Democrats, Racism, and Free Markets

[Fenton Lum]

Because, according to liberal thinking, all black people are capable of only thinking a certain way. Got it. That's racist.

You do know you're exhibiting the behavior Carson was talking about, right?

1. In her book, "Uncle Sam's Plantation," Star Parker recounts her journey from life as a hustler and welfare addict to freedom. The following gives one version of the path to success.

2. "My first post-welfare job was hardly a dream job. Assigned to a sterile basement room in a huge office building, I had to hand-write the orders called in by salesmen, and send it to the shipping department. Since, the more orders they called in, the more money they made, the salesman talked fast and were rushed. The shippers, union laborers, on the other hand, received the same wage no matter how much work they did, so they talked slowly and made no effort to be efficient.

a. I acted as if it was my own customer, and the order that I was receiving was worth a million dollars to my business. My view was that hard work would open up opportunities to leave welfare behind, and poverty forever.


3. The only other black in the department was a 32-year-old female who had been there 15 years. On my first day at work she was eager to give me the scoop, including how to get away with the least amount of work for the maximum financial benefit- by paying $260 to join the labor union. Every day she would say I was "uppity" because I worked fast and actually enjoyed it! The more I fulfilled my tasks with vigor, the more dislike I engendered from the union workers.

a. I didn't now about unions, but as an ex-street hustler and con artist, it sounded a lot like paying for protection. Actually, I had no plans to remain for long, and intended to start my own business as soon as I finished writhing a business plan.


4. One particularly busy day, calls were coming in furiously! But I responded by making each feel that they were the most important call I had received that day. My supervisor asked me "Have you ever considered sales and marketing?" He went on to tell me about a full-time position in the marketing department that paid much more than my current wage. And, provided benefits without having to join a union!

a. I declined, as I had my sights set on finishing college, and owning my own business. When the union went on strike, I saw it as the right time to try my hand as an entrepreneur.



5. I began publishing a monthly magazine with a calendar of events from churches around Los Angeles. I added editorials that addressed inner city needs. The spotlight was on wholesome entertainment for single Christians. What began as 16 black-and-white pages, eventually became 64 full color pages of professional layout and some 80 advertisements 8 years later. Exciting, yes, but it was hard work to sell enough ads to cover costs, my personal overhead, and the needs of my daughter.

a. A major pitfall occurred the first time I received the ubiquitous "congratulations, you have qualified" letter from a credit card company. Wow...a symbol of accomplishment and prestige! Before long I had 10 credit cards. Six years after starting my business, I went into bankruptcy. A year later, California went into severe recession. Two years later, the L.A. riots wiped out what was left, as many of my advertisers were burned to the ground. In the middle of all that...I was divorced.

6. But my determination never wavered. I refused to go back on welfare or listen to the leftist lies that sought to discourage me from even trying! I used my talkng/selling experience to cohosting a talk show on a small Christian radio station in Long Beach. It didn't quite pay minimum wage, and had no benefits....so I made money based on commissions from advertisers of the show. So, no guarantees.....but hard work and a positive attitude paid off: soon, I was offered the opportunity to host my own three-hour daily radio talk show with and ABC affiliate in San Francisco. Not only a good salary, but they put a studio in my home!


Nothing new here.....the same works and worked for everyone.


The book is worth reading, and may well bring a tear to the eyes of any not an indoctrinated Liberal.

Better see if ya can get it on Oprah's book club listings. Let all the black folks know you're there for them.

Just thought I'd give you another chance to show some guts.....

In post #3 I caught you in this lie:
"We all know the history of how the Dixiecrats hopped over to the republican party as a result of – in opposition to - desegregation."


The Dixiecrats weren't Dixiecans....they were Democrats and continued to be Democrats.

I've provided an undeniable question....one that you have been fearful of answering, as it proves your babble to be a slanderous lie.

This question:
.....what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising George Bush's election and presidency, and voting Republican.





As the chances are zero......conclude that the same are the chances that anti-slavery party became racist.




What a team!!! You lie, and I expose the lie.

The real story.

See the South was solid Democrat, racist, segregationist. Then when the Northern coalition of Democrats and Republican forced the Civil right bill down their throats, the Republican saw the opportunity to strategically turn the typically Democratic southern states into Republican ones by appealing to the racist voters and their prodigy who felt betrayed by the democrats. It didn't happen overnight but now we see the Republican have the racist vote in the south solid.

The Dixiecrats weren't Dixiecans....they were Democrats and continued to be Democrats.

I've provided an undeniable question....one that you have been fearful of answering, as it proves your babble to be a slanderous lie.

This question:
.....what the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as he does, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for his news.....

.....what he thinks the chances would be that he woke up tomorrow praising George Bush's election and presidency, and voting Republican.


As the chances are zero......conclude that the same are the chances that anti-slavery party became racist.


What a team!!! You lie, and I expose the lie.



