Democrats lie about recession

Why we may not be in a Recession

Both negative quarters are in borderline negative territory
Employment is up
Consumer spending is up

Let the Economists make the call
Yeah...sure...sometime next year...after the midterms...they'll finally admit that Republicans were right when they said inflation isn't temporary we are in a recession.

The "experts" of the Biden administration...then and now...




...
 
Economists disagree

Two quarters of negative growth is a good indicator but Economists say there are other factors they consider before declaring a Recession
Like where their next paychecks are coming from, after being wrong so consistently.
If it’s a Recession lets call it a Recession
If it’s not…we don’t

Let Economists make the call, not your favorite Fox News host
By decades long definition it is a recession, until the democrats decide to rename it to cover their butts.
 
Economists disagree

Two quarters of negative growth is a good indicator but Economists say there are other factors they consider before declaring a Recession
They consider the political climate and what the ruling party say to say. Just like the worthless covid lockdowns and shots. So simple even you should be able to figure it out instead of just saying "maybe".
 
They consider the political climate and what the ruling party say to say. Just like the worthless covid lockdowns and shots. So simple even you should be able to figure it out instead of just saying "maybe".
damn…you boys are so Paranoid

Everyone is out to get you
 
If it’s a Recession lets call it a Recession
If it’s not…we don’t

Let Economists make the call, not your favorite Fox News host

1659304576812.png

 

View attachment 676770
So? And you are claiming that any of these could not be wrong or change their minds at any time? Rather hopeful of you when faced with an actual recession.

Btw, what about the economist that say we are in a recession? Are they automatically wrong because they don't agree with your claims?
 
Last edited:
Not anxious...two quarters if negative growth has ALWAYS indicated a recession. But in Dem world where the word woman can't be defined, men can get pregnant and there are a whole spectrum of genders ...well ...who knows...

It's the text book definition.

But since Xi's Biden Regime ran the economy into the rocks, the fascists want to rewrite reality.
 
Economists disagree

Nope - fascist stenographers are trying to alter reality.

Virtually ALL legitimate economists have slapped you morons down already. Only Krugman is carrying the Reich lie.


Two quarters of negative growth is a good indicator but Economists say there are other factors they consider before declaring a Recession

It's the textbook definition.

And you Nazis haven't the time to rewrite all the textbooks.

Your lie failed.


No reputable economist claims otherwise - only that clown Krugman.
 
If it’s a Recession lets call it a Recession
If it’s not…we don’t

Let Economists make the call, not your favorite Fox News host

It's a recession, and you're a fucking liar - as are the Stenographers for the Reich.

 
Doesn't matter....Two quarters of negative growth has always indicated recession.

Pretty funny OB that in a time like this, our "president" is more concerned about arguing the technical definition of a recession than actually dealing with it.

As Steve Gruber pointed out, if the economy is hitting you badly enough to call it a recession, then it probably IS a recession!

The unusual thing here is that typically in a recession, you have high unemployment, but that could yet still come. Meantime, employed or not, if inflation is high enough, it still ACTS and FEELS like a recession because costs are so high and unaffordable.

The Biddum Administration ought to be more concerned that everyone is calling this a recession rather than trying to argue why technically, it isn't. Yet.

Bet that opinion changes a lot by this November when food shortages begin.
 
Pretty funny OB that in a time like this, our "president" is more concerned about arguing the technical definition of a recession than actually dealing with it.

As Steve Gruber pointed out, if the economy is hitting you badly enough to call it a recession, then it probably IS a recession!

The unusual thing here is that typically in a recession, you have high unemployment, but that could yet still come. Meantime, employed or not, if inflation is high enough, it still ACTS and FEELS like a recession because costs are so high and unaffordable.

The Biddum Administration ought to be more concerned that everyone is calling this a recession rather than trying to argue why technically, it isn't. Yet.

Bet that opinion changes a lot by this November when food shortages begin.

What makes this recession different is that it SHOULDN'T be happening. We had a complete shutdown of the economy due to the Chinese biological attack. As those lockdowns lifted, the economy was rebounding rapidly - until Xi's Biden Regime took over and siphoned $8 trillion from the private sector for their fascist schemes. This crashed a robust economy. The employment we have is people who returned to work after being locked out of them during the Wuhan scourge.

At the start of 2019, 157 million Americans were working. That is the largest number in history - in August of 2022 we have not regained that number.


Unemployment is low, yet we still have not regained all the jobs that were had before the attack.
 
What makes this recession different is that it SHOULDN'T be happening. We had a complete shutdown of the economy due to the Chinese biological attack. As those lockdowns lifted, the economy was rebounding rapidly - until Xi's Biden Regime took over and siphoned $8 trillion from the private sector for their fascist schemes. This crashed a robust economy. The employment we have is people who returned to work after being locked out of them during the Wuhan scourge.

At the start of 2019, 157 million Americans were working. That is the largest number in history - in August of 2022 we have not regained that number.


Unemployment is low, yet we still have not regained all the jobs that were had before the attack.


It's happening because the current administration is printing too much money that is backed by nothing except promises. That's ultimately why this is happening. They weakend the us dollar by over saturating the dollar and lowering its value.

What money actually is is debt. It's part of the debt market. A dollar is debt in reality and not what most people's brains perceive it as. The us dollar doesn't represent actual money or value because it's just paper that says 1 dollar.

The deeper in debt we get the more money we print, the more money we print the less it's worth.

The other part of the debt market is bonds, and the only people buying bonds are our own government with more printed money so the market doesn't crash. That's why right now the bond market has a inverted yield curve meaning interest earnings are higher on 2 year bonds than they are on 10 year bonds, which is the exact opposite of how it's supposed to work.

It also doesn't help the current administration is printing billions and trillions to just give away to other countries.

It all started with inflation. Which doesn't mean products are getting more expensive to make, it means it takes more dollars to make them because the dollar is losing its value. What used to cost 1 dollar now costs 1.85 dollars because the value is much lower on a dollar
 

Forum List

Back
Top