Democrats Have Always Destroyed the Economy

[Brain357]

Even trump will tell you how bad bush was.

 

[22lcidw]

No, spending exploded our deficits and debt. Try to keep up.

A drop in revenue growth also attributed to the deficits and debt

And we are back to do you claim cutting taxes had no benefit. You lefties really suck at math.

I am claiming that tax cuts always reduce revenue growth.

Then you are stupid.

The 10 years prior to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 12.41%
The 10 years after to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 5.93%

Revenue growth was cut in more than half.

The 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 6.64%
The 5 years after to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 4.25%

A 36% reduction in revenue growth.

You forgot the part where people were drowning in not being able to afford as much due to high inflation and being put into higher tax brackets. The endless malaise of slow economic growth and recession. But people like you are owed. Always owed....always owed....Of course you could be spinnning those numbers. After all you like the idea of toddlers getting transgender operations. And Epstein...oh so Epstein..

 

[Faun]

A drop in revenue growth also attributed to the deficits and debt

And we are back to do you claim cutting taxes had no benefit. You lefties really suck at math.

I am claiming that tax cuts always reduce revenue growth.

Then you are stupid.

The 10 years prior to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 12.41%
The 10 years after to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 5.93%

Revenue growth was cut in more than half.

The 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 6.64%
The 5 years after to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 4.25%

A 36% reduction in revenue growth.

You forgot the part where people were drowning in not being able to afford as much due to high inflation and being put into higher tax brackets. The endless malaise of slow economic growth and recession. But people like you are owed. Always owed....always owed....Of course you could be spinnning those numbers. After all you like the idea of toddlers getting transgender operations. And Epstein...oh so Epstein..

What does any of that have to do with tax cuts shrink revenue?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

A drop in revenue growth also attributed to the deficits and debt

And we are back to do you claim cutting taxes had no benefit. You lefties really suck at math.

I am claiming that tax cuts always reduce revenue growth.

Then you are stupid.

The 10 years prior to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 12.41%
The 10 years after to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 5.93%

Revenue growth was cut in more than half.

The 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 6.64%
The 5 years after to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 4.25%

A 36% reduction in revenue growth.

You forgot the part where people were drowning in not being able to afford as much due to high inflation and being put into higher tax brackets. The endless malaise of slow economic growth and recession. But people like you are owed. Always owed....always owed....Of course you could be spinnning those numbers. After all you like the idea of toddlers getting transgender operations. And Epstein...oh so Epstein..

I merely presented the facts, tax cuts reduce revenue growth.

Then since you cannot refute or dispute the facts you make it all personal.

Typical partisan sheep.

 

[Issa]

The biggest propaganda lie ever concocted and foisted upon the American people is the lie that Bush caused our economic crisis. He did not.

Before the Democrats took Congress in 2007 unemployment was 4.1%, gas was $1.70 a gallon, and the economy was expanding.

Then the Democrats took Congress in 2007 and promptly destroyed the economy. When Obama became president in 2009 he made it twice as bad.

Let’s do a little math here:

Bush was president for 8 years, from 2001 to 2009.

As I said, in 2007 unemployment was 4.1% and the economy was expanding. That is SIX years into the Bush presidency mind you - SIX OUT OF EIGHT. (And BTW: 4.1% is almost perfect since there is no such thing as a 0% rate.)

Now, can anyone explain to me why the first six years of the eight-year Bush presidency was just fine, and then magically, when the Democrats took over Congress, the economy tanked? Simple: The Democrats took power. When they took power they pushed their social engineering policy of trying to let minorities who wants to own a house own a house whether they could afford it or not. All the bad loans the banks made, they were browbeat into that by the Left. And THAT was the first domino in line to fall.

As I said: The biggest propaganda lie ever concocted and foisted upon the American people is the lie that Bush caused our economic crisis. In fact, Democrats did, with policies that can find their genesis in the Clinton years

Stay tuned for Part Two.........

Good Bush economy attacked, bad Obama economy ignored by media
Obama didn't end the Great Recession that Bush didn't cause - AEI

False.

 

[bodecea]

The biggest propaganda lie ever concocted and foisted upon the American people is the lie that Bush caused our economic crisis. He did not.

Before the Democrats took Congress in 2007 unemployment was 4.1%, gas was $1.70 a gallon, and the economy was expanding.

Then the Democrats took Congress in 2007 and promptly destroyed the economy. When Obama became president in 2009 he made it twice as bad.

Let’s do a little math here:

Bush was president for 8 years, from 2001 to 2009.

As I said, in 2007 unemployment was 4.1% and the economy was expanding. That is SIX years into the Bush presidency mind you - SIX OUT OF EIGHT. (And BTW: 4.1% is almost perfect since there is no such thing as a 0% rate.)

