Democrats Never Met A Communist....

Herein is a video from a different perspective; long time readers of this message board understand that PoliticalChic is a hard and fast partisan,whose posts are mindful of a Monday morning QB. Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is one sided and measured by a moral judgment today, when the blood of those who have fallen has long disappeared and she can assassinate the character of those long dead.

The video is an example of a pragmatic POTUS, who chose the lives of American GI's over the lives of Russian troops. Here's is thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently and sent our troops into Eastern Europe to fight the Germans, and then to fight the Russians?

My dad served for the duration, as did many of your dad's or grandfathers.

Idealogues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced.

Did the West sell out Eastern Europe at Yalta Eastern Front Videos WW2History.com



"Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is" based on truth, knowledge and courage.

You, a foul-mouthed dunce who has no ability to lean or to incorporate knowledge into his worldview.

One example will destroy your post:

On March 26, 1945, Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall issued the following order: "Censor all stories, delete criticism Russian treatment." This was aimed at those Americans who had been POWs of the Red Army. Note that some 20,000 US soldiers were never returned by "Uncle Joe."

a. FDR died April 12th..but, based on Marshall's order, the White House clearly knew of the following prior to that:

" By May 15, 1945, the Pentagon believed 25,000 American POWs "liberated" by the Red Army were still being held hostage to Soviet demands that all "Soviet citizens" be returned to Soviet control, "without exception" and by force if necessary, as agreed to at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. When the U.S. refused to return some military formations composed of Soviet citizens, such as the First Ukrainian SS Division, Stalin retaliated by returning only 4,116 of the hostage American POWs. On June 1, 1945, the United States Government issued documents, signed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower, explaining away the loss of approximately 20,000 POWs remaining under Stalin's control." http://www.nationalalliance.org/wwii/wwii.htm



"Here's is (sic) thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently ..."
Tell that to the 20,000 American troops that FDR sacrificed to his pal, Stalin, you dope.

"Ideologues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced and the cold hard decisions they made."



So......when was the time that America had to align itself with homicidal, sociopathic murderers?

1933?
Right after Muggeridge and Garth Jones revealed how Stalin starved seven million farmers, men, women, and children, to death?

Really, you moron?

"Really, you moron?"

You really ought to do some research, something most of us learned at the U. I guess Columbia Jr. College didn't teach research.

Q. when was the time that America had to align itself with homicidal, sociopathic murderers?

A. FLASHBACK That Time When Dick Cheney Wanted to Keep Saddam Hussein in Power Video Americans Against the Tea Party
 
Herein is a video from a different perspective; long time readers of this message board understand that PoliticalChic is a hard and fast partisan,whose posts are mindful of a Monday morning QB. Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is one sided and measured by a moral judgment today, when the blood of those who have fallen has long disappeared and she can assassinate the character of those long dead.

The video is an example of a pragmatic POTUS, who chose the lives of American GI's over the lives of Russian troops. Here's is thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently and sent our troops into Eastern Europe to fight the Germans, and then to fight the Russians?

My dad served for the duration, as did many of your dad's or grandfathers.

Idealogues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced.

Did the West sell out Eastern Europe at Yalta Eastern Front Videos WW2History.com



"Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is" based on truth, knowledge and courage.

You, a foul-mouthed dunce who has no ability to lean or to incorporate knowledge into his worldview.

One example will destroy your post:

On March 26, 1945, Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall issued the following order: "Censor all stories, delete criticism Russian treatment." This was aimed at those Americans who had been POWs of the Red Army. Note that some 20,000 US soldiers were never returned by "Uncle Joe."

a. FDR died April 12th..but, based on Marshall's order, the White House clearly knew of the following prior to that:

" By May 15, 1945, the Pentagon believed 25,000 American POWs "liberated" by the Red Army were still being held hostage to Soviet demands that all "Soviet citizens" be returned to Soviet control, "without exception" and by force if necessary, as agreed to at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. When the U.S. refused to return some military formations composed of Soviet citizens, such as the First Ukrainian SS Division, Stalin retaliated by returning only 4,116 of the hostage American POWs. On June 1, 1945, the United States Government issued documents, signed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower, explaining away the loss of approximately 20,000 POWs remaining under Stalin's control." http://www.nationalalliance.org/wwii/wwii.htm



"Here's is (sic) thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently ..."
Tell that to the 20,000 American troops that FDR sacrificed to his pal, Stalin, you dope.

"Ideologues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced and the cold hard decisions they made."