How about this: can you deny that the most popular Democrat/Liberal, Bill 'the rapist' Clinton, has been a racist his entire (Democrat) political life?

How about it?

Pease keep reaching out to black voters like this.

 

[Fenton Lum]

"Token".

You do realize that pretty much provides an example of the point, right?
.

Your leverage of this man does. How many black folk agree with him? Why didn't you all nominate him?

None of that deflection changes my point.

You did precisely what the graphic says.
.

Well....of course he did....but, one must cut him some slack.

In Luke 23:34...Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing."

Nowhere is that more true than in the case of that dunce poster.....he is simply clueless.

And we all know you follow Jesus, bwa ha ha ha ha ....

".... follow Jesus, bwa ha ha ha ha ...."


Speaking of which, therein we can find the solutions to many of the problems spotlighted in this thread:

"John Calvin’s and Martin Luther’s emphasis on individual responsibility, hard work, thrift, providence, honesty, and deferred gratification at its center—shaped the spirit of capitalism and helped it succeed…religions chiefly of the middle and working classes, and the virtues they promoted led to a new kind of affluence and upward mobility, based not on land (which was largely owned by the aristocracy) but on productive enterprises. The bourgeois values had helped to sustain Weber’s “rational tempering” of the impulse to accumulate wealth: they helped put the rationality in “rational self-interest,” or, as Tocqueville put it, “self-interest rightly understood.”
http://www.city-journal.org/2009/19_3_work-ethic.html

Nuttin' tado with Jesus in there, heh love. Nuttin' tado with Jesus in there, heh love. And by the way, the first thing the "capitalists" did here was grab all the land. Hmmmmm.

 

[hadit]

... and they always like to find a token to express their own categorization of human beings for them

And there's the racism Carson is talking about on display.

Please do show us Carson's massive black support, k? You know what Carson is to the power structure, you folks "made" him for a purpose. That's what the PC oppressed crowd always does. You will never win the black vote, or more of it, like this. Watch.

Because, according to liberal thinking, all black people are capable of only thinking a certain way. Got it. That's racist.

You do know you're exhibiting the behavior Carson was talking about, right?

Where is your support in the black community again love?

It would seem that you persist in claiming that black people cannot think as individuals and instead must adhere to the mindset created for them by white liberals.

 

[Fenton Lum]

"Token".

You do realize that pretty much provides an example of the point, right?
.

Your leverage of this man does. How many black folk agree with him? Why didn't you all nominate him?

None of that deflection changes my point.

You did precisely what the graphic says.
.

Well....of course he did....but, one must cut him some slack.

In Luke 23:34...Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing."

Nowhere is that more true than in the case of that dunce poster.....he is simply clueless.

And we all know you follow Jesus, bwa ha ha ha ha ....

".... follow Jesus, bwa ha ha ha ha ...."


Speaking of which, therein we can find the solutions to many of the problems spotlighted in this thread:

"John Calvin’s and Martin Luther’s emphasis on individual responsibility, hard work, thrift, providence, honesty, and deferred gratification at its center—shaped the spirit of capitalism and helped it succeed…religions chiefly of the middle and working classes, and the virtues they promoted led to a new kind of affluence and upward mobility, based not on land (which was largely owned by the aristocracy) but on productive enterprises. The bourgeois values had helped to sustain Weber’s “rational tempering” of the impulse to accumulate wealth: they helped put the rationality in “rational self-interest,” or, as Tocqueville put it, “self-interest rightly understood.”
http://www.city-journal.org/2009/19_3_work-ethic.html

Nuttin' tado with Jesus in there, heh love.

... and they always like to find a token to express their own categorization of human beings for them

And there's the racism Carson is talking about on display.

Please do show us Carson's massive black support, k? You know what Carson is to the power structure, you folks "made" him for a purpose. That's what the PC oppressed crowd always does. You will never win the black vote, or more of it, like this. Watch.

Because, according to liberal thinking, all black people are capable of only thinking a certain way. Got it. That's racist.

You do know you're exhibiting the behavior Carson was talking about, right?

Where is your support in the black community again love?

It would seem that you persist in claiming that black people cannot think as individuals and instead must adhere to the mindset as created for them by white liberals.

I asked for a quantitation of the level of support for Carson in the black community since a “conservative” here is insinuating that Carson is a black leader.
.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Your leverage of this man does. How many black folk agree with him? Why didn't you all nominate him?

None of that deflection changes my point.

You did precisely what the graphic says.
.

Well....of course he did....but, one must cut him some slack.

In Luke 23:34...Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing."

Nowhere is that more true than in the case of that dunce poster.....he is simply clueless.

And we all know you follow Jesus, bwa ha ha ha ha ....

".... follow Jesus, bwa ha ha ha ha ...."


