Scotus has already chimed-in on Gun Law interpretation.And they will not do that as it will never pass.
One in 2018 and one a few weeks ago.
Plus the 2008 { District of Columbia v. Heller }.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Scotus has already chimed-in on Gun Law interpretation.And they will not do that as it will never pass.
Define how to blend-in as an American.
That mere statement is an affront to what this country
was founded around.Or ...
E Pluribus Unum
All sounds rather William Fulbright {ish }.
The guy who was mentor to Bill Clinton and a big
Segregationist.His Fulbright scholarships only applied
to Foreign Exchange students.Some claim Obama was offered
a Fulbright scholarship to attend Occidental College.
" ,Government by the people is possibloe but not
probable."
" To Criticize one's country is to do it a service ....
Criticism,in short is more than a right; it is an act
of patriotism -- a higher form of patriotism" - J. Fulbright
I expect an all fraud effort by dems to win seats in the Senate for exactly that issue.This law will never pass in the Senate. Not until and unless the democrats ever manage to end the filibuster.
I expect an interesting Fall season on this.I expect an all fraud effort by dems to win seats in the Senate for exactly that issue.
I expect an interesting Fall season on this.
Democrats have lost significant funding.
The Roe v Wade decision will play heavily in voting decisions but so will back pocket politics. And currently most "undecideds " back pockets are feeling the pinch of double digit inflation, which causes huge amounts of uncertainty.
They raised and spent a load of money last election and narrowly held the house.The few things I've seen has shown the Democrats raising more money than the Republicans.
People have short memories (unfortunately). Gas may be under $3.00 again come November in a good part of the country.
They raised and spent a load of money last election and narrowly held the house.
No kidding....They did a horrible job last time. I don't expect them to do better this time either but unfortunately most will vote for (D) or (R) and in the end doing a terrible job isn't at the top of people's concerns.
Still, it sets a precedent. That may be what they are trying to achieve now.This law will never pass in the Senate. Not until and unless the democrats ever manage to end the filibuster.
Maybe. Or maybe the sheeple will just buckle under as they did when government said everyone has to wear the stupid masks and stop all work and school. Instant obedience, just as if we're Chinese.That's a very large "if". Is it possible? Sure but it would depend on finding a few politicians who were willing to end their career over one bill. When that day comes, Americans will have a choice to make. The reality is that there aren't enough armed thugs available to confiscate weapons. The real effect of the law would be to create a criminal class and use the threat of sporadic searches to punish and disarm some while threatening others. I think it would quickly lead to a situation where cops would become fair game when they came knocking or kicking doors. This is the final red line. Every other freedom is lost as soon as 2A becomes optional at the whim of DC.
So many people opine strong statements about the future.You’re a liar.
There’s no political will in Washington for a ‘new’ AWB.
That’s why the right’s demagoguery, rhetoric, and lies about a ‘ban’ are dishonest, ridiculous, and idiotic.
And this thread is likewise idiotic – the proposed measure will not pass and will not come before the Court.
Many D's went GOP or Indie since the last election, plus alot of D's will vote for the R's on pocketbook issues that won't go away anytime soon. They'll probably get worse.They did a horrible job last time. I don't expect them to do better this time either but unfortunately most will vote for (D) or (R) and in the end doing a terrible job isn't at the top of people's concerns.
I saw several recent changes the last couple weeks that should limit fraud.No kidding....
The Wisconsin Judicial system is a prime example of that. It's a 5 time national embarrassment winner but nobody has seen fit to fix anything. If anything they are getting worse.
How many precedents already sit on desks that never become law?Still, it sets a precedent. That may be what they are trying to achieve now.
So you " expect " ? Not " wish " or " anticipate " or " become sickened "I expect an all fraud effort by dems to win seats in the Senate for exactly that issue.
After the last election, my comment doesn't surprise you?So you " expect " ? Not " wish " or " anticipate " or " become sickened "
at the thought { effort }.
Nice of you to clarify.
Um ... You dint take up the Clarinet in high school per chance.?
The Left is on a mission.To discombobulate what once was.After the last election, my comment doesn't surprise you?
Still, it sets a precedent. That may be what they are trying to achieve now.