Democrat Voters Will Settle For A President That Will Not Tell Them The Truth

"Democrat Voters Will Settle For A President That Will Not Tell Them The Truth"

Another ridiculous lie from the right.
They have before, hell all Americans do, whether their presidents are Republicans or Democrats. I suspect our next president will be a liar. I think it is part of the job description.:badgrin:
 
Basically what is wrong is that it is not true ...he grew up preserved and actualized his potential because he had the assistance of the Social Safety net...

ROFLMNAO!

ABSOLUTE, 100% DELUSIONAL DRIVEL!

He was able to get ahead in life due to public assistance, affirmative action, and elements of the "safety net" that he now sees as imprisoning minorities. The man has a very, very short memory.
No, he did what any minority can do if they want, he grew up.
AND NOT FEELING SORRY FOR HIMSELF!!!
 
"Democrat Voters Will Settle For A President That Will Not Tell Them The Truth"

Another ridiculous lie from the right.
They have before, hell all Americans do, whether their presidents are Republicans or Democrats. I suspect our next president will be a liar. I think it is part of the job description.:badgrin:

If the next President is a Prog... it is axiomatic that it will be a liar.

But that's only because "Progressive" is synonymous with deceit.
 
Last edited:
I know but your problem is that you are unable to acknowledge a documented truth . The truth is " the Potential of Ben Carson was preserved and actualized with assistance from the social safety net"

There is nothing truthful, about that. It is a deceit, fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the ignorant.


If you're saying that Ben Carson's family didn't receive assistance from the government, you are a liar.

He writes about receiving food stamps in his autobiography.

"She couldn't have provided for us and kept up the house without that subsidy." --Ben Carson
No one can claim the socialist "safety net" is the be all and end all of the individual??
That is foolish thinking, with an double edge.

It was Ben Carson who said his mother couldn't have provided for the family without that subsidy.
 
I know but your problem is that you are unable to acknowledge a documented truth . The truth is " the Potential of Ben Carson was preserved and actualized with assistance from the social safety net"

There is nothing truthful, about that. It is a deceit, fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the ignorant.


If you're saying that Ben Carson's family didn't receive assistance from the government, you are a liar.

He writes about receiving food stamps in his autobiography.

"She couldn't have provided for us and kept up the house without that subsidy." --Ben Carson
No one can claim the socialist "safety net" is the be all and end all of the individual??
That is foolish thinking, with an double edge.
but no one is saying that ...that is your reduction to the absurd attempt ...
Stop making excuses then, any individual no matter perceived limitations has only themselves to "really" rely on in this world...
 
It was Ben Carson who said his mother couldn't have provided for the family without that subsidy.

ROFLMNAO!

Once again: "If Not for Socialism BEN CARSON WOULD HAVE DIED FROM STARVATION!"

It's false... and its being advanced purely as a means to mislead others. Therefore it is a LIE!

And it is being advanced by the advocates of Foreign Ideas that are Hostile to American Principle.
 
I know but your problem is that you are unable to acknowledge a documented truth . The truth is " the Potential of Ben Carson was preserved and actualized with assistance from the social safety net"

There is nothing truthful, about that. It is a deceit, fraudulently advanced as a means to influence the ignorant.


If you're saying that Ben Carson's family didn't receive assistance from the government, you are a liar.

He writes about receiving food stamps in his autobiography.

"She couldn't have provided for us and kept up the house without that subsidy." --Ben Carson
No one can claim the socialist "safety net" is the be all and end all of the individual??
That is foolish thinking, with an double edge.

It was Ben Carson who said his mother couldn't have provided for the family without that subsidy.
Meaning??
 
Hillary-Clinton-Newscom.jpg


If you listen to parts of the media.....Hillary is doing a victory lap after winning the White House. She came off so smooth and practiced in comparison to the sometimes flustered investigators, who knew she was lying her ass off, it was startling.....to the media. They wanted the truth.....and she only gave them half of the truth and at times none of the truth. It was masterful. How can a person lie that convincingly, knowing that what they're saying is a lie, and everyone in the room knows they're lying, and not feel a particle of remorse? This is what was amazing. Hillary feels no shame. He feels that regardless of the fact that her negligence caused the deaths of friends that she sent there personally, she doesn't feel any real remorse. If she voices any, it's only to gain sympathy, not show embarrassment. I would have loved to put a lie-detector machine on her to see if her pulse went up while she was relating testimony that she knew was total BS.