Speaking of which, therein we can find the solutions to many of the problems spotlighted in this thread:

"John Calvin’s and Martin Luther’s emphasis on individual responsibility, hard work, thrift, providence, honesty, and deferred gratification at its center—shaped the spirit of capitalism and helped it succeed…religions chiefly of the middle and working classes, and the virtues they promoted led to a new kind of affluence and upward mobility, based not on land (which was largely owned by the aristocracy) but on productive enterprises. The bourgeois values had helped to sustain Weber’s “rational tempering” of the impulse to accumulate wealth: they helped put the rationality in “rational self-interest,” or, as Tocqueville put it, “self-interest rightly understood.”
http://www.city-journal.org/2009/19_3_work-ethic.html

Nuttin' tado with Jesus in there, heh love.

And there's the racism Carson is talking about on display.

Please do show us Carson's massive black support, k? You know what Carson is to the power structure, you folks "made" him for a purpose. That's what the PC oppressed crowd always does. You will never win the black vote, or more of it, like this. Watch.

Because, according to liberal thinking, all black people are capable of only thinking a certain way. Got it. That's racist.

You do know you're exhibiting the behavior Carson was talking about, right?

Where is your support in the black community again love?

It would seem that you persist in claiming that black people cannot think as individuals and instead must adhere to the mindset as created for them by white liberals.

I asked for a quantitation of the level of support for Carson in the black community since a “conservative” here is insinuating that Carson is a black leader.
.

The suggestion that a dunce like you can bleat about not getting what you ask for is laughable.

Throughout the thread, you've been beaten as badly as Carthage in the Third Punic War, and now, you're making demands on Scipio Africanus and the victorious Romans????
Hardly.


So....pay attention to the rule: losers do not make demands.
They make requests.
They make pleas.

 

[hadit]

Your leverage of this man does. How many black folk agree with him? Why didn't you all nominate him?

None of that deflection changes my point.

You did precisely what the graphic says.
.

Well....of course he did....but, one must cut him some slack.

In Luke 23:34...Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing."

Nowhere is that more true than in the case of that dunce poster.....he is simply clueless.

And we all know you follow Jesus, bwa ha ha ha ha ....

".... follow Jesus, bwa ha ha ha ha ...."


Speaking of which, therein we can find the solutions to many of the problems spotlighted in this thread:

"John Calvin’s and Martin Luther’s emphasis on individual responsibility, hard work, thrift, providence, honesty, and deferred gratification at its center—shaped the spirit of capitalism and helped it succeed…religions chiefly of the middle and working classes, and the virtues they promoted led to a new kind of affluence and upward mobility, based not on land (which was largely owned by the aristocracy) but on productive enterprises. The bourgeois values had helped to sustain Weber’s “rational tempering” of the impulse to accumulate wealth: they helped put the rationality in “rational self-interest,” or, as Tocqueville put it, “self-interest rightly understood.”
http://www.city-journal.org/2009/19_3_work-ethic.html

Nuttin' tado with Jesus in there, heh love.

And there's the racism Carson is talking about on display.

Please do show us Carson's massive black support, k? You know what Carson is to the power structure, you folks "made" him for a purpose. That's what the PC oppressed crowd always does. You will never win the black vote, or more of it, like this. Watch.

Because, according to liberal thinking, all black people are capable of only thinking a certain way. Got it. That's racist.

You do know you're exhibiting the behavior Carson was talking about, right?

Where is your support in the black community again love?

It would seem that you persist in claiming that black people cannot think as individuals and instead must adhere to the mindset as created for them by white liberals.

I asked for a quantitation of the level of support for Carson in the black community since a “conservative” here is insinuating that Carson is a black leader.
.

That's odd, given that Carson is simply a black man with an opinion that counters those that white liberals seem to think are the only ones appropriate for black men to hold. Therein lies true racism, insisting that black men be allowed only one set of opinions and to venture off that plantation is to earn vituperative attacks from insecure white liberals.

 

[Fenton Lum]

None of that deflection changes my point.

You did precisely what the graphic says.
.

Well....of course he did....but, one must cut him some slack.

In Luke 23:34...Jesus said, "Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing."

Nowhere is that more true than in the case of that dunce poster.....he is simply clueless.

And we all know you follow Jesus, bwa ha ha ha ha ....

".... follow Jesus, bwa ha ha ha ha ...."


Speaking of which, therein we can find the solutions to many of the problems spotlighted in this thread:

"John Calvin’s and Martin Luther’s emphasis on individual responsibility, hard work, thrift, providence, honesty, and deferred gratification at its center—shaped the spirit of capitalism and helped it succeed…religions chiefly of the middle and working classes, and the virtues they promoted led to a new kind of affluence and upward mobility, based not on land (which was largely owned by the aristocracy) but on productive enterprises. The bourgeois values had helped to sustain Weber’s “rational tempering” of the impulse to accumulate wealth: they helped put the rationality in “rational self-interest,” or, as Tocqueville put it, “self-interest rightly understood.”
http://www.city-journal.org/2009/19_3_work-ethic.html

Nuttin' tado with Jesus in there, heh love.

