Denver baker sued for refusing to write anti-gay slogans on cake

[bodecea]

Would I attend a same-sex "wedding"?

Dunno.

If they were serving a friggin' carrot wedding cake, probably not.

DUDE! I love carrot cake!

 

[Syriusly]

According to Ms. Silva, Jack pulled out a piece of paper with the phrase “God hates gays” and anti-gay passages he said were from the Bible. Silva also said that Jack wanted her to draw two men holding hands with an “X” crossing them out.

"After I read it, I was like 'No way.' " Silva told USA Today. " ‘We're not doing this. This is just very discriminatory and hateful.’ ”

Instead, Silva said she told Jack that she would make a cake with a blank Bible page so that he could draw the messages himself. She even claims she offered him frosting and a pastry bag to do so.

“I told him, ‘I’ll make you a cake any flavor and shape that you like and then I’ll give you the icing and you can write the message yourself,’” Silva told the Daily News.

But according to Silva’s account, Jack became “very pushy and disruptive,” refused to write the message himself, and said he needed to talk to an attorney.

Sounds like its the baker who has a case, possibly for assault.

IF a baker has to make a wedding cake with two homos on it, then he should also have to make the cake requested above. The law has taken away the baker's right to draw the line on what he can put on a cake.

No- you just don't understand the law.

I understand that the law and the liberal judges who interpret it are fucked. They will dream up some utterly hypocritical rational for ruling one way in one case and the opposite way in another case. That's why libturd judges do.

Obviously any judge you disagree with becomes a 'libturd' judge.

Like I said- you just don't understand the law.

 

[bripat9643]

According to Ms. Silva, Jack pulled out a piece of paper with the phrase “God hates gays” and anti-gay passages he said were from the Bible. Silva also said that Jack wanted her to draw two men holding hands with an “X” crossing them out.

"After I read it, I was like 'No way.' " Silva told USA Today. " ‘We're not doing this. This is just very discriminatory and hateful.’ ”

Instead, Silva said she told Jack that she would make a cake with a blank Bible page so that he could draw the messages himself. She even claims she offered him frosting and a pastry bag to do so.

“I told him, ‘I’ll make you a cake any flavor and shape that you like and then I’ll give you the icing and you can write the message yourself,’” Silva told the Daily News.

But according to Silva’s account, Jack became “very pushy and disruptive,” refused to write the message himself, and said he needed to talk to an attorney.

Sounds like its the baker who has a case, possibly for assault.

IF a baker has to make a wedding cake with two homos on it, then he should also have to make the cake requested above. The law has taken away the baker's right to draw the line on what he can put on a cake.

No- you just don't understand the law.

I understand that the law and the liberal judges who interpret it are fucked. They will dream up some utterly hypocritical rational for ruling one way in one case and the opposite way in another case. That's why libturd judges do.

Obviously any judge you disagree with becomes a 'libturd' judge.

Like I said- you just don't understand the law.

You have failed to demonstrate that I don't understand the law.

 

[bodecea]

Actually we believe that your kind is the cause of that. Evil, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.

I wonder if you can actually feed yourself, I don't hate anyone. Liberals cannot say that.

So you want to claim you don't hate anyone, but you just hate to see certain types of people have equal rights.

Yes, that's so much nicer...

Who said I hate, I disagree there is a difference. I was wanting to compromise, but you couldn't have that.

No you weren't. Besides, why do we have to 'compromise' when it comes to gay rights?

Are you willing to 'compromise' your own rights?

The Supreme Court has already compromised our rights, so it's not like we have a choice.

Tissue?

 

[bripat9643]

I wonder if you can actually feed yourself, I don't hate anyone. Liberals cannot say that.

So you want to claim you don't hate anyone, but you just hate to see certain types of people have equal rights.

Yes, that's so much nicer...

Who said I hate, I disagree there is a difference. I was wanting to compromise, but you couldn't have that.

No you weren't. Besides, why do we have to 'compromise' when it comes to gay rights?

Are you willing to 'compromise' your own rights?

The Supreme Court has already compromised our rights, so it's not like we have a choice.

Tissue?

In other words, you don't give a shit about the Constitution?

We already knew that.

 

[Seawytch]

So you want to claim you don't hate anyone, but you just hate to see certain types of people have equal rights.

Yes, that's so much nicer...

Who said I hate, I disagree there is a difference. I was wanting to compromise, but you couldn't have that.

No you weren't. Besides, why do we have to 'compromise' when it comes to gay rights?

Are you willing to 'compromise' your own rights?

The Supreme Court has already compromised our rights, so it's not like we have a choice.

Tissue?

In other words, you don't give a shit about the Constitution?

We already knew that.

I happen to care a great deal...especially since anti gay marriage laws are being found unconstitutional (by conservative and liberal judges)

 

[bripat9643]

Who said I hate, I disagree there is a difference. I was wanting to compromise, but you couldn't have that.

No you weren't. Besides, why do we have to 'compromise' when it comes to gay rights?

Are you willing to 'compromise' your own rights?

The Supreme Court has already compromised our rights, so it's not like we have a choice.

Tissue?

In other words, you don't give a shit about the Constitution?

We already knew that.

I happen to care a great deal...especially since anti gay marriage laws are being found unconstitutional (by conservative and liberal judges)

I said the Constitution, not a bunch of hack liberal judges. They don't give a shit about the Constitution either.

 

[Camp]

Post any stance BY ME that conflicts with the above, or stfu and quit making a fool of yourself.

Did you support forcing a baker to cater a gay wedding?

If the caterer is a business offering wedding catering to the public, then yes - they cannot discriminate against same sex weddings any more than they could discriminate against a Jewish wedding, or a mixed race wedding.

Okay, then if the other baker writes anything on his cupcakes, then he cannot discriminate either.

