin wanted Eastern Europe left to the Red Army's occupation.


2. Evidence can be seen in a document which Hopkins took with him to the Quebec conference in August, 1943, entitled "Russia's Position," quoted as follows in Robert Sherwood's book, "Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History,":
"Russia's post-war position in Europe will be a dominant one. With Germany crushed, there is no power in Europe to oppose her tremendous military forces."



You really should take my offer to suggest a series of books, so you don't remain an imbecile.

Hitler and Stalin were Allies for the first two years of WWII. Little known FACT.

There is no such thing as a 'Nazi'. Never has been. They were 'National Socialists' but the Russians complained about the US Papers calling them National Socialists, saying that it put socialism in a bad light and that the USSR was socialist, too.

So they started calling them 'Nazis'. A derivative of 'national socialist' used as a pejorative term by Germans.

PC, the Alps might have been a problem when invading through Italy

 

[PoliticalChic]

They love America.....sure they do.

But.....just to be sure, let's check:



"Democrats’ campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices"
Democrats' campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices


"Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats."
Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats.


"The Senate is undemocratic and it matters"
The Senate is undemocratic and it matters



"Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution”
Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution” | National Review




And....where it started....

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

Roosevelt made the right choice there. I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII or you are misrepresenting it because you are a cheerleader for one train of political thought. Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin.

Overly simplistic but it makes a point.

Heck, most of the countries in your high school history books ceased to exist or were ruled by madmen. The world had problems.

1. "Roosevelt made the right choice there."

As usual...you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be, but you wouldn't be successful.


2."I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII..."
First of all, you must never use those first two words again....clearly, you don't.

Now...your lesson in history:
No, Germany would not have conquered the USSR.

Hitler knew that....and so must have Roosevelt.

Here are the facts:
.. when Operation Barbarossa started on June 22, 1941, the available (German) supplies of fuel, tires, spare parts etc., were only good enough for about two months.....

Stalin, in fact, had been supplying resources to Hitler.

The Wehrmacht continued to advance, albeit very slowly, and by mid-November some units found themselves at only 30 kilometers from the capital. But the troops were now totally exhausted, and running out of supplies. Their commanders knew that it was simply impossible to take Moscow.
Hitler s Failed Blitzkrieg against the Soviet Union. The Battle of Moscow and Stalingrad Turning Point of World War II Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
72 Years Ago, December 1941: Turning Point of World War II
'The Victory of the Red Army in front of Moscow was a Major Break'…
by Jacques Pauwels



By attacking in June, Hitler had planned to avoid Russia's three greatest generals....December, January, and February.
He didn't.


So....once one recognizes that Stalin was going to be the winner.....
....why did FDR send him supplies that the Allies could have used?

The schools hide the truth to shield FDR from richly deserved contumely.


Same reason so many universities eschew teaching the French Revolution....students might recognize that it gave birth to every totalitarian revolution in modern times.



"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence




FDR had a bromance with Stalin, and embraced the cultural Marxism we labor under today.





3. "Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin."

Gads, you're a dunce .....the very opposite is the case.

And....mull this over: who knows more about the evil than those living under same.

1. When the Allies succumbed to Stalin's demands at Yalta, that all those refugees, from generals of armies to intellectuals, Cossacks, kulaks, teachers, peasants, and workers, be repatriated to Stalin!

2. The 850,000 strong army of Gen. Andrei Andreyevich Vlasov, having gone to the other side, Germany, "to save their country from Stalin" and having later surrendered to US forces, "formed the core of those forcebly repatritated between 1944 and 1947." "Operation Keelhaul; The Story of Forced Repatriation from 1944 to the Present. by Julius Epstein p.27, 53.
a. Gen. Deniken, former commanding general of the White Russian armies which were supported by the USA in 1917-1920, explained that none of these men served in the Nazi army out of love for Germany..."they hated the Germans" he wrote....rather, they knew what awaited them in the 'Soviet paradise.'
3. How badly did these individuals not want to go to Stalin's USSR? From the NYTimes, January 20, 1946: "Ten renegade Russian soldiers, in a frenzy of terror over their impending repatriation to the homeland, committed suicide today during a riot in the Dachau prison camp...."
a. And, in the Times, March 5, 1946: " - Many thousands of persons hostile to the present regime in the Soviet Union are being forcibly sent there....the Catholic Church constantly received appeals from 'displaced persons' terrified of being sent back to territory now controlled by Russia."
4. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.




Why have you never read a book????

Ask nicely, and I'll provide a curriculum that will let you appear less of an idiot.