Please do show us Carson's massive black support, k? You know what Carson is to the power structure, you folks "made" him for a purpose. That's what the PC oppressed crowd always does. You will never win the black vote, or more of it, like this. Watch.

Because, according to liberal thinking, all black people are capable of only thinking a certain way. Got it. That's racist.

You do know you're exhibiting the behavior Carson was talking about, right?

Where is your support in the black community again love?

It would seem that you persist in claiming that black people cannot think as individuals and instead must adhere to the mindset as created for them by white liberals.

I asked for a quantitation of the level of support for Carson in the black community since a “conservative” here is insinuating that Carson is a black leader.
.

The suggestion that a dunce like you can bleat about not getting what you ask for is laughable.

Throughout the thread, you've been beaten as badly as Carthage in the Third Punic War, and now, you're making demands on Scipio Africanus and the victorious Romans????
Hardly.


So....pay attention to the rule: losers do not make demands.
They make requests.
They make pleas.

Just keep reaching out to black voters exactly as you are, please.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

1. Jim Crow Laws:

"It shall be unlawful for a negro and white person to play together or in company with each other at any game of pool or billiards."


"All marriages between a white person and a negro, or between a white person and a person of negro descent to the fourth generation inclusive, are hereby forever prohibited."


"No colored barber shall serve as a barber to white women or girls."


"Separate free schools shall be established for the education of children of African descent; and it shall be unlawful for any colored child to attend any white school, or any white child to attend a colored school."
http://townhall.com/columnists/walt...tm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=




2. As is regularly pointed out on this board, the Jim Crow laws were due to the power of Democrats in control of government.
Democrat: the party of slavery, segregation, second class citizenship....and over regulation of private industry.
Those two aspects of Democrat policy are linked...as I will show.


a. Now....an example of what changed, and largely ended institutional racism.....Republicans:

In 1966- Republican Spiro Agnew ran against Democrat segregationists George Mahoney for governor of Maryland. Agnew enacted some of the first laws in the nation against race discrimination in public housing. “Agnew signed the state's first open-housing laws and succeeded in getting the repeal of an anti-miscegenation law.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiro_Agnew#Governor_of_Maryland


b. Sadly, continued power of Democrats has resulted in this:

"... in today’s recovery — the slowest in the modern era going back to 1947 — private capital investment has lagged badly. ... so has the jobs situation, with 92 million dropping out of the workforce altogether. A labor-participation rate of 62.8% and an employment-to-population rate of 58% are historic lows indicative of the anemic jobs recovery. Big Business Swings Behind a Mantra of Growth - The New York Sun



And this:
α. Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s...st-ground-every-single-economic#ixzz2hihAOpVl


β. (CNSNews.com) – The unemployment rate for black Americans is more than double that of white Americans, according to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).... In the numbers released today, covering the month of June, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for black Americans age 16 and over was 10.7%, reported the BLS. The unemployment rate for white Americans in the same age group and time-frame was 5.3%, said the BLS. Black Unemployment 10.7%, More Than Double White Unemployment 5.3%


γ. "CHICAGO (Reuters) - Predominantly African-American neighborhoods in Chicago have seen poverty rise and services diminish even as the nation's third largest city has become less racially segregated,.... black areas are seeing economic stagnation or decline,.... mostly black areas have lost health clinics, social service agencies and other areas of support..." Exclusive: Poverty up, services diminished in Chicago's black neighborhoods - study




Let's see how Democrat policies are related to, and advance, racism.

Coming right up.....

It is correct and proper to point out that the Democrats of the Jim Crow era were status quo hugging Conservative leftovers of the antebellum South! And there's no way of getting around that fact, unless one wants to keep shifting the narrative through lies and distortions of history and truth!

"....the Democrats of the Jim Crow era were status quo hugging Conservative leftovers...."



Now watch me obliterate this fool.

It's always been about Democrats, free markets, and racism.....



3. While Democrat/Liberal strangle hold on the media and the 'education' industry have been nearly 100% successful in shifting the argument to 'no...it was CONSERVATIVE Democrats that were the bad ones!!!"....the truth is the Democrats then were the same as the Democrats now.

Simple enough to find racist statements by Bill Clinton.
Challenge me on that.



a. On the other hand, from the inception of this once great nation, classical liberals, the Founders....the views that today are identified as conservatives, have been based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government....




...Democrats live by doctrines that center on totally opposite dicta:

.... the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


And certainly not on free markets and capitalism.




b. Even government school dunces who have been trained to endorse Democrat fabrications will see through this lie:

"OBAMA: ‘THERE’S LITTLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMMUNISM AND CAPITALISM"
Obama: ‘There’s Little Difference Between Communism and Capitalism’




Democrat policy, anti-capitalism, anti-free markets is supposedly anti-racist, as well.