Now, can anyone explain to me why the first six years of the eight-year Bush presidency was just fine, and then magically, when the Democrats took over Congress, the economy tanked? Simple: The Democrats took power. When they took power they pushed their social engineering policy of trying to let minorities who wants to own a house own a house whether they could afford it or not. All the bad loans the banks made, they were browbeat into that by the Left. And THAT was the first domino in line to fall.

As I said: The biggest propaganda lie ever concocted and foisted upon the American people is the lie that Bush caused our economic crisis. In fact, Democrats did, with policies that can find their genesis in the Clinton years

Stay tuned for Part Two.........

Good Bush economy attacked, bad Obama economy ignored by media
Obama didn't end the Great Recession that Bush didn't cause - AEI

Herbert Hoover, George Bush Sr. and Dubya approve your post.

 

[bodecea]

holy shit

Reality is just not a concept that donnie's deplorables get, do they?

 

[Mac1958]

holy shit

Reality is just not a concept that donnie's deplorables get, do they?

Sometimes all you can do is just shake your head.
.

 

[bodecea]

Socialism has been tried countless times and in countless forms… And it has 100% failure rate. End of story

You don't even know what a Socialist is.....

 

[bodecea]

Dumbass republicans post Obama had a crap economy in one post and then post how great the Republican Congress did with the same economy in the next. Idiots. Republican Presidents tank the economy every time. Trump is working hard to kill the longest expansion ever which historians are already calling the “Obama expansion”.

The kenyan even had his buddies in the FED pump $85,000,000,000.00 a MONTH into the stock market, and the economy still SUCKED. He had no idea whatsoever what the hell he was doing. He was a moron little punk community organizer that didn't know his ass from a hole in the ground when it came to the ECONOMY.

"The kenyan".....says all we need to know about YOUR thought processes....or lack thereof.....

 

[okfine]

PART THREE TO COME LATER TODAY

Part three: After the Dems destroyed the economy in late 2007, Obama came in and made it worse. It did not start turning around a little bit until the Republicans took back the Congress two years into Obama's first term. Any small gains after that were thanks to the GOP putting the breaks on Obama's extremism.

You are a toothless moron. Do you get paid by Fox News?

 

[22lcidw]

And we are back to do you claim cutting taxes had no benefit. You lefties really suck at math.

I am claiming that tax cuts always reduce revenue growth.

Then you are stupid.

The 10 years prior to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 12.41%
The 10 years after to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 5.93%

Revenue growth was cut in more than half.

The 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 6.64%
The 5 years after to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 4.25%

A 36% reduction in revenue growth.

You forgot the part where people were drowning in not being able to afford as much due to high inflation and being put into higher tax brackets. The endless malaise of slow economic growth and recession. But people like you are owed. Always owed....always owed....Of course you could be spinnning those numbers. After all you like the idea of toddlers getting transgender operations. And Epstein...oh so Epstein..

I merely presented the facts, tax cuts reduce revenue growth.

Then since you cannot refute or dispute the facts you make it all personal.

Typical partisan sheep.

I don't know about you but the 23% reduction in federal taxes during a bad time helped out immensely. This was for the working class peasants. The personal quotes are because you lie. It was fun when Paul Volcker raised the federal prime rate into double digits. That was the last time we could squeeze the bad debts out because we can't do that today. I really want to say this. You can not get something for nothing forever. Several years after the tax cuts, social security even with massive growth had problems. Why? Because the previous generation waas retiring in droves. Medical care was going up big time also for several years. So we had massive Social security/medicare increases and a raise in age to collect. People questioning it were told to shut up. With Claude pepper and Tip O'Neill singing the praises. I still remember...."Don't worry, Trust us"! The CBO told us it was solvent until the mid 2070's. And now the jackals are at it again proposing social security increases because the system is going bankrupt!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I am claiming that tax cuts always reduce revenue growth.

Then you are stupid.

The 10 years prior to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 12.41%
The 10 years after to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 5.93%

Revenue growth was cut in more than half.

The 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 6.64%
The 5 years after to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 4.25%

A 36% reduction in revenue growth.

You forgot the part where people were drowning in not being able to afford as much due to high inflation and being put into higher tax brackets. The endless malaise of slow economic growth and recession. But people like you are owed. Always owed....always owed....Of course you could be spinnning those numbers. After all you like the idea of toddlers getting transgender operations. And Epstein...oh so Epstein..

I merely presented the facts, tax cuts reduce revenue growth.

Then since you cannot refute or dispute the facts you make it all personal.

Typical partisan sheep.

I don't know about you but the 23% reduction in federal taxes during a bad time helped out immensely. This was for the working class peasants. The personal quotes are because you lie. It was fun when Paul Volcker raised the federal prime rate into double digits. That was the last time we could squeeze the bad debts out because we can't do that today. I really want to say this. You can not get something for nothing forever. Several years after the tax cuts, social security even with massive growth had problems. Why? Because the previous generation waas retiring in droves. Medical care was going up big time also for several years. So we had massive Social security/medicare increases and a raise in age to collect. People questioning it were told to shut up. With Claude pepper and Tip O'Neill singing the praises. I still remember...."Don't worry, Trust us"! The CBO told us it was solvent until the mid 2070's. And now the jackals are at it again proposing social security increases because the system is going bankrupt!