Hindsight is 20/20. I donot totally disagree with your opinion that the Red Army may have won the war by themselves. Letting iur enemies beat themselves into the ground was a strategy but man. What did Russia pull off at Kursk? A loss of 5 men for every German?

Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!

It's not my opinion, you dunce.

I provided links and sources.



"Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!"

What a moron.
FDR's agenda was to give half of Europe to his bro.

He did give half of Europe to the Communists!!!!!!!!

1. FDR let Stalin determine the attack on Europe at the western most part...Normandy. The army, and Eisenhower, knew that straight up through Italy, already conquered, was best.
But FDR and Stalin wanted Eastern Europe left to the Red Army's occupation.


2. Evidence can be seen in a document which Hopkins took with him to the Quebec conference in August, 1943, entitled "Russia's Position," quoted as follows in Robert Sherwood's book, "Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History,":
"Russia's post-war position in Europe will be a dominant one. With Germany crushed, there is no power in Europe to oppose her tremendous military forces."



You really should take my offer to suggest a series of books, so you don't remain an imbecile.

Hitler and Stalin were Allies for the first two years of WWII. Little known FACT.

There is no such thing as a 'Nazi'. Never has been. They were 'National Socialists' but the Russians complained about the US Papers calling them National Socialists, saying that it put socialism in a bad light and that the USSR was socialist, too.

So they started calling them 'Nazis'. A derivative of 'national socialist' used as a pejorative term by Germans.

PC, the Alps might have been a problem when invading through Italy

We'll never know what would have been.

It wasn't a soldier's choice.....it was political.


Until the bribe of a fifth star was offered, Eisenhower noted that Italy, not Normandy, was the correct choice.


1. As to the question of Eisenhower's preference in attacking Fortress Europa, he stated in 1948: "My own recommendation, then as always, was that no operation should be taken in the Mediterranean except as a directly supporting move for the Channel attack and our planned deployment [of troops out of Italy] should proceed with all possible speed."
Eisenhower, "Crusade in Europe," p.198-200

a. But, in 1943, before he was offered another star:
"Italy was the correct place in which to deploy our main forces and the objective should be the Valle of the PO. In no other area could we so well threaten the whole German structure including France, the Balkans and the Reich itself. Here also our air would be closer to vital objectives in Germany."
FRUS: The conferences at Cairo and Tehran, 1943, p.359-361
That report was published in "Foreign Relations of the United States" in 1961

Eisenhower's statement was to an audience in November 26, 1943....

" In December 1943, it was announced that Eisenhower would be Supreme Allied Commander in Europe." Military career of Dwight D. Eisenhower - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

He received his fifth star December 20, 1944....four days after Marshall received his.



Clark thought it was crazy to leave Italy, and circle around to the West...

'To withdraw from the European continent [Italy] to re-invade the European continent was simply crazy.'
Dunn, "Caught Between Roosevelt and Stalin," p.195-196
Yet, Roosevelt sided with Stalin over Churchill, and over General Mark Clark, commander of the 5th US Army, in Italy.
Why?

. "One of the few Americans to agree with Churchill and Alexander was Lt. Gen. Mark W. Clark, commander of US Fifth Army in Italy, who said in his 1951 autobiography that "the weakening of the campaign in Italy in order to invade southern France, instead of pushing on into the Balkans, was one of the outstanding political mistakes of the war. The Italian campaign did have military value. It knocked Italy out of the war and it tied down more than 20 German divisions"
Churchill?s Southern Strategy



But....Stalin demanded it....so Roosevelt agreed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Now, those Democrats who love America and Americans.....not....


"To the modern Democratic Party, Americans are an afterthought. Try to find a Democrat running this year, for example, on the opioid crisis or high energy prices, the collapse of public schools, the decline of the middle class. Hard to find one.

In order to win and maintain power, Democrats understand they need reliable new voters, voter who will support them obediently without making difficult demands like a higher standard of living.

That's why the Democratic Party suddenly supports open borders so fervently. Immigration is really the only issue that matters to them because packing the electorate is the only way they can regain control of this country. Their goal is clear. They will do or say anything to achieve it.

Here, for example, is the governor of New York likening the Trump administration to Islamic terrorists for the crime of daring to enforce federal immigration law.


...it wasn't that long ago that leading Democrats like Bill Clinton, for example, argued in public that our country should deport illegal immigrants. They are here illegally, after all. They're breaking our law.

Now, Democrats claim that non-citizens, even illegal ones, have a right to vote in our elections."
Tucker Carlson: To The Democratic Party, Americans Are An Afterthought



What Democrats love is party and power......and nothing else.