Is this what Democrat voters want? A president that lies so blatantly that even though everyone in the room knows it's a bold-faced lie.....it doesn't seem to matter. A president has to make life and death decisions all of the time. If your decision making is faulty....people die. I prefer wisdom and sound judgment over an attitude that nothing you do wrong will come back to haunt you, or that you aren't accountable for any mistake you make. Is that the kind of president we want? I prefer the first interview over this one. At least her arrogance was in full display when she pounded her desk and said "What Difference Does It Make" that these killers were terrorists or just protesters out to raise Hell over a video. That was the real Hillary. Or was it? That's the problem here. What is Hillary really like....because we rarely ever see it.


hillary-clinton-wide-620x349.jpg


October 25, 2015
Do Hillary's Lies Matter?
By Clarice Feldman

It is of little concern to me that the corporate media says Hillary aced the Benghazi hearing, To me she didn’t, and I care more that the public is being inured to public officials’ lying. Were I running for president against her I’d produce a simple campaign video.

My campaign video would be short -- it would be Hillary before the caskets of the four Americans slaughtered in Benghazi blaming an obscure video and its maker for the incident; Hillary telling the father of one of the deceased, Ty Woods, that the video maker would be arrested (“we are going to have the film maker arrested who was responsible for the death of your son"), and her testimony before the committee that she never blamed it on the video. The ad would take just a couple of minutes. . Message at end -- are you ready for a president who lies over the bodies of dead American patriots?

Maybe I’ve misjudged the voters. Maybe they really would like a brazen, self-seeking consummate liar. Because that’s what she certainly is.

She dissembled so often in the hearings I cannot possibly keep you awake while detailing them all. Let me pick just a few of her more outrageous lies -- the video and her correspondence with Sidney Blumenthal.


Links Krauthammer: "We're Living In An Age Where What You Say And Its Relation With The Facts Is Completely Irrelevant"

Roskam vs. Clinton: Before Benghazi Happened You Were Preparing To Take Political Credit For Libya

State Can’t Verify Clinton Email Claim Made At Benghazi Hearing


Other media deceptions......
Trump leading everywhere but the one poll the media wants us to focus on in Iowa - RealClearPolitics - 2016 Latest Polls

Settle? They're not settling. They WANT a President who lies to them. They're impressed and excited over how pathological she is about it.
 
I would vote for Carson if he weren't so crazy. I think he's a fine neurosurgeon, and probably a nice man, but I just can't get past the fact that he's crazy.
How is he "crazy?"


Wait, you actually read that and didn't find any craziness?

Let me highlight that he thinks Seventh-day Adventists will someday be considered criminals, arrested by the Government, then be sentenced to death.

How is that not any more insane than RWer's thinking that Jade Helm was taking over Walmart stores, or that the Government has FEMA re-education camps waiting for them?

You are aware that what you read and what you see is there to manipulate how you think and feel about the candidates, right?

Why else would the media strive so hard to make him look like a fool?

I think you missed the point of my post. You need to focus on character. Do you still truly believe his character is worse than Hillary?

Frankly, I wouldn't vote for either. He knows next to nothing about how the government actually works. That's obvious by his campaign.

And the establishment would never allow him to be POTUS, so this is sort of a moot discussion. However, all other things being equal, he seems like a more honest and trustworthy individual than Hillary.



I'm not thrilled with Hillary because I've never forgiven her for her vote on the Iraq war. I'm not thrilled with her ties to Wall Street. Her email and Benghazi scandal is partisan bullshit.

The most honest and trustworthy politician I see is Bernie Sanders, but I seriously doubt he will get the nomination.

So to answer your question, yes, yes I do think Hillary would be better than Carson, who is a lunatic.

Then you are the one that is a certifiable lunatic.

Hillary was the driving force behind the GD TPP. The Clintons at first always oppose and then destroy America with their globalist policies. And the zombies just follow in line.

SHE PRACTICALLY WROTE THE TPP. Do you actually think she will stop it's implementation? She is a known liar and fraud.