So......when was the time that America had to align itself with homicidal, sociopathic murderers?

1933?
Right after Muggeridge and Garth Jones revealed how Stalin starved seven million farmers, men, women, and children, to death?

Really, you moron?

"Really, you moron?"

You really ought to do some research, something most of us learned at the U. I guess Columbia Jr. College didn't teach research.

Q. when was the time that America had to align itself with homicidal, sociopathic murderers?

A. FLASHBACK That Time When Dick Cheney Wanted to Keep Saddam Hussein in Power Video Americans Against the Tea Party



Let's get that on the record:

You're not denying that Franklin Roosevelt had America align itself with homicidal, sociopathic murderers?

Great!


Now....did Cheney lie to the public and claim that Saddam was fighting for the same values as America was????

No....only Roosevelt did that, endorsing communism.
 
Herein is a video from a different perspective; long time readers of this message board understand that PoliticalChic is a hard and fast partisan,whose posts are mindful of a Monday morning QB. Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is one sided and measured by a moral judgment today, when the blood of those who have fallen has long disappeared and she can assassinate the character of those long dead.

The video is an example of a pragmatic POTUS, who chose the lives of American GI's over the lives of Russian troops. Here's is thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently and sent our troops into Eastern Europe to fight the Germans, and then to fight the Russians?

My dad served for the duration, as did many of your dad's or grandfathers.

Idealogues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced.

Did the West sell out Eastern Europe at Yalta Eastern Front Videos WW2History.com



"Her agenda, clearly and concisely stated, is" based on truth, knowledge and courage.

You, a foul-mouthed dunce who has no ability to lean or to incorporate knowledge into his worldview.

One example will destroy your post:

On March 26, 1945, Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall issued the following order: "Censor all stories, delete criticism Russian treatment." This was aimed at those Americans who had been POWs of the Red Army. Note that some 20,000 US soldiers were never returned by "Uncle Joe."

a. FDR died April 12th..but, based on Marshall's order, the White House clearly knew of the following prior to that:

" By May 15, 1945, the Pentagon believed 25,000 American POWs "liberated" by the Red Army were still being held hostage to Soviet demands that all "Soviet citizens" be returned to Soviet control, "without exception" and by force if necessary, as agreed to at the Yalta Conference in February 1945. When the U.S. refused to return some military formations composed of Soviet citizens, such as the First Ukrainian SS Division, Stalin retaliated by returning only 4,116 of the hostage American POWs. On June 1, 1945, the United States Government issued documents, signed by General Dwight D. Eisenhower, explaining away the loss of approximately 20,000 POWs remaining under Stalin's control." http://www.nationalalliance.org/wwii/wwii.htm



"Here's is (sic) thought for those of us today, how many of us would not be here, had FDR chose differently ..."
Tell that to the 20,000 American troops that FDR sacrificed to his pal, Stalin, you dope.

"Ideologues like PC spend too much time supporting their agenda and too little time understanding our leaders in the frame of their time and the realities they faced and the cold hard decisions they made."



So......when was the time that America had to align itself with homicidal, sociopathic murderers?

1933?
Right after Muggeridge and Garth Jones revealed how Stalin starved seven million farmers, men, women, and children, to death?

Really, you moron?

"Really, you moron?"

You really ought to do some research, something most of us learned at the U. I guess Columbia Jr. College didn't teach research.

Q. when was the time that America had to align itself with homicidal, sociopathic murderers?

A. FLASHBACK That Time When Dick Cheney Wanted to Keep Saddam Hussein in Power Video Americans Against the Tea Party



Let's get that on the record:

You're not denying that Franklin Roosevelt had America align itself with homicidal, sociopathic murderers?

Great!


Now....did Cheney lie to the public and claim that Saddam was fighting for the same values as America was????

No....only Roosevelt did that, endorsing communism.

Do you every experience dizzyness? Your spin made my eyes roll.
 
....that they didn't adore.



...


“Never met a communist they didn’t adore” , that is not really so, up until the later part of Vietnam they were pretty good about resisting communist aggression, But when it looked like they going to win the Cold War liberal spines turned to jelly. Who was the liberal anchor woman who praised the liberation of Saigon? They were desperate to be on the winning side; the communist were not very forgiving. They considered anyone that stood up to them as a war criminal, to be punished. As punishment they raped almost ever German woman in their in their sector of occupied Germany.



"“Never met a communist they didn’t adore” , that is not really so, up until the later part of Vietnam they were pretty good about resisting communist aggression,..."

Perhaps you've never heard of Franklin Roosevelt.

