jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 139,518
- 29,265
- 2,180
![]()
PUTIN: "You know We are going to f* up your government, right Chuck?!"
SCHUMER: 'Not before the Democratic Party does, Vlad."
(Both laugh)
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
![]()
PUTIN: "You know We are going to f* up your government, right Chuck?!"
SCHUMER: 'Not before the Democratic Party does, Vlad."
(Both laugh)
![]()
Sounds like your pussy hat is too tight.TALK ABOUT A FAR, unsuccessful Reach!!!
Did Schumer LIE about it under oath or to the FBI?
Was this during a time when the Russians were hacking the DNC and trying to influence our elections?
Was Schummer running for President? With a platform of supporting the murderous thug over NATO, over our allies, and over US existing policy?
Did Scummr invite Russian operatives to the DNC Convention?
Did Schummer get the DNC to change their platform in SUPPORT of Russia?
get back with me, will ya?
Great points.
The right-wingers here are too embarrassed to admit they voted for Putin's puppet.
TALK ABOUT A FAR, unsuccessful Reach!!!
Did Schumer LIE about it under oath or to the FBI?
Was this during a time when the Russians were hacking the DNC and trying to influence our elections?
Was Schummer running for President? With a platform of supporting the murderous thug over NATO, over our allies, and over US existing policy?
Did Scummr invite Russian operatives to the DNC Convention?
Did Schummer get the DNC to change their platform in SUPPORT of Russia?
get back with me, will ya?
Great points.
The right-wingers here are too embarrassed to admit they voted for Putin's puppet.
Wait. I thought they had the goods on Sessions. So they don't know what was said.And Schumer's meeting was a matter of public record, and a transcript of what was said is available. The press was invited to document what happened. That's not what happened in all of the Trump campaign meetings.
Thanks!
I know Sessions felt the need to lie about the meetings happening.
No you don't, because he didn't lie. He answered the question that was asked in the context of how it was asked. Only partisan hillarybots dispute that.
So he recused himself for no reason? Is Sessions a Democrat now?
Wait. I thought they had the goods on Sessions. So they don't know what was said.And Schumer's meeting was a matter of public record, and a transcript of what was said is available. The press was invited to document what happened. That's not what happened in all of the Trump campaign meetings.
Thanks!
I know Sessions felt the need to lie about the meetings happening.
No you don't, because he didn't lie. He answered the question that was asked in the context of how it was asked. Only partisan hillarybots dispute that.
So he recused himself for no reason? Is Sessions a Democrat now?
You claimed it was covered live and there was a vidoe of it, but now you claim there isn't?You want a link denying something took place? How about if you supply a link about a "conference" or even meeting behind closed doors or in private. How would a person even find a link about a non-occurrence?Got a link?There was no conference. You are just making that up. This was a public meeting and photo op at a Russian-owned gas station in NYC, the first one being opened in the US. It was entirely covered live and on video by the media. It was an open and public meeting.You claimed a transcript of Chuckie's conferences with Putin were available, and now you are saying you have no idea if they are.Bullshit. Show us the link to this fabled transcript.
I have no idea where that transcript might be, but do you really think there was a public meeting between Putin and a prominent member of the senate without all our security departments FBI, CIA, etc., monitoring every word, burp and fart? The meetings Trump's campaign had weren't public.
Uh-huh. Because Putin comes to America and expects to meet with Democrats every time they open a gas station....So do liberals often meet Russian leaders at Russian-owned businesses to share a meal and a laugh...?This was a public meeting and photo op at a Russian-owned gas station in NYC....
![]()
Every time the first Russian gas station in our country opens, and Putin happens to be in the country.
(Hey, did that plastic 'Reset' Prop Hillary gave the Russians have the passwords to all the DNC accounts that were hacked taped to the bottom of it - is that how they hacked the DNC's computers so easily? She sold them the access - I heard she was really good at selling access...until she just lost.)
"It" is the key word. What is "it". The Gateway Pundit" link in the OP shows a photo op. That is my version of "it". You are claiming a conference or closed door meeting is "it", hence, it is on you to prove your version of "it", the claim you are making about a conference.You claimed it was covered live and there was a vidoe of it, but now you claim there isn't?You want a link denying something took place? How about if you supply a link about a "conference" or even meeting behind closed doors or in private. How would a person even find a link about a non-occurrence?Got a link?There was no conference. You are just making that up. This was a public meeting and photo op at a Russian-owned gas station in NYC, the first one being opened in the US. It was entirely covered live and on video by the media. It was an open and public meeting.You claimed a transcript of Chuckie's conferences with Putin were available, and now you are saying you have no idea if they are.I have no idea where that transcript might be, but do you really think there was a public meeting between Putin and a prominent member of the senate without all our security departments FBI, CIA, etc., monitoring every word, burp and fart? The meetings Trump's campaign had weren't public.
I am just claiming what the snowflakes are claiming of Sessions - he met with a Russian, except Schumer did not just meet with A Russian. He met with THE Russian.You are claiming a conference or closed door meeting is "it", hence, it is on you to prove your version of "it", the claim you are making about a conference.
![]()
Flashback: Chuck Schumer Meets with Putin in New York City
'Democrat Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer continues to push the Russia conspiracy.
But it was Schumer who met with Putin in New York City – not Trump.'
What can be heard from the Left on this most recent flaming bout of hypocrisy?