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[PoliticalChic]

 

[Toronado3800]

They love America.....sure they do.

But.....just to be sure, let's check:



"Democrats’ campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices"
Democrats' campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices


"Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats."
Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats.


"The Senate is undemocratic and it matters"
The Senate is undemocratic and it matters



"Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution”
Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution” | National Review




And....where it started....

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

Roosevelt made the right choice there. I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII or you are misrepresenting it because you are a cheerleader for one train of political thought. Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin.

Overly simplistic but it makes a point.

Heck, most of the countries in your high school history books ceased to exist or were ruled by madmen. The world had problems.

1. "Roosevelt made the right choice there."

As usual...you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be, but you wouldn't be successful.


2."I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII..."
First of all, you must never use those first two words again....clearly, you don't.

Now...your lesson in history:
No, Germany would not have conquered the USSR.

Hitler knew that....and so must have Roosevelt.

Here are the facts:
.. when Operation Barbarossa started on June 22, 1941, the available (German) supplies of fuel, tires, spare parts etc., were only good enough for about two months.....

Stalin, in fact, had been supplying resources to Hitler.

The Wehrmacht continued to advance, albeit very slowly, and by mid-November some units found themselves at only 30 kilometers from the capital. But the troops were now totally exhausted, and running out of supplies. Their commanders knew that it was simply impossible to take Moscow.
Hitler s Failed Blitzkrieg against the Soviet Union. The Battle of Moscow and Stalingrad Turning Point of World War II Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
72 Years Ago, December 1941: Turning Point of World War II
'The Victory of the Red Army in front of Moscow was a Major Break'…
by Jacques Pauwels



By attacking in June, Hitler had planned to avoid Russia's three greatest generals....December, January, and February.
He didn't.


So....once one recognizes that Stalin was going to be the winner.....
....why did FDR send him supplies that the Allies could have used?

The schools hide the truth to shield FDR from richly deserved contumely.


Same reason so many universities eschew teaching the French Revolution....students might recognize that it gave birth to every totalitarian revolution in modern times.



"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence




FDR had a bromance with Stalin, and embraced the cultural Marxism we labor under today.





3. "Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin."

Gads, you're a dunce .....the very opposite is the case.

And....mull this over: who knows more about the evil than those living under same.

1. When the Allies succumbed to Stalin's demands at Yalta, that all those refugees, from generals of armies to intellectuals, Cossacks, kulaks, teachers, peasants, and workers, be repatriated to Stalin!

2. The 850,000 strong army of Gen. Andrei Andreyevich Vlasov, having gone to the other side, Germany, "to save their country from Stalin" and having later surrendered to US forces, "formed the core of those forcebly repatritated between 1944 and 1947." "Operation Keelhaul; The Story of Forced Repatriation from 1944 to the Present. by Julius Epstein p.27, 53.
a. Gen. Deniken, former commanding general of the White Russian armies which were supported by the USA in 1917-1920, explained that none of these men served in the Nazi army out of love for Germany..."they hated the Germans" he wrote....rather, they knew what awaited them in the 'Soviet paradise.'
3. How badly did these individuals not want to go to Stalin's USSR? From the NYTimes, January 20, 1946: "Ten renegade Russian soldiers, in a frenzy of terror over their impending repatriation to the homeland, committed suicide today during a riot in the Dachau prison camp...."
a. And, in the Times, March 5, 1946: " - Many thousands of persons hostile to the present regime in the Soviet Union are being forcibly sent there....the Catholic Church constantly received appeals from 'displaced persons' terrified of being sent back to territory now controlled by Russia."
4. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.




Why have you never read a book????

Ask nicely, and I'll provide a curriculum that will let you appear less of an idiot.

Hindsight is 20/20. I donot totally disagree with your opinion that the Red Army may have won the war by themselves. Letting iur enemies beat themselves into the ground was a strategy but man. What did Russia pull off at Kursk? A loss of 5 men for every German?

Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!

It's not my opinion, you dunce.

I provided links and sources.



"Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!"

What a moron.
FDR's agenda was to give half of Europe to his bro.

He did give half of Europe to the Communists!!!!!!!!

1. FDR let Stalin determine the attack on Europe at the western most part...Normandy. The army, and Eisenhower, knew that straight up through Italy, already conquered, was best.
But FDR and Stalin wanted Eastern Europe left to the Red Army's occupation.