45 times Secretary Clinton pushed the trade bill she now opposes
45 times Clinton pushed the trade bill she now opposes - CNNPolitics.com



She says she changed her mind on the TPP because it does not meet her standards. (Bernie voted no, btw)

In fairness to Clinton, the TPP was still under negotiation when Clinton made the "gold standard" comment. The partners only finalized the deal this year. It’s quite possible the deal looks dramatically different than it did at the early stages of negotiations, when Clinton was at the State Department -- something Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill pointed out to us for this fact-check. The negotiations have been conducted in secret, so it’s hard for us to assess that ourselves. Also, as secretary of state, she spoke as a representative of the Obama administration, which was and remains wholeheartedly in favor of the deal.

What Hillary Clinton really said about TPP and the 'gold standard'

Here is her statement.

CQviRK7WgAISoYk.png
 
How is he "crazy?"


Wait, you actually read that and didn't find any craziness?

Let me highlight that he thinks Seventh-day Adventists will someday be considered criminals, arrested by the Government, then be sentenced to death.

How is that not any more insane than RWer's thinking that Jade Helm was taking over Walmart stores, or that the Government has FEMA re-education camps waiting for them?

You are aware that what you read and what you see is there to manipulate how you think and feel about the candidates, right?

Why else would the media strive so hard to make him look like a fool?

I think you missed the point of my post. You need to focus on character. Do you still truly believe his character is worse than Hillary?

Frankly, I wouldn't vote for either. He knows next to nothing about how the government actually works. That's obvious by his campaign.

And the establishment would never allow him to be POTUS, so this is sort of a moot discussion. However, all other things being equal, he seems like a more honest and trustworthy individual than Hillary.



I'm not thrilled with Hillary because I've never forgiven her for her vote on the Iraq war. I'm not thrilled with her ties to Wall Street. Her email and Benghazi scandal is partisan bullshit.

The most honest and trustworthy politician I see is Bernie Sanders, but I seriously doubt he will get the nomination.

So to answer your question, yes, yes I do think Hillary would be better than Carson, who is a lunatic.

Then you are the one that is a certifiable lunatic.

Hillary was the driving force behind the GD TPP. The Clintons at first always oppose and then destroy America with their globalist policies. And the zombies just follow in line.

SHE PRACTICALLY WROTE THE TPP. Do you actually think she will stop it's implementation? She is a known liar and fraud.

45 times Secretary Clinton pushed the trade bill she now opposes
45 times Clinton pushed the trade bill she now opposes - CNNPolitics.com



She says she changed her mind on the TPP because it does not meet her standards. (Bernie voted no, btw)

In fairness to Clinton, the TPP was still under negotiation when Clinton made the "gold standard" comment. The partners only finalized the deal this year. It’s quite possible the deal looks dramatically different than it did at the early stages of negotiations, when Clinton was at the State Department -- something Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill pointed out to us for this fact-check. The negotiations have been conducted in secret, so it’s hard for us to assess that ourselves. Also, as secretary of state, she spoke as a representative of the Obama administration, which was and remains wholeheartedly in favor of the deal.

What Hillary Clinton really said about TPP and the 'gold standard'

Here is her statement.

CQviRK7WgAISoYk.png

Yessss... Let's get a look at what the inveterate liar says. I mean JUST because she's has a lifetime of history that demonstrates that she has no allegiance to the truth, that's no reason to not lend credence to what she says!

ROFLMNAO!

You can NOT make this crap up!
 
I'm not voting for Neurosurgeon of the Year, I'm voting for the President of the United States.

Mouthy British Socialists posing as US Citizens aren't voting at all.

So there's that... .

But setting that aside... Diagnosis and operating on the Human Brain, particularly the brain of a child... and this is never less so than where the child being operated upon IS IN THE MOTHER's WOMB... is vastly more complex than being Chief Executive.

The consequences are life and death... the timeline is in the present moment and the responsibility is ENTIRELY THAT OF THE SURGEON.

Carson is a MAN... he is the epitome of a MAN... and as such, he is designated persona non grata by those who reject the very concept of what being a man, is.

Now does it require the same skill set of being Chief Executive.

You do not put mix your labors skills. You do not put your Cardiologist in charge of taking care of your car. You do not let your mechanic operate on your heart.

Understand the difference!
 