Economist Walter E. Williams writes that the free market minimizes racism, and that Democrats are, in fact the ones who inoculate society with exactly that....racism.

Next.

Oh horseshit Cynthia/Chica! Conservatism is a social philosophy not a damn political party. Political parties differentiate themselves, one from the other, by embracing different facets of social philosophies, and sure as Hell are not the Party itself. They are two different animals in spite of your continual efforts to conflate the two for your propaganda purposes!

The Republican party in its early period started out influenced by the abolitionist movement and the Constitutional institution of slavery is proof that the fledging political party was challenging the status quo of the conservatives to maintain the status quo of slavery then!! Are you going to rewrite that history again too?

The early Republican party fought the status quo, Cynthia/Chica. They became what they are now after the 1950's in their social philosophy as strict conservatives to maintain the status quo as they saw/see fit! And folks like you belly up to the bar and willingly drink the shit sundaes you're served without questioning a damn thing because;

"Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia!"
~ G.O.~

A defining characteristic: on my side of the aisle, facts and knowledge; on your side of the aisle, profanity and vulgarity.

Seems I've scored another point against ignorance, indoctrination and mythology.

Excellent.

Just another deflection with the excuse of profanity employed because I used the words horseshit once in the first paragraph and shit in the third! That makes for a pitiful display of your fear to even address the concept that social philosophies are not political parties and political parties are not social philosophies. You conflate the two and use them interchangeably all the time when spewing your distortions of reality, which creates the false narrative you desire!

I'll post what I wrote originally to let you respond to the points made...the substance within those three paragraphs, but close your eyes when you read the second word in the first paragraph. And beware of that terrible word shit at the end of the third paragraph, 'Kayyyyy, Cindy/Chica?

"Oh horseshit Cynthia/Chica! Conservatism is a social philosophy not a damn political party. Political parties differentiate themselves, one from the other, by embracing different facets of social philosophies, and sure as Hell are not the Party itself. They are two different animals in spite of your continual efforts to conflate the two for your propaganda purposes!

The Republican party in its early period started out influenced by the abolitionist movement and the Constitutional institution of slavery is proof that the fledging political party was challenging the status quo of the conservatives to maintain the status quo of slavery then!! Are you going to rewrite that history again too?

The early Republican party fought the status quo, Cynthia/Chica. They became what they are now after the 1950's in their social philosophy as strict conservatives to maintain the status quo as they saw/see fit! And folks like you belly up to the bar and willingly drink the shit sundaes you're served without questioning a damn thing because;

"Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia!"
~ G.O.~"

Will you respond to the words in blue above with and explain the glaring inconsistencies in your faulty contradictory "logic" you continue to spew from week to week, or dive for cover again like the coward you truly are. Don't bore me with your supercilious Copy and Paste jobs of unrelated crap as if you are making some esoteric point only the Gods could fathom. In other words, don't try to baffle me with horse OR bull S**T!

But IF you respond at all to this, it will probably be just more of the same type of dance, dodge and deflection!

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Jim Crow Laws:

"It shall be unlawful for a negro and white person to play together or in company with each other at any game of pool or billiards."


"All marriages between a white person and a negro, or between a white person and a person of negro descent to the fourth generation inclusive, are hereby forever prohibited."


"No colored barber shall serve as a barber to white women or girls."


"Separate free schools shall be established for the education of children of African descent; and it shall be unlawful for any colored child to attend any white school, or any white child to attend a colored school."
http://townhall.com/columnists/walt...tm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=




2. As is regularly pointed out on this board, the Jim Crow laws were due to the power of Democrats in control of government.
Democrat: the party of slavery, segregation, second class citizenship....and over regulation of private industry.
Those two aspects of Democrat policy are linked...as I will show.


a. Now....an example of what changed, and largely ended institutional racism.....Republicans:

In 1966- Republican Spiro Agnew ran against Democrat segregationists George Mahoney for governor of Maryland. Agnew enacted some of the first laws in the nation against race discrimination in public housing. “Agnew signed the state's first open-housing laws and succeeded in getting the repeal of an anti-miscegenation law.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiro_Agnew#Governor_of_Maryland


b. Sadly, continued power of Democrats has resulted in this:

"... in today’s recovery — the slowest in the modern era going back to 1947 — private capital investment has lagged badly. ... so has the jobs situation, with 92 million dropping out of the workforce altogether. A labor-participation rate of 62.8% and an employment-to-population rate of 58% are historic lows indicative of the anemic jobs recovery. Big Business Swings Behind a Mantra of Growth - The New York Sun



And this:
α. Tavis Smiley: 'Black People Will Have Lost Ground in Every Single Economic Indicator' Under Obama
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-s...st-ground-every-single-economic#ixzz2hihAOpVl