2. Evidence can be seen in a document which Hopkins took with him to the Quebec conference in August, 1943, entitled "Russia's Position," quoted as follows in Robert Sherwood's book, "Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History,":
"Russia's post-war position in Europe will be a dominant one. With Germany crushed, there is no power in Europe to oppose her tremendous military forces."



You really should take my offer to suggest a series of books, so you don't remain an imbecile.

Flaming and name calling, always a sign of an intellectual. As this is modern America and there are few others to talk to I shall continue ...

Curious, what was the right choice?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Democrat Version of "I Love America"

Now, don't get me started on the Republican version of "I love America."

 

[PoliticalChic]

They love America.....sure they do.

But.....just to be sure, let's check:



"Democrats’ campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices"
Democrats' campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices


"Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats."
Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats.


"The Senate is undemocratic and it matters"
The Senate is undemocratic and it matters



"Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution”
Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution” | National Review




And....where it started....

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

Roosevelt made the right choice there. I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII or you are misrepresenting it because you are a cheerleader for one train of political thought. Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin.

Overly simplistic but it makes a point.

Heck, most of the countries in your high school history books ceased to exist or were ruled by madmen. The world had problems.

1. "Roosevelt made the right choice there."

As usual...you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be, but you wouldn't be successful.


2."I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII..."
First of all, you must never use those first two words again....clearly, you don't.

Now...your lesson in history:
No, Germany would not have conquered the USSR.

Hitler knew that....and so must have Roosevelt.

Here are the facts:
.. when Operation Barbarossa started on June 22, 1941, the available (German) supplies of fuel, tires, spare parts etc., were only good enough for about two months.....

Stalin, in fact, had been supplying resources to Hitler.

The Wehrmacht continued to advance, albeit very slowly, and by mid-November some units found themselves at only 30 kilometers from the capital. But the troops were now totally exhausted, and running out of supplies. Their commanders knew that it was simply impossible to take Moscow.
Hitler s Failed Blitzkrieg against the Soviet Union. The Battle of Moscow and Stalingrad Turning Point of World War II Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
72 Years Ago, December 1941: Turning Point of World War II
'The Victory of the Red Army in front of Moscow was a Major Break'…
by Jacques Pauwels



By attacking in June, Hitler had planned to avoid Russia's three greatest generals....December, January, and February.
He didn't.


So....once one recognizes that Stalin was going to be the winner.....
....why did FDR send him supplies that the Allies could have used?

The schools hide the truth to shield FDR from richly deserved contumely.


Same reason so many universities eschew teaching the French Revolution....students might recognize that it gave birth to every totalitarian revolution in modern times.



"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence




FDR had a bromance with Stalin, and embraced the cultural Marxism we labor under today.





3. "Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin."

Gads, you're a dunce .....the very opposite is the case.

And....mull this over: who knows more about the evil than those living under same.

1. When the Allies succumbed to Stalin's demands at Yalta, that all those refugees, from generals of armies to intellectuals, Cossacks, kulaks, teachers, peasants, and workers, be repatriated to Stalin!

2. The 850,000 strong army of Gen. Andrei Andreyevich Vlasov, having gone to the other side, Germany, "to save their country from Stalin" and having later surrendered to US forces, "formed the core of those forcebly repatritated between 1944 and 1947." "Operation Keelhaul; The Story of Forced Repatriation from 1944 to the Present. by Julius Epstein p.27, 53.
a. Gen. Deniken, former commanding general of the White Russian armies which were supported by the USA in 1917-1920, explained that none of these men served in the Nazi army out of love for Germany..."they hated the Germans" he wrote....rather, they knew what awaited them in the 'Soviet paradise.'
3. How badly did these individuals not want to go to Stalin's USSR? From the NYTimes, January 20, 1946: "Ten renegade Russian soldiers, in a frenzy of terror over their impending repatriation to the homeland, committed suicide today during a riot in the Dachau prison camp...."
a. And, in the Times, March 5, 1946: " - Many thousands of persons hostile to the present regime in the Soviet Union are being forcibly sent there....the Catholic Church constantly received appeals from 'displaced persons' terrified of being sent back to territory now controlled by Russia."
4. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.




Why have you never read a book????

Ask nicely, and I'll provide a curriculum that will let you appear less of an idiot.

Hindsight is 20/20. I donot totally disagree with your opinion that the Red Army may have won the war by themselves. Letting iur enemies beat themselves into the ground was a strategy but man. What did Russia pull off at Kursk? A loss of 5 men for every German?

Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!

It's not my opinion, you dunce.

I provided links and sources.



"Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!"