.

I wonder if you can actually feed yourself, I don't hate anyone. Liberals cannot say that.

So you want to claim you don't hate anyone, but you just hate to see certain types of people have equal rights.

Yes, that's so much nicer...

Who said I hate, I disagree there is a difference. I was wanting to compromise, but you couldn't have that.

No you weren't. Besides, why do we have to 'compromise' when it comes to gay rights?

Are you willing to 'compromise' your own rights?

The Supreme Court has already compromised our rights, so it's not like we have a choice.

Tissue?

Nah, he use's his sleeve or just wipes the snot across his face.

 

[ABikerSailor]

This baker did nothing wrong. They agreed to make a blank Bible cake, and even offered to provide the customer with a frosting bag and frosting so that he could write his own message on the cake.

Forcing the baker to write something on the cake that the baker didn't think was appropriate is actually a violation of the baker's free speech, because the customer is trying to force the baker to say something that the baker didn't believe.

I hope the baker wins the case and the customer gets sued.

 

[SwimExpert]

This baker did nothing wrong. They agreed to make a blank Bible cake, and even offered to provide the customer with a frosting bag and frosting so that he could write his own message on the cake.

Forcing the baker to write something on the cake that the baker didn't think was appropriate is actually a violation of the baker's free speech, because the customer is trying to force the baker to say something that the baker didn't believe.

I hope the baker wins the case and the customer gets sued.

So you would feel the same if a baker refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple?

 

[Camp]

Somebody needs to open you name it we make it, any kind of friggin cake store in Denver.

 

[Seawytch]

No you weren't. Besides, why do we have to 'compromise' when it comes to gay rights?

Are you willing to 'compromise' your own rights?

The Supreme Court has already compromised our rights, so it's not like we have a choice.

Tissue?

In other words, you don't give a shit about the Constitution?

We already knew that.

I happen to care a great deal...especially since anti gay marriage laws are being found unconstitutional (by conservative and liberal judges)

I said the Constitution, not a bunch of hack liberal judges. They don't give a shit about the Constitution either.

yeah...appointed by "libruls" like Reagan and Bush.

 

[bripat9643]

Did you support forcing a baker to cater a gay wedding?

If the caterer is a business offering wedding catering to the public, then yes - they cannot discriminate against same sex weddings any more than they could discriminate against a Jewish wedding, or a mixed race wedding.

Okay, then if the other baker writes anything on his cupcakes, then he cannot discriminate either.

.

So you want to claim you don't hate anyone, but you just hate to see certain types of people have equal rights.

Yes, that's so much nicer...

Who said I hate, I disagree there is a difference. I was wanting to compromise, but you couldn't have that.

No you weren't. Besides, why do we have to 'compromise' when it comes to gay rights?

Are you willing to 'compromise' your own rights?

The Supreme Court has already compromised our rights, so it's not like we have a choice.

Tissue?

Nah, he use's his sleeve or just wipes the snot across his face.

You're showing all the signs of butthurt from getting thrashed in another thread.

 

[Camp]

If the caterer is a business offering wedding catering to the public, then yes - they cannot discriminate against same sex weddings any more than they could discriminate against a Jewish wedding, or a mixed race wedding.

Okay, then if the other baker writes anything on his cupcakes, then he cannot discriminate either.

.

Who said I hate, I disagree there is a difference. I was wanting to compromise, but you couldn't have that.

No you weren't. Besides, why do we have to 'compromise' when it comes to gay rights?

Are you willing to 'compromise' your own rights?

The Supreme Court has already compromised our rights, so it's not like we have a choice.

Tissue?

Nah, he use's his sleeve or just wipes the snot across his face.

You're showing all the signs of butthurt from getting thrashed in another thread.

Oh nonsense. You are delusional little boy. I stand undefeated against the crazy lady.

 

[Synthaholic]

The law goes both ways, Luddly. If a person wants to degrade his religion that way, the baker may be in a PA bind.

No. The baker cannot be coerced into hate speech.

In fact, bakers are not required to write anything on a Gay couple's cake, either. They are paying for a cake, not for commentary.

 

[Synthaholic]

Baker refuses wedding cake for gay couple = Discrimination.

Baker refuses cake for homophobe = Not discrimination.

You're a retard.

 

[SwimExpert]

The law goes both ways, Luddly. If a person wants to degrade his religion that way, the baker may be in a PA bind.

No. The baker cannot be coerced into hate speech.

In fact, bakers are not required to write anything on a Gay couple's cake, either. They are paying for a cake, not for commentary.

I had no idea that the profession of baking was so heavily regulated.

 

[SwimExpert]

Baker refuses wedding cake for gay couple = Discrimination.

Baker refuses cake for homophobe = Not discrimination.

You're a retard.

Says the person who pointlessly has an avatar of a photoshopped woman with oversized breasts that are nude, save carefully placed seat belts. Are you trying to create an image of yourself as a middle school dropout redneck, or does it just happen naturally?

 

[The2ndAmendment]

He was forced to stop baking wedding cakes

Actually he wasn't. He was told to make more cakes, something a reasonable businessman would consider to be a damn good idea if the market will pay but he's not a businessman, he's a zealot and that's were his problems began.

Translation: The state punished him for his religious convictions.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Hey, if gays are willing to sue a Christian photographer because she very politely and respectfully declined to service a lesbian ceremony, then by all means let's give the hateful, bigoted "gay rights" lobby a taste of their own medicine.

Now, the people who wanted the guy to write anti-gay statements on the case could and should have just used a different baker. But, then again, the bigoted lesbians who sued the Christian photographer lady in NM could and should have just used a different photographer.

You know: live and let live. Don't try to force your views on me, and I won't try to force my views on you.