You are a strange one, I post nothing but facts and you say you made personal attacks because I lie...even though you can’t show my figures are false...seems you are the liar.

As for the rest of your rant, what does any of it have to do with my data?

 

[bodecea]

Welcome to backwards world folks.

Newsflash...the Clinton years were an unparalleled economic success and the Bush years lead to the worst economic disaster since the Great Depression.

Jesus people...the OP is batshit crazy

You know they know the GOP messed up....that's why they are trying so hard to re-write history.....

 

[bodecea]

Obama incurred more debt......

.....than all president before him combined, as I said.

Now shut up homo boy.

Ah.....personal attack time.....we accept your surrender.

 

[Faun]

Then you are stupid.

The 10 years prior to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 12.41%
The 10 years after to the Reagan tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 5.93%

Revenue growth was cut in more than half.

The 5 years prior to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 6.64%
The 5 years after to the Bush II tax cuts revenue grew at an average rate of 4.25%

A 36% reduction in revenue growth.

You forgot the part where people were drowning in not being able to afford as much due to high inflation and being put into higher tax brackets. The endless malaise of slow economic growth and recession. But people like you are owed. Always owed....always owed....Of course you could be spinnning those numbers. After all you like the idea of toddlers getting transgender operations. And Epstein...oh so Epstein..

I merely presented the facts, tax cuts reduce revenue growth.

Then since you cannot refute or dispute the facts you make it all personal.

Typical partisan sheep.

I don't know about you but the 23% reduction in federal taxes during a bad time helped out immensely. This was for the working class peasants. The personal quotes are because you lie. It was fun when Paul Volcker raised the federal prime rate into double digits. That was the last time we could squeeze the bad debts out because we can't do that today. I really want to say this. You can not get something for nothing forever. Several years after the tax cuts, social security even with massive growth had problems. Why? Because the previous generation waas retiring in droves. Medical care was going up big time also for several years. So we had massive Social security/medicare increases and a raise in age to collect. People questioning it were told to shut up. With Claude pepper and Tip O'Neill singing the praises. I still remember...."Don't worry, Trust us"! The CBO told us it was solvent until the mid 2070's. And now the jackals are at it again proposing social security increases because the system is going bankrupt!

You are a strange one, I post nothing but facts and you say you made personal attacks because I lie...even though you can’t show my figures are false...seems you are the liar.

As for the rest of your rant, what does any of it have to do with my data?

Nothing, but he felt compelled to say something.

 

[Rustic]

Socialism has been tried countless times and in countless forms… And it has 100% failure rate. End of story

You don't even know what a Socialist is.....

Lol
A socialist is a control freak

 

[Cellblock2429]

During war time it exploded our deficits and debt.

Obama incurred more debt than all previous president combined your dickless worm. Where was your big fat faggot-ass mouth then.

Obama incurred more debt because he had the worst recession in our lifetime dumped on him by the right.

And you're lying when you falsely claim Obama added more debt than all other presidents before him combined.

It is very convient for Democrats to take ofice and then blame their failure on the previous Republican president. If by some miracle, one of the left-wing nuts wins in 2020, the economy will undoutedly tank and it will be Trump's fault. The smart money is in the markets. Notice what will happen to the market if it even looks like one of the Democrats will win. Also take note that all the left-wing nuts told us the markets would crash if Trump was elected. Meanwhile, the "smart" people knew that Trump would be fantastic for the markets and thus the markets went up, not down.

Liberal economists are led around by the nose by their ideology. They no longer use their knowledge to devise sound economic policy, they use their knowledge to try to prove that their ideology is sound, despite facts being to the contrary. Ideology trumps all for Liberals. Sadly, this has even infiltrated much scientiic thought as well.(man made climate change)

Actually, the Dow has really stalled for the last 18 months... The Dow was higher in Jan 18 than is is now...

/-----/ "
Actually, the Dow has really stalled for the last 18 months... The Dow was higher in Jan 18 than is is now..."
Care to explain this 14% return on the Dow ETF that only invests in the Dow 30 since Jan 1?

Fund Summary
The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before expenses, correspond to the price and yield performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (the “DJIA”). The Trust seeks to achieve its investment objective by holding a portfolio of the common stocks that are included in the DJIA (the “Portfolio”), with the weight of each stock in the Portfolio substantially corresponding to the weight of such stock in the DJIA.

 

[Brain357]

Bill Clinton economy the best I remember. He even balanced the budget with it.

 

[Rustic]

Bill Clinton economy the best I remember. He even balanced the budget with it.

Lol