What a moron.
FDR's agenda was to give half of Europe to his bro.

He did give half of Europe to the Communists!!!!!!!!

1. FDR let Stalin determine the attack on Europe at the western most part...Normandy. The army, and Eisenhower, knew that straight up through Italy, already conquered, was best.
But FDR and Stalin wanted Eastern Europe left to the Red Army's occupation.


2. Evidence can be seen in a document which Hopkins took with him to the Quebec conference in August, 1943, entitled "Russia's Position," quoted as follows in Robert Sherwood's book, "Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History,":
"Russia's post-war position in Europe will be a dominant one. With Germany crushed, there is no power in Europe to oppose her tremendous military forces."



You really should take my offer to suggest a series of books, so you don't remain an imbecile.

Flaming and name calling, always a sign of an intellectual. As this is modern America and there are few others to talk to I shall continue ...

Curious, what was the right choice?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

Everything I posted in the eminently simple evisceration of your attempted posts was linked and sourced.


Everything.


Does that neon light flashing IDIOT over your head keep you awake at night?

 

[Toronado3800]

Roosevelt made the right choice there. I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII or you are misrepresenting it because you are a cheerleader for one train of political thought. Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin.

Overly simplistic but it makes a point.

Heck, most of the countries in your high school history books ceased to exist or were ruled by madmen. The world had problems.

1. "Roosevelt made the right choice there."

As usual...you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be, but you wouldn't be successful.


2."I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII..."
First of all, you must never use those first two words again....clearly, you don't.

Now...your lesson in history:
No, Germany would not have conquered the USSR.

Hitler knew that....and so must have Roosevelt.

Here are the facts:
.. when Operation Barbarossa started on June 22, 1941, the available (German) supplies of fuel, tires, spare parts etc., were only good enough for about two months.....

Stalin, in fact, had been supplying resources to Hitler.

The Wehrmacht continued to advance, albeit very slowly, and by mid-November some units found themselves at only 30 kilometers from the capital. But the troops were now totally exhausted, and running out of supplies. Their commanders knew that it was simply impossible to take Moscow.
Hitler s Failed Blitzkrieg against the Soviet Union. The Battle of Moscow and Stalingrad Turning Point of World War II Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
72 Years Ago, December 1941: Turning Point of World War II
'The Victory of the Red Army in front of Moscow was a Major Break'…
by Jacques Pauwels



By attacking in June, Hitler had planned to avoid Russia's three greatest generals....December, January, and February.
He didn't.


So....once one recognizes that Stalin was going to be the winner.....
....why did FDR send him supplies that the Allies could have used?

The schools hide the truth to shield FDR from richly deserved contumely.


Same reason so many universities eschew teaching the French Revolution....students might recognize that it gave birth to every totalitarian revolution in modern times.



"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence




FDR had a bromance with Stalin, and embraced the cultural Marxism we labor under today.





3. "Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin."

Gads, you're a dunce .....the very opposite is the case.

And....mull this over: who knows more about the evil than those living under same.

1. When the Allies succumbed to Stalin's demands at Yalta, that all those refugees, from generals of armies to intellectuals, Cossacks, kulaks, teachers, peasants, and workers, be repatriated to Stalin!

2. The 850,000 strong army of Gen. Andrei Andreyevich Vlasov, having gone to the other side, Germany, "to save their country from Stalin" and having later surrendered to US forces, "formed the core of those forcebly repatritated between 1944 and 1947." "Operation Keelhaul; The Story of Forced Repatriation from 1944 to the Present. by Julius Epstein p.27, 53.
a. Gen. Deniken, former commanding general of the White Russian armies which were supported by the USA in 1917-1920, explained that none of these men served in the Nazi army out of love for Germany..."they hated the Germans" he wrote....rather, they knew what awaited them in the 'Soviet paradise.'
3. How badly did these individuals not want to go to Stalin's USSR? From the NYTimes, January 20, 1946: "Ten renegade Russian soldiers, in a frenzy of terror over their impending repatriation to the homeland, committed suicide today during a riot in the Dachau prison camp...."
a. And, in the Times, March 5, 1946: " - Many thousands of persons hostile to the present regime in the Soviet Union are being forcibly sent there....the Catholic Church constantly received appeals from 'displaced persons' terrified of being sent back to territory now controlled by Russia."
4. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.




Why have you never read a book????

Ask nicely, and I'll provide a curriculum that will let you appear less of an idiot.

Hindsight is 20/20. I donot totally disagree with your opinion that the Red Army may have won the war by themselves. Letting iur enemies beat themselves into the ground was a strategy but man. What did Russia pull off at Kursk? A loss of 5 men for every German?

Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!

It's not my opinion, you dunce.

I provided links and sources.



"Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!"

What a moron.
FDR's agenda was to give half of Europe to his bro.

He did give half of Europe to the Communists!!!!!!!!

1. FDR let Stalin determine the attack on Europe at the western most part...Normandy. The army, and Eisenhower, knew that straight up through Italy, already conquered, was best.
But FDR and Stalin wanted Eastern Europe left to the Red Army's occupation.


2. Evidence can be seen in a document which Hopkins took with him to the Quebec conference in August, 1943, entitled "Russia's Position," quoted as follows in Robert Sherwood's book, "Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History,":
"Russia's post-war position in Europe will be a dominant one. With Germany crushed, there is no power in Europe to oppose her tremendous military forces."



You really should take my offer to suggest a series of books, so you don't remain an imbecile.

Flaming and name calling, always a sign of an intellectual. As this is modern America and there are few others to talk to I shall continue ...

Curious, what was the right choice?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

Everything I posted in the eminently simple evisceration of your attempted posts was linked and sourced.


Everything.


Does that neon light flashing IDIOT over your head keep you awake at night?

Do you want me to paste a source here saying global warming is the greatest threat to mankind then another saying it isn't?

Anyways, life is frequently 50 shades of grey not Star Wars right or wrong.

What would you or your teachers of done?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

-Stayed out of the war?

All are defendable positions.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. "Roosevelt made the right choice there."

As usual...you couldn't be more wrong.
You could try to be, but you wouldn't be successful.


2."I think you are misunderstanding the larger threat to the future of humanity in WWII..."
First of all, you must never use those first two words again....clearly, you don't.

Now...your lesson in history:
No, Germany would not have conquered the USSR.

Hitler knew that....and so must have Roosevelt.

Here are the facts:
.. when Operation Barbarossa started on June 22, 1941, the available (German) supplies of fuel, tires, spare parts etc., were only good enough for about two months.....

Stalin, in fact, had been supplying resources to Hitler.

The Wehrmacht continued to advance, albeit very slowly, and by mid-November some units found themselves at only 30 kilometers from the capital. But the troops were now totally exhausted, and running out of supplies. Their commanders knew that it was simply impossible to take Moscow.
Hitler s Failed Blitzkrieg against the Soviet Union. The Battle of Moscow and Stalingrad Turning Point of World War II Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization
72 Years Ago, December 1941: Turning Point of World War II
'The Victory of the Red Army in front of Moscow was a Major Break'…
by Jacques Pauwels



By attacking in June, Hitler had planned to avoid Russia's three greatest generals....December, January, and February.
He didn't.


So....once one recognizes that Stalin was going to be the winner.....
....why did FDR send him supplies that the Allies could have used?

The schools hide the truth to shield FDR from richly deserved contumely.


Same reason so many universities eschew teaching the French Revolution....students might recognize that it gave birth to every totalitarian revolution in modern times.



"....realistically middle sized Germany could not defeat the much larger Ussr in the long term. Germany would have eventually surrendered to the western allies to prevent total occupation by the USSR ..."
So did the Red Army really singlehandedly defeat the Third Reich Stuff I Done Wrote - The Michael A. Charles Online Presence




FDR had a bromance with Stalin, and embraced the cultural Marxism we labor under today.





3. "Consider when the Germans invaded Russia the NAZI's were sooo bad somehow partisans rose up to fight against them not help them fight the monster Stalin."

Gads, you're a dunce .....the very opposite is the case.

And....mull this over: who knows more about the evil than those living under same.

1. When the Allies succumbed to Stalin's demands at Yalta, that all those refugees, from generals of armies to intellectuals, Cossacks, kulaks, teachers, peasants, and workers, be repatriated to Stalin!

2. The 850,000 strong army of Gen. Andrei Andreyevich Vlasov, having gone to the other side, Germany, "to save their country from Stalin" and having later surrendered to US forces, "formed the core of those forcebly repatritated between 1944 and 1947." "Operation Keelhaul; The Story of Forced Repatriation from 1944 to the Present. by Julius Epstein p.27, 53.
a. Gen. Deniken, former commanding general of the White Russian armies which were supported by the USA in 1917-1920, explained that none of these men served in the Nazi army out of love for Germany..."they hated the Germans" he wrote....rather, they knew what awaited them in the 'Soviet paradise.'
3. How badly did these individuals not want to go to Stalin's USSR? From the NYTimes, January 20, 1946: "Ten renegade Russian soldiers, in a frenzy of terror over their impending repatriation to the homeland, committed suicide today during a riot in the Dachau prison camp...."
a. And, in the Times, March 5, 1946: " - Many thousands of persons hostile to the present regime in the Soviet Union are being forcibly sent there....the Catholic Church constantly received appeals from 'displaced persons' terrified of being sent back to territory now controlled by Russia."
4. Ask yourself this: why was it that the USSR, of all the Allies, had provided the enemy with thousands of recruits? Nearly one million Russian and other anti-Soviet men joined the enemy of their Soviet Army. "The Secret Betrayal" by Nikolai Tolstoy, p. 19-20.