Another brilliant hyper-partisan thread that defies reality.
Now I'll go along with the notion that Clinton has issues with truth. No question there.
But I would suggest something, instead of just focusing on just the "other side" as your targets and enemies, use that same technique on your own side.
Why are hyper-partisans so afraid to look at their own side honestly, objectively and critically?
It 's very apparent that a growing number of Americans are becoming more and more disatisfied with both parties. Neither party's views represent a majority of Americans and people just don't trust either party.
According to Gallup, Independent voters outnumber both Democrats and Republicans, with a record 43% of Americans and soon be even larger outnumbering both parties combined.
More and more people are looking at both parties and are saying "enough of this bullshit".
Stop quoting useless polls.....and start using your brain.

Hillary is already a known. She is hopelessly undefendable. You have to totally ignore everything she's done in the past to support her.

Carson and Trump are not. They are outsiders....and thus.....not part of the establishment that has done plenty not to deserve our trust.

20071115ST2AP-Hillary.jpg
 
Last edited:
Another brilliant hyper-partisan thread that defies reality.
Now I'll go along with the notion that Clinton has issues with truth. No question there.
But I would suggest something, instead of just focusing on just the "other side" as your targets and enemies, use that same technique on your own side.
Why are hyper-partisans so afraid to look at their own side honestly, objectively and critically?
It 's very apparent that a growing number of Americans are becoming more and more disatisfied with both parties. Neither party's views represent a majority of Americans and people just don't trust either party.
According to Gallup, Independent voters outnumber both Democrats and Republicans, with a record 43% of Americans and soon be even larger outnumbering both parties combined.
More and more people are looking at both parties and are saying "enough of this bullshit".
Stop quoting useless polls.....and start using your brain.

Hillary is already a known. She is hopelessly undefendable. You have to totally ignore everything she's done in the past to support her.

Carson and Trump are not. They are outsiders....and thus.....not part of the establishment that has done plenty not to deserve our trust.
...and she's a loopy kunt
 
I'm not voting for Neurosurgeon of the Year, I'm voting for the President of the United States.

Mouthy British Socialists posing as US Citizens aren't voting at all.

So there's that... .

But setting that aside... Diagnosis and operating on the Human Brain, particularly the brain of a child... and this is never less so than where the child being operated upon IS IN THE MOTHER's WOMB... is vastly more complex than being Chief Executive.

The consequences are life and death... the timeline is in the present moment and the responsibility is ENTIRELY THAT OF THE SURGEON.

Carson is a MAN... he is the epitome of a MAN... and as such, he is designated persona non grata by those who reject the very concept of what being a man, is.

Now does it require the same skill set of being Chief Executive.

You do not put mix your labors skills. You do not put your Cardiologist in charge of taking care of your car. You do not let your mechanic operate on your heart.

Understand the difference!

What I understand is that you're an imbecile.

You have absolutely no idea what skills are necessary to cut open the skull of a child, operate on their brain and sew them up with a fair certainty that the child will be better off from the exercise... .

None.

If you did, then you could reasonably compare the skills of Doc Carson and the absence of skills in the Brown Clown who has never done a DAM' THING in its life that was no GIVEN TO HIM.
 
What's wrong with he grew up and now is responsible, we all make mistakes in our youth.

The warm and fuzzy do good feelings are attractive to young and shallow minds...

Basically what is wrong is that it is not true ...he grew up preserved and actualized his potential because he had the assistance of the Social Safety net...can you say that to yourself ... I know you can...
A socialist society does not make the man, he admits in his youth he was an absolute fool...

Got to admire his honesty and courage for not being a progressive lap dog....


He admitted that his family could not survive without government assistance.
 
What's wrong with he grew up and now is responsible, we all make mistakes in our youth.

The warm and fuzzy do good feelings are attractive to young and shallow minds...

Basically what is wrong is that it is not true ...he grew up preserved and actualized his potential because he had the assistance of the Social Safety net...can you say that to yourself ... I know you can...
A socialist society does not make the man, he admits in his youth he was an absolute fool...

Got to admire his honesty and courage for not being a progressive lap dog....


He admitted that his family could not survive without government assistance.

ROFLMNAO!

Yes... for the 4th time in just this thread... a Communist comes to mislead the reader, hoping to convince them that WITHOUT FOOD STAMPS PEOPLE WOULD STARVE TO DEATH!

It's false... and the individual stating it, KNOWS THAT IT IS FALSE... thus it is a LIE.

A deceit, fraudulently advanced as the truth, as a means to influence the ignorant.
 

Forum List

Back
Top