β. (CNSNews.com) – The unemployment rate for black Americans is more than double that of white Americans, according to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).... In the numbers released today, covering the month of June, the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for black Americans age 16 and over was 10.7%, reported the BLS. The unemployment rate for white Americans in the same age group and time-frame was 5.3%, said the BLS. Black Unemployment 10.7%, More Than Double White Unemployment 5.3%


γ. "CHICAGO (Reuters) - Predominantly African-American neighborhoods in Chicago have seen poverty rise and services diminish even as the nation's third largest city has become less racially segregated,.... black areas are seeing economic stagnation or decline,.... mostly black areas have lost health clinics, social service agencies and other areas of support..." Exclusive: Poverty up, services diminished in Chicago's black neighborhoods - study




Let's see how Democrat policies are related to, and advance, racism.

Coming right up.....

It is correct and proper to point out that the Democrats of the Jim Crow era were status quo hugging Conservative leftovers of the antebellum South! And there's no way of getting around that fact, unless one wants to keep shifting the narrative through lies and distortions of history and truth!

"....the Democrats of the Jim Crow era were status quo hugging Conservative leftovers...."



Now watch me obliterate this fool.

It's always been about Democrats, free markets, and racism.....



3. While Democrat/Liberal strangle hold on the media and the 'education' industry have been nearly 100% successful in shifting the argument to 'no...it was CONSERVATIVE Democrats that were the bad ones!!!"....the truth is the Democrats then were the same as the Democrats now.

Simple enough to find racist statements by Bill Clinton.
Challenge me on that.



a. On the other hand, from the inception of this once great nation, classical liberals, the Founders....the views that today are identified as conservatives, have been based on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government....




...Democrats live by doctrines that center on totally opposite dicta:

.... the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.


And certainly not on free markets and capitalism.




b. Even government school dunces who have been trained to endorse Democrat fabrications will see through this lie:

"OBAMA: ‘THERE’S LITTLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN COMMUNISM AND CAPITALISM"
Obama: ‘There’s Little Difference Between Communism and Capitalism’




Democrat policy, anti-capitalism, anti-free markets is supposedly anti-racist, as well.


Economist Walter E. Williams writes that the free market minimizes racism, and that Democrats are, in fact the ones who inoculate society with exactly that....racism.

Next.

Oh horseshit Cynthia/Chica! Conservatism is a social philosophy not a damn political party. Political parties differentiate themselves, one from the other, by embracing different facets of social philosophies, and sure as Hell are not the Party itself. They are two different animals in spite of your continual efforts to conflate the two for your propaganda purposes!

The Republican party in its early period started out influenced by the abolitionist movement and the Constitutional institution of slavery is proof that the fledging political party was challenging the status quo of the conservatives to maintain the status quo of slavery then!! Are you going to rewrite that history again too?

The early Republican party fought the status quo, Cynthia/Chica. They became what they are now after the 1950's in their social philosophy as strict conservatives to maintain the status quo as they saw/see fit! And folks like you belly up to the bar and willingly drink the shit sundaes you're served without questioning a damn thing because;

"Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia!"
~ G.O.~

A defining characteristic: on my side of the aisle, facts and knowledge; on your side of the aisle, profanity and vulgarity.

Seems I've scored another point against ignorance, indoctrination and mythology.

Excellent.

Just another deflection with the excuse of profanity employed because I used the words horseshit once in the first paragraph and shit in the third! That makes for a pitiful display of your fear to even address the concept that social philosophies are not political parties and political parties are not social philosophies. You conflate the two and use them interchangeably all the time when spewing your distortions of reality, which creates the false narrative you desire!

I'll post what I wrote originally to let you respond to the points made...the substance within those three paragraphs, but close your eyes when you read the second word in the first paragraph. And beware of that terrible word shit at the end of the third paragraph, 'Kayyyyy, Cindy/Chica?

"Oh horseshit Cynthia/Chica! Conservatism is a social philosophy not a damn political party. Political parties differentiate themselves, one from the other, by embracing different facets of social philosophies, and sure as Hell are not the Party itself. They are two different animals in spite of your continual efforts to conflate the two for your propaganda purposes!

The Republican party in its early period started out influenced by the abolitionist movement and the Constitutional institution of slavery is proof that the fledging political party was challenging the status quo of the conservatives to maintain the status quo of slavery then!! Are you going to rewrite that history again too?

The early Republican party fought the status quo, Cynthia/Chica. They became what they are now after the 1950's in their social philosophy as strict conservatives to maintain the status quo as they saw/see fit! And folks like you belly up to the bar and willingly drink the shit sundaes you're served without questioning a damn thing because;

"Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia!"
~ G.O.~"

Will you respond to the words in blue above with and explain the glaring inconsistencies in your faulty contradictory "logic" you continue to spew from week to week, or dive for cover again like the coward you truly are. Don't bore me with your supercilious Copy and Paste jobs of unrelated crap as if you are making some esoteric point only the Gods could fathom. In other words, don't try to baffle me with horse OR bull S**T!