Why have you never read a book????

Ask nicely, and I'll provide a curriculum that will let you appear less of an idiot.

Hindsight is 20/20. I donot totally disagree with your opinion that the Red Army may have won the war by themselves. Letting iur enemies beat themselves into the ground was a strategy but man. What did Russia pull off at Kursk? A loss of 5 men for every German?

Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!

It's not my opinion, you dunce.

I provided links and sources.



"Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!"

What a moron.
FDR's agenda was to give half of Europe to his bro.

He did give half of Europe to the Communists!!!!!!!!

1. FDR let Stalin determine the attack on Europe at the western most part...Normandy. The army, and Eisenhower, knew that straight up through Italy, already conquered, was best.
But FDR and Stalin wanted Eastern Europe left to the Red Army's occupation.


2. Evidence can be seen in a document which Hopkins took with him to the Quebec conference in August, 1943, entitled "Russia's Position," quoted as follows in Robert Sherwood's book, "Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History,":
"Russia's post-war position in Europe will be a dominant one. With Germany crushed, there is no power in Europe to oppose her tremendous military forces."



You really should take my offer to suggest a series of books, so you don't remain an imbecile.

Flaming and name calling, always a sign of an intellectual. As this is modern America and there are few others to talk to I shall continue ...

Curious, what was the right choice?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

Everything I posted in the eminently simple evisceration of your attempted posts was linked and sourced.


Everything.


Does that neon light flashing IDIOT over your head keep you awake at night?

Do you want me to paste a source here saying global warming is the greatest threat to mankind then another saying it isn't?

Anyways, life is frequently 50 shades of grey not Star Wars right or wrong.

What would you or your teachers of done?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

-Stayed out of the war?

All are defendable positions.

Let's review:

1. No one expected Germany to defeat Russia

2. Stalin ordered FDR to invade via Normandy, rather than the correct place, Italy

3. FDR ceded fully half of Europe to his pal Stalin

4. Stalin had a spy living....LIVING....in FDR's White House.

5. When told about Stalin's spies in his administration....FDR promoted them!!!!


Oh...and 6. FDR sent supplies that American forces needed, to Russia.



You are a total moron for several reasons....probably mainly because you don't read books.

Hence....without moi...you will remain so.

 

[Toronado3800]

Hindsight is 20/20. I donot totally disagree with your opinion that the Red Army may have won the war by themselves. Letting iur enemies beat themselves into the ground was a strategy but man. What did Russia pull off at Kursk? A loss of 5 men for every German?

Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!

It's not my opinion, you dunce.

I provided links and sources.



"Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!"

What a moron.
FDR's agenda was to give half of Europe to his bro.

He did give half of Europe to the Communists!!!!!!!!

1. FDR let Stalin determine the attack on Europe at the western most part...Normandy. The army, and Eisenhower, knew that straight up through Italy, already conquered, was best.
But FDR and Stalin wanted Eastern Europe left to the Red Army's occupation.


2. Evidence can be seen in a document which Hopkins took with him to the Quebec conference in August, 1943, entitled "Russia's Position," quoted as follows in Robert Sherwood's book, "Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History,":
"Russia's post-war position in Europe will be a dominant one. With Germany crushed, there is no power in Europe to oppose her tremendous military forces."



You really should take my offer to suggest a series of books, so you don't remain an imbecile.

Flaming and name calling, always a sign of an intellectual. As this is modern America and there are few others to talk to I shall continue ...

Curious, what was the right choice?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

Everything I posted in the eminently simple evisceration of your attempted posts was linked and sourced.


Everything.


Does that neon light flashing IDIOT over your head keep you awake at night?

Do you want me to paste a source here saying global warming is the greatest threat to mankind then another saying it isn't?

Anyways, life is frequently 50 shades of grey not Star Wars right or wrong.

What would you or your teachers of done?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

-Stayed out of the war?