View attachment 115226
In other words you have no clue what Chuckie and Putin talked about or what kind of a deal they may have made."It" is the key word. What is "it". The Gateway Pundit" link in the OP shows a photo op. That is my version of "it". You are claiming a conference or closed door meeting is "it", hence, it is on you to prove your version of "it", the claim you are making about a conference.You claimed it was covered live and there was a vidoe of it, but now you claim there isn't?You want a link denying something took place? How about if you supply a link about a "conference" or even meeting behind closed doors or in private. How would a person even find a link about a non-occurrence?Got a link?There was no conference. You are just making that up. This was a public meeting and photo op at a Russian-owned gas station in NYC, the first one being opened in the US. It was entirely covered live and on video by the media. It was an open and public meeting.You claimed a transcript of Chuckie's conferences with Putin were available, and now you are saying you have no idea if they are.
Did they talk about how to hack the DNC and beat Hillary?
According to the article, they discussed donuts and coffee. The only deal made was who got which donut.In other words you have no clue what Chuckie and Putin talked about or what kind of a deal they may have made."It" is the key word. What is "it". The Gateway Pundit" link in the OP shows a photo op. That is my version of "it". You are claiming a conference or closed door meeting is "it", hence, it is on you to prove your version of "it", the claim you are making about a conference.You claimed it was covered live and there was a vidoe of it, but now you claim there isn't?You want a link denying something took place? How about if you supply a link about a "conference" or even meeting behind closed doors or in private. How would a person even find a link about a non-occurrence?Got a link?There was no conference. You are just making that up. This was a public meeting and photo op at a Russian-owned gas station in NYC, the first one being opened in the US. It was entirely covered live and on video by the media. It was an open and public meeting.
and the donut was hitlery's server.According to the article, they discussed donuts and coffee. The only deal made was who got which donut.In other words you have no clue what Chuckie and Putin talked about or what kind of a deal they may have made."It" is the key word. What is "it". The Gateway Pundit" link in the OP shows a photo op. That is my version of "it". You are claiming a conference or closed door meeting is "it", hence, it is on you to prove your version of "it", the claim you are making about a conference.You claimed it was covered live and there was a vidoe of it, but now you claim there isn't?You want a link denying something took place? How about if you supply a link about a "conference" or even meeting behind closed doors or in private. How would a person even find a link about a non-occurrence?Got a link?
TALK ABOUT A FAR, unsuccessful Reach!!!
Did Schumer LIE about it under oath or to the FBI?
Was this during a time when the Russians were hacking the DNC and trying to influence our elections?
Was Schummer running for President? With a platform of supporting the murderous thug over NATO, over our allies, and over US existing policy?
Did Scummr invite Russian operatives to the DNC Convention?
Did Schummer get the DNC to change their platform in SUPPORT of Russia?
get back with me, will ya?
Great points.
The right-wingers here are too embarrassed to admit they voted for Putin's puppet.
More likely they talked about trying to hush up John Podesta's Kemlin connetions.![]()
Flashback: Chuck Schumer Meets with Putin in New York City
'Democrat Senate Minority leader Chuck Schumer continues to push the Russia conspiracy.
But it was Schumer who met with Putin in New York City – not Trump.'
What can be heard from the Left on this most recent flaming bout of hypocrisy?
View attachment 115226
Did they talk about how to hack the DNC and beat Hillary?
According to the article, they discussed donuts and coffee. The only deal made was who got which donut.
Or perhaps how they were going to try to cover up John Podesta's Kremlin connections.According to the article, they discussed donuts and coffee. The only deal made was who got which donut.In other words you have no clue what Chuckie and Putin talked about or what kind of a deal they may have made."It" is the key word. What is "it". The Gateway Pundit" link in the OP shows a photo op. That is my version of "it". You are claiming a conference or closed door meeting is "it", hence, it is on you to prove your version of "it", the claim you are making about a conference.You claimed it was covered live and there was a vidoe of it, but now you claim there isn't?You want a link denying something took place? How about if you supply a link about a "conference" or even meeting behind closed doors or in private. How would a person even find a link about a non-occurrence?Got a link?
Guess you don't know the difference between courtesy calls from incoming administration officials and rubbing elbows with diplomats in an official capacity.And some don't know or refuse to acknowledge the difference between diplomatic talks and negotiations noticed to the WORLD and unlawful secret backroom deal making. Yup, you're on top of it all citing fucking Drudge. DAMN!
Another OP FAIL!
What we know is that Lukoil, the Russian oil and gas company bought Getty oil and in 2003 began rebranding Getty stations, the first one being in NYC in Sept of 2003, which is what the OP article is about. You guys are whining about and propagandizing an event that happened over 15 years ago.In other words you have no clue what Chuckie and Putin talked about or what kind of a deal they may have made."It" is the key word. What is "it". The Gateway Pundit" link in the OP shows a photo op. That is my version of "it". You are claiming a conference or closed door meeting is "it", hence, it is on you to prove your version of "it", the claim you are making about a conference.You claimed it was covered live and there was a vidoe of it, but now you claim there isn't?You want a link denying something took place? How about if you supply a link about a "conference" or even meeting behind closed doors or in private. How would a person even find a link about a non-occurrence?Got a link?There was no conference. You are just making that up. This was a public meeting and photo op at a Russian-owned gas station in NYC, the first one being opened in the US. It was entirely covered live and on video by the media. It was an open and public meeting.