But IF you respond at all to this, it will probably be just more of the same type of dance, dodge and deflection!

We'll get right to it....after I teach you how to address your betters.

 

[Uncensored2008]

We all know the history of how the Dixiecrats hopped over to the republican party as a result of – in opposition to - desegregation.

Really?

Which ones?

Orval Faubus?

Bull Conner?

Albert Gore?

George Wallace?

Fritz Hollings?

Ohh wait, you're just lying - democrat!

You are just pushing the BIG LIE as you little Goebbels like to do.

Kinda like what your party's going through right now in response to the first half black guy in the white house. Some of you just flipped over to batshitcrazy; you being chief among them.

So let's recap, you're a fucking liar who blames others for what you yourself does.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Just another deflection with the excuse of profanity employed because I used the words horseshit once in the first paragraph and shit in the third! That makes for a pitiful display of your fear to even address the concept that social philosophies are not political parties and political parties are not social philosophies. You conflate the two and use them interchangeably all the time when spewing your distortions of reality, which creates the false narrative you desire!

I'll post what I wrote originally to let you respond to the points made...the substance within those three paragraphs, but close your eyes when you read the second word in the first paragraph. And beware of that terrible word shit at the end of the third paragraph, 'Kayyyyy, Cindy/Chica?

"Oh horseshit Cynthia/Chica! Conservatism is a social philosophy not a damn political party. Political parties differentiate themselves, one from the other, by embracing different facets of social philosophies, and sure as Hell are not the Party itself. They are two different animals in spite of your continual efforts to conflate the two for your propaganda purposes!

The Republican party in its early period started out influenced by the abolitionist movement and the Constitutional institution of slavery is proof that the fledging political party was challenging the status quo of the conservatives to maintain the status quo of slavery then!! Are you going to rewrite that history again too?

The early Republican party fought the status quo, Cynthia/Chica. They became what they are now after the 1950's in their social philosophy as strict conservatives to maintain the status quo as they saw/see fit! And folks like you belly up to the bar and willingly drink the shit sundaes you're served without questioning a damn thing because;

"Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia!"
~ G.O.~"

Will you respond to the words in blue above with and explain the glaring inconsistencies in your faulty contradictory "logic" you continue to spew from week to week, or dive for cover again like the coward you truly are. Don't bore me with your supercilious Copy and Paste jobs of unrelated crap as if you are making some esoteric point only the Gods could fathom. In other words, don't try to baffle me with horse OR bull S**T!

But IF you respond at all to this, it will probably be just more of the same type of dance, dodge and deflection!

Ohh look, another leftist spewing the BIG LIE!

What do you call a leftist who isn't a pathological liar?

Ether....

 

[PoliticalChic]

We all know the history of how the Dixiecrats hopped over to the republican party as a result of – in opposition to - desegregation.

Really?

Which ones?

Orval Faubus?

Bull Conner?

Albert Gore?

George Wallace?

Fritz Hollings?

Ohh wait, you're just lying - democrat!

You are just pushing the BIG LIE as you little Goebbels like to do.

Kinda like what your party's going through right now in response to the first half black guy in the white house. Some of you just flipped over to batshitcrazy; you being chief among them.

So let's recap, you're a fucking liar who blames others for what you yourself does.

Clearly he is as dumb as asphalt....with apologies to asphalt.....

On the other hand, he has all the makings of a reliable Democrat voter.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Just another deflection with the excuse of profanity employed because I used the words horseshit once in the first paragraph and shit in the third! That makes for a pitiful display of your fear to even address the concept that social philosophies are not political parties and political parties are not social philosophies. You conflate the two and use them interchangeably all the time when spewing your distortions of reality, which creates the false narrative you desire!

I'll post what I wrote originally to let you respond to the points made...the substance within those three paragraphs, but close your eyes when you read the second word in the first paragraph. And beware of that terrible word shit at the end of the third paragraph, 'Kayyyyy, Cindy/Chica?

"Oh horseshit Cynthia/Chica! Conservatism is a social philosophy not a damn political party. Political parties differentiate themselves, one from the other, by embracing different facets of social philosophies, and sure as Hell are not the Party itself. They are two different animals in spite of your continual efforts to conflate the two for your propaganda purposes!

The Republican party in its early period started out influenced by the abolitionist movement and the Constitutional institution of slavery is proof that the fledging political party was challenging the status quo of the conservatives to maintain the status quo of slavery then!! Are you going to rewrite that history again too?

