- Jul 21, 2009
- 133,137
- 69,810
- Thread starter
- #161
Now try naming anyone in Washington that is busy solving gridlock.....because none of these experts seem to have their shit together.I'm not voting for Neurosurgeon of the Year, I'm voting for the President of the United States.
Mouthy British Socialists posing as US Citizens aren't voting at all.
So there's that... .
But setting that aside... Diagnosis and operating on the Human Brain, particularly the brain of a child... and this is never less so than where the child being operated upon IS IN THE MOTHER's WOMB... is vastly more complex than being Chief Executive.
The consequences are life and death... the timeline is in the present moment and the responsibility is ENTIRELY THAT OF THE SURGEON.
Carson is a MAN... he is the epitome of a MAN... and as such, he is designated persona non grata by those who reject the very concept of what being a man, is.
Now does it require the same skill set of being Chief Executive.
You do not put mix your labors skills. You do not put your Cardiologist in charge of taking care of your car. You do not let your mechanic operate on your heart.
Understand the difference!
What I understand is that you're an imbecile.
You have absolutely no idea what skills are necessary to cut open the skull of a child, operate on their brain and sew them up with a fair certainty that the child will be better off from the exercise... .
None.
If you did, then you could reasonably compare the skills of Doc Carson and the absence of skills in the Brown Clown who has never done a DAM' THING in its life that was no GIVEN TO HIM.
Sorry, the ability to saw through a skull and operate on the brain is not equivalent nor necessary for a president to have.
Nor is it required skill for a neurosurgeon to decide policy measures for a state.
Incompatible skill sets.
One requires precision tools, steady hands, and knowledge on the functions and structure f the human brain,
The other the ability to negotiate with groups, construct and organize plans that is accordance with existing laws, and arguing/debating ideas based on an over arching agenda for the societys future.
But you are claiming the two are the exact same? Weird.
As Obama said once "Maybe it's time we tried something different".