All are defendable positions.

Let's review:

1. No one expected Germany to defeat Russia

2. Stalin ordered FDR to invade via Normandy, rather than the correct place, Italy

3. FDR ceded fully half of Europe to his pal Stalin

4. Stalin had a spy living....LIVING....in FDR's White House.

5. When told about Stalin's spies in his administration....FDR promoted them!!!!


Oh...and 6. FDR sent supplies that American forces needed, to Russia.



You are a total moron for several reasons....probably mainly because you don't read books.

Hence....without moi...you will remain so.

What would you or your teachers of done?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

-Stayed out of the war?

All are defendable positions.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

They love America.....sure they do.

But.....just to be sure, let's check:



"Democrats’ campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices"
Democrats' campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices


"Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats."
Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats.


"The Senate is undemocratic and it matters"
The Senate is undemocratic and it matters



"Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution”
Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution” | National Review




And....where it started....

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

How Trump and his supporters want American soldiers to march.

Tactic of the left. Accuse others of what you, yourself, are doing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's not my opinion, you dunce.

I provided links and sources.



"Also consider a Europe with the Red Army crossing the Rhine and taking Sicily. If we let that happen Roosevelt would be in trouble for giving Europe to the Communists!"

What a moron.
FDR's agenda was to give half of Europe to his bro.

He did give half of Europe to the Communists!!!!!!!!

1. FDR let Stalin determine the attack on Europe at the western most part...Normandy. The army, and Eisenhower, knew that straight up through Italy, already conquered, was best.
But FDR and Stalin wanted Eastern Europe left to the Red Army's occupation.


2. Evidence can be seen in a document which Hopkins took with him to the Quebec conference in August, 1943, entitled "Russia's Position," quoted as follows in Robert Sherwood's book, "Roosevelt and Hopkins: An Intimate History,":
"Russia's post-war position in Europe will be a dominant one. With Germany crushed, there is no power in Europe to oppose her tremendous military forces."



You really should take my offer to suggest a series of books, so you don't remain an imbecile.

Flaming and name calling, always a sign of an intellectual. As this is modern America and there are few others to talk to I shall continue ...

Curious, what was the right choice?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

Everything I posted in the eminently simple evisceration of your attempted posts was linked and sourced.


Everything.


Does that neon light flashing IDIOT over your head keep you awake at night?

Do you want me to paste a source here saying global warming is the greatest threat to mankind then another saying it isn't?

Anyways, life is frequently 50 shades of grey not Star Wars right or wrong.

What would you or your teachers of done?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

-Stayed out of the war?

All are defendable positions.

Let's review:

1. No one expected Germany to defeat Russia

2. Stalin ordered FDR to invade via Normandy, rather than the correct place, Italy

3. FDR ceded fully half of Europe to his pal Stalin

4. Stalin had a spy living....LIVING....in FDR's White House.

5. When told about Stalin's spies in his administration....FDR promoted them!!!!


Oh...and 6. FDR sent supplies that American forces needed, to Russia.



You are a total moron for several reasons....probably mainly because you don't read books.

Hence....without moi...you will remain so.

What would you or your teachers of done?

-Not get into Europe for as long as possible and hope the Russians pulled it off?

-Race into Europe as quickly as possible to save white America's ancestors from the Russians? Lord, what if T-34's liberated Paris.

-Attack Russia also?

-Stayed out of the war?

All are defendable positions.

I never mentioned any 'teachers.' As you've found....I'm an expert in the subject.

I spoke of facts....these:

1. No one expected Germany to defeat Russia

2. Stalin ordered FDR to invade via Normandy, rather than the correct place, Italy

3. FDR ceded fully half of Europe to his pal Stalin

4. Stalin had a spy living....LIVING....in FDR's White House.

5. When told about Stalin's spies in his administration....FDR promoted them!!!!


Oh...and 6. FDR sent supplies that American forces needed, to Russia.


And, you are unable to deny any of them.

 

[PoliticalChic]

They love America.....sure they do.

But.....just to be sure, let's check:



"Democrats’ campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices"
Democrats' campaign to delegitimize the Supreme Court is an attempt to intimidate the Justices


"Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats."
Abolish the electoral college? Dream on, Democrats.


"The Senate is undemocratic and it matters"
The Senate is undemocratic and it matters



"Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution”
Ginsburg: “I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution” | National Review




And....where it started....

Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.

How Trump and his supporters want American soldiers to march.

Tactic of the left. Accuse others of what you, yourself, are doing.

Exactly so....it is
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.