The early Republican party fought the status quo, Cynthia/Chica. They became what they are now after the 1950's in their social philosophy as strict conservatives to maintain the status quo as they saw/see fit! And folks like you belly up to the bar and willingly drink the shit sundaes you're served without questioning a damn thing because;

"Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia!"
~ G.O.~"

Will you respond to the words in blue above with and explain the glaring inconsistencies in your faulty contradictory "logic" you continue to spew from week to week, or dive for cover again like the coward you truly are. Don't bore me with your supercilious Copy and Paste jobs of unrelated crap as if you are making some esoteric point only the Gods could fathom. In other words, don't try to baffle me with horse OR bull S**T!

But IF you respond at all to this, it will probably be just more of the same type of dance, dodge and deflection!

Ohh look, another leftist spewing the BIG LIE!

What do you call a leftist who isn't a pathological liar?

Ether....

Soooo....you're saying he would disappear into fat air???

 

[Fenton Lum]

We all know the history of how the Dixiecrats hopped over to the republican party as a result of – in opposition to - desegregation.

Really?

Which ones?

Orval Faubus?

Bull Conner?

Albert Gore?

George Wallace?

Fritz Hollings?

Ohh wait, you're just lying - democrat!

You are just pushing the BIG LIE as you little Goebbels like to do.

Kinda like what your party's going through right now in response to the first half black guy in the white house. Some of you just flipped over to batshitcrazy; you being chief among them.

So let's recap, you're a fucking liar who blames others for what you yourself does.

It's been well recorded for posterity, go look into it.

 

[Fenton Lum]

We all know the history of how the Dixiecrats hopped over to the republican party as a result of – in opposition to - desegregation.

Really?

Which ones?

Orval Faubus?

Bull Conner?

Albert Gore?

George Wallace?

Fritz Hollings?

Ohh wait, you're just lying - democrat!

You are just pushing the BIG LIE as you little Goebbels like to do.

Kinda like what your party's going through right now in response to the first half black guy in the white house. Some of you just flipped over to batshitcrazy; you being chief among them.

So let's recap, you're a fucking liar who blames others for what you yourself does.

Clearly he is as dumb as asphalt....with apologies to asphalt.....

On the other hand, he has all the makings of a reliable Democrat voter.

Aw, pc got herself disagreed with again poor thing.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

It's been well recorded for posterity, go look into it.

You are telling the BIG LIE.

That is what you leftists do, tell an outrageous lie, and repeat it often.

Your scheme depends on people not pointing out that you're lying through your fucking teeth..

 

[Uncensored2008]

We all know the history of how the Dixiecrats hopped over to the republican party as a result of – in opposition to - desegregation.

Really?

Which ones?

Orval Faubus?

Bull Conner?

Albert Gore?

George Wallace?

Fritz Hollings?

Ohh wait, you're just lying - democrat!

You are just pushing the BIG LIE as you little Goebbels like to do.

Kinda like what your party's going through right now in response to the first half black guy in the white house. Some of you just flipped over to batshitcrazy; you being chief among them.

So let's recap, you're a fucking liar who blames others for what you yourself does.

Clearly he is as dumb as asphalt....with apologies to asphalt.....

On the other hand, he has all the makings of a reliable Democrat voter.

Aw, pc got herself disagreed with again poor thing.

You didn't "disagree" with anyone, you lied.

democrat!

 

[Fenton Lum]

[

It's been well recorded for posterity, go look into it.

You are telling the BIG LIE.

That is what you leftists do, tell an outrageous lie, and repeat it often.

Your scheme depends on people not pointing out that you're lying through your fucking teeth..

Or don't, your choice.

 

[Fenton Lum]

We all know the history of how the Dixiecrats hopped over to the republican party as a result of – in opposition to - desegregation.

Really?

Which ones?

Orval Faubus?

Bull Conner?

Albert Gore?

George Wallace?

Fritz Hollings?

Ohh wait, you're just lying - democrat!

You are just pushing the BIG LIE as you little Goebbels like to do.

Kinda like what your party's going through right now in response to the first half black guy in the white house. Some of you just flipped over to batshitcrazy; you being chief among them.

So let's recap, you're a fucking liar who blames others for what you yourself does.

Clearly he is as dumb as asphalt....with apologies to asphalt.....

On the other hand, he has all the makings of a reliable Democrat voter.

Aw, pc got herself disagreed with again poor thing.

You didn't "disagree" with anyone, you lied.

democrat!

Aw, we have another that doesn't handle it very well.

 

[HnL]

It is self evident that Republicans cannot justify the extreme racism that permeates through the GOP.

In 1964 Democratic president PUSHED for the Civil Rights Act bill and SIGNED it. And then, in response, the Republicans NOMINATED Barry Goldwater a few months later. Barry Goldwater was opposed to the Civil Rights Act. And all the RACIST whites in the south—registered Democrats—voted for him.

The racist scum DIVORCED the Democratic Party in 1964 and had an affair with the GOP until 2008, when the Democratic Party nominated a black man. So then, the GOP and the most disgusting racists had a big public wedding.

The END.