He did everything he could to support Stalin and make certain that communism survived....including lie to the American people about communism.

September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR. "The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow,"by Dennis J. Dunn, p. 137

In war we do things we would not normally do. During WW II Hitler was seen as the greater danger, so we teamed up with a greater evil that seemed to be less of a threat to us at the time. We did the same thing during the Cold War. What is unforgivable about FDR is that he started to believe his propaganda about the Communist which led to the Soviets getting the bomb. Evidently he was not that smart.
 
....that they didn't adore.



...


“Never met a communist they didn’t adore” , that is not really so, up until the later part of Vietnam they were pretty good about resisting communist aggression, But when it looked like they going to win the Cold War liberal spines turned to jelly. Who was the liberal anchor woman who praised the liberation of Saigon? They were desperate to be on the winning side; the communist were not very forgiving. They considered anyone that stood up to them as a war criminal, to be punished. As punishment they raped almost ever German woman in their in their sector of occupied Germany.



"“Never met a communist they didn’t adore” , that is not really so, up until the later part of Vietnam they were pretty good about resisting communist aggression,..."

Perhaps you've never heard of Franklin Roosevelt.

He did everything he could to support Stalin and make certain that communism survived....including lie to the American people about communism.

September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR. "The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow,"by Dennis J. Dunn, p. 137

In war we do things we would not normally do. During WW II Hitler was seen as the greater danger, so we teamed up with a greater evil that seemed to be less of a threat to us at the time. We did the same thing during the Cold War. What is unforgivable about FDR is that he started to believe his propaganda about the Communist which led to the Soviets getting the bomb. Evidently he was not that smart.


Horsefeathers.

FDR rushed to embrace Stalin in 1933.

. The Terror Famine in the Ukraine, in which 3-3.5 million persons were starved to death by the USSR, reached its peak in the spring of 1933. On November 16, 1933, President Roosevelt rushed to embrace....recognize...the USSR. What should the press have done....ignore the confluence?


a. "A deaf-and-dumb reporter, hermetically sealed in a hotel room could not have escaped knowledge of the essential facts..."
Eugene Lyons, "Assignment in Utopia," p.572.
 
"Almost immediately upon taking office, however, President Roosevelt moved to establish formal diplomatic relations between the United States and the Soviet Union.

"His reasons for doing so were complex, but the decision was based on several primary factors.

"Roosevelt hoped that recognition of the Soviet Union would serve U.S. strategic interests by limiting Japanese expansionism in Asia, and he believed that full diplomatic recognition would serve American commercial interests in the Soviet Union, a matter of some concern to an Administration grappling with the effects of the Great Depression.

"Finally, the United States was the only major power that continued to withhold official diplomatic recognition from the Soviet Union."
Recognition of the Soviet Union 1933 - 1921 1936 - Milestones - Office of the Historian
 
Add in the communist spin-offs in China, Cambodia, Cuba, Viet Nam, etc., and the number goes well beyond 100 million mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, lives counted as less important than the victory of communism.
And this is the hallmark of every totalist view, communism, Nazism, socialism, Liberalism, Progressivism.....the life of the individual may never be considered, only the collective, the state, the "general will" is paramount.

DEMOCRAT Harry Truman spent some 36,000 American lives keeping the Communist North Koreans out of South Korea.

If you support that Democratic President's actions, you have an odd way of showing it.

If you looked into democrat Harry Truman's handling of the Korean War instead of chanting grammar school propaganda you might have a different view of the media created legend of "give 'em hell Harry". The Korean War was over in less than a year and U.N. forces actually captured the N.K. capital of Pyongyang but Truman was too timid to confront his own general who ordered American Troops into the biggest ambush in history. Under Truman's inept leadership victory turned into an embarrassing truce at the cost of 50,000 (revised by the Clinton D.O.D. to 36,000) American lives as the war dragged on for three years. Because of Truman's cowardly actions and MacArthur's possibly insane ego trip we are living with a N.K. threat to this day.
 
"Almost immediately upon taking office, however, President Roosevelt moved to establish formal diplomatic relations between the United States and the Soviet Union.

"His reasons for doing so were complex, but the decision was based on several primary factors.

"Roosevelt hoped that recognition of the Soviet Union would serve U.S. strategic interests by limiting Japanese expansionism in Asia, and he believed that full diplomatic recognition would serve American commercial interests in the Soviet Union, a matter of some concern to an Administration grappling with the effects of the Great Depression.

"Finally, the United States was the only major power that continued to withhold official diplomatic recognition from the Soviet Union."
Recognition of the Soviet Union 1933 - 1921 1936 - Milestones - Office of the Historian


Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

Your post: spin designed to shield Roosevelt's infatuation with Stalin and totalitarian government.
 
So what is the best definition of a communist nation, one that actually practices Marxist communism or one that practices something else but calls itself, communistic? And what of others if they call a nation communistic is it in fact a communist nation.
 
Spin…altering the truth without altering the facts.

Your post: spin designed to shield Roosevelt's infatuation with Stalin and totalitarian government.
The truth is Roosevelt had no choice but to join the rest of the world and recognize the Soviet Union, and it was lucky he did:
"In the hope of improving relations, President Roosevelt dispatched businessman Joseph E. Davies to Moscow as Bullitt’s replacement in 1936. While Davies managed to reestablish amicable relations with the Soviet leadership, his dismissive attitude concerning the purges alienated other American diplomats. Moreover, Davies faced unprecedented new challenges as a result of the worsening political situation in Europe. U.S.-Soviet relations reached their nadir in August 1939, when the Soviets signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact with Nazi Germany after the British and French rejected Soviet offers to establish a military alliance against Germany. Not until the German invasion of Soviet Union began in June 1941 would the United States and the Soviet Union once again find a way to make common cause on any meaningful issue."

Recognition of the Soviet Union 1933 - 1921 1936 - Milestones - Office of the Historian
 
Political Chic, I have a confession to make; I am one of those very rare things, a moderate Democrat. I hope that does not lower standing as a human being. However, in my defense I will say at least I am not a liberal.
 
Political Chic, I have a confession to make; I am one of those very rare things, a moderate Democrat. I hope that does not lower standing as a human being. However, in my defense I will say at least I am not a liberal.


You are accepted as a member of that reputable pantheon that includes such lights as JFK, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, and Scoop Jackson.

Badge and membership card on the way.
 
What is a communist?
Is it someone that follows Marx, , or is a communist simply someone we disagree with and so we label them communist?
Along the same lines, is a communist nation one that follows Marx, or a nation that people simply label communist?
Is it the practice of Marx or people's labels that decides who or what is communism?
 
Today, February 20th is an anniversary of sorts....


February 20th, 2001.... FBI agent Robert Hanssen is arrested and charged with spying for Russia for 15 years.

One wonders how different things would be if Franklin Roosevelt were President at this time.....

No doubt, just as he promoted Alger Hiss, Roosevelt would have given some sort of award to Hanssen.

Perhaps he would have been nominated as US ambassador to the United Nations.....
 
What is a communist?
Is it someone that follows Marx, , or is a communist simply someone we disagree with and so we label them communist?
Along the same lines, is a communist nation one that follows Marx, or a nation that people simply label communist?
Is it the practice of Marx or people's labels that decides who or what is communism?

Great question.

The answer is, anyone who is liberal, progressive, a college professor, a member of a labor union, doctors without borders, the Democratic Party, or the MSM - sans Fox Entertainment, aka Fox News, in fact anyone who believes Capitalism needs to be policed, that is regulated, by laws passed by elected officials of good will.

The word Communist is a pejorative, a word which has been used to scare people for over a century, a word which has more in common with an ogre as neither actually exist.

Of course some very bad men adopted the label, but like "big tent" and "country first" the use of socialist republic/people's republic are words without the substance of reality; bad mean who call their regime a republic, murdered innocent men and women as most despots do, but not one of the mass killers ever established a workers paradise, in fact the rulers and those who supported them and their use of power lived like just like Capitalists, taking the fruits of the labor of the many for themselves.

So let's call a spade a spade and stop with this foolishness. There is no movement to remake the economic system, the effort is to make Capitalism safe from the Capitalists, for greed is and always will be a deadly sin, and will never set any of us free.
 
Last edited:
What is a communist?
Is it someone that follows Marx, , or is a communist simply someone we disagree with and so we label them communist?
Along the same lines, is a communist nation one that follows Marx, or a nation that people simply label communist?
Is it the practice of Marx or people's labels that decides who or what is communism?

Some communists aspire to a potentially, divine Commune of Heaven; they are usually Religious.
 
, for greed is and always will be a deadly sin, and will never set any of us free.

the beauty of Republican capitalism is that it makes greed impossible. Imagine a greedy business competing with a business that wanted to serve its customers? Capitalism encourages service to others and quickly bankrupts those who don't function well in this environment.

Do you understand?
 

Forum List

Back
Top