Democrats' Jan 6th Bombshell Hearsay Testimony Exposed As A Lie - Trump Did Not Grab Steering Wheel And Demand To Be Driven To The Capitol

[Billo_Really]

You probably saw Cassidy Hutchinson, a former assistant to Mark Meadows, testify today that she heard that on Jan 6th, Trump had a fit of rage and attempted to grab the steering wheel of The Beast and lunged at agents, insisting they drive him to the Capitol, because "I am the f****ing President..."

Who is Cassidy Hutchinson? Former aide to Trump's White House chief of staff Mark Meadows testifies in January 6 hearing

An unexpected hearing was announced so the House Jan. 6 committee could present "recently obtained evidence" and hear testimony from Cassidy Hutchinson. But who is she?

www.cbsnews.com

Well, it was all a lie. As you should have noticed, it was all hearsay. She was not in the vehicle, and she heard everything about her testimony from someone else.

Secret Service prepared to testify Trump did NOT grab steering wheel

Secret Services is reportedly prepared to push back against claims that President Trump tried to grab the steering wheel of his presidential vehicle when agents refused to take him to the Capitol.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Secret Service lead and presidential driver are prepared to testify under oath that Trump did NOT grab steering wheel or lunge at agents to drive himself to Capitol on January 6​

• Bobby Engel, the lead agent on Trump's detail, and the presidential driver at the time are prepared to testify under oath to the committee that Hutchinson's testimony is incorrect, according to multiple news outlets
• 'I'm the effing president, take me to the Capitol now,' Cassidy Hutchinson, Mark Meadows' top aide, said Trump ordered
• 'Sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel. We're going back to the West Wing, we're not going to the Capitol,' Hutchinson was told Secret Service agent Robert Engel said
• 'Mr. Trump then used his free hand to lunge towards Bobby Engel,' Hutchinson recalled
• Hutchinson was revealed to be the surprise witness for Tuesday's last-minute January 6 hearing
• Hutchinson also testified that Trump was 'furious' that his armed supporters were not allowed into the official grounds for his Stop The Steal rally on Jan. 6
• 'Who cares if they have weapons, they're not here to hurt me,' the former president allegedly said
• The Secret Service promised in a public statement after the hearing to respond to the allegations.

Hopefully, you didn't fall for it. Like the pee dossier, it was obviously false.

If you did fall for it, ask yourself why.

Have they testified under oath? No! So fuck off!

 

[Nostra]

Have they testified under oath? No! So fuck off!

Wow! Are you really behind the times.

 

[Faun]

I predicted more childish word games from lil Fawnboi, and I nailed it!

Now that we got that out of the way, let's try again to see if lil Fawnboi can cobble together a coherent response to this:


They had to ask a question of that nature, Simp. The exact wording doesn't matter to anyone but simpletons like you who have nothing left but childish word games.

What was his answer to whether or not it actually happened?

Can't wait for your next pathetic response dodging that question.

First you'll need to learn the purpose of quotation marks, Dumbfuck...

When do you use quotation marks?

Unsurprisingly, quotation marks are used to begin and end quotations. A quotation, or quote, is an exact repeat of another source’s spoken or written words.​

Then try asking your question again, but honestly this time.

 

[jc456]

Man you are stupid beyond belief. Given the fact the two agents who were actually there say she lied, it's my informed opinion she lied.

You have nothing showing she didn't lie, Simp. Get back to me when you have confirmation of her claims.

Maybe the driver?

 

[Nostra]

First you'll need to learn the purpose of quotation marks, Dumbfuck...

When do you use quotation marks?​

​

Unsurprisingly, quotation marks are used to begin and end quotations. A quotation, or quote, is an exact repeat of another source’s spoken or written words.​

Then try asking your question again, but honestly this time.

 

[jc456]

Have they testified under oath? No! So fuck off!

Has anyone who can back her up?

 

[Faun]

Have they testified under oath? No! So fuck off!

Yes they did. And both of them said they don't recall.

 

[Billo_Really]

Wow! Are you really behind the times.

Well, have they?

 

[Nostra]

Yes they did. And both of them said they don't recall.

Quote them.

 

[Faun]

 

[struth]

I never said "I don't recall" is a confirmation. I said it's neither a confirmation nor a denial. It's basically a non-answer.

And since I can't read his mind, I can't say whether or not he could have given a clear answer. And neither can you.

No it's an actual answer....not confirming that he had the convo with her, very clear to me......with that said, what about the actual assault? He didn't confirm that either. So, once again, the Committee, has decided to only make one witness, a confirmed perjurer, their star....and nobody supports her story...none of the people she claimed could....actually could....

and Shifty and the Dems give us yet another parody

 

[Faun]

You can’t prove she didn’t

So?

 

[struth]

LOL

And you still have no denial from Ornato. Which still means you lied when you claimed Hutchinson lied.

She's already said she was willing to commit perjury. She's got zero cred....simply used by the Committee for parody

 

[struth]

So?

you nail it with this post....you nailed it....you don't care about the truth, so why should the "Committee"

 

[Faun]

Man you are stupid beyond belief. Given the fact the two agents who were actually there say she lied, it's my informed opinion she lied.

You have nothing showing she didn't lie, Simp. Get back to me when you have confirmation of her claims.

No agents who were there said that. Once again, your illiteracy makes a fool of you. Only Ornato and Engel were there and neither of them are on record denying her account.

 

[jc456]

I never said "I don't recall" is a confirmation. I said it's neither a confirmation nor a denial. It's basically a non-answer.

And since I can't read his mind, I can't say whether or not he could have given a clear answer. And neither can you.

It proves she can’t back up her lie

 

[Nostra]

No agents who were there said that. Once again, your illiteracy makes a fool of you. Only Ornato and Engel were there and neither of them are on record denying her account.

Later on Tuesday, The Washington Post reported that three agents who were with Trump in the vehicle dispute that he “assaulted or grabbed at the leader of his security detail or that he grabbed for the steering wheel,” according to one current and one former law enforcement official familiar with the agents’ accounts. Various outlets also reported that Ornato and Bobby Engel, the lead Secret Service agent in the vehicle, are willing to testify to the committee disputing Hutchinson’s account.

 

[jc456]

No agents who were there said that. Once again, your illiteracy makes a fool of you. Only Ornato and Engel were there and neither of them are on record denying her account.

They did say it didn’t. Just not under oath! There’s that

 

[Nostra]

They did say it didn’t. Just not under oath! There’s that

They probably did say it under oath, which is why the Clown Show Committee refuses to release their transcripts of the agent's interviews.

 

[jc456]

Have they testified under oath? No! So fuck off!

They said it didn’t happen, doesn’t need to be said under oath